RESUMO
Fluid management in obstetrical care is crucial because of the complex physiological conditions of pregnancy, which complicate clinical manifestations and fluid balance management. This expert review examined the use of point-of-care ultrasound to evaluate and monitor the response to fluid therapy in pregnant patients. Pregnancy induces substantial physiological changes, including increased cardiac output and glomerular filtration rate, decreased systemic vascular resistance, and decreased plasma oncotic pressure. Conditions, such as preeclampsia, further complicate fluid management because of decreased intravascular volume and increased capillary permeability. Traditional methods for assessing fluid volume status, such as physical examination and invasive monitoring, are often unreliable or inappropriate. Point-of-care ultrasound provides a noninvasive, rapid, and reliable means to assess fluid responsiveness, which is essential for managing fluid therapy in pregnant patients. This review details the various point-of-care ultrasound modalities used to measure dynamic changes in fluid status, focusing on the evaluation of the inferior vena cava, lung ultrasound, and left ventricular outflow tract. Inferior vena cava ultrasound in spontaneously breathing patients determines diameter variability, predicts fluid responsiveness, and is feasible even late in pregnancy. Lung ultrasound is crucial for detecting early signs of pulmonary edema before clinical symptoms arise and is more accurate than traditional radiography. The left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral assesses stroke volume response to fluid challenges, providing a quantifiable measure of cardiac function, which is particularly beneficial in critical care settings where rapid and accurate fluid management is essential. This expert review synthesizes current evidence and practice guidelines, suggesting the integration of point-of-care ultrasound as a fundamental aspect of fluid management in obstetrics. It calls for ongoing research to enhance techniques and validate their use in broader clinical settings, aiming to improve outcomes for pregnant patients and their babies by preventing complications associated with both under- and overresuscitation.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To Determine whether maternal body mass index (BMI) can affect the accuracy of sonographic estimation of fetal weight (EFW) in the third trimester when compared to neonatal birthweight (BW). METHODS: Secondary analysis from our original prospective cohort of pregnant women beyond 34 weeks, distributed in 4 groups according to their BMI: normal, overweight, obese and morbid obese. Fetal biometry and fluid measurements were obtained by two experienced sonographers, blinded for patient's clinical information and to each other's measurements. Average EFW and neonatal BW were converted into gestational-specific Z-scores. Interobserver correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's reliability coefficient (CRC) were calculated. Bland-Altman (BA) plots were constructed to assess the level of accuracy. RESULTS: 100 women were enrolled (800 measurements obtained by 17 sonographers): 17 had normal BMI (17%), 27 were overweight (27%), 29 were obese (29%) and 27 were morbidly obese (27%). There was no statistical difference for GA at delivery (p = 0.74), EFW (p = 0.05) or BW (p = 0.09) between groups (Table 1). Mean Z-score for EFW was - 0.17 (SD 0.81) and for neonatal BW was - 0.25 (SD 0.74). ICC was 0.69 (95% CI 0.57, 0.78) and CRC was 0.82. Mean Z-score difference was small (Table 2). When stratifying according to BMI categories, the ICC ranged from 0.49 to 0.76. Reliability indices ranged from 0.66 to 0.86. The Z-scores' differences were overall small with no statistical difference (Table 3). BA showed evenly distributed interobserver differences (Fig. 1). CONCLUSIONS: When performed by trained sonographers, fetal weight estimation in the third trimester is accurate when compared to neonatal birthweight at increasing BMI categories.