Questions about COVID-19 associated coagulopathy: possible answers from the viscoelastic tests.

Abnormal coagulation parameters are often observed in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the severity of derangement has been associated with a poor prognosis. The COVID-19 associated coagulopathy (CAC) displays unique features that include a high risk of developing thromboembolic complications. Viscoelastic tests (VETs), such as thromboelastometry (ROTEM), thromboelastography (TEG) and Quantra Hemostasis Analyzer (Quantra), provide "dynamic" data on clot formation and dissolution; they are used in different critical care settings, both in hemorrhagic and in thrombotic conditions. In patients with severe COVID-19 infection VETs can supply to clinicians more information about the CAC, identifying the presence of hypercoagulable and hypofibrinolysis states. In the last year, many studies have proposed to explain the underlying characteristics of CAC; however, there remain many unanswered questions. We tried to address some of the important queries about CAC through VETs analysis.

Antiphospholipid antibodies in critically ill COVID-19 patients with thromboembolism: cause of disease or epiphenomenon?

Coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) is associated with coagulation dysfunction that predisposes patients to an increased risk for both arterial (ATE) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) and consequent poor prognosis; in particular, the incidence of ATE and VTE in critically ill COVID-19 patients can reach 5% and 31%, respectively. The mechanism of thrombosis in COVID-19 patients is complex and still not completely clear. Recent literature suggests a link between the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) and thromboembolism in COVID-19 patients. However, it remains uncertain whether aPLs are an epiphenomenon or are involved in the pathogenesis of the disease.

Evaluation of coagulation function by rotation thromboelastometry in critically ill patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia.

Critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia suffered both high thrombotic and bleeding risk. The effect of SARS-CoV-2 on coagulation and fibrinolysis is not well known. We conducted a retrospective study of critically ill patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) a cause of severe COVID-19 pneumonia and we evaluated coagulation function using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) on day of admission (T0) and 5 (T5) and 10 (T10) days after admission to ICU. Coagulation standard parameters were also evaluated. Forty patients were enrolled into the study. The ICU and the hospital mortality were 10% and 12.5%, respectively. On ICU admission, prothrombin time was slightly reduced and it increased significantly at T10 (T0 = 65.1 ± 9.8 vs T10 = 85.7 ± 1.5, p = 0.002), while activated partial thromboplastin time and fibrinogen values were higher at T0 than T10 (32.2 ± 2.9 vs 27.2 ± 2.1, p = 0.017 and 895.1 ± 110 vs 332.5 ± 50, p = 0.002, respectively); moreover, whole blood thromboelastometry profiles were consistent with hypercoagulability characterized by an acceleration of the propagation phase of blood clot formation [i.e., CFT below the lower limit in INTEM 16/40 patients (40%) and EXTEM 20/40 patients (50%)] and significant higher clot strength [MCF above the upper limit in INTEM 20/40 patients (50%), in EXTEM 28/40 patients (70%) and in FIBTEM 29/40 patients (72.5%)]; however, this hypercoagulable state persists in the first five days, but it decreases ten day after, without returning to normal values. No sign of secondary hyperfibrinolysis or sepsis induced coagulopathy (SIC) were found during the study period. In six patients (15%) a deep vein thrombosis and in 2 patients (5%) a thromboembolic event, were found; 12 patients (30%) had a catheter-related thrombosis. ROTEM analysis confirms that patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia had a hypercoagulation state that persisted over time.

The influence of interscalene block technique on adverse hemodynamic events.

PURPOSE: A hemodynamic event such as hypertension after interscalene block (ISB) is a complication that is often overlooked. The irregular spread of local anesthetic would cause a blockade of carotid sinus baroreceptors leading to the adverse event. The purpose of the present study is to compare ultrasound and neurostimulation technique in preventing hypertension after ISB. METHODS: Thirty patients without hypertension history who underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery for a rotator cuff tear were enrolled. After preoperative administration of the State Trait Anxiety Inventory questionnaire, patients were allocated to receive ultrasound-guided ISB with 20 ml levobupivacaine-HCl 0.5 % (group US) and 40 ml levobupivacaine-HCl 0.5 % with neurostimulation (group NS). The need for antihypertensive drug was recorded. Block onset sensory and motor times were assessed. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and heart rate and pulse oximetry (SpO2), were evaluated before the block as well as 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min after. RESULTS: No differences in patient characteristics and anxiety were found in the two groups. Block onset times were similar. At 15 min after block placement, group NS showed significantly higher systolic and diastolic blood pressures compared to group US. No differences in heart rate and SpO2 were found between the two groups. Three patients of group NS required urapidil administration because of hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided ISB permits the use of a low volume of local anesthetic and seems to reduce the incidence of hypertension.

The clinical impact of pectoral nerve block in an 'enhanced recovery after surgery' program in breast surgery.

Background: Pectoral nerve block (PECS) is increasingly performed in breast surgery. Aim: The study evaluated the clinical impact of these blocks in the postoperative course. Patients & methods: In this case-control study, patients undergoing breast surgery with 'enhanced recovery after surgery' pathways were divided into group 1 (57 patients) in whom PECS was performed before general anesthesia, and group 2 (57 patients) in whom only general anesthesia was effected. Results: Postoperative opioid consumption (p < 0.002), pain at 32 h after surgery (p < 0.005) and the length of stay (p < 0.003) were significantly lower in group 1. Conclusion: Reducing opioid consumption and pain after surgery, PECS could favor a faster recovery with a reduction in length of stay, ensuring a higher turnover of patients undergoing breast surgery.

'Enhanced recovery after surgery' (ERAS) protocols have been recently applied in breast cancer patients in order to improve the postoperative course. However, the incidence of moderate to severe pain after breast surgery is frequent, and a multimodal approach is recommended. In this view, the interfascial plane blocks are advocated as a valid alternative to both paravertebral and epidural blockade. In this study, we evaluated the effects of these blocks on the postoperative course in patients undergoing breast surgery with ERAS protocols. We compared two patient groups: in the first, pectoral blocks were performed before general anesthesia, while in the second no block was carried out. We found that in the patient group receiving the blocks, postoperative opioid consumption (with essentially the same pain after surgery) and length of stay were significantly lower. Therefore, although more robust studies are needed to confirm our findings, these emerging locoregional techniques could favor a faster recovery in the context of ERAS in breast surgery. These results could have important clinical implications in terms of not only reducing healthcare costs but also ensuring a higher turnover of patients undergoing breast surgery.

Combined pericapsular nerve group and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve blocks for hip fracture in a polytraumatized patient-A case report.

Locoregional anesthetic techniques in hip fracture are significant in order to control pain, reduce postoperative opioid use, and perioperative adverse events. Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block has been described and proved as an effective analgesic method for hip surgery as an alternative to other regional nerve blocks. The association of PENG and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LCFN) block can be performed to achieve skin and subcutaneous tissues analgesia or anesthesia. Direct anterior approach PENG block is considered a safe and effective anesthesia technique for total hip arthroplasty surgery. In this paper, we aim to describe a case report of a PENG and LFCN block successful association for anesthesia in a major trauma patient who undergone surgical percutaneous fixation of femoral neck fracture.

"In Less than No Time": Feasibility of Rotational Thromboelastometry to Detect Anticoagulant Drugs Activity and to Guide Reversal Therapy.

Anticoagulant drugs (i.e., unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparins, vitamin K antagonists, and direct oral anticoagulants) are widely employed in preventing and treating venous thromboembolism (VTE), in preventing arterial thromboembolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), and in treating acute coronary diseases early. In certain situations, such as bleeding, urgent invasive procedures, and surgical settings, the evaluation of anticoagulant levels and the monitoring of reversal therapy appear essential. Standard coagulation tests (i.e., activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and prothrombin time (PT)) can be normal, and the turnaround time can be long. While the role of viscoelastic hemostatic assays (VHAs), such as rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), has successfully increased over the years in the management of bleeding and thrombotic complications, its usefulness in detecting anticoagulants and their reversal still appears unclear.

Derangement of the coagulation process using subclinical markers and viscoelastic measurements in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia and non-coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia.

Systemic coagulation abnormalities including clotting activation and inhibition of anticoagulant factors have been observed in patients with pneumonia. In severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) the alteration of coagulation parameters was associated with poor prognosis. We evaluated the difference in coagulopathy between critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (COVID group) and non-COVID-19 pneumonia (non-COVID group), using traditional coagulation markers and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM). Standard laboratory and ROTEM parameters were evaluated in 45 patients (20 COVID group patients and 25 non-COVID group patients) at time of admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (T0) and at 5 (T5) and 10 days (T10) later. In all evaluations times, platelet count was found higher in COVID group rather than in non-COVID group. At T0, COVID group revealed a fibrinogen value greater than non-COVID group. d-Dimer values were high in both groups and they were not statistically different. At T0 COVID group showed a significant reduction of clot formation time in INTEM and in EXTEM and a significant increase of maximum clot firmness in INTEM, EXTEM and FIBTEM respect to non-COVID group. Moreover, COVID group demonstrated a coagulability state with ROTEM profiles higher than non-COVID group at T5 and T10. Coagulation profiles showed that critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia are characterized by a higher coagulable state than others; this greater procoagulative state persists over time.

Venous thromboembolism and bleeding in critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with higher than standard low molecular weight heparin doses and aspirin: A call to action.

BACKGROUND: Critically ill COVID-19 patients have a clear pattern of inflammation and hypercoagulable state. The main aim of the study was to evaluate the outcome of severe COVID-19 patients basing on prothrombotic risk factors (i.e. D-dimer). We also evaluated the impact of different doses of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) on the incidence of bleedings. METHODS: The data of forty-two patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) were retrospectively analyzed. On ICU admission, patients with D-dimer < 3000 ng/mL (Group 1) received enoxaparin 4000 UI (6000 UI, if body mass index >35) subcutaneously b.i.d. and patients with D-dimer ≥ 3000 ng/mL (Group 2) received enoxaparin 100 UI/kg every 12 h. Aspirin was administered to all patients once a day. RESULTS: Both groups presented a high incidence of perivascular thrombosis (40.9% in Group 1 and 30% in Group 2). Patients of Group 2 suffered a higher incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) than Group 1 (65% vs 13.6%, p = 0.001). One patient (4.5%) of Group 1 and three patients (15%) of Group 2 suffered from minor bleeding; no patient had major bleeding. Group 2 had a longer ICU and hospital stay than Group 1 (11.5 ±â€¯5.6 vs 9.0 ±â€¯4.8 and 30 ±â€¯4.9 vs 21 ±â€¯2.3, p < 0.05, respectively) as well as increased ICU mortality (25% vs 9.1%). CONCLUSIONS: More severe critically ill COVID-19 patients have a high incidence of VTE and worse outcome, despite the use of heparin at the therapeutic dose. However, the use of heparin did not increase the incidence of bleeding complications.

Bilateral pneumothorax after general anesthesia in patient with pleomorphic sarcoma of soft tissue.

The occurrence of a pneumothorax using supraglottic device is a rare complication during general anesthesia. Moreover, less than 2% of pneumothoraxes can be related to lung metastases, most due to soft tissue sarcoma. We present the case of a 45-year-old female diagnosed with metastatic sarcoma who developed a bilateral pneumothorax after general anesthesia with supraglottic device. Different causes of pneumothorax were discussed.

A new technique for regional anesthesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery based on a suprascapular nerve block and an axillary nerve block: an evaluation of the first results.

PURPOSE: We propose a new technique of regional anesthesia that combines suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) and axillary nerve block (ANB) in arthroscopic shoulder surgery. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic procedures for shoulder cuff diseases were included in the trial. SSNB was performed by introducing the stimulating needle approximately 2 cm medial to the medial border of the acromion and about 2 cm cranial to the superior margin of the scapular spine until supraspinatus or infraspinatus muscle contractions were elicited. Following negative aspiration, 15 mL of a mixture of 2% lidocaine (5 mL) and 0.5% levobupivacaine (10 mL) was injected. ANB was performed; a line was drawn between the lateral-posterior angle of the acromion and the olecranon tip of the elbow. The location was about 2 cm cranial to the convergence of this line with the perpendicular line from the axillary fold. The needle was introduced approximately 2 cm cranial to this crossing point to elicit deltoid muscle contractions, and another 15 mL of the same anesthetic mixture was injected. Five mL of the same mixture was injected into each portal of the arthroscopic area. During surgery, patients were sedated with the use of midazolam. General anesthesia was not performed. Acceptance of the technique was assessed through a postsurgical survey of those treated. RESULTS: No serious complications occurred. None of the patients required opiates, analgesics, or general anesthesia during the surgical procedure. Postoperative pain control, which was assessed using a visual analog scale, was effective during the observation time. The total demand for nonopiate analgesics during the first 24 postoperative hours was negligible. Patient satisfaction and comfort were satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: Combining SSNB and ANB is an effective and safe technique for intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia for certain procedures of shoulder arthroscopic surgery.

Recovery of laryngeal nerve function with sugammadex after rocuronium-induced profound neuromuscular block.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of sugammadex in reversing profound rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block at the laryngeal adductor muscles using motor-evoked potentials (mMEPs). DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SETTING: University surgical center. PATIENTS: Twenty patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class I-II status who underwent propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for the surgery of the thyroid gland. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were enrolled for reversal of profound neuromuscular block (sugammadex 16 mg/kg, 3 minutes after rocuronium 1.2 mg/kg). To prevent laryngeal nerve injury during the surgical procedures, all patients underwent neurophysiologic monitoring using mMEPs from vocal muscles. At the same time, the registration of TOF-Watch acceleromyograph at the adductor pollicis muscle response to ulnar nerve stimulation was performed; recovery was defined as a train-of-four (TOF) ratio ≥0.9. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: After injection of 16 mg/kg of sugammadex, the mean time to recovery of the basal mMEPs response at the laryngeal adductor muscles was 70 ± 18.2 seconds. The mean time to recovery of the TOF ratio to 0.9 was 118 ± 80 seconds. In the postoperative period, 12 patients received follow-up evaluation of the vocal cords and no lesions caused by the surface laryngeal electrode during electrophysiological monitoring were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Recovery from profound rocuronium-induced block on the larynx is fast and complete with sugammadex. In urgent scenarios, "early" extubation can be performed, even with a TOF ratio ≤0.9. However, all procedures to prevent postoperative residual curarization should still be immediately undertaken.

Blood Component Therapy and Coagulopathy in Trauma: A Systematic Review of the Literature from the Trauma Update Group.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic coagulopathy is thought to increase mortality and its treatment to reduce preventable deaths. However, there is still uncertainty in this field, and available literature results may have been overestimated. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE database using the PubMed platform. We formulated four queries investigating the prognostic weight of traumatic coagulopathy defined according to conventional laboratory testing, and the effectiveness in reducing mortality of three different treatments aimed at contrasting coagulopathy (high fresh frozen plasma/packed red blood cells ratios, fibrinogen, and tranexamic acid administration). Randomized controlled trials were selected along with observational studies that used a multivariable approach to adjust for confounding. Strict criteria were adopted for quality assessment based on a two-step approach. First, we rated quality of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Then, this rating was downgraded if other three criteria were not met: high reporting quality according to shared standards, absence of internal methodological and statistical issues not detailed by the GRADE system, and absence of external validity issues. RESULTS: With few exceptions, the GRADE rating, reporting and methodological quality of observational studies was "very low", with frequent external validity issues. The only two randomized trials retrieved were, instead, of high quality. Only weak evidence was found for a relation between coagulopathy and mortality. Very weak evidence was found supporting the use of fibrinogen administration to reduce mortality in trauma. On the other hand, we found high evidence that the use of 1:1 vs. 1:2 high fresh frozen plasma/packed red blood cells ratios failed to obtain a 12% mortality reduction. This does not exclude lower mortality rates, which have not been investigated. The use of tranexamic acid in trauma was supported by "high" quality evidence according to the GRADE classification but was downgraded to "moderate" for external validity issues. CONCLUSIONS: Tranexamic acid is effective in reducing mortality in trauma. The other transfusion practices we investigated have been inadequately studied in the literature, as well as the independent association between mortality and coagulopathy measured with traditional laboratory testing. Overall, in this field of research literature quality is poor.