Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography evaluation of vitreoretinal adhesions in idiopathic epiretinal membranes.

BACKGROUND: Vitreoretinal adhesions play a key role in the vector forces exerted on the vitreoretinal interface, leading to tractional retina deformation and macular hole formation. The aim of this study was to identify the presence of vitreopapillary and vitreofoveal adhesions in idiopathic epiretinal membranes (ERMs) with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and to evaluate their influence on the vitreoretinal interface. METHODS: Sixty-five eyes (65 patients) with idiopathic ERM and 64 healthy eyes (64 patients) underwent SD-OCT analysis. We studied vitreopapillary and vitreofoveal adhesion prevalence in eyes with idiopathic ERM using different SD-OCT patterns ("adherent" or "tractional"). We analyzed their influence on central foveal thickness (CFT), on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, and on morphological modifications (foveal depression profile and inner/outer photoreceptor junction). RESULTS: Vitreopapillary adhesion was present in 51.6 % of normal eyes and in 24.6 % of eyes with idiopathic ERM, while vitreofoveal adhesion was found in 14.1 % of normal eyes and in 15.4 % of eyes with ERM. Vitreopapillary adhesion prevalence was significantly higher in the tractional ERM subgroup (p = 0.01), than in the adherent ERM subgroup. Both adhesions had no influence on CFT, RNFL thickness, or inner segment/outer segment junction status. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that vitreoretinal adhesions may influence the pathogenesis and course of idiopathic ERM. The absence of vitreopapillary adhesion in the adherent type, and its presence in the tractional type, seems to play a key role in ERM characterization.

Vascularized retinal pigment epithelial detachment in age-related macular degeneration: treatment and RPE tear incidence.

BACKGROUND: To review vascularized-pigment epithelial detachment (V-PED) treatment visual outcome, and to assess acute retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) tear incidence. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two eyes of 125 consecutive patients with age-related macular degeneration and V-PED were included. Ninety-four eyes (71.2%) were associated with choroidal new vessels (CNV), 38 (28.8%) with retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP). Patients, treated over a 10-year period with the time-current therapy, received: verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) (group 1, 38 eyes), combined intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) and PDT (group 2, 44 eyes) or intravitreal anti-VEGF injection (bevacizumab or ranibizumab) (group 3, 50 eyes). RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 20.5 months. At month 12, all eyes treated with PDT or with IVTA and PDT showed a mean significant severe visual decrease. Eyes with CNV lost -0.67 and -0.37 logMAR (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01 respectively), and eyes with RAP -0.55 and -0.31 logMAR (p < 0.01 and p = 0.01 respectively). RPE tear occurred in 14 eyes (36.8%) and in six eyes (13.6%) in groups 1 and 2 respectively. Eyes treated with anti-VEGF therapy showed slight mean visual acuity decrease at month 12. Those with CNV had a mean baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 0.36 ± 0.24 logMAR, final of 0.44 ± 0.30 logMAR (-0.08 logMAR, n.s.). In eyes with RAP, mean baseline BCVA was 0.58 ± 0.39 logMAR, final was 0.78 ± 0.47 logMAR (-0.20 logMAR, n.s.). RPE tear occurred in 14 eyes (36.8%). Patients with either V-PED with CNV or a better baseline BCVA showed greater risk of acute RPE tear (p = 0.01 and p = 0.003 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Effective treatment for vascularized PED is still lacking. Until now, only stabilization of the disease has been achieved using anti-VEGF therapy, but the risk of RPE tear can further hamper our expectations. Baseline characteristics are helpful for prognosis, but patients must be informed of the uncertain response. New therapeutic strategies are needed.

Macular thickness interoperator and intraoperator reproducibility in healthy eyes using 7 optical coherence tomography instruments.

PURPOSE: To evaluate macular thickness measurement reproducibility using 6 new spectral-domain (SD) optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices and 1 time-domain OCT device DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. METHODS: setting: Clinical practice. study population: Macular thickness was assessed in 18 randomly chosen consecutive eyes of 18 healthy volunteers by 2 masked operators using 6 SD OCT devices and 1 time-domain OCT device. main outcome measures: Intraoperator and interoperator reproducibility of OCT-measured central macular thickness. RESULTS: Mean macular thickness ranged from 172.77 to 272.87 microm. Intraobserver Intraclass coefficient correlation ranged from 0.75 to 0.96. Intraobserver coefficient of variation ranged from 0.44 to 2.75. In Bland-Altman analysis, interoperator mean difference ranged from 0.22 to -9.69. An analysis of variance used for repeated measurement was statistically significant for instruments (P < .001) and operators (P = .04), but not for instruments x operators (P = .32). CONCLUSIONS: The 7 OCT devices presented differing macular thickness measurement values; the lowest value was with Copernicus, and the highest was with Spectralis HRA+OCT (Heidelberg Engineering). The new generation of SD OCT devices has good intraoperator reproducibility, but the Spectralis presents the highest reproducibility together with the best interoperator agreement. The software, and in particular the algorithm, used is the most important factor regarding reproducibility differences in macular thickness measurement. The main result of our study is that macular thickness absolute value differs for each device. For this reason, the devices are not interchangeable.