Outcomes of bacteremia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa with reduced susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam: implications on the appropriateness of the resistance breakpoint.

BACKGROUND: Bacteremia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa is associated with grave clinical outcomes. Recent studies have emphasized the importance of appropriate empirical therapy, but controversy arises when piperacillin-tazobactam is used against isolates with reduced susceptibility. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of pseudomonal bacteremia from 2002 to 2006. Patients were identified by the microbiology laboratory database, and pertinent clinical data (demographic characteristics, baseline Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II scores, source of bacteremia, and therapy) were retrieved from the electronic medical records. All patients received appropriate empirical therapy within 24 h of positive culture results. Patients receiving piperacillin-tazobactam were compared with those receiving other agents (control subjects). The primary outcome was 30-day mortality from the first day of bacteremia. RESULTS: A total of 34 bacteremia episodes were identified involving isolates with reduced susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam (minimum inhibitory concentration, 32 or 64 mg/L, reported as susceptible); piperacillin-tazobactam was empirically given in 7 episodes. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups. Thirty-day mortality was found to be 85.7% in the piperacillin-tazobactam group and 22.2% in the control group (P = .004). Time to hospital mortality was also found to be shorter in the piperacillin-tazobactam group (P < .001). In the multivariate analysis, 30-day mortality was found to be associated with empirical piperacillin-tazobactam therapy (odds ratio, 220.5; 95% confidence interval, 3.8-12707.4; P = .009), after adjustment for differences in age and APACHE II score. CONCLUSIONS: In P. aeruginosa bacteremia due to isolates with reduced piperacillin-tazobactam susceptibility, empirical piperacillin-tazobactam therapy was associated with increased mortality. Additional studies are warranted to examine the appropriateness of the current Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute resistance breakpoint of piperacillin-tazobactam.

An integrated pharmacoeconomic approach to antimicrobial formulary decision-making.

PURPOSE: The utility of a novel interdisciplinary approach to antimicrobial formulary decision-making was studied. METHODS: Pseudomonas aeruginosa minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distribution data for cefepime and ceftazidime were retrieved from nonrepeat isolates obtained from November 2002 to October 2003. Unbound drug exposures were simulated for 5000 patients using the Monte Carlo method. Weighted target attainment rates (TARs) were calculated for cefepime and ceftazidime 1 g every 8 hours and 1 g every 12 hours (infused over 0.5, 2, and 4 hours), using three representative pharmacodynamic targets (percentage of time above the MIC of 67%, 100%, and 400%). RESULTS: MIC data for 1230 nonrepeat P. aeruginosa were analyzed. The MIC at which 90% of the P. aeruginosa isolates were inhibited was 16 and 32 mg/L for cefepime and ceftazidime, respectively. Drug acquisition cost was the highest with cefepime 1 g given every 8 hours (37.56 dollars/day), followed by cefepime 1 g every 12 hours (25.04 dollars/day) and ceftazidime 1 g every 8 hours (22.26 dollars/day). When infused over 0.5 hour, the highest TAR was achieved with cefepime 1 g every 8 hours (82%), followed by ceftazidime 1 g every 8 hours (77%) and cefepime 1 g every 12 hours (66%); ceftazidime 1 g every 8 hours was 70% more cost-effective than cefepime 1 g every 8 hours. Cefepime 1 g every 12 hours, infused over 4 hours, increased the TAR to 89% and was similar in cost-effectiveness to ceftazidime 1 g every 8 hours infused over 0.5 hour. CONCLUSION: An integrated pharmacoeconomic approach to antimicrobial formulary decision-making addressed local resistance patterns, population pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, dosing regimens, and drug acquisition costs. This method appeared to be more realistic and objective than the conventional approach of considering only drug acquisition costs, especially for agents in a similar structural or functional class.