RESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aimed to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of cancer patients with COVID-19, exploring factors associated with adverse outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study methodically extracted and curated data from electronic medical records (EMRs) of numerous healthcare institutions on cancer patients diagnosed with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection between May 2020 and August 2021, to identify risk factors linked to extended hospitalization and mortality. The retrieved information encompassed the patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, including the incidence of prolonged hospitalization, acute complications, and COVID-19-related mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1446 cancer patients with COVID-19 were identified (mean [Standard deviation] age, 59.2 [14.3] years). Most patients were female (913 [63.1%]), non-white (646 [44.7%]), with non-metastatic (818 [56.6%]) solid tumors (1318 [91.1%]), and undergoing chemotherapy (647 [44.7%]). The rate of extended hospitalization due to COVID-19 was 46% (n = 665), which was significantly impacted by age (p = 0.012), sex (p = 0.003), race and ethnicity (p = 0.049), the presence of two or more comorbidities (p = 0.006), hematologic malignancies (p = 0.013), metastatic disease (p = 0.002), and a performance status ≥ 2 (p = 0.001). The COVID-19-related mortality rate was 18.9% (n = 273), and metastatic disease (<0.001), performance status ≥2 (<0.001), extended hospitalization (p = 0.028), renal failure (p = 0.029), respiratory failure (p < 0.001), sepsis (p = 0.004), and shock (p = 0.040) significantly and negatively influenced survival. CONCLUSION: The rate of extended hospitalization and COVID-19-specific death in cancer patients was notably high and could be influenced by comorbidities, cancer treatment status, and clinical fragility. These observations may aid in developing risk counseling strategies regarding COVID-19 in individuals diagnosed with cancer.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , COVID-19/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos Retrospectivos , Brasil/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , HospitalizaçãoRESUMO
JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A vasculite urticariforme (VU) corresponde entre 5% a 10% das urticárias crônicas, devendo-se distinguir suas lesões daquelas da urticária crônica idiopática, que é a forma mais comum. Apesar de comumente ser de origem idiopática, pode ocorrer em associação com doenças autoimunes, reação a drogas, infecções ou malignidade, podendo ocorrer de forma sistêmica ou limitada à pele. O diagnóstico de VU deve ser considerado na presença de urticária persistente com achados clínicos e sorológicos sugestivos, ou evidência de doença sistêmica. O objetivo deste estudo foi mostrar um caso raro de acometimento renal da forma normocomplementêmica da vasculite urticariforme. RELATO DO CASO: Paciente do sexo masculino, 38 anos, previamente hígido, que apresentava lesões papulares eritêmato-violáceas extensas. Exames laboratoriais iniciais não apresentavam alterações significativas; exame qualitativo de urina demonstrava alteração progressiva da função renal e níveis nefróticos de proteinúria. A imunofluorescência renal foi negativa. Sorologias foram todas negativas e exames imunológicos não reagentes. Dosagemde complemento sérico (C3 e C4) foi normal. Realizou-se pulsoterapia com corticoide endovenoso e seguimento com corticoide oral, obtendo-se boa resposta clínica. A lesão cutânea apresentou regressão espontânea sem o uso de medicação tópica. CONCLUSÃO: O diagnóstico da doença sistêmica a partir de uma alteração cutânea salienta a importância da investigação adicional das lesões vasculares de pele.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Urticarial vasculitis (UV) corresponds between 5% to 10% of chronic urticaria, and their lesions must be distinguished from those of chronic idiopathic urticaria, which is more common. Although commonly idiopathic, it may occur associated with autoimmune diseases, drug reactions, infections or malignancy, which may occur in asystemic presentation or limited to the skin. The diagnosis of UV should be considered in the presence of persistent urticaria with suggestive clinical and serologic findings, or evidence of systemic disease. The case report illustrates a rare renal complication of the normocomplementemic form of urtical vasculitis. CASE REPORT: Male patient, 38 years, previously healthy, who presented extensive erythematous-violaceous papules. Initial laboratory tests showed no significant changes, qualitative urine test showed progressive impairment of renal function and levels of nephrotic proteinuria. Renal immunofluorescence was negative. Serology and immunological tests were all negative. Dosage of serum complement (C3 and C4) was normal. We performed intravenous steroid pulse therapy and follow up with oral steroids,obtaining good clinical response. The skin lesions regressed spontaneously without the use of topical medication. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of systemic disease from a skin change emphasizes the importance of further investigation of cutaneous vascular lesions.