Borderline Ovarian Tumors: Fifteen Years' Experience at a Scottish Tertiary Cancer Center.

OBJECTIVES: Since the recognition of borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) in the 1970s, the management of this subset of epithelial ovarian tumors has presented a challenge to clinicians. The majority present at an early stage, but their diagnosis is often only made following surgery, hence the heterogeneity of surgical management. Borderline ovarian tumors are morphologically diverse, and their behavior is subsequently also heterogeneous. We aimed to assess recurrence rates and the rate of malignant transformation in patients diagnosed with BOT. Secondary objectives included a review of current management and assessment of tumor markers, stage, cyst dimensions, and the presence of micropapillary features as prognostic indicators of recurrence. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients treated with BOT between 2000 and 2015 in the southeast region of Scotland. Clinical, surgicopathological, and follow-up data were collated. Data were analyzed with reference to recurrence and malignant transformation. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-five patients underwent treatment for BOT in the study period. Surgical management was highly variable. A diagnosis of recurrent/persistent BOT or ovarian malignancy following initial treatment of BOT was rare, with only 12 (4%) of 275 cases. There were 7 cases (3%) of ovarian malignancy. Advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage was the most prominent prognostic factor. Elevated preoperative serum CA-125 and the presence of micropapillary features correlated with advanced stage at presentation. With a lack of clear guidance, follow-up was highly variable with a median of 43 months (0-136 months). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this study is the largest BOT cohort in the United Kingdom. Recurrent disease is rare in optimally staged, completely resected, early-stage BOT, without high-risk features. Caution is needed in women electing not to undergo completion staging after diagnosis and in those opting for a fertility-preserving approach. Thorough informed consent and clear plans for surveillance and follow-up are needed with consideration of delayed completion surgery as appropriate.

Vulval squamous cell cancer - does precursor lesion margin status affect recurrence-free survival after optimal surgical resection for early-stage disease?

OBJECTIVES: Vulval cancer accounts for around 4% of all gynaecological malignancies and most tumours ( > 90%) are of a squamous cell histotype. Most lesions arise on a background of differentiated VIN (dVIN) or lichen sclerosus (LS). Surgical treatment has undergone a paradigm shift with less radical surgery being attempted to preserve vulval structure and function, without compromising oncological outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this single site retrospective analysis, we consider the data from a tertiary oncology unit, to assess progression-free survival based on the presence of a precursor lesion at the margin of resection.123 patients with FIGO stage 1 vulvar SCC (n = 33 1A, n = 90 1B) were included. RESULTS: One Hundred Five patients (85%) had an associated precursor lesion (dVIN and/or LS). Within the follow-up period, 33 patients (26.8%) had invasive recurrence, of which 24 (72.7%) had surgical resection margins which were positive for a precursor lesion. In patients with an acceptable microscopically clear invasive resection margin of > 2 mm the presence of a precursor lesion at the margin conveyed a higher risk of malignant recurrence when compared to those with completely clear margins (HR = 2.42; 95% CI 1.14-5.16). CONCLUSIONS: This study adds to the available literature emphasising the clinical significance of dVIN or LS at the surgical margin of optimally resected disease. In those who have marginal involvement of a precancerous lesion, increased surveillance should be considered. Future work should explore the need for additional adjuvant therapy in this cohort.

Ovarian carcinosarcoma is highly aggressive compared to other ovarian cancer histotypes.

Background: Ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS) is an unusual ovarian cancer type characterized by distinct carcinomatous and sarcomatous components. OCS has been excluded from many of the pan-histotype studies of ovarian carcinoma, limiting our understanding of its behavior. Methods: We performed a multi-cohort cross-sectional study of characteristics and outcomes in ovarian cancer patients from Scotland (n=2082) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program (SEER, n=44946) diagnosed with OCS or one of the other major histotypes: high grade serous (HGSOC), endometrioid (EnOC), clear cell (CCOC), mucinous (MOC) or low grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC). Differences in overall survival were quantified using Cox regression models to calculate hazard ratios (HR). Results: Across both cohorts, OCS patients were significantly older at diagnosis compared to all other histotypes (median age at diagnosis 69 and 67 in Scottish and SEER cohorts) and demonstrated the shortest survival time upon univariable analysis. Within the Scottish cohort, 59.3% and 16.9% of OCS patients presented with FIGO stage III and IV disease, respectively; this was significantly higher than in EnOC, CCOC or MOC (P<0.0001 for all), but lower than in HGSOC (P=0.004). Multivariable analysis accounting for other prognostic factors identified OCS as independently associated with significantly shorter survival time compared to HGSOC, EnOC, LGSOC and MOC in both the Scottish (multivariable HR vs OCS: HGSOC 0.45, EnOC 0.39, LGSOC 0.26, MOC 0.43) and SEER cohorts (multivariable HR vs OCS: HGSOC 0.59, EnOC 0.34, LGSOC 0.30, MOC 0.81). Within the SEER cohort, OCS also demonstrated shorter survival compared to CCOC (multivariable HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.58-0.68), but this was not replicated within the Scottish cohort (multivariable HR for CCOC: 1.05, 95% CI 0.74-1.51). Within early-stage disease specifically (FIGO I-II or SEER localized stage), OCS was associated with the poorest survival of all histotypes across both cohorts. In the context of late-stage disease (FIGO III-IV or SEER distant stage), OCS, MOC and CCOC represented the histotypes with poorest survival. Conclusion: OCS is a unique ovarian cancer type that affects older women and is associated with exceptionally poor outcome, even when diagnosed at earlier stage. New therapeutic options are urgently required to improve outcomes.