Pre-clinical endodontic training with artificial instead of extracted human teeth: does the type of exercise have an influence on clinical endodontic outcomes?

AIM: To evaluate whether artificial resin teeth could replace extracted human teeth in pre-clinical endodontic training and if this teaching approach influences the outcome of root canal treatment on patients. METHODOLOGY: In a pre-clinical training course, students of group 1 (n = 44) performed simulated endodontic exercises on four plastic blocks and three extracted human teeth. Students of group 2 (n = 45) performed their exercises on plastic blocks and artificial resin teeth (Real-T Endo, Acadental, Lenexa, KS, USA). Both groups performed their first root canal treatments on patients in the following term. Radiographs taken during root canal treatment were used for the evaluation of treatment outcome. Distances between the master cone or the root filling and the radiographic apex as well as iatrogenic errors were assessed, and comparisons were made using Fischer's exact test. RESULTS: In the pre-clinical course root canal treatments performed by students of group 2 were more often classified as acceptable and a higher number of iatrogenic errors were observed in group 1. When root canal treatments were performed on patients for the first time, no significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of radiographic technical quality of root fillings. CONCLUSIONS: The application of artificial teeth instead of extracted human teeth had no effect on the technical quality of root fillings in terms of position in relation to the root apex or the creation of aberrations.

Evaluation of an improved endodontic teaching model: do preclinical exercises have an influence on the technical quality of root canal treatments?

AIM: To investigate whether the preclinical application of an electronic root canal length measurement device (ERCLMD) leads to more accurate working length (WL) determinations in a preclinical endodontic course and if this exercise effects the technical quality of root canal procedures when treatments are performed on patients for the first time. METHODOLOGY: Root canal treatments performed by two consecutive groups of third year students (group 1: n = 39, group 2: n = 44) were compared in the preclinical course and when root canal treatments were performed on patients in the following term. Two different teaching models were applied in the preclinical endodontic course. WL in group 1 was determined with radiographs only. The teaching model applied in group 2 allowed the application of an ERCLMD. When treatments were performed on patients, both groups used the same technique to determine WL. It was first determined using an ERCLMD and verified radiographically. Master cone and root filling lengths were evaluated using radiographs, and comparisons between both groups were made using Fischer's exact test. RESULTS: Root fillings performed by students of group 2 were more often classified as acceptable. This observation was made in the preclinical endodontic course and when treatments were performed on patients. CONCLUSIONS: The application of an ERCLMD in combination with radiographs is more accurate to determine WL than radiographs alone. Students practiced the use of ERCLMDs with the new model and benefited from this experience when performing their first root canal treatments on patients.