Experimental Models of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome: A Review From Pathophysiology to Therapeutic Targets.

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a clinical and radiological entity characterized by nonspecific symptomatology (eg, headache, visual disturbances, encephalopathy, and seizures) and classically cortical and subcortical vasogenic edema predominantly affecting the parietooccipital region. PRES etiologies are usually dichotomized into toxic PRES (eg, antineoplastic drugs, illicit drugs) and clinical condition-associated PRES (eg, acute hypertension, dysimmune disorders). Although the pathophysiology of PRES remains elusive, 2 main pathogenic hypotheses have been suggested: cerebral hyperperfusion due to acute hypertension and cerebral hypoperfusion related to endothelial dysfunction. Research into the pathogenesis of PRES has emerged through the development of animal models in the last decade. The motivation for developing a suitable PRES model is 2-fold: to fill in knowledge gaps of the pathophysiological mechanisms involved, and to open new perspectives for clinical assessment of pharmacological targets to improve therapeutic management of PRES. All current models of PRES have a hypertensive background, on which other triggers (acute hypertension, inflammatory, drug toxicity) have been added to address specific facets of PRES (eg, seizures). The initial model consisted in inducing a reduced uterine perfusion pressure that mimics preeclampsia, a leading cause of PRES. More recently, a model of stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats on high-salt diet, originally developed for hypertensive small vessel disease and vascular cognitive impairment, has been studied in PRES. This review aims to discuss, depending on the research objective, the benefits and limitations of current experimental approaches and thus to define the desirable characteristics for studying the pathophysiology of PRES and developing new therapies.

Beta-blockers and breastfeeding: a real-life prospective study.

PURPOSE: At Lille University Hospital, a pregnancy heart team including cardiologists, obstetricians, pediatricians, anesthetists, geneticists, and pharmacologists discusses about treatment compatibility taken during breastfeeding in pregnant women (or those wishing to be pregnant) with complex cardiovascular pathologies. Beta-blockers are among the drug most often used in these patients, and data are missing or suggest a risk to the breastfed child. The aim of this study was to evaluate the proportion of women treated with beta-blockers, identified during the multidisciplinary meeting, who breastfed and to monitor adverse effects (AEs) in newborns. METHODS: A prospective descriptive study was conducted from 1 December 2017 to 1 December 2021. All pregnant patients followed up by the pregnancy heart team in Lille University Hospital, treated with beta-blockers and who gave birth, were contacted as part of the pharmacovigilance follow-up. RESULTS: The proportion of women treated with beta-blockers intending to breastfeed was 69.8%. Among the 53 women interviewed, 49% did not breastfeed, including 10 because of the theoretical incompatibility of their beta-blocker with breastfeeding. Among the 27 women who breastfed, 30% breastfed while treated with a theoretically incompatible beta-blocker; 56% was changed from their initial beta-blocker to allow safe breastfeeding. No serious AE was observed. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, our study is the largest series of patients treated with beta-blockers during breastfeeding. Taking a treatment can be an obstacle to breastfeeding, but for the particular case of beta-blockers, even if the available data are few and sometimes worrying, the data from this study are reassuring.

Incidence and preventability of hospital admissions for adverse drug reactions in France: A prospective observational study (IATROSTAT).

AIMS: In the last French study in 2007, the incidence of hospital admissions (HAs) related to adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was 3.6%. The objective was to assess the current ADR-HA incidence in France and to describe both its characteristics and preventability. METHODS: A prospective multicentre study was conducted among randomly selected French public hospital medical wards (April-July 2018). Patients admitted during a week period were included. ADR-HA cases were collected by the French Regional Pharmacovigilance Centres network. An independent committee validated potential cases and ADR preventability. RESULTS: ADR-HA incidence was 8.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.6-9.4%), increasing with age (3.3% [95%CI: 1.8-5.5%] ≤16 y vs. 10.6% [95%CI: 9.3-12.0%] ≥65 y). The most common ADRs were haemorrhagic events (8.8%), haematological disorders (6.5%), acute renal failure (6.3%), fluid and electrolyte disorders (6.0%), and falls (5.2%). New drugs were involved: targeted therapies (22.8% of antineoplastics), direct oral anticoagulants (29.6% of antithrombotics) and incretin-based drugs (20.0% of antidiabetics). ADRs were preventable in 16.1% of cases because the drugs involved had not been used in accordance with monographies, package leaflets or other therapeutic guidelines. The main situations of noncompliance addressed either dose or duration of use (27.9%), warning (23.2%), use precaution (18.6%) and inappropriate self-medication or misuse by patients (11.6%). CONCLUSION: In France, ADR-HA incidence dramatically increased over the last decade. A significant proportion was related to new pharmacological classes and considered as preventable. These findings should lead to in-depth thought on preventive actions on at-risk drug classes.

Fosfomycin-induced agranulocytosis: a case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: The intravenous form of fosfomycin, a bactericide antibiotic used to treat multiresistant bacterial infections is little prescribed. The most common reported adverse effects are hypokaliemia and hypernatremia. We describe a case of agranulocytosis, a rarely described side effect that may be fatal. CASE PRESENTATION: A 45 year-old woman was admitted to the intensive care unit for post-surgical meningitis following meningioma resection. Meropenem and vancomycin were first introduced. A DRESS-syndrom with meropenem was suspected. Neutropenia was diagnosed three days after the introduction of parenteral fosfomycin and agranulocytosis four days later. Eosinophilia was also observed. A bone marrow aspiration was performed showing a disappearance of the neutrophil granulocyte line and a significant eosinophilia. Meropenem was discontinued. Fosfomycin was maintained and filgrastim was added. As filgrastim had no effect, the relationship with fosfomycin was suspected, so it was then withheld. An increase of the neutrophil count was observed. Because of the complexity of the case, the unfavorable course of the illness and the urgent need for revision surgery, a rechallenge with fosfomycin was done followed by a decrease of the neutrophil count. CONCLUSION: This is the third paper reporting agranulocytosis induced by fosfomycin, and the first detailed description of a case. Based on chronological and semiological criteria and bibliographic data, the event was qualified as probable with the Naranjo adverse drug probability scale. Literature data is scarce. The summary of product characteristics mentions that only a few cases of transient neutropenia and agranulocytosis have been reported. An analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database highlighted a higher than expected frequency of agranulocytosis in patients treated with fosfomycin. Parenteral fosfomycin is often used in patients receiving other medications, so that it is rarely the only suspect. In our case, the results of the bone marrow aspiration, the sudden drop of the neutrophil count with concomitant eosinophilia and the absence of improvement despite the dose decrease, point towards an immuno-allergic mechanism. However, the overlap between the suspected DRESS induced by meropenem and the agranulocytosis do not allow to conclude with certainty on the causality. Awareness should be raised about this side effect.

Myeloneuropathy induced by recreational nitrous oxide use with variable exposure levels.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although several case series have described nitrous-oxide-associated neurological disorders, a comprehensive assessment of exposure characteristics (e.g., time to onset, level of exposure) in substance abusers has not been performed. The aim of this study was to describe the onset patterns of recreational use of nitrous-oxide-induced neurological disorders. METHODS: All cases of neurological disorders related to nitrous oxide recreational use reported to the Hauts-de-France addictovigilance center between January 2019 and August 2020 were selected. Only cases requiring hospitalization with informative data to perform the nitrous oxide causality assessment were included. RESULTS: A total of 20 cases from five hospitals were included. The male-to-female ratio was 6:1 and the median age was 19 years (range 16-34). The neurological presentation (myeloneuropathy 64%, 7/11; sensorimotor neuropathy 36%, 4/11) included for all patients gait disorders due to proprioceptive ataxia and limb hypoesthesia. The median dose used per occasion was 100 cartridges (range 5-960; n = 19). The median time from the start of nitrous oxide use to the onset of neurological symptoms was 6 months (range 0.7-54; n = 16). The cumulative dose was significantly higher in patients with damage to all four limbs than in patients with lower limb symptoms only (p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: A low intermittent exposure may be sufficient to cause neurological damage in some subjects, suggesting that, at the population level, there is no safe exposure to nitrous oxide in recreational settings. The severity of neurological impairment could increase once used at high doses and for prolonged durations of nitrous oxide.

Initial characteristics and follow-up of patients with a diagnosis of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor induced angioedema.

Background: A differential diagnosis between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) angioedema (AE) and histaminergic AE (hAE) might be challenging. Follow-up data may help discriminate these conditions but are scarcely reported. Objective: To report on the follow-up of patients with suspected ACEi-AE and to describe the baseline characteristics of AE attacks in patients with a diagnosis of ACEi-AE after follow-up. Methods: Sixty-four patients with suspected ACEi-AE (i.e., with exposure to ACEi before the first attack, no urticaria associated, and normal C1-inhibitor levels) and at least one follow-up visit were included. Data were retrospectively collected at baseline and during the follow-up. Results: After the follow-up, the diagnosis of ACEi-AE was probable in only 30 patients. The remaining patients were reclassified as having probable hAE (21 patients) or undetermined-mechanism AE (13 patients). Patients with ACEi-AE were mostly men (61%), with a median age of 64 years (interquartile range [IQR] ±17 years), with a highly variable delay from ACEi introduction (median: 23 months; interquartile range: 103 months). Attacks preferentially involved lips (50%), tongue (47%), and throat (30%). Interestingly, patients with probable ACEi-AE after a follow-up also frequently presented with a history of allergy and atopic conditions (20%), attacks with preferential evening onset (25%), and spontaneous resolution in < 24 hours (26%), which are usually considered as suggestive of hAE. ACEi-AE attacks responded to icatibant in 79% of the patients. Conclusion: Patients with probable ACEi-AE were mostly men with facial involvement. A third of the patients with an initial suspected diagnosis of ACEi-AE had a final diagnosis of probable hAE. Although a follow-up of all patients should be a standard of care, it is critical to the correct diagnosis in the case of suspected bradykinin-associated AE, which may actually be due to histamine.

REview of potentially inappropriate MEDIcation pr[e]scribing in Seniors (REMEDI[e]S): French implicit and explicit criteria.

PURPOSE: To establish a consensus on both explicit and implicit criteria in order to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in French older people aged 75 years and over or 65 years and over with multimorbidity. METHODS: Fifteen experts in geriatrics, general practice, pharmacy, and clinical pharmacology were involved in a two-round Delphi survey to assess preliminary explicit and implicit criteria based on an extensive literature review and up-to-date evidence data. Experts were asked to rate their level of agreement using a 5-level Likert scale for inclusion of criteria and also for rationale and therapeutic alternatives. A consensus was considered as reached if at least 75% of the experts rated criteria as "strongly agreed" or "agreed." RESULTS: The new tool included a seven-step algorithm (implicit criteria) encompassing the three main domains that define PIP (i.e. overprescribing, underprescribing, and misprescribing) and 104 explicit criteria. Explicit criteria were divided into 6 tables related to inappropriate drug duplications (n = 7 criteria), omissions of medications and/or medication associations (n = 16), medications with an unfavourable benefit/risk ratio and/or a questionable efficacy (n = 39), medications with an unsuitable dose (n = 4) or duration (n = 6), drug-disease (n = 13), and drug-drug interactions (n = 19). CONCLUSION: The REMEDI[e]S tool (REview of potentially inappropriate MEDIcation pr[e]scribing in Seniors) is an original mixed tool, adapted to French medical practices, aimed at preventing PIP both at the individual level in clinical practice and the population level in large-scale studies. Therefore, its use could contribute to an improvement in healthcare professionals' prescribing practices and safer care in older adults.

Impact of pregnancy on antidepressant treatment course: a population-based comparative cohort study in France.

The prevention of relapses and the treatment of depression during pregnancy are difficult challenges. The maintenance of antidepressants in pregnancy with its concomitant risks to mother and child needs to be weighed against those associated with not treating the disease. This study aimed at quantifying the impact of the occurrence of pregnancy on the course of antidepressant treatment among newly treated women (< 6 months). We performed a comparative observational cohort study using the nationwide French reimbursement healthcare system database. Women who conceived in 2014 and initiated an antidepressant at any time in the 6 months before pregnancy were compared with nonpregnant women newly exposed to antidepressants with matching on age, antidepressant exposure, history of psychiatric disorders, and area of residence. The primary outcome was a composite of antidepressant discontinuation, switch to another antidepressant, and concomitant use of antidepressants. The secondary outcome was the resumption of antidepressant during follow-up. We used Cox marginal proportional hazards models to compare time to outcomes between pregnant and nonpregnant women. The pregnant cohort included 6593 women, and the comparison cohort 29,347 nonpregnant women. In the period following the first month of treatment, pregnant women were more likely to experience treatment modification, and especially to stop receiving it, compared with nonpregnant women (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.58; 95%CI, 1.51-1.62). Pregnant women who discontinued treatment had a 41% decreased incidence of antidepressant resumption compared with nonpregnant women (aHR 0.59; 95%CI, 0.56-0.62). Pregnancy was a determinant of antidepressant treatment modification, and especially of discontinuation.

Early clindamycin for bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy (PREMEVA): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Preterm delivery during pregnancy (<37 weeks' gestation) is a leading cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity. Treating bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy can reduce poor outcomes, such as preterm birth. We aimed to investigate whether treatment of bacterial vaginosis decreases late miscarriages or spontaneous very preterm birth. METHODS: PREMEVA was a double-blind randomised controlled trial done in 40 French centres. Women aged 18 years or older with bacterial vaginosis and low-risk pregnancy were eligible for inclusion and were randomly assigned (2:1) to three parallel groups: single-course or triple-course 300 mg clindamycin twice-daily for 4 days, or placebo. Women with high-risk pregnancy outcomes were eligible for inclusion in a high-risk subtrial and were randomly assigned (1:1) to either single-course or triple-course clindamycin. The primary outcome was a composite of late miscarriage (16-21 weeks) or spontaneous very preterm birth (22-32 weeks), which we assessed in all patients with delivery data (modified intention to treat). Adverse events were systematically reported. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00642980. FINDINGS: Between April 1, 2006, and June 30, 2011, we screened 84 530 pregnant women before 14 weeks' gestation. 5630 had bacterial vaginosis, of whom 3105 were randomly assigned to groups in the low-risk trial (n=943 to receive single-course clindamycin, n=968 to receive triple-course clindamycin, and n=958 to receive placebo) or high-risk subtrial (n=122 to receive single-course clindamycin and n=114 to receive triple-course clindamycin). In 2869 low-risk pregnancies, the primary outcome occurred in 22 (1·2%) of 1904 participants receiving clindamycin and 10 (1·0%) of 956 participants receiving placebo (relative risk [RR] 1·10, 95% CI 0·53-2·32; p=0·82). In 236 high-risk pregnancies, the primary outcome occurred in 5 (4·4%) participants in the triple-course clindamycin group and 8 (6·0%) participants in the single-course clindamycin group (RR 0·67, 95% CI 0·23-2·00; p=0·47). In the low-risk trial, adverse events were more common in the clindamycin groups than in the placebo group (58 [3·0%] of 1904 vs 12 [1·3%] of 956; p=0·0035). The most commonly reported adverse event was diarrhoea (30 [1·6%] in the clindamycin groups vs 4 [0·4%] in the placebo group; p=0·0071); abdominal pain was also observed in the clindamycin groups (9 [0·6%] participants) versus none in the placebo group (p=0·034). No severe adverse event was reported in any group. Adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly between groups in the high-risk subtrial. INTERPRETATION: Systematic screening and subsequent treatment for bacterial vaginosis in women with low-risk pregnancies shows no evidence of risk reduction of late miscarriage or spontaneous very preterm birth. Use of antibiotics to prevent preterm delivery in this patient population should be reconsidered. FUNDING: French Ministry of Health.

Drug-induced osteoporosis/osteomalacia: analysis in the French and Spanish pharmacovigilance databases.

INTRODUCTION: Osteomalacia and osteoporosis are two metabolic bone disorders that increase the risk of fracture due to several causes. In terms of drugs, apart from corticosteroids, which are known to induce bone disorders, several other drugs used in chronic disease management have also been linked with an increased risk of osteoporosis and osteomalacia. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe spontaneous reports of drug-induced osteoporosis and osteomalacia in the French (FPVDB) and Spanish (SPVDB) pharmacovigilance databases. METHODS: Data were provided by the FPVDB and SPVDB. All reports of osteoporosis and osteomalacia recorded from 1985 up to 31 December 2015 inclusive were selected. Taking the time to onset of bone loss into account, all cases occurring in less than 1 month were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 369 reports (44 cases of osteomalacia, 325 cases of osteoporosis) were registered in the FPVDB and 64 (22 cases of osteomalacia, 42 cases of osteoporosis) in the SPVDB. In France, the top 5 drugs involved in the onset of osteoporosis were corticosteroids accounting for approximately half of the reports (n = 170) followed by systemic antiviral (n = 87), antacid (n = 29), antiepileptic (n = 27) and antithrombotic (n = 24) drugs. The 2 main classes of drugs implicated in osteomalacia were systemic antiretroviral drugs for half of the reports (n = 21) and antiepileptic drugs (n = 15). In Spain, corticosteroids were involved in 35.7% of reported cases of osteoporosis (n = 15) followed by systemic antiviral drugs (n = 12). There was no spontaneous report for antacid drugs. For osteomalacia, the 2 main drug classes were systemic antiretroviral drugs (n = 18, 81.8%) followed by antiepileptics (n = 2, 9.0%). In both countries, concomitant administration of systemic corticosteroids with other suspected drugs did not significantly modify the time to onset of drug-induced osteoporosis. CONCLUSION: Despite some differences between the French and Spanish PVDBs, our data consistently show that bone loss is not only restricted to glucocorticoids but also involves antivirals, antiepileptic drugs, antacid drugs or antidepressants. Further analysis might prove useful in exploring the characteristics of drug-induced bone loss on a larger scale.

Polypharmacy in older patients: identifying the need for support by a community pharmacist.

BACKGROUND: The community pharmacist is a key player in medication reviews of older outpatients. However, it is not always clear which individuals require a medication review. The objective of the present study was to identify high-priority older patients for intervention by a community pharmacist. METHODS: As part of their final-year placement in a community pharmacy, pharmacy students conducted 10 interviews each with older adults (aged 65 or over) taking at least five medications daily. The student interviewer also offered to examine the patient's home medicine cabinet. An interview guide was developed by an expert group to assess the difficulties in managing and taking medications encountered by older patients. RESULTS: The 141 students interviewed a total of 1370 patients (mean age: 81.5; mean number of medications taken daily: 9.3). Of the 1370 interviews, 743 (54.2%) were performed in the patient's home, and thus also included an examination of the home medicine cabinet. Adverse events were reported by 566 (42.0%) patients. A total of 378 patients (27.6%) reported difficulties in preparing, administering and/or swallowing medications. The inspections of medicine cabinets identified a variety of shortcomings: poorly located cabinets (in 15.0% of inspections), medication storage problems (21.7%), expired medications (40.7%), potentially inappropriate medications (15.0%), several different generic versions of the same drug (19.9%), and redundant medications (20.4%). CONCLUSIONS: In a community pharmacy setting, high-priority older patients for intervention by a community pharmacist can be identified by asking simple questions about difficulties in managing, administering, taking or storing medications.

Patterns of antidepressant use during pregnancy: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

AIMS: We explored the patterns of antidepressant use during pregnancy. METHODS: A cohort of women who started a pregnancy in 2014 was identified using data from the French reimbursement healthcare system (covering approximately 99% of the population). Antidepressant usage (initiated before or during pregnancy) was assessed. Explored changes in antidepressant treatment were: associations, switches, discontinuation and resumption of antidepressants during pregnancy. RESULTS: The cohort included 766 508 pregnancies (755 519 women). Antidepressant use during pregnancy was 25.7 per 1000 [95% CI: 25.3-26.0]. New use concerned 3.9 per 1000 [95% CI: 3.7-4.0]; the most initiated class during pregnancy was selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), while the most prescribed individual drug in second and third trimesters was amitriptyline, a tricyclic. Most changes were observed before pregnancy and during the first trimester: 63% of ongoing treatments in the year before pregnancy were discontinued before conception; 68% of treatments maintained after conception were discontinued during the first trimester; switches or antidepressant associations mostly occurred during the periconceptional period or during the first trimester. Regardless of initial antidepressant, switches to sertraline were the most frequent. Associations mainly consisted of a prescription of tri-/tetracyclic or mirtazapine/mianserin in addition to an SSRI. Discontinuation during pregnancy led to treatment resumption in 22% of pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that pregnancy was planned or the treatment especially adapted in accordance with existing recommendations in a large proportion of women under antidepressants or in whom such treatments have been initiated after starting a pregnancy.

Acute kidney injury after high dose etoposide phosphate: A retrospective study in children receiving an allogeneic hematopoetic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Etoposide phosphate (EP; single injection, 60 mg/kg) followed by total body irradiation (TBI) at 12 Gy has been used as an allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) conditioning regimen for children since 2010. In our institution, EP has been suspected of leading to acute nephrotoxicity. The aim of this study was to assess the potential renal toxicity of EP in this context. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out on children hospitalized between 2007 and 2015 for allo-SCT with TBI-based myeloablative conditioning associated with cyclophosphamide (CY, 60 mg/kg/day × 2 days) or EP. The primary endpoint of the study was the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI). Additional endpoints were time to recovery for children with AKI, survival, and treatment-related mortality. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were analyzed (CY: 22 vs. EP: 13). AKI occurred more frequently in the EP group than in the CY one (69% vs. 27%, adjusted odds ratio 6.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.145; 31.445], P = 0.03). The median time to recovery was estimated at 3 days, 95% CI (2; 17), with CY and 11 days 95% CI (5; 18) with EP (adjusted hazard ratio of recovery for EP vs. CY 0.262, 95% CI [0.071; 0.969], P = 0.04). No significant difference was highlighted between the two treatments for survival or for treatment-related mortality. DISCUSSION: This study shows that EP at high dosage or one of its excipients is probably responsible for AKI, as compared to CY. Further studies are required to explore the origin of this adverse effect.

Pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to cancer chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: There is little data on the effects of cancer chemotherapy in pregnant women. The objective of this study was to describe pregnancy outcomes of women exposed to cancer chemotherapy, recorded in the French Terappel database. METHODS: We performed a descriptive, prospective study of the pregnancies of women exposed to cancer chemotherapy recorded in Terappel between June 1984 and December 2016. Terappel is a French database that has recorded questions of health professionals and/or individuals at the Regional Pharmacovigilance Centres about drugs and pregnancy. For each question, pregnancies are monitored and the outcome is recorded in the database. RESULTS: In total, 75 questions about "anti-cancer drugs and pregnancy" received by 16 Regional Pharmacovigilance Centres between 1997 and 2016 were recorded in Terappel. Breast cancer accounted for 62.7% of the cases, followed by leukaemia (13.3%) and lymphoma (9.3%). Cyclophosphamide is the leading anti-cancer drug with 40.0% of exposed pregnant women, followed by 5-fluorouracil (34.7%), epirubicin (32.0%), tamoxifen (26.7%), and doxorubicin (16.0%). Among the 75 pregnancies, we observed 55 births with 57 children (73.3%) (two cases of twins), nine medical terminations of pregnancy (12.0%), six voluntary terminations of pregnancy (8.0%), three intrauterine foetal deaths (4.0%), and two miscarriages (2.7%). We found a malformation rate of 7.8%. Sixteen of 57 (28.1%) newborns developed one or more neonatal pathologies. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy of women taking anti-cancer drugs resulted in birth in 73% of cases. Nevertheless, pregnant women exposed to cancer chemotherapy remains at risk of malformations and neonatal conditions related to prematurity and drugs.

[Antidepressive agents and hyponatremia: A literature review and a case/non-case study in the French Pharmacovigilance database]. / Antidépresseurs et hyponatrémie : revue de littérature et analyse cas/non-cas dans la base nationale de pharmacovigilance française.

OBJECTIVE: Most antidepressants have been associated with a risk of hyponatremia in the literature. This effect is not always reported in monographs. The aim of our study was to clarify the difference of increased risk of hyponatremia among various antidepressants. METHODS: Retrospective study of such cases/non-cases from observations recorded in the French national pharmacovigilance between 01/01/2004 and 31/12/2013. We studied all antidepressants marketed in 2014 in France, with a positive control (haloperidol) and a negative one (amoxicillin). The association between exposure to a given drug and the occurrence of an adverse event was estimated by calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR). His confidence interval (CI) was calculated with the method of Woolf, with an alpha risk of 5%. The disproportionality is defined by an ROR>1, the 95% CI did not include the value 1. RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2013, 3397 cases of hyponatremia were. All antidepressants were associated with hyponatremia among these cases, with the exception of: milnacipran, amoxapine, dosulepine, doxepine, trimipramine, iproniazide. The effect was predominant for the class of selective inhibitors of serotonin reuptake (SSRIs), inhibitors of serotonin reuptake and noradrenaline (SNRIs) and other antidepressants; it seemed more doubtful for tricyclic and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs). Contrary to the literature, we found an association between hyponatremia and exposure to agomelatine (ROR=4.1, 95% CI [2.2 to 7.7]), mianserine (ROR=2.7, 95% CI [2.0 to 3.7]) and tianeptine (ROR=6.1, 95% CI [4.7 to 7.9]). CONCLUSION: This study suggests to stay alert to electrolyte disorders when using all antidepressants, not only serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

[Gastric acid rebound after a proton pump inhibitor: Narrative review of literature]. / Le rebond d'acidité gastrique après arrêt d'un inhibiteur de la pompe à protons : revue narrative de littérature.

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of the first proton pump inhibitor (PPI) 20 years ago, studies have examined the presence of a rebound effect when this treatment is discontinued. These studies are heterogeneous and contradictory: the last literature review on the rebound in gastric acidity dates from 2006 and did not allow to conclude on the subject. Our objective was to carry out an up-to-date literature review on the existence and characteristics of this gastric acid rebound at the end of PPIs. METHODS: We conducted a review of the literature on the gastric acid rebound, without excluding the design of the studies. The Medline® databases (PubMed), ISI (Web Of Science) and Google Scholar were queried using the following equation: ("inhibitor proton pump" OR omeprazole OR esomeprazole OR lansoprazole OR pantoprazole OR rabeprazole) AND "rebound" AND "Acid hypersecretion". Only studies with a measure (whatever it was) before and after treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 131 publications identified, 10 were selected. The design of the studies was very heterogeneous. Five studies concluded a rebound effect. Studies with a treatment duration of less than 4 weeks did not demonstrate a rebound effect. The colonization with Helicobacter pylori masked the appearance of the rebound. CONCLUSION: Daily PPI exposure for more than 4 weeks is likely to trigger a rebound of acid hypersecretion about 15 days after discontinuation, and lasting from a few days to several weeks depending on the duration of the exposure.