RESUMO
Background: Clinical practice guidelines support efforts to improve functioning in patients with schizophrenia. Discrepancies in the perception of cognitive status between clinicians, patients with schizophrenia, and their caregivers have been associated with impaired functional abilities in patients; medication side effects might worsen both cognition and daily functioning. We assessed daily/social functioning and cognition in stable patients with schizophrenia who switched to the long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic aripiprazole lauroxil (AL). Methods: Clinically stable adults with residual symptoms of schizophrenia or intolerance following three or more doses of paliperidone palmitate or risperidone LAI were switched to flexibly dosed open-label AL treatment (441mg, 662mg, or 882mg every 4 weeks or 882mg every 6 weeks) for six months (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02634320). Daily/social functioning was assessed using the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP); total and subscale scores were summarized using descriptive statistics. The cognitive status of patients was assessed using the New York Assessment of Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT) at baseline and Month 6 or early termination, providing patient, caregiver, and clinician perspectives. A post hoc analysis assessed level of agreement in ratings of cognitive status among respondents, evaluated at baseline and last assessment, using weighted kappa coefficients (0.01-0.20, slight agreement; 0.21-0.40, fair agreement; 0.41-0.60, moderate agreement; 0.61-0.80, substantial agreement.). Results: All 51 enrolled patients received one or more AL doses; 35 completed the study, and 45 contributed data at last assessment. Mean age was 40.6 years; 72.5 percent of patients were male. Based on PSP total score, functioning was maintained from baseline (mean [standard deviation (SD)]: 55.1 [10.5]) through six months of AL treatment (mean [SD]: 57.7 [13.2]). Proportions of patients rating personal and social functioning issues as "not present" or "mild" remained stable between baseline and Month 6 for each PSP subscale. At baseline (n=50), cognitive difficulties were most commonly rated "not present" or "mild" in all NY-AACENT domains by patients (58-86% across domains), clinicians (62-94%), and caregivers (50-92%), and these rates were maintained or increased at last assessment for all reporters. Weighted kappa coefficients indicated fair-to-substantial agreement between patients and clinicians across domains at last assessment (0.32-0.64; baseline: 0.14-0.55); patient-caregiver agreement ranged from 0.07 to 0.50 at last assessment (baseline: 0.25-0.60). Conclusion: In clinically stable patients with schizophrenia who initiated AL, self-reported functioning was maintained over six months of treatment. Clinician-, caregiver-, and patient-reported cognitive function was stable at baseline and maintained in all NY-AACENT domains; patient-clinician agreement on level of cognitive impairment increased over six months of treatment with AL.
RESUMO
Introduction: People living with bipolar I disorder (BD-I) have an increased risk for obesity compared with the general population that may be related to genetic, lifestyle, and treatment factors. Few studies have examined possible effects of obesity on those living with BD-I. This study examined relationships between obesity and clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes among adults with BD-I. Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study analyzed survey responses from a nationally representative sample of US adults participating in the 2016 or 2020 National Health and Wellness Survey. Respondents (18-64 years) with a self-reported physician diagnosis of BD-I were included and categorized by body mass index: underweight/normal weight (<25 kg/m2), overweight (25 to <30 kg/m2), or obese (≥30 kg/m2). Adjusted analyses assessed comorbidities, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), work productivity, health care resource utilization (HCRU), and economic outcomes. Results: In total, responses from 1,853 participants were analyzed; most were female (65%) and white (62%). Respondents with obesity had the highest prevalence of medical comorbidities, including high blood pressure (52%), sleep apnea (37%), hypercholesterolemia (34%), and type 2 diabetes (12%). Obesity was generally associated with the lowest scores of physical health and HRQoL. Activity impairment scores were highest among respondents with obesity, as were numbers of hospitalizations and emergency department visits in the previous 6 months. Respondents with obesity incurred higher annual indirect and direct medical costs ($28,178 and $37,771, respectively) when compared with the underweight/normal weight ($23,823 and $32,227, respectively) and overweight ($24,312 and $35,231, respectively) groups. Conclusion: In this nationally representative sample, obesity was associated with several outcomes that may negatively affect people living with BD-I, including medical comorbidities, higher HCRU, HRQoL impairments, and greater indirect and direct medical costs. These findings highlight the importance of considering the presence of or risk for obesity and associated medical comorbidities when treating BD-I.
RESUMO
The goal of this study was to estimate the health and economic consequences of non-compliance with oral antimicrobial treatment in dogs with superficial pyoderma, wounds or abscesses in the US. A mathematical model (Markov model) which simulated treatment with long-term injectable cefovecin versus oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid was developed and accounted for the effect of non-compliance on clinical outcomes and mean total treatment costs per patient. Efficacy parameters considered in the model were derived from clinical studies. Treatment failure due to oral antimicrobial treatment non-compliance was approximated from published data at 13.6%. US cost data for 2009 were derived from public sources. When non-compliance was considered as a cause of treatment failure with oral medication, the long-term injectable antibiotic was more effective than oral comparator (162 versus 158 days without clinical signs). Mean total treatment costs were lower with cefovecin (USD 376.74) versus amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (USD 382.34) in dogs of 25 kg; and cefovecin remained cost-saving up to a body weight of 31 kg. In large dogs, cefovecin was more costly; however, total therapy costs were less than 6% greater than with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Accordingly the higher drug and administration costs of the long-term injectable antibiotic were totally or substantially offset when non-compliance was considered as reason for treatment failure with oral medication. The model also allowed for the estimation of the impact of various non-compliance scenarios.