RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The axillary artery (AX) access for intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) as a bridge to heart transplant (HT) allows mobility while awaiting a suitable donor. As end-stage heart failure patients often have an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) on the left side, the left AX approach may be avoided due to the perception of difficult access and proximity of two devices. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients bridged to HT with a left-sided AX IABP with or without ipsilateral ICDs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed HT candidates at our institution supported by left-sided axillary IABP from November 2019 to February 2024, dividing them into two groups based on the presence (Group ICD, n = 48) or absence (Group No-ICD, N = 19) of an ipsilateral left-sided ICD. The exposure time was defined as the time from skin incision to the beginning of anastomoses of a Dacron graft. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 100% of the cohort, with median exposure times for AX access similar between groups (ICD, 12 [7.8, 18.2] vs. No ICD, 11 [7, 19] min; p = 0.75). The rate of procedural adverse events, such as significant access site bleeding and ipsilateral limb ischemia, did not significantly differ between both groups. Device malfunction rates were comparable (ICD, 29.2% vs. No ICD, 15.8%; p = 0.35). Posttransplant, in-hospital mortality, severe primary graft dysfunction, and stroke rates were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSION: The presence of an ipsilateral left-sided ICD does not adversely impact the procedural efficacy, complication rates, or posttransplant outcomes of left-sided AX IABP insertion in HT candidates.
Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Transplante de Coração , Balão Intra-Aórtico , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Seguimentos , Prognóstico , Artéria AxilarRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In heart transplantation (HT), peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is utilized preoperatively as a direct bridge to HT or postoperatively for primary graft dysfunction (PGD). Little is known about wound complications of an arterial VA-ECMO cannulation site which can be fatal. METHODS: From 2009 to 2021, outcomes of 80 HT recipients who were supported with peripheral VA-ECMO either preoperatively or postoperatively were compared based on the site of arterial cannulation: axillary (AX: N = 49) versus femoral artery (FA: N = 31). RESULTS: Patients in the AX group were older (AX: 59 years vs. 52 years, p = .006), and less likely to have extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (0% vs. 12.9%, p = .040). Survival to discharge (AX, 81.6% vs. FA. 90.3%, p = .460), incidence of stroke (10.2% vs. 6.5%, p = .863), VA-ECMO cannulation-related bleeding (6.1% vs. 12.9%, p = .522), and arm or limb ischemia (0% vs. 3.2%, p = .816) were comparable. ECMO cannulation-related wound complications were lower in the AX group (AX, 4.1% vs. FA, 45.2%, p < .001) including the wound infections (2.0% vs. 32.3%, p < .001). In FA group, all organisms were gram-negative species. In univariate logistic regression analysis, AX cannulation was associated with less ECMO cannulation-related wound complications (Odds ratio, .23, p < .001). There was no difference between cutdown and percutaneous FA insertion regarding cannulation-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Given the lower rate of wound complications and comparable hospital outcomes with femoral cannulation, axillary VA-ECMO may be an excellent option in HT candidates or recipients when possible.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Periférico , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Transplante de Coração , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas , Humanos , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Artéria Femoral/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Little is known about safety and efficacy of the use of Impella 5.5 compared to previous iterations in the setting of Impella with Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support as ECPELLA. METHODS: Consecutive patients who were treated by ECPELLA with surgically implanted axillary Impella 5.5 (N = 13) were compared with patients supported by ECPELLA with percutaneous femoral Impella CP or 2.5 (Control, N = 13). RESULTS: The total ECPELLA flow was higher in ECPELLA 5.5 group (6.9 vs. 5.4 L/min, p = 0.019). Actual hospital survival was higher than predicted and comparable in both groups (ECPELLA 5.5, 61.5% vs. Control, 53.8%, p = 0.691). Both total device complications (ECPELLA 5.5, 7.7% vs. Control, 46.1%, p = 0.021) and Impella-specific complications (ECPELLA 5.5, 0% vs. Control, 30.8%, p = 0.012) were significantly lower in the ECPELLA 5.5 group. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of Impella 5.5 in the setting of ECPELLA provides greater hemodynamic support with a lower risk of complications compared to Impella CP or 2.5.
Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Coração Auxiliar , Humanos , Choque Cardiogênico/cirurgia , Choque Cardiogênico/etiologia , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , HemodinâmicaRESUMO
Direct heart transplant from veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support is challenging. Continuation of postoperative VA-ECMO support may be required in the setting of primary graft dysfunction or severe vasoplegia. We describe a simple technique to perfuse the ipsilateral leg of an arterial ECMO cannula during heart transplant while the ECMO circuit is turned off but maintaining the arterial cannula and distal perfusion catheter in place. This technique minimizes the number of intraoperative procedures with a minimal risk of leg ischemia, and provides a smooth transition to postoperative VA-ECMO support if necessary.
Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Humanos , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Perna (Membro) , Perfusão , Cateterismo/métodos , Isquemia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Optimal flow balance between Impella 5.5 and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support in the setting of EC-PELLA (ECMO+Impella) is unknown. Outcomes of high Impella 5.5 flow in the setting of EC-PELLA support were reviewed (N = 7). EC-PELLA was successfully explanted in 6 patients (bridge-to-transplant, N = 1; bridge-to-recovery, N = 5). The median duration of EC-PELLA support in explanted patients was 6 days. Survival at discharge was 71.4% (5 patients). In terms of device-related events, either VA-ECMO or Impella-related complications were not experienced. The median performance level of Impella 5.5 was P5 at the time of starting EC-PELLA support and then increased with time up to the median of P8 with increment of the Impella flow, and index (L/min/m2 ). The percentage of Impella flow per total EC- PELLA flow reached 50% after 48 h of support. The vasoactive-inotropic score and serum lactate level improved after institution of EC-PELLA support as well as the pulmonary artery pressures and central venous pressure. In conclusion, a high pump flow from Impella 5.5 with partial VA-ECMO support in the setting of EC-PELLA provided great support with favorable survival and device-related complications rate.
Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Coração Auxiliar , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/efeitos adversos , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Pesquisa , Estudos Retrospectivos , Choque Cardiogênico/etiologia , Choque Cardiogênico/cirurgiaRESUMO
Donation after Circulatory Death (DCD) is an alternative to Donation after Brain death (DBD), and is a growing strategy for organ procurement in the United States(US). The purpose of this analysis was to review the number and quality of hearts in one United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Region that were not utilized as a potential consequence of nonheart DCD donation. We retrospectively identified all successful US DCD solid organ donors from 1/2011 to 3/1/2017, defined an ideal heart donor by age and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and then reviewed the donor charts of unused hearts in New York and Vermont (UNOS Region 9). Of 8302 successful DCD donors across the United States, 5033 (61%) were between 18 and 49 years of age, and 872 had a screening echocardiogram, with 573 (66%) measuring an EF >50%. Of these 573 potential donors, 44 (7.7%) were from Region 9. Detailed donor chart review identified 36 ideal heart donors, 24 (66.7%) with anoxic brain injury. Trends in Region 9 DCD donation increased from 4 unused hearts in 2011, to 13 in 2016. In the context of severe organ scarcity, these data indicate that implementation of DCD heart transplantation in the United States would improve overall donation rates and provide a pathway to utilize these ideal donor hearts.
Assuntos
Transplante de Coração/legislação & jurisprudência , Doadores de Tecidos , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Transplante de Coração/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos , Função Ventricular Esquerda/fisiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To describe baseline characteristics and outcomes in the largest known registry of advanced heart failure (HF) patients receiving continuous outpatient intravenous inotrope therapy. Studies evaluating the use of outpatient inotropes for palliation or as a bridge to advanced therapies were performed before current guideline directed medical and device therapy (GDMDT). There are limited data on the modern experience using outpatient inotrope (OI) therapy. STUDY QUESTION: We aimed to study current use and outcomes of OI. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: From 2015 to 2017, 1540 advanced HF patients in a largess nationwide registry received OI with either milrinone or dobutamine. Baseline characteristics of 1149 patients data were retrospectively reviewed. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival estimates censored at the time of transplant or mechanical circulatory support were reported. RESULTS: Of 1149 patients, more patients were treated with milrinone than dobutamine (64.6% vs. 35.4%). Regardless of the indication for OI, estimated 1 and 2-years survival was 61.8% and 41.6%, respectively. Milrinone use was associated with a greater 1-year survival than dobutamine (70.7% vs. 46.2%, P < 0.0001). The superiority of milrinone over dobutamine extended to all indications for OI, including bridge to transplant (85.9% vs. 71.3%, P < 0.0001), bridge to mechanical support (91.4% vs. 71%, P = 0.001), and palliation (73.6% vs. 63.3%, P < 0.001). After adjusting for indication, age, gender and weight, milrinone was associated with lower mortality than dobutamine (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.39-0.64, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In the largest dataset of HF patients receiving OI, survival on OI for palliation in the current era of GDMDT is significantly higher than previously reported. Compared with dobutamine, milrinone was associated with improved survival in all cohorts.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Cardiotônicos/uso terapêutico , Dobutamina , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Milrinona , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
We report a case of invasive candidiasis causing a mycotic pseudoaneurysm involving the ascending aorta and pulmonary artery. The patient presented two years after heart-kidney transplant with acute limb ischemia resulting from embolization of fungal vegetations. Operative findings included a pseudoaneurysm resulting from near-complete dehiscence of the aortic suture line, and large vegetations within the ascending aorta extended to the aortic arch and pulmonary artery, with localized dehiscence of the pulmonic suture line. The ascending aorta was replaced, and the pulmonary artery was repaired with bovine pericardium. The patient did well, and blood cultures were negative at 6 months follow-up.
Assuntos
Falso Aneurisma , Aneurisma Infectado , Transplante de Rim , Falso Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagem , Falso Aneurisma/cirurgia , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma Infectado/cirurgia , Animais , Aorta/cirurgia , Candida , Bovinos , Humanos , Artéria Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Pulmonar/cirurgiaRESUMO
This study was performed to determine if organ selection practices for heart utilization by Region 9 transplant programs were optimal, and to identify opportunities to increase local organ recovery. A retrospective review of de-identified region-wide donor data January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2013 was performed. Over the study period 537 heart donors were identified, of which 321 (60%) were transplanted. Two hundred-sixteen consented hearts were not used; 190 of these were not recovered, and 26 were recovered but not transplanted. Of these, 245/321 (76%) hearts were transplanted at one of 5 regional programs, 15 (5%) were transplanted out of region as primary offers, and 61 (19%) were turned down in region and exported. Of the 61 exported hearts, 43 were turned down in region for donor-related "quality" codes (UNOS 830, 833-837) by at least one program, the remaining 18 hearts were turned down for non-"quality" reasons, primarily histocompatibility and size. Only 5/43 exported were turned down for "quality" reasons by all regional programs offered the organ. A review of consented, not recovered donor offers suggested an additional 28 organs were possibly appropriate for transplant. Our review of regional turn-downs suggests transplant centers could potentially identify additional usable organs without compromising short-term outcomes.
Assuntos
Seleção do Doador , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/normas , Transplante de Coração , Alocação de Recursos/normas , Doadores de Tecidos/provisão & distribuição , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/métodos , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/normas , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Prognóstico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are an effective therapy for a growing and aging population in the background of limited donor supply. Selecting the proper patient involves assessment of indications, risk factors, scores for overall outcomes, assessment for right ventricular failure, and optimal timing of implantation. LVAD complications have a 5% to 10% perioperative mortality and complications of bleeding, thrombosis, stroke, infection, right ventricular failure, and device failure. As LVAD engineering technology evolves, so will the risk-prediction scores. Hence, more large-scale prospective data from multicenters will continually be required to aid in patient selection, reduce complications, and improve long-term outcomes.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Coração Auxiliar , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Feminino , HumanosAssuntos
COVID-19 , Transplante de Órgãos , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos , Adulto , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2 , Doadores de TecidosRESUMO
Apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a phenotypic variant of nonobstructive HCM, in which hypertrophy of the myocardium predominantly involves the left ventricular apex. It is common in Japanese and other Asian populations but is rare in the United States. Apical HCM has a relatively benign prognosis in terms of cardiovascular mortality; however, morbid events such as ventricular aneurysms, apical thrombi, diastolic dysfunction, atrial fibrillation, and myocardial infarction are not uncommon. We report a case of an 18-year-old white man who presented to our hospital after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The patient had a witnessed collapse while playing basketball in the field. He was found to be pulseless and unresponsive by his coach, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation was immediately started. Upon arrival of emergency medical services, an automated external defibrillator advised shock and he was defibrillated thrice. Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in 15 minutes. He was intubated for airway protection and was brought to the hospital. Therapeutic hypothermia was initiated. He demonstrated good neurological status after active rewarming. Subsequent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was suggestive of apical HCM with right ventricular involvement. The patient underwent an implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement for secondary prevention and was subsequently discharged. In conclusion, apical HCM can rarely be associated with adverse cardiovascular events. The diagnosis may be missed on transthoracic 2-dimensional cardiac echocardiogram, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging should be considered to exclude apical HCM in young patients who present after sudden cardiac arrest.
Assuntos
Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica/complicações , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/etiologia , Adolescente , Eletrocardiografia , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , MasculinoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Patients with profound cardiovascular compromise have poor prognosis despite inotropic and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support. Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) offers these patients temporary support as a bridge to various options including the 'bridge to recovery'. METHODS: We studied the outcomes of 135 patients who underwent peripheral V-A ECMO and concomitant IABP implantation in our hospital from 2007 to 2012 for various clinical indications. The ECMO circuit consisted of a centrifugal pump and an oxygenator. RESULTS: V-A ECMO was implanted in the cardiac catheterization laboratory in 51 patients (37.8%), at the bedside in 5 (3.7%) and in the operating room in 79 (58.5%). Mean duration of support was 8.5 ± 7.1 days. Median length of stay was 28 days (interquartile range 14-62). Complications included bleeding at the access site in 14.1%, stroke in 11.1% and vascular complications requiring intervention in 16.3%. Overall inhospital survival was 57.8% with outcomes including heart transplantation (3%), implantable left ventricular assist device (8.1% as bridge to transplantation and 6.7% as destination therapy), surgery (7.4%) and myocardial recovery (40.7%). Prior IABP use and axillary cannulation were independent predictors of reduced inhospital mortality, stroke or vascular injury. CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral V-A ECMO with IABP is an effective therapy for patients with severely compromised cardiovascular function. It offers reasonable survival and a spectrum of definitive options from 'bridge to recovery' to heart transplantation for the management of this critically ill population.
Assuntos
Cardiomiopatias/terapia , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Coração Auxiliar , Balão Intra-Aórtico , Adulto , Idoso , Índice de Massa Corporal , Cardiomiopatias/mortalidade , Cuidados Críticos , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Transplante de Coração/métodos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs), including heart transplant (HT) recipients, infected with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are at higher risk of hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, or death when compared with general population. Advances in diagnosis and treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection have reduced COVID-19-related mortality rates from ~30% in the early pandemic to <3% in 2022 among HT recipients. We performed a retrospective chart review including adult HT recipients at Westchester Medical Center from January 1, 2020 to December 10, 2022, who received anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19, and those who received tixagevimab/cilgavimab for preexposure prophylaxis. Additionally, a comprehensive review of the literature involving SOTRs who received mAbs for COVID-19 was conducted. In this largest single-center study in this population, 42 adult HT recipients received casirivimab/imdevimab (36%), sotrovimab (31%), or bebtelovimab (29%) for treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Among these recipients, no infusion-associated adverse effects, progression of disease, COVID-19-associated hospitalizations, or death were noted. Preexposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab was given to 63 HT recipients in a dedicated infusion center (40%), inpatient setting (33%), or at time of annual heart biopsy (27%). No immediate adverse events were noted. There were 11 breakthrough infections, all mild. Overall, the data suggests that HT recipients receiving mAbs have reduced rates of hospitalization, need for intensive care unit care, or death. Use of anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAbs in SOTRs is resource intensive and requires a programmatic team approach for optimal administration and to minimize any risk of disparities in their use.
RESUMO
The use of continuous inotropy in patients with advanced heart failure (HF) has been historically controversial due to the prevailing notion that it will increase mortality. In practice, clinicians have continued to revisit this idea as there remains a lack of treatment options for patients in stage D HF. Clinical trials in the past have generally not shown favorable effects of long-term chronic infusions of positive IV inotropic agents on symptoms and exercise tolerance. However, these older studies which indicated poor outcomes with palliative inotropes may not apply to current practice. Modern trials and case series have shown that milrinone and dobutamine may be safely used in patients who are bridging to device therapy or transplant or for palliation. Broad adoption of mortality-reducing modern guideline-directed medical therapy and implantable cardioverter defibrillators may have contributed to the positive results that contemporary trials have seen with inotrope use. For the stage D HF patient, modern use of outpatient inotropy (OI) can alleviate symptom burden and prolong time spent at home. Additionally, more recent studies and case series suggest that OI can be a reasonable alternative to left ventricular assist device placement for both bridging to transplant or as destination therapy. In the appropriate patient, and according to the patient's informed decision and preference, this may be a viable alternative therapeutic option. Contemporary data suggest that OI should be considered in patients who are being evaluated for advanced therapies.
RESUMO
Cardiogenic shock remains the leading cause of in-hospital death for patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction. For patients with refractory cardiogenic shock, early revascularization and intra-aortic balloon pump support are often inadequate to reverse the persistent circulatory collapse. We report 5 cases in which an extracorporeal oxygenator in series with the TandemHeart system was instituted emergently in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction. From our experience, we showed that the device can be safely and easily inserted and that it is able to reverse circulatory collapse and provide hemodynamic stability in patients who otherwise have a high mortality rate.
Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Coração Auxiliar , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Choque Cardiogênico/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicações , Revascularização Miocárdica/métodos , Choque Cardiogênico/etiologiaRESUMO
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening medical condition that requires prompt recognition and treatment. The use of standardized CS criteria, such as the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions criteria, can categorize patients and guide therapeutic strategies. Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices have become valuable tools in the treatment of CS, as they can provide cardiovascular support as a bridge to recovery, cardiac surgery, or advanced therapies such as cardiac transplant or durable ventricular assist devices. The use of MCS should be tailored to each individual patient, focused on a stepwise escalation of circulatory support to support both end-organ perfusion and myocardial recovery. As newer MCS devices reduce myocardial oxygen demand without increasing ischemia, the possibility of recovery is optimized. In this review, we discuss the different modalities of MCS focusing on the mechanism of support and the advantages and disadvantages of each device.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Impella devices have emerged as a critical tool for temporary mechanical circulatory support (TMCS) in the management of cardiogenic shock (CS) and high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The purpose of this review is to examine the history of the different Impella devices, their hemodynamic profiles, and how the data supports their use. AREAS COVERED: This review covers the development and specifications of the Impella 2.5, Impella CP, Impella 5.0/Left Direct (LD), Impella RP, and Impella 5.5 devices. This review also covers the clinical trials that illuminate the Impella devices' use in their appropriate clinical contexts. These studies examine the effectiveness of Impella devices and have begun to yield promising results, demonstrating improved survival rates when compared to the historically high mortality rates associated with CS. It is important to weigh the benefits of Impella devices in light of their contraindications. A literature search was conducted by searching the PubMed database for reviews, meta-analyses, and clinical trials pertinent to Impella devices. EXPERT OPINION: Impella devices are a crucial tool for management of patients undergoing high-risk PCI and those with CS. There is evidence that early Impella implantation is beneficial in the treatment of patients presenting with CS. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to better elucidate the benefits of Impella devices in various clinical settings.
Assuntos
Coração Auxiliar , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Humanos , Choque Cardiogênico/terapia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Heart Failure (HF) patients are at a higher risk of adverse events associated with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Large population-based reports of the impact of COVID-19 on patients hospitalized with HF are limited. The National Inpatient Sample database was queried for HF admissions during 2020 in the United States (US), with and without a diagnosis of COVID-19 based on ICD-10-CM U07. Propensity score matching was used to match patients across age, race, sex, and comorbidities. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of mortality. A weighted total of 1,110,085 hospitalizations for HF were identified of which 7,905 patients (0.71%) had a concomitant diagnosis of COVID-19. After propensity matching, HF patients with COVID-19 had higher rate of in-hospital mortality (8.2% vs 3.7%; odds ratio [OR]: 2.33 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.69, 3.21]; P< 0.001), cardiac arrest (2.9% vs 1.1%, OR 2.21 [95% CI: 1.24,3.93]; P<0.001), and pulmonary embolism (1.0% vs 0.4%; OR 2.68 [95% CI: 1.05, 6.90]; Pâ¯=â¯0.0329). During hospitalizations for HF, COVID-19 was also found to be an independent predictor of mortality. Further, increasing age, arrythmias, and chronic kidney disease were independent predictors of mortality in HF patients with COVID-19. COVID-19 is associated with increased in-hospital mortality, longer hospital stays, higher cost of hospitalization and increased risk of adverse outcomes in patients admitted with HF.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Humanos , Estados Unidos , COVID-19/complicações , Hospitalização , Tempo de Internação , Comorbidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnósticoRESUMO
Scarcity of donor hearts continues to be a challenge for heart transplantation (HT). The recently Food and Drug Administration-approved Organ Care System (OCS; Heart, TransMedics) for ex vivo organ perfusion enables extension of ex situ intervals and thus may expand the donor pool. Because postapproval real-world outcomes of OCS in HT are lacking, we report our initial experience. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who received HT at our institution in the post-Food and Drug Administration approval period from May 1 to October 15, 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups: OCS versus conventional technique. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared. Results: A total of 21 patients received HT during this period, 8 using OCS and 13 conventional techniques. All hearts were from donation after brain death donors. The indication for OCS was an expected ischemic time of >4 h. Baseline characteristics in the 2 groups were comparable. The mean distance traveled for heart recovery was significantly higher in the OCS group (OCS, 845 ± 337, versus conventional, 186 ± 188 mi; P < 0.001), as was the mean total preservation time (6.5 ± 0.7 versus 2.5 ± 0.7 h; P < 0.001). The mean OCS time was 5.1 ± 0.7 h. In-hospital survival in the OCS group was 100% compared with 92.3% in the conventional group (P = 0.32). Primary graft dysfunction was similar in both groups (OCS 12.5% versus conventional 15.4%; P = 0.85). No patient in the OCS group required venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support after transplant compared with 1 in the conventional group (0% versus 7.7%; P = 0.32). The mean intensive care unit length of stay after transplant was comparable. Conclusions: OCS allowed utilization of donors from extended distances that otherwise would not be considered because ischemic time would be prohibitive by conventional technique.