Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Transfus Apher Sci ; 62(2): 103662, 2023 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36842884

RESUMO

Therapeutic apheresis is an extracorporeal treatment that selectively removes abnormal cells or harmful substances in the blood that are associated with or cause certain diseases. During the last decades the application of therapeutic apheresis has expanded to a broad spectrum of hematological and non-hematological diseases due to various studies on the clinical efficacy of this procedure. In this context there are more than 30 centers performing therapeutic apheresis and registered in the apheresis database in Turkey. Herein, we, The Turkish Apheresis Registry, aimed to analyze some key articles published so far from Turkey regarding the use of apheresis for various indications.


Assuntos
Remoção de Componentes Sanguíneos , Humanos , Turquia , Remoção de Componentes Sanguíneos/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Bases de Dados Factuais
2.
Transfus Apher Sci ; 60(5): 103239, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34412948

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To consider the effectiveness of apheresis, which is a supportive treatment method, in sepsis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A hundred and eleven adults with sepsis or septic shock were included in this retrospective study. The demographic characteristics of the patients, the focus and source of infection causing sepsis or septic shock, characteristics of the pathogen, Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Assessment (APACHE) II score, routine laboratory values, which apheresis method was used, the characteristics of the replacement fluids used during the apheresis procedure, the number of apheresis procedures, complications related to the apheresis procedure, the follow-up time after the procedure, and mortality were recorded. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. RESULTS: Sixty-nine (62.2 %) of the patients were male. The mean age of the patients was 47.7 ± 18.6 years. The most common source of sepsis was hospital-acquired (79.3 %), the most common pathogen causing sepsis was gram-negative bacteria (41.4 %), and the most common infection site was the respiratory tract (58.7 %). The median APACHE II score was 19 (13-24). 92 (82.9 %) of the patients had septic shock. Theropeutic plasma exchange (TPE) was performed in 11.7 % of the patients and immunoabsorbtion IA in 88.3 %. The median number of sessions was 3 (3-5). No procedure-related fatal complication was observed in the study. While 28-day mortality was 61.3 % in all patients, when the mortality according to the apheresis procedures was examined, it was 11.3 % and 88.2 % in the patients who underwent TPE and IA, respectively. The most common cause of mortality was multiorgan failure. CONCLUSIONS: Apheresis in sepsis can be considered as a salvage treatment. The indication for apheresis in sepsis is still at the level of patient-based individualized decision in line with the studies done so far, including our study. However, there is a need for a multicenter randomized controlled study with a large number of patients in order to give positive or negative recommendations about its effectiveness.


Assuntos
Remoção de Componentes Sanguíneos , Troca Plasmática/métodos , Sepse/terapia , Choque Séptico/terapia , APACHE , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Chemother ; 35(6): 563-569, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37211906

RESUMO

A multicenter, retrospective, observational study was conducted to explore effectiveness and safety of ixazomib plus lenalidomide with dexamethasone (IRd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients following at least ≥ two lines of therapy. Patients' treatment responses, overall response rate, progression-free survival rate, and adverse events were recorded. Mean age of 54 patients was 66.5 ± 9.1 years. There were 20 patients (37.0%) with progression. Median progression-free survival was 13 months in patients who received a median of three therapy lines in a 7.5-month follow-up period. Overall response rate was 38.5%. Of 54 patients, 19 (40.4%) had at least one adverse event, and nine (19.1%) had an adverse event of at least grade 3 or more. Of 72 adverse events observed in 47 patients, 68% were grade 1 or 2. Treatment was not stopped in any patient due to adverse events. IRd combination therapy was effective and safe in heavily treated RRMM patients.


Assuntos
Mieloma Múltiplo , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiplo/etiologia , Lenalidomida/efeitos adversos , Turquia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Dexametasona/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA