Do bariatric patient's in rural areas achieve comparative weight loss as national average? single center experience in appalachia west virginia.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is one of the leading public health concerns with over half a million Americans being classified as obese and almost two billion classified as overweight. This has an impact on overall health of the individual, with increased comorbidities and premature death, as well as increased economic cost. This study evaluates the weight loss of patients with limited societal support and resources cared for at a single bariatric center of excellence, The Center for Surgical Weight Control, in Cabell County, West Virginia. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients that have undergone either a Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (VSG) or a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RNYGB) between the years of 2017 and 2018 At the Center for Surgical Weight Control. Weight loss was evaluated at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. RESULTS: There were 290 patients between 2017 and 2018. On average, the VSG group lost 46% of excess body weight (EBW) at 6 months, 57% of EBW at 1 year, and 61% of EBW at 2 years. In the RNYGB group patients lost on average 54% of EBW at 6 months, 65% of EBW at 1 year, and 88% of EBW at 2 years. DISCUSSION: A loss of 5-15% of EBW can improve obesity-related comorbidities. These comorbidities include diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and obstructive sleep apnea. Improvement in these comorbidities not only benefits each patient individually, but will also help improve the effects on society as a whole. CONCLUSION: Obesity is a debilitating and deadly disease, thus makes it very important to address in order to reduce burden on both patients and society as a whole. There is an expected amount of weight loss a patient should have depending on the type of surgery they undergo. Our patients were successful at meeting and exceeding the expected percentage of EBW loss after both VSG and RNYGB.

Case logging habits among general surgery residents are discordant and inconsistent.

BACKGROUND: General surgery residents log operative case experience as "first assist" (FA) or "primary surgeon" (PS). This study will evaluate their quantitative and qualitative case log practices. METHODS: Modified Delphi technique was used to create a questionnaire and distributed online to institutions via the APDS. Descriptive analyses and example operative scenarios for resident case logging habits were ascertained. RESULTS: There were 363 residents from university (60%) and non-university (40%) programs; 94% did not know the definition of primary surgeon. Over 50% stated they had been encouraged to log a case as surgeon that they did not feel was warranted. Only 4% felt the current logging system is "very accurate." Given an operative scenario, residents varied how they chose to log the case. CONCLUSION: General surgery residents do not know the current definition of PS. Case logging should be an objective measure of resident operative exposure, but may actually be more complex than previously recognized.