RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) causes kidney compromise in up to 40% of patients, contributing significantly to morbidity. Lupus nephritis (LN), an early onset manifestation in most patients, is histologically classified into six types, with types III, IV, and V requiring treatment with induction therapies, usually glucocorticoids with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVC). However, up to 60% of patients fail to achieve complete remission, and 27%-66% have subsequent flares. There is scarce literature on the superiority of IVC or MMF in the Latin population. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective cohort study of 72 LN patients at a high-complexity hospital in Chile between 2016 and 2021 was conducted. Demographics, urine studies, creatinine levels, complement levels, antibody profiles, biopsy results, and response to treatment were analysed. RESULTS: The median age of the cohort was 29 years, with women representing 90% of patients. At diagnosis, 87.5% of the patients presented with proteinuria, 55% had haematuria, and 49% had acute kidney injury. The most common LN type was type IV. For induction therapy, half of the patients were treated with IVC, and the other half with MMF. The response to treatment did not differ significantly between the two. DISCUSSION: This is one of the few studies to focus on the Latin American population, specifically Chile. These results are consistent with the current understanding of LN treatment. Despite its limitations, this study provides valuable insights into the treatment effectiveness of IVC and MMF in this population. CONCLUSION: This study did not find significant differences in the clinical response to IVC or MMF at 6 months. Future prospective studies are required to determine the optimal induction therapy for LN, especially in Latin populations.
Assuntos
Ciclofosfamida , Glucocorticoides , Imunossupressores , Nefrite Lúpica , Ácido Micofenólico , Humanos , Nefrite Lúpica/tratamento farmacológico , Chile/epidemiologia , Feminino , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapêutico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Indução de Remissão , AdolescenteRESUMO
This narrative review explores the implementation and impact of sepsis code protocols, an urgent intervention strategy designed to improve clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis. We examined the degree of implementation, activation criteria, areas of implementation, personnel involved, responses after activation, goals and targets, impact on clinical indicators, and challenges in implementation. The reviewed evidence suggests that sepsis codes can significantly reduce sepsis-related mortality and enhance early administration of treatments. However, variability in activation criteria and inconsistent application present ongoing challenges. The review considers the incorporation of newer scoring systems, such as NEWS and MEWS, and the potential integration of machine learning tools for early sepsis detection. It highlights the importance of tailoring implementation to specific healthcare contexts and the value of ongoing training to optimize sepsis response. Limitations include the ongoing controversy surrounding sepsis definitions and the need for standardized, feasible quality indicators. Future research should focus on standardizing activation criteria, improving protocol adherence, and exploring emerging technologies to enhance early sepsis detection and management. Despite challenges, sepsis codes show promise in improving patient outcomes when implemented thoughtfully and consistently across healthcare settings.
RESUMO
Introduction: Critically ill patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) exhibit unique pharmacokinetics. This study aimed to assess the achievement of vancomycin therapeutic targets in these patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients on ECMO treated with vancomycin between January 2010 and December 2018. Ninety patients were analyzed based on ECMO connection modality, baseline creatinine levels, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), renal replacement therapy (RRT) requirements, and vancomycin loading dose administration. Results: Twenty-three percent of the patients achieved the therapeutic range defined by baseline levels. No significant differences in meeting the therapeutic goal were found in multivariate analysis considering ECMO cannulation modality, initial creatinine level, initial eGFR, RRT requirement, or loading dose use. All trough levels between 15 and 20â mcg/mL achieved an estimated area under the curve/minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) between 400 and 600, almost all trough levels over 10â mcg/mL predicted an AUC/MIC >400. Discussion: Achieving therapeutic plasma levels in these patients remains challenging, potentially due to factors such as individual pharmacokinetics and pathophysiology. A trough plasma level between 12 and 20 estimated the therapeutic AUC/MIC for all models, proposing a possible lower target, maintaining exposure, and potentially avoiding adverse effects. Despite being one of the largest cohorts of vancomycin use in ECMO patients studied, its retrospective nature and single-center focus limits its broad applicability.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Estado Terminal , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Vancomicina , Humanos , Vancomicina/farmacocinética , Vancomicina/administração & dosagem , Vancomicina/sangue , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estado Terminal/terapia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/sangue , Adulto , Idoso , Área Sob a Curva , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Terapia de Substituição Renal/métodos , Creatinina/sangueRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of coma among patients in critical care units in Chile. We also aimed to provide insight into the demographic characteristics, etiologies, and complications associated with coma. METHODS: A single day cross-sectional study was conducted through a national survey of public and private hospitals with critical and intensive cardiac care units across Chile. Data were collected using an online questionnaire that contained questions regarding critically ill patients' information, demographic characteristics, etiology and duration of coma, medical complications, and support requirements. RESULTS: A total of 84% of all health facilities answered, accounting for a total of 2,708 patients. The overall coma prevalence was 2.9%. The median age of the comatose patients was 61 years (interquartile range 50-72) and 66.2% were male. The median coma duration was five days (interquartile range 2-9). Cerebral hemorrhage was the most common etiology, followed by severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, acute ischemic stroke, and traumatic brain injury. A total of 48.1% of coma patients experienced acute and ongoing treatment complications, with pneumonia being the most common complication, and 97.4% required support during comatose management. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an overview of the prevalence of coma in Chilean critical and cardiac care units. Coma is a common condition. Comatose patients frequently experience medical complications during their hospitalization.
Assuntos
Coma , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Humanos , Coma/epidemiologia , Coma/etiologia , Chile/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Transversais , Idoso , Prevalência , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Hemorragia Cerebral/epidemiologia , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/epidemiologia , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/complicações , Adulto , Hipóxia-Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiologia , AVC Isquêmico/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To explore the experiences of clinical and non-clinical staff in an intensive care unit regarding the perceived benefits and drawbacks of using in situ simulation as a training tool. METHODS: A descriptive phenomenological qualitative study was conducted among clinical and nonclinical ICU personnel. Simulations and interviews were conducted until data saturation was achieved. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim for analysis, and interpreted using the Colaizzi method. RESULTS: Ten participant interviews generated data saturation. ISS was found to be feasible and beneficial in the ICU, facilitating experiential and emotion-based learning in real-world environments. Eight result categories were identified: simulation benefits, simulation benefits in real conditions, scenario authenticity, interference with usual work, ISS sessions, high-fidelity generating affective bonding, ISS as knowledge reinforcement, and recommendations for improvement. The fundamental structure revealed that ISS is perceived as an authentic and emotionally impactful team simulation modality that promotes experiential learning, reflection, and care improvement opportunities within the complex sociotechnical system of the ICU. CONCLUSIONS: All interviewees considered ISS to be a feasible simulation tool that should be implemented in the ICU to improve knowledge and skills, thereby enhancing teamwork.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The knowledge about the epidemiological profile of patients admitted to the hospital for severe COVID infection, allows an adequate health care planning and resource allocation. AIM: To describe the epidemiology of patients with COVID-19 admitted to a public hospital between March 2020 and July 2021. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Demographic variables, comorbidities, ventilatory support requirements, and hospital resources were recorded from clinical records and hospital databases of diagnosis related groups. The primary outcomes were overall mortality and need of ventilatory support. RESULTS: In the study period, 4,474 patients (56% males) were hospitalized with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Overall mortality was 25.8% and in-hospital mortality was 18%. Invasive and non-invasive ventilatory support was required in 1349 (30.2%) and 2060 (46%) patients, respectively. The most common comorbidities in admitted patients were diabetes mellitus (29.2%), chronic kidney disease (11.1%), and chronic liver disease (10.4%). The readmission rate was 3.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality associated with COVID-19 in this hospital was similar to the rates reported abroad. Local risk predictors for this infection should be identified.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , SARS-CoV-2 , Atenção Terciária à Saúde , Hospitalização , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais Públicos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS) with cerebral cortical involvement is a rare complication of severe hyponatremia correction. Careful management of hyponatremia is crucial, particularly in patients with risk factors, such as alcohol use disorder and diabetes insipidus. CASE: A patient in his 40s with a history of alcohol use disorder and central diabetes insipidus developed ODS after a 24 mEq/L osmolar increase during the treatment of hyponatremia. The patient's condition progressed into locked-in syndrome and then improved to spastic tetraparesis after cortical basal ganglia ODS improved. DISCUSSION: The differential diagnosis of cortical demyelination includes laminar cortical necrosis, being the interpretation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) MRI sequence is a useful tool.This case underscores the need to investigate and improve diagnosis and treatment strategies in patients with ODS. It also emphasises the significance of careful hyponatremia correction and frequent monitoring, particularly in patients with known risk factors for ODS.
Assuntos
Alcoolismo , Doenças Desmielinizantes , Diabetes Insípido Neurogênico , Diabetes Mellitus , Hiponatremia , Humanos , Hiponatremia/diagnóstico , Diabetes Insípido Neurogênico/complicações , Diabetes Insípido Neurogênico/diagnóstico , Alcoolismo/complicações , Doenças Desmielinizantes/complicações , Doenças Desmielinizantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Asthma is one of the 4 leading causes of death worldwide. Severe asthma is associated with poor quality of life, decreased life expectancy, and higher health resources consumption such as the use of oral corticosteroids (OCSs). This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of mepolizumab as an add-on compared with the standard care of the Chilean public health system (combined inhaled corticosteroid therapy and a long-acting beta-agonist, short-acting beta-agonist, and OCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov model was adapted to represent the day-to-day of patients with severe asthma over a lifetime horizon. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to account for the second-order uncertainty of the model. In addition, a risk subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of mepolizumab across different risk populations. RESULTS: Mepolizumab produces more benefits than standard of care alone (1 additional quality-adjusted life-year, a decrease of OCS usage, an approximated 11 avoided exacerbations) but it cannot be considered cost-effective in the light of the Chilean threshold (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio: US dollars [USD] 105 967/quality-adjusted life-year vs USD 14 896). Despite this, cost-effectiveness increases in specific subgroups, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of USD 44 819 in patients with eosinophil count ≥ 300 cell/mcL and exacerbation history of at least 4 exacerbations in the past year. CONCLUSION: Mepolizumab cannot be considered a cost-effective strategy for the Chilean health system. Nevertheless, price discount in specific subgroups improves its cost-effectiveness profile significantly and may offer opportunities for access to specific subgroups.
Assuntos
Antiasmáticos , Asma , Humanos , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Chile , Qualidade de Vida , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Corticosteroides/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND The knowledge about the epidemiological profile of patients admitted to the hospital for severe COVID infection, allows an adequate health care planning and resource allocation. AIM: To describe the epidemiology of patients with COVID-19 admitted to a public hospital between March 2020 and July 2021. Material and Methods: Demographic variables, comorbidities, ventilatory support requirements, and hospital resources were recorded from clinical records and hospital databases of diagnosis related groups. The primary outcomes were overall mortality and need of ventilatory support. RESULTS: In the study period, 4,474 patients (56% males) were hospitalized with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Overall mortality was 25.8% and in-hospital mortality was 18%. Invasive and non-invasive ventilatory support was required in 1349 (30.2%) and 2060 (46%) patients, respectively. The most common comorbidities in admitted patients were diabetes mellitus (29.2%), chronic kidney disease (11.1%), and chronic liver disease (10.4%). The readmission rate was 3.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality associated with COVID-19 in this hospital was similar to the rates reported abroad. Local risk predictors for this infection should be identified.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , COVID-19 , Atenção Terciária à Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , SARS-CoV-2 , Hospitalização , Hospitais PúblicosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Daclatasvir and Asunaprevir (DCV/ASV) have recently been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection. In association, they are more effective and safer than previous available treatments, but more expensive. It is unclear if paying for the additional costs is an efficient strategy considering limited resources. METHODS: A Markov model was built to estimate the expected costs in Chilean pesos (CL$) and converted to US dollars (US$) and benefits in quality adjusted life years (QALYs) in a hypothetic cohort of naive patients receiving DCV/ASV compared to protease inhibitors (PIs) and Peginterferon plus Ribavirin (PR). Efficacy was obtained from a mixed-treatment comparison study and costs were estimated from local sources. Utilities were obtained applying the EQ-5D survey to local patients and then valued with the Chilean tariff. A time horizon of 46 years and a discount rate of 3% for costs and outcomes was considered. The ICERs were estimated for a range of DCV/ASV prices. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: PIs were extendedly dominated by DCV/ASV. The ICER of DCV/ASV compared to PR was US$ 16,635/QALY at a total treatment price of US$ 77,419; US$11,581 /QALY at a price of US$ 58,065; US$ 6,375/QALY at a price of US$ 38,710; and US$ 1,364 /QALY at a price of US$ 19,355. The probability of cost-effectiveness at a price of US$ 38,710 was 91.6% while there is a 21.43% probability that DCV/ASV dominates PR if the total treatment price was US$ 19,355. Although the results are sensitive to certain parameters, the ICER did not increase above the suggested threshold of 1 GDP per capita. CONCLUSIONS: DCV/ASV can be considered cost-effective at any price of the range studied. These results provide decision makers useful information about the value of incorporating these drugs into the public Chilean healthcare system.