Superior mesenteric vein aneurysm.

A 41-year-old female patient was under study for abdominal pain located in the epigastrium and mesogastrium with no other associated symptoms. There was no record of previous episodes of pancreatitis and she denied abdominal trauma and laboratory tests were normal. A computed tomography (CT) scan was performed.

Adenocarcinoma of the small intestine in Crohn's disease.

The first case of small-bowel carcinoma (SBC) associated with Crohn's disease (CD) was described by Ginzburg in 1956. Since then, only 220 cases have been published in the literature.

Exploratory analysis of immunomodulatory factors identifies L1CAM as a prognostic marker in alveolar soft-part sarcoma.

Background: Alveolar soft-part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare tumor driven by the ASPSCR1-TFE3 fusion protein, with a propensity for metastasis. Prognostic factors remain poorly understood, and traditional chemotherapies are largely ineffective. Recent interest lies in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), yet predictive biomarkers for treatment response are lacking. Previous studies have shown promising results with ICIs in ASPS, indicating a need for further investigation into biomarkers associated with immune response. Objectives: To identify prognostic biomarkers in ASPS and to explore the role of immune-related markers, particularly L1CAM, in predicting patient outcomes. Design: A retrospective cohort study of 19 ASPS patients registered in the GEIS database. The study involved the collection of clinical and histopathological data, followed by an analysis of immune markers and gene expression profiles to identify potential prognostic indicators. Methods: Clinical and histopathological data were retrospectively collected from the GEIS-26 study cohort of 19 ASPS patients. Immunohistochemistry was performed to evaluate immune markers programmed death-1 ligand (PD-L1), programmed death-1, FAS, FASL, CD8, CD3, and CD4. An HTG ImmunOncology panel was conducted on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples to explore gene expression. Effects of differentially expressed genes on survival were explored by Kaplan-Meier. Results: PD-L1 positivity was widely observed (63%) in tumors, and CD8+ lymphocytic infiltration was common. High CD8 density correlated with greater overall survival (OS) while not statistically significant. No associations were found for other immune markers. L1CAM was identified as differentially expressed in patients with low CD8 infiltration and correlated negatively with OS. Conclusion: High L1CAM expression correlated with poorer OS, highlighting its potential as a prognostic marker and therapeutic target in ASPS. Immunomodulatory interventions may hold promise, as evidenced by PD-L1 expression and CD8+ infiltration. Further research, including larger cohorts and international collaborations, is needed to validate these findings and explore therapeutic strategies targeting L1CAM in ASPS.

Understanding immune response in a rare cancer: exploring avenues for alveolar soft-part sarcoma Why was the study done? Alveolar soft-part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare cancer with limited treatment options. Our study aimed to understand how the immune system responds to ASPS and explore potential treatments, as current therapies are often ineffective. What did the researchers do? We analyzed data from 19 ASPS patients to investigate immune response and potential treatment targets. We examined the expression of immune markers and genes related to immune response to identify factors influencing patient outcomes. What did the researchers find? We found that most tumors showed signs of an active immune response, with a protein called PD-L1 being present. We also noticed that many tumors had a type of immune cell called CD8+ lymphocytes. Although having more of these CD8+ cells seemed to be linked to better survival, this connection wasn't strong enough to be certain. We didn't find any clear links with other immune markers we looked at. However, we did find that a protein called L1CAM was more common in patients who had fewer CD8+ cells in their tumors, and this was linked to poorer overall survival. What do the findings mean? Our study sheds light on the immune response in ASPS and identifies potential targets for therapy. By understanding these mechanisms, we hope to pave the way for more effective treatments and improve outcomes for ASPS patients in the future.

Feasibility and Short-Term Outcomes in Liver-First Approach: A Spanish Snapshot Study (the RENACI Project).

(1) Background: The liver-first approach may be indicated for colorectal cancer patients with synchronous liver metastases to whom preoperative chemotherapy opens a potential window in which liver resection may be undertaken. This study aims to present the data of feasibility and short-term outcomes in the liver-first approach. (2) Methods: A prospective observational study was performed in Spanish hospitals that had a medium/high-volume of HPB surgeries from 1 June 2019 to 31 August 2020. (3) Results: In total, 40 hospitals participated, including a total of 2288 hepatectomies, 1350 for colorectal liver metastases, 150 of them (11.1%) using the liver-first approach, 63 (42.0%) in hospitals performing <50 hepatectomies/year. The proportion of patients as ASA III was significantly higher in centers performing ≥50 hepatectomies/year (difference: 18.9%; p = 0.0213). In 81.1% of the cases, the primary tumor was in the rectum or sigmoid colon. In total, 40% of the patients underwent major hepatectomies. The surgical approach was open surgery in 87 (58.0%) patients. Resection margins were R0 in 78.5% of the patients. In total, 40 (26.7%) patients had complications after the liver resection and 36 (27.3%) had complications after the primary resection. One-hundred and thirty-two (89.3%) patients completed the therapeutic regime. (4) Conclusions: There were no differences in the surgical outcomes between the centers performing <50 and ≥50 hepatectomies/year. Further analysis evaluating factors associated with clinical outcomes and determining the best candidates for this approach will be subsequently conducted.

Repeated pancreatic resection for pancreatic metastases from renal cell Carcinoma: A Spanish multicenter study (PANMEKID).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recurrent isolated pancreatic metastasis from Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) after pancreatic resection is rare. The purpose of our study is to describe a series of cases of relapse of pancreatic metastasis from renal cancer in the pancreatic remnant and its surgical treatment with a repeated pancreatic resection, and to analyse the results of both overall and disease-free survival. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective study of patients undergoing pancreatic resection for RCC pancreatic metastases, from January 2010 to May 2020. Patients were grouped into two groups depending on whether they received a single pancreatic resection (SPS) or iterative pancreatic resection. Data on short and long-term outcome after pancreatic resection were collected. RESULTS: The study included 131 pancreatic resections performed in 116 patients. Thus, iterative pancreatic surgery (IPS) was performed in 15 patients. The mean length of time between the first pancreatic surgery and the second was 48.9 months (95 % CI: 22.2-56.9). There were no differences in the rate of postoperative complications. The DFS rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 86 %, 78 % and 78 % vs 75 %, 50 % and 37 % in the IPS and SPS group respectively (p = 0.179). OS rates at 1, 3, 5 and 7 years were 100 %, 100 %, 100 % and 75 % in the IPS group vs 95 %, 85 %, 80 % and 68 % in the SPS group (p = 0.895). CONCLUSION: Repeated pancreatic resection in case of relapse of pancreatic metastasis of RCC in the pancreatic remnant is justified, since it achieves OS results similar to those obtained after the first resection.

Pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma. Postoperative outcome after surgical treatment in a Spanish multicenter study (PANMEKID).

BACKGROUND: Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) occasionally spreads to the pancreas. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the short and long-term results of a multicenter series in order to determine the effect of surgical treatment on the prognosis of these patients. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective study of patients undergoing surgery for RCC pancreatic metastases, from January 2010 to May 2020. Variables related to the primary tumor, demographics, clinical characteristics of metastasis, location in the pancreas, type of pancreatic resection performed and data on short and long-term evolution after pancreatic resection were collected. RESULTS: The study included 116 patients. The mean time between nephrectomy and pancreatic metastases' resection was 87.35 months (ICR: 1.51-332.55). Distal pancreatectomy was the most performed technique employed (50 %). Postoperative morbidity was observed in 60.9 % of cases (Clavien-Dindo greater than IIIa in 14 %). The median follow-up time was 43 months (13-78). Overall survival (OS) rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 96 %, 88 %, and 83 %, respectively. The disease-free survival (DFS) rate at 1, 3, and 5 years was 73 %, 49 %, and 35 %, respectively. Significant prognostic factors of relapse were a disease free interval of less than 10 years (2.05 [1.13-3.72], p 0.02) and a history of previous extrapancreatic metastasis (2.44 [1.22-4.86], p 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic resection if metastatic RCC is found in the pancreas is warranted to achieve higher overall survival and disease-free survival, even if extrapancreatic metastases were previously removed. The existence of intrapancreatic multifocal compromise does not always warrant the performance of a total pancreatectomy in order to improve survival.

[Hepatocholangiocarcinoma in young patient with a giant liver tumour]. / Hepatocolangiocarcinoma en paciente joven con tumoración hepática gigante.

BACKGROUND: Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma is a rare primary hepatic tumour, showing both hepatocellular as well as biliary epithelium differentiation. Its diagnosis is often delayed, as it occurs in young patients without comorbidities and with non-specific symptoms. Most cases are confused with other types of cancer, especially fibrolamellar liver cancer, which is more frequent and has similar clinical and radiological features. CLINICAL CASE: The case is presented of a 26 year old woman with a giant combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma with difficulties in its diagnosis and a complicated surgical approach. DISCUSSION: The definitive diagnosis of this disease is defined by the histological demonstration of cholangiolar and hepatocellular differentiation, with surgical treatment always being the best choice, but with lower survival than classic hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. In some patients with unfavourable prognostic factors, adjuvant chemotherapy mainly directed cholangiolar component can be given. CONCLUSION: The current incidence of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma varies from 2 to 5% of cases, and is one of the rarest histological types in the world. The large size and hypervascularisation of the tumour makes a surgical approach difficult in these patients, while the rare histological features require a more detailed study of the piece and the application of immunohistochemical techniques to confirm the diagnosis.