How Many Tests Does It Take to Diagnose a Triple-Hit B-Lymphoblastic Lymphoma? (Hint, It's A Lot).

B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (B-ALL/LBL) is a precursor B-cell neoplasm that often harbors specific cytogenetic/molecular abnormalities with distinctive clinical, phenotypic, and prognostic characteristics. Subcategorization of B-ALL/LBL therefore requires extensive cytogenetic and/or molecular testing to determine the appropriate classification and therapeutic interventions for these patients. Herein, we present a case of a 17-year-old young woman diagnosed with B-LBL harboring not only an IGH::MYC rearrangement but also BCL2 and BCL6 rearrangements (so-called "triple-hit") and somatic biallelic TP53 inactivation. MYC rearrangements are relatively rare in B-ALL/LBL, and the identification of a "triple-hit" elicited an initial diagnostic dilemma. However, a multimodal approach allowed for the classification of this complex case and helped guide selection of an appropriate therapeutic regimen.

Anti-HLA antibodies in recipients of CD19 versus BCMA-targeted CAR T-cell therapy.

Antibodies against foreign human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules are barriers to successful organ transplantation. B cell-depleting treatments are used to reduce anti-HLA antibodies but have limited efficacy. We hypothesized that the primary source for anti-HLA antibodies is long-lived plasma cells, which are ineffectively targeted by B cell depletion. To study this, we screened for anti-HLA antibodies in a prospectively enrolled cohort of 49 patients who received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CARTx), targeting naïve and memory B cells (CD19-targeted, n = 21) or plasma cells (BCMA-targeted, n = 28) for hematologic malignancies. Longitudinal samples were collected before and up to 1 year after CARTx. All individuals were in sustained remission. We identified 4 participants with anti-HLA antibodies before CD19-CARTx. Despite B cell depletion, anti-HLA antibodies and calculated panel reactive antibody scores were stable for 1 year after CD19-CARTx. Only 1 BCMA-CARTx recipient had pre-CARTx low-level anti-HLA antibodies, with no follow-up samples available. These data implicate CD19neg long-lived plasma cells as an important source for anti-HLA antibodies, a model supported by infrequent HLA sensitization in BCMA-CARTx subjects receiving previous plasma cell-targeted therapies. Thus, plasma cell-targeted therapies may be more effective against HLA antibodies, thereby enabling improved access to organ transplantation and rejection management.

Characterization of HLH-like manifestations as a CRS variant in patients receiving CD22 CAR T cells.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell toxicities resembling hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) occur in a subset of patients with cytokine release syndrome (CRS). As a variant of conventional CRS, a comprehensive characterization of CAR T-cell-associated HLH (carHLH) and investigations into associated risk factors are lacking. In the context of 59 patients infused with CD22 CAR T cells where a substantial proportion developed carHLH, we comprehensively describe the manifestations and timing of carHLH as a CRS variant and explore factors associated with this clinical profile. Among 52 subjects with CRS, 21 (40.4%) developed carHLH. Clinical features of carHLH included hyperferritinemia, hypertriglyceridemia, hypofibrinogenemia, coagulopathy, hepatic transaminitis, hyperbilirubinemia, severe neutropenia, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and occasionally hemophagocytosis. Development of carHLH was associated with preinfusion natural killer(NK) cell lymphopenia and higher bone marrow T-cell:NK cell ratio, which was further amplified with CAR T-cell expansion. Following CRS, more robust CAR T-cell and CD8 T-cell expansion in concert with pronounced NK cell lymphopenia amplified preinfusion differences in those with carHLH without evidence for defects in NK cell mediated cytotoxicity. CarHLH was further characterized by persistent elevation of HLH-associated inflammatory cytokines, which contrasted with declining levels in those without carHLH. In the setting of CAR T-cell mediated expansion, clinical manifestations and immunophenotypic profiling in those with carHLH overlap with features of secondary HLH, prompting consideration of an alternative framework for identification and management of this toxicity profile to optimize outcomes following CAR T-cell infusion.

Nelarabine, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide in relapsed pediatric T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia and T-lymphoblastic lymphoma (study T2008-002 NECTAR).

Children with relapse of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) or lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) have a dismal prognosis, largely due to difficulty attaining second remission. We hypothesized that adding etoposide and cyclophosphamide to the nucleoside analog nelarabine could improve response rates over single-agent nelarabine for relapsed T-ALL and T-LBL. This phase I dose-escalation trial's primary objective was to evaluate the dose and safety of nelarabine given in combination with etoposide at 100 mg/m2 /day and cyclophosphamide at 330-400 mg/m2 /day, each for 5 consecutive days in children with either T-ALL (13 patients) or T-LBL (10 patients). Twenty-three patients were treated at three dose levels; 21 were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and response. The recommended phase II doses (RP2D) for this regimen, when given daily ×5 every 3 weeks, were nelarabine 650 mg/m2 /day, etoposide 100 mg/m2 /day, and cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2 /day. DLTs included peripheral motor and sensory neuropathies. An expansion cohort to evaluate responses at the RP2D was terminated early due to slow accrual. The overall best response rate was 38% (8/21), with 33% (4/12) responses in the T-ALL cohort and 44% (4/9) responses in the T-LBL cohort. These response rates are comparable to those seen with single-agent nelarabine in this setting. These data suggest that the addition of cyclophosphamide and etoposide to nelarabine does not increase the incidence of neurologic toxicities or the response rate beyond that obtained with single-agent nelarabine in children with first relapse of T-ALL and T-LBL.

Preemptive mitigation of CD19 CAR T-cell cytokine release syndrome without attenuation of antileukemic efficacy.

Immunotherapy with the adoptive transfer of T cells redirected with CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) for B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) can salvage >80% of patients having relapsed/refractory disease. The therapeutic index of this emerging modality is attenuated by the occurrence of immunologic toxicity syndromes that occur upon CAR T-cell engraftment. Here, we report on the low incidence of severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in a subject treated with a CAR T-cell product composed of a defined ratio CD4:CD8 T-cell composition with a 4-1BB:zeta CAR targeting CD19 who also recieved early intervention treatment. We report that early intervention with tocilizumab and/or corticosteroids may reduce the frequency at which subjects transition from mild CRS to severe CRS. Although early intervention doubled the numbers of subjects dosed with tocilizumab and/or corticosteroids, there was no apparent detrimental effect on minimal residual disease-negative complete remission rates or subsequent persistence of functional CAR T cells compared with subjects who did not receive intervention. Moreover, early intervention therapy did not increase the proportion of subjects who experience neurotoxicity or place subjects at risk for infectious sequelae. These data support the contention that early intervention with tocilizumab and/or corticosteroids in subjects with early signs of CRS is without negative impact on the antitumor potency of CD19 CAR T cells. This intervention serves to enhance the therapeutic index in relapsed/refractory patients and provides the rationale to apply CAR T-cell therapy more broadly in ALL therapy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT020284.

Glial injury in neurotoxicity after pediatric CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To test whether systemic cytokine release is associated with central nervous system inflammatory responses and glial injury in immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy in children and young adults. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of clinical manifestations as well as imaging, pathology, CSF, and blood biomarkers on 43 subjects ages 1 to 25 who received CD19-directed CAR/T cells for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). RESULTS: Neurotoxicity occurred in 19 of 43 (44%) subjects. Nine subjects (21%) had CTCAE grade 3 or 4 neurological symptoms, with no neurotoxicity-related deaths. Reversible delirium, headache, decreased level of consciousness, tremor, and seizures were most commonly observed. Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) scores ≥9 had 94% sensitivity and 33% specificity for grade ≥3 neurotoxicity, and 91% sensitivity and 72% specificity for grade ≥2 neurotoxicity. Neurotoxicity correlated with severity of cytokine release syndrome, abnormal past brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and higher peak CAR-T cell numbers in blood, but not cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). CSF levels of S100 calcium-binding protein B and glial fibrillary acidic protein increased during neurotoxicity, indicating astrocyte injury. There were concomitant increases in CSF white blood cells, protein, interferon-γ (IFNγ), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, and granzyme B (GzB), with concurrent elevation of serum IFNγ IL-10, GzB, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor, macrophage inflammatory protein 1 alpha, and tumor necrosis factor alpha, but not IL-6. We did not find direct evidence of endothelial activation. INTERPRETATION: Our data are most consistent with ICANS as a syndrome of systemic inflammation, which affects the brain through compromise of the neurovascular unit and astrocyte injury. ANN NEUROL 2019.

ASTCT Consensus Grading for Cytokine Release Syndrome and Neurologic Toxicity Associated with Immune Effector Cells.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is rapidly emerging as one of the most promising therapies for hematologic malignancies. Two CAR T products were recently approved in the United States and Europe for the treatment ofpatients up to age 25years with relapsed or refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and/or adults with large B cell lymphoma. Many more CAR T products, as well as other immunotherapies, including various immune cell- and bi-specific antibody-based approaches that function by activation of immune effector cells, are in clinical development for both hematologic and solid tumor malignancies. These therapies are associated with unique toxicities of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic toxicity. The assessment and grading of these toxicities vary considerably across clinical trials and across institutions, making it difficult to compare the safety of different products and hindering the ability to develop optimal strategies for management of these toxicities. Moreover, some aspects of these grading systems can be challenging to implement across centers. Therefore, in an effort to harmonize the definitions and grading systems for CRS and neurotoxicity, experts from all aspects of the field met on June 20 and 21, 2018, at a meeting supported by the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT; formerly American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, ASBMT) in Arlington, VA. Here we report the consensus recommendations of that group and propose new definitions and grading for CRS and neurotoxicity that are objective, easy to apply, and ultimately more accurately categorize the severity of these toxicities. The goal is to provide a uniform consensus grading system for CRS and neurotoxicity associated with immune effector cell therapies, for use across clinical trials and in the postapproval clinical setting.

Intent-to-treat leukemia remission by CD19 CAR T cells of defined formulation and dose in children and young adults.

Transitioning CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells from early-phase trials in relapsed patients to a viable therapeutic approach with predictable efficacy and low toxicity for broad application among patients with high unmet need is currently complicated by product heterogeneity resulting from transduction of undefined T-cell mixtures, variability of transgene expression, and terminal differentiation of cells at the end of culture. A phase 1 trial of 45 children and young adults with relapsed or refractory B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia was conducted using a CD19 CAR product of defined CD4/CD8 composition, uniform CAR expression, and limited effector differentiation. Products meeting all defined specifications occurred in 93% of enrolled patients. The maximum tolerated dose was 106 CAR T cells per kg, and there were no deaths or instances of cerebral edema attributable to product toxicity. The overall intent-to-treat minimal residual disease-negative (MRD-) remission rate for this phase 1 study was 89%. The MRD- remission rate was 93% in patients who received a CAR T-cell product and 100% in the subset of patients who received fludarabine and cyclophosphamide lymphodepletion. Twenty-three percent of patients developed reversible severe cytokine release syndrome and/or reversible severe neurotoxicity. These data demonstrate that manufacturing a defined-composition CD19 CAR T cell identifies an optimal cell dose with highly potent antitumor activity and a tolerable adverse effect profile in a cohort of patients with an otherwise poor prognosis. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02028455.

Lymphocyte apheresis for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell manufacturing in children and young adults with leukemia and neuroblastoma.

BACKGROUND: The first step in the production of chimeric antigen receptor T cells is the collection of autologous T cells using apheresis technology. The procedure is technically challenging, because patients often have low leukocyte counts and are heavily pretreated with multiple lines of chemotherapy, marrow transplantation, and/or radiotherapy. Here, we report our experience of collecting T lymphocytes for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell manufacturing in pediatric and young adult patients with leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, or neuroblastoma. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Apheresis procedures were performed on a COBE Spectra machine using the mononuclear cell program, with a collection target of 1 × 109 total mononuclear cells per kilogram. Data were collected regarding preapheresis and postapheresis blood counts, apheresis parameters, products, and adverse events. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients (ages 1.3-25.7 years) and 102 apheresis events were available for analysis. Patients underwent apheresis at a variety of absolute lymphocyte cell counts, with a median absolute lymphocyte count of 944 cells/µL (range, 142-6944 cells/µL). Twenty-two patients (21.6%) had absolute lymphocyte counts less than 500 cells/µL. The mononuclear cell target was obtained in 100% of all apheresis harvests, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell production was possible from the majority of collections (94%). Mononuclear cell collection efficiency was 65.4%, and T-lymphocyte collection efficiency was 83.4%. Ten patients (9.8%) presented with minor adverse events during the 102 apheresis procedures, with one exception of a severe allergy. CONCLUSIONS: Mononuclear cell apheresis for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is well tolerated and safe, and it is possible to obtain an adequate quantity of CD3+ lymphocytes for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell manufacturing in heavily pretreated patients who have low lymphocyte counts.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy.

Patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) cancers have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. The recent approval of 2 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) autologous T-cell products for R/R B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treatment is setting the stage for what is possible in other diseases. However, there are important factors that must be considered, including patient selection, toxicity management, and costs associated with CAR T-cell therapy. To begin to address these issues, NCCN organized a task force consisting of a multidisciplinary panel of experts in oncology, cancer center administration, and health policy, which met for the first time in March 2018. This report describes the current state of CAR T-cell therapy and future strategies that should be considered as the application of this novel immunotherapy expands and evolves.

Myeloid lineage switch following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in a patient with TCF3-ZNF384 fusion-positive B-lymphoblastic leukemia.

A pediatric patient diagnosed initially with B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) relapsed with lineage switch to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplant. A TCF3-ZNF384 fusion was identified at diagnosis, persisted through B-ALL relapse, and was also present in the AML relapse cell population. ZNF384-rearrangements define a molecular subtype of B-ALL characterized by a pro-B-cell immunophenotype; furthermore, ZNF384-rearrangements are prevalent in mixed-phenotype acute leukemias. Lineage switch following CAR-T therapy has been described in patients with KMT2A (mixed lineage leukemia) rearrangements, but not previously in any patient with ZNF384 fusion.

Generation of CD19-chimeric antigen receptor modified CD8+ T cells derived from virus-specific central memory T cells.

The adoptive transfer of donor T cells that have been genetically modified to recognize leukemia could prevent or treat leukemia relapse after allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT). However, adoptive therapy after allo-HSCT should be performed with T cells that have a defined endogenous TCR specificity to avoid GVHD. Ideally, T cells selected for genetic modification would also have the capacity to persist in vivo to ensure leukemia eradication. Here, we provide a strategy for deriving virus-specific T cells from CD45RA(-)CD62L(+)CD8(+) central memory T (T(CM)) cells purified from donor blood with clinical grade reagents, and redirect their specificity to the B-cell lineage marker CD19 through lentiviral transfer of a gene encoding a CD19-chimeric Ag receptor (CAR). Virus-specific T(CM) were selectively transduced by exposure to the CD19 CAR lentivirus after peptide stimulation, and bi-specific cells were subsequently enriched to high purity using MHC streptamers. Activation of bi-specific T cells through the CAR or the virus-specific TCR elicited phosphorylation of downstream signaling molecules with similar kinetics, and induced comparable cytokine secretion, proliferation, and lytic activity. These studies identify a strategy for tumor-specific therapy with CAR-modified T cells after allo-HSCT, and for comparative studies of CAR and TCR signaling.

Development of a Safety Surveillance Plan for the Academic Medicine Sponsor Performing First-in-Human Cellular Therapy Clinical Trials: A Report from the Consortium for Pediatric Cellular Immunotherapy.

Pharmacovigilance (PV), also known as drug safety, is the science of risk management involving the detection, assessment, understanding, and prevention of adverse effects related to a medication. This discipline has traditionally focused on the postmarketing period, with less attention to early-phase clinical trials. However, during the immunotherapy and cellular therapy investigational stage, regulatory agencies are increasingly emphasizing the need to identify and characterize safety signals earlier in clinical development as part of a comprehensive safety surveillance plan. Compliance with PV and safety regulations are further heightened as cell and gene therapy (CGT) trials grow in complexity and scope owing to ever-changing and increasingly rigorous regulatory mandates. Based on this changing landscape, a critical aspect of early-phase trials of cellular products where significant safety events are anticipated is to ensure that every effort is made to protect clinical trial participants by maximizing attention to the risk-versus-benefit profile. This includes the development of robust plans for safety surveillance that provide a continual assessment of safety signals to enable safety reporting to regulatory bodies and the Food and Drug Administration, a regular analysis of aggregate safety data, and a plan to communicate safety findings. This report focuses on PV in early-phase clinical trials of first-in-human investigational products sponsored by academic centers in which the availability of PV resources and subject matter experts is limited. To more fully understand the challenges of CGT PV oversight within pediatric academic medical centers conducting early-phase clinical trials, a working group from institutions participating in the Consortium for Pediatric Cellular Immunotherapy composed of faculty and regulatory professionals was convened to compare experiences, identify best practices, and review published literature to identify commonalities and opportunities for alignment. Here we present guidelines on PV planning in early-phase CGT clinical trials occurring in academic medical centers and offer strategies to mitigate risk to trial participants. Standards to address regulatory requirements and governance for safety signal identification and risk assessment are discussed.

ACT To Sustain: Adoptive Cell Therapy To Sustain Access to Non-Commercialized Genetically Modified Cell Therapies.

Genetically modified cell therapies (GMCT), particularly immune effector cells (IEC) such as chimeric receptor antigen (CAR) T cells, have shown promise in curing cancer and rare diseases after a single treatment course. Following close behind CAR T approvals are GMCT based on hematopoietic stem cells, such as products developed for hemoglobinopathies and other disorders. Academically sponsored GMCT products, often developed in academic centers without industry involvement, face challenges in sustaining access after completion of early phase studies when there is no commercial partner invested in completing registration trials for marketing applications. The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) formed a task force named ACT To Sustain (Adoptive Cell Therapy to Sustain) to address the "valley of death" of academic GMCT products. This paper presents the task force's findings and considerations regarding financial sustainability of academically sponsored GMCT products in the absence of commercial development. We outline case scenarios illustrating barriers to maintaining access to promising GMCT developed by academic centers. The paper also delves into the current state of GMCT development, commercialization, and reimbursement, citing examples of abandoned products, cost estimates associated with GMCT manufacturing and real-world use of cost recovery. We propose potential solutions to address the financial, regulatory, and logistical challenges associated with sustaining access to academically sponsored GMCT products and to ensure that products with promising results do not languish in a "valley of death" due to financial or implementational barriers. The suggestions include aligning US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) designations with benefit coverage, allowing for cost recovery of certain products as a covered benefit, and engaging with regulators and policy makers to discuss alternative pathways for academic centers to provide access. We stress the importance of sustainable access to GMCT and call for collaborative efforts to develop regulatory pathways that support access to academically sponsored GMCT products.

Drug-regulated CD33-targeted CAR T cells control AML using clinically optimized rapamycin dosing.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) designs that incorporate pharmacologic control are desirable; however, designs suitable for clinical translation are needed. We designed a fully human, rapamycin-regulated drug product for targeting CD33+ tumors called dimerizaing agent-regulated immunoreceptor complex (DARIC33). T cell products demonstrated target-specific and rapamycin-dependent cytokine release, transcriptional responses, cytotoxicity, and in vivo antileukemic activity in the presence of as little as 1 nM rapamycin. Rapamycin withdrawal paused DARIC33-stimulated T cell effector functions, which were restored following reexposure to rapamycin, demonstrating reversible effector function control. While rapamycin-regulated DARIC33 T cells were highly sensitive to target antigen, CD34+ stem cell colony-forming capacity was not impacted. We benchmarked DARIC33 potency relative to CD19 CAR T cells to estimate a T cell dose for clinical testing. In addition, we integrated in vitro and preclinical in vivo drug concentration thresholds for off-on state transitions, as well as murine and human rapamycin pharmacokinetics, to estimate a clinically applicable rapamycin dosing schedule. A phase I DARIC33 trial has been initiated (PLAT-08, NCT05105152), with initial evidence of rapamycin-regulated T cell activation and antitumor impact. Our findings provide evidence that the DARIC platform exhibits sensitive regulation and potency needed for clinical application to other important immunotherapy targets.

GFAP and NfL increase during neurotoxicity from high baseline levels in pediatric CD19-CAR T-cell patients.

There is a need for biomarkers to predict and measure the severity of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light chain (NfL) are well-validated biomarkers of astroglial and neuronal injury, respectively. We hypothesized that pretreatment GFAP and NfL levels can predict the risk of subsequent ICANS and that increases in GFAP and NfL levels during treatment reflect ICANS severity. We measured cerebrospinal fluid GFAP (cGFAP) and NfL (cNfL) along with serum NfL (sNfL) levels at pretreatment and day 7 to 10 after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell infusion in 3 pediatric cohorts treated with CD19- or CD19/CD22-directed CAR T cells. cGFAP and cNfL levels increased during grade ≥1 ICANS in patients treated with CD19-directed CAR T cells but not in those who received CD19/CD22-directed CAR T cells. The sNfL levels did not increase during ICANS. Prelymphodepletion cGFAP, cNfL, and sNfL levels were not predictive of subsequent ICANS. Elevated baseline cGFAP levels were associated with a history of transplantation. Patients with prior central nervous system (CNS) radiation had higher cNfL levels, and elevated baseline sNfL levels were associated with a history of peripheral neuropathy. Thus, cGFAP and cNfL may be useful biomarkers for measuring the severity of CNS injury during ICANS in children. Elevated baseline levels of cGFAP, cNfL, and sNfL likely reflect the cumulative injury to the central and peripheral nervous systems from prior treatment. However, levels of any of the 3 biomarkers before CAR T-cell infusion did not predict the risk of ICANS.

Paving the Road for Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells: American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy 80/20 Task Force Consensus on Challenges and Solutions to Improving Efficiency of Clinical Center Certification and Maintenance of Operations for Commercially Approved Immune Effector Cell Therapies.

As the number and type of regulatory authority-approved cellular therapies grow, clinical treatment centers face a heavy burden of duplicative documentation around initial qualification, ongoing auditing, and reporting, with overlapping requirements from each manufacturer to ensure safe use of their specific product, which in the United States are stipulated under individual Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Biologic License Applications. The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) convened the 80/20 Task Force to consider challenges and potential solutions to these issues. The Task Force proposed that 80% of manufacturers' requirements for onboarding and ongoing operations of commercially available products could be standardized and streamlined. Task Force members interviewed dozens of stakeholders, including clinicians at large academic medical centers already using commercial and investigational immune effector cell (IEC) products, regulators, members of accrediting bodies and professional cellular therapy societies, and manufacturers of IEC therapies for oncologic indications. In November 2021, the Task Force organized and led virtual discussions in a public forum and at a private ASTCT 80/20 Workshop at the online AcCELLerate Forum, a cellular-therapy stakeholders' meeting organized by the ASTCT, National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), and Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). At the workshop, approximately 60 stakeholders worked to identify and prioritize common challenges in onboarding and maintenance of operations at clinical sites for commercial FDA-approved and future IEC therapies and ways to streamline the process. It was agreed that standardization would improve efficiency of onboarding, allowing more cost-effective, sustainable growth of approved IEC therapies at treatment centers, and facilitate wider access while maintaining safety and clinical success. This early but extensive survey of stakeholders resulted in 5 overarching suggestions for both established and emerging treatment centers: (1) eliminate duplication in accreditation and auditing of clinical sites; (2) define expectations for the education about and management of CAR-T therapy toxicities to potentially replace product-specific REMS programs; (3) streamline current REMS education, testing, and data reporting; (4) standardize information technology (IT) platforms supporting enrollment, clinical site-manufacturer communication, and logistics of maintaining chain of identity/chain of custody across multiple transportation steps; and (5) encourage the use of universal nomenclature by cell therapy manufacturers. Future discussions need to engage a broader range of stakeholders, including administrators, pharmacists, nurses, data coordinators, surgeons, pathologists, and those developing promising cellular therapies for solid tumors, as well as teams from smaller academic or community cancer center settings. Continued collaboration with stakeholders outside of clinical sites will include accrediting bodies/auditors, established and emerging cell therapy companies, software developers, professional societies, and the patients who receive these therapies. Active dialog with government regulators remains essential. Such joint efforts are critical as the number of IEC therapies for myriad oncologic and nononcologic indications grows.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells as Salvage Therapy for Post-Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Failure.

Outcomes for post-chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy (CART) relapse are poor. The utilization of a unique CAR T cell construct for post-CART failure is increasing, but this approach is not well described. In this study, with CART-A the first unique CAR T cell construct received and CART-B the second, the primary objective was to characterize outcomes following CART-B. Secondary objectives included evaluating safety and toxicity with sequential CART infusions; investigating the impact of potential factors, such as antigen modulation and interval therapy, on CART-B response; and characterizing long-term outcomes in patients receiving multiple CARTs. This was a retrospective review (NCT03827343) of children and young adults with B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) undergoing CART therapy who received at least 2 unique CART constructs, excluding interim CART reinfusions of the same product. Of 135 patients, 61 (45.1%) received 2 unique CART constructs, including 13 who received >2 CARTs over time. Patients included in this analysis received 14 distinct CARTs targeting CD19 and/or CD22. The median age at CART-A was 12.6 years (range, 3.3 to 30.4 years). The median time from CART-A to CART-B was 302 days (range, 53 to 1183 days). CART-B targeted a different antigen than CART-A in 48 patients (78.7%), owing primarily to loss of CART-A antigen target. The rate of complete remission (CR) was lower with CART-B (65.5%; 40 of 61) than with CART-A (88.5%; 54 of 61; P = .0043); 35 of 40 (87.5%) CART-B responders had CART-B targeting a different antigen than CART-A. Among the 21 patients with a partial response or nonresponse to CART-B, 8 (38.1%) received CART-B with the same antigen target as CART-A. Of 40 patients with CART-B complete response (CR), 29 (72.5%) relapsed. For the 21 patients with evaluable data, the relapse immunophenotype was antigennegative in 3 (14.3%), antigendim in 7 (33.3%), antigenpositive in 10 (47.6%), and lineage switch in 1 (4.8%). The median relapse-free survival following CART-B CR was 9.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.1 to 13.2 months), and overall survival was 15.0 months (95% CI, 13.0 to 22.7 months). Given the limited salvage options for post-CART relapse, identifying optimizing strategies for CART-B is critical. We raise awareness about the emerging use of CART for post-CART failure and highlight clinical implications accompanying this paradigm shift.

Preinfusion factors impacting relapse immunophenotype following CD19 CAR T cells.

Relapse following chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy directed against CD19 for relapsed/refractory B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (r/r B-ALL) remains a significant challenge. Three main patterns of relapse predominate: CD19 positive (CD19pos) relapse, CD19 negative (CD19neg) relapse, and lineage switch (LS). Development and validation of risk factors that predict relapse phenotype could help define potential pre- or post-CAR T-cell infusion interventions aimed at decreasing relapse. Our group sought to extensively characterize preinfusion risk factors associated with the development of each relapse pattern via a multicenter, retrospective review of children and young adults with r/r B-ALL treated with a murine-based CD19-CAR construct. Of 420 patients treated with CAR, 166 (39.5%) relapsed, including 83 (50%) CD19pos, 68 (41%) CD19neg, and 12 (7.2%) LS relapses. A greater cumulative number of prior complete remissions was associated with CD19pos relapses, whereas high preinfusion disease burden, prior blinatumomab nonresponse, older age, and 4-1BB CAR construct were associated with CD19neg relapses. The presence of a KMT2A rearrangement was the only preinfusion risk factor associated with LS. The median overall survival following a post-CAR relapse was 11.9 months (95% CI, 9-17) and was particularly dismal in patients experiencing an LS, with no long-term survivors following this pattern of relapse. Given the poor outcomes for those with post-CAR relapse, study of relapse prevention strategies, such as consolidative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, is critical and warrants further investigation on prospective clinical trials.