Validation and Modification of a Severity of Illness Score for Children With Acute Hematogenous Osteomyelitis.

BACKGROUND: Children with osteomyelitis demonstrate a wide spectrum of illness. Objective measurement of severity is important to guide resource allocation and treatment decisions, particularly for children with advanced illness. The purpose of this study is to validate and improve a previously published severity of illness scoring system for children with acute hematogenous osteomyelitis (AHO). METHODS: Children with AHO were prospectively studied during evaluation and treatment by a multidisciplinary team who provided care according to evidence-based guidelines to reduce variation. A severity of illness score was calculated for each child and correlated with surrogate measures of severity. Univariate analysis was used to assess the significance of each parameter within the scoring model along with new parameters, which were evaluated to improve the model. The scoring system was then modified by the addition of band count to replace respiratory rate. The modified score was calculated and applied to the prospective cohort followed by correlation with the surrogate measures of severity. RESULTS: One hundred forty-eight children with AHO were consecutively studied. The original severity of illness score correlated well with length of stay and other established measures of severity. Band percent of the white blood cell differential ≥1.5% was found to be significantly associated with severity and chosen to replace respiratory rate in the model. The modified calculated severity scores correlated well with the chosen surrogate measures and significantly differentiated children with osteomyelitis on the basis of causative organism, length of stay, intensive care, surgeries, bacteremia, and disseminated or multifocal disease. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study validate the previously published severity of illness scoring tool in large cohort of children who were prospectively evaluated. The replacement of respiratory rate with band count improved the scoring system.

Two Techniques for Retrograde Flexible Intramedullary Fixation of Pediatric Femur Fractures: All-Lateral Entry Versus Medial and Lateral Entry Point.

BACKGROUND: Multiple techniques for flexible intramedullary nailing (FIMN) of pediatric femur fractures have been described. To our knowledge, no study has compared combined medial-lateral (ML) entry versus all-lateral (AL) entry retrograde nailing. This study compares surgical outcomes, radiographic outcomes, and complication rates between these 2 techniques. METHODS: A retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients treated by retrograde, dual FIMN of femur fractures was performed from 2005 to 2012. Demographics and operative data were recorded. Radiographs were analyzed for fracture pattern, fracture location, percent canal fill by the nails, as well as shortening and angulation at the time of osseous union. Rates of symptomatic implants and their removal were noted. Data were compared between patients treated with medial and lateral entry (ML group) nailing and those treated with all-lateral entry (AL group) nailing using the Student t test and correlation statistics. RESULTS: Of the 244 children with femoral shaft fractures treated with retrograde FIMN using Ender stainless steel nails, 156 were in the ML group and 88 were in the AL group. There were no statistical differences in sex (74% vs. 82% males), age (8.0 vs. 8.6 y), weight (29.4 vs. 31.1 kg), or fracture pattern between the 2 groups. The average total anesthesia time was less in the AL group (133 vs. 103 min) (P<0.0001). There was no difference between the techniques in shortening (3.9 vs. 3.0 mm), coronal angulation (2.9 vs. 2.6 degrees), or sagittal angulation (3.3 vs. 2.7 degrees) at union. In the AL group, there was a correlation between canal fill and reduced shortening at union. No differences were found in the presence or degree of varus alignment, procurvatum deformity, or recurvatum angulation between the constructs. There were 5 malunions in the AL group and 9 malunions in the ML group (5.7% vs. 5.8%, P=1). The incidence of having a healed femur fracture with >10 degrees of valgus was higher in the AL group (0% vs. 3.4%) (P=0.04). There were no differences between the groups in the rate of symptomatic implant removal or surgical complications. CONCLUSIONS: The AL entry technique for FIMN of pediatric femur fractures is 30 minutes faster without worse final fracture alignment, additional complications, or increased rates of symptomatic implants. When using the AL technique, specific attention should be paid to percentage of canal fill and ensuring that the fracture is not reduced in a valgus position. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-therapeutic.

Determining pediatric hypertension criteria: concordance between observed physician methods and guideline-recommended methods.

OBJECTIVE: To determine and evaluate the accuracy of methods physicians use to detect diagnostic criteria for pediatric hypertension [hypertensive blood pressures (BPs) on three or more occasions] in electronic health records (EHRs). METHODS: Methods used by pediatric-trained physicians (n = 12) to detect diagnostic criteria for hypertension in a simulation using a child's EHR data were directly observed, timed, and evaluated for accuracy. All physicians were given the same information regarding diagnostic criteria to eliminate knowledge gaps. Then, computer modeling and EHR data from 41 654 3-18-year-olds were used to simulate and compare the accuracy of detecting hypertension criteria using an observed-shorthand method vs. the guideline-recommended/gold-standard method. RESULTS: No physician used the guideline-recommended method of determining multiple time-of-care hypertension thresholds for child age/height at the time of each BP measure. One physician estimated the child's BP diagnosis without computing thresholds; 11 of 12 physicians determined the child's hypertension threshold from age/height data at the time of a current visit and applied/imputed this threshold to BP measured at all visits (current-visit threshold used to assess historical-visit BPs) to detect three separate BP elevations. Physicians took 2.3 min (95% confidence interval, 1.5-3.0) to declare a diagnosis. Sensitivity was 83.1% when applying the current-visit threshold to detect the guideline-recommended-BP-threshold diagnosis using EHR data. Specificity and positive-predictive/negative-predictive values ranged from 98.5 to 99.9%. CONCLUSION: Physicians applied a shorthand method to evaluate pediatric BPs. Computer-simulated comparison of the shorthand and guideline methods using clinical data suggest the shorthand method could yield an inaccurate impression of a child's BP history in 17% of pediatric ambulatory visits.

A proposed scoring system for assessment of severity of illness in pediatric acute hematogenous osteomyelitis using objective clinical and laboratory findings.

BACKGROUND: Severity of illness in children with acute hematogenous osteomyelitis (AHO) is variable, ranging from mild, requiring short-duration antibiotic therapy without surgery, to severe, requiring intensive care, multiple surgeries and prolonged hospitalization. This study evaluates severity of illness among children with AHO using clinical and laboratory findings. METHODS: Fifty-six children with AHO, consecutively treated in 2009, were retrospectively studied. Objective clinical, radiographic and laboratory parameters related to severity of illness were gathered for each child. A physician panel was assembled to rank order objective clinical parameters, review clinical data and classify each child as mild, moderate or severe. Statistically significant parameters correlated with length of hospitalization were utilized to devise a severity of illness score and applied to the cohort of children for internal validation. RESULTS: The physician panel had perfect or substantial agreement regarding 7 parameters (ICU admission, intubation, pulmonary involvement, venous thrombosis, multifocal infection, surgeries and febrile days on antibiotics). Parameters that significantly correlated with total length of stay included: C-reactive protein values at admission (P < 0.0001), 48 hours (P < 0.0001) and 96 hours (P < 0.0002); febrile days on antibiotics (P < 0.0001); admission respiratory rate (P = 0.023) and evidence of disseminated disease (P = 0.016). A scoring system, derived from selected parameters, significantly differentiated children with AHO on the basis of causative organism, intensive care admission, surgeries, length of hospitalization, complications and physician panel assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Severity of illness score for AHO, derived from preliminary clinical and laboratory findings, is useful stratifying children with this disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II.