Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of surgery versus observation for men with localized prostate cancer detected by means of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is not known. METHODS: From November 1994 through January 2002, we randomly assigned 731 men with localized prostate cancer (mean age, 67 years; median PSA value, 7.8 ng per milliliter) to radical prostatectomy or observation and followed them through January 2010. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; the secondary outcome was prostate-cancer mortality. RESULTS: During the median follow-up of 10.0 years, 171 of 364 men (47.0%) assigned to radical prostatectomy died, as compared with 183 of 367 (49.9%) assigned to observation (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to 1.08; P=0.22; absolute risk reduction, 2.9 percentage points). Among men assigned to radical prostatectomy, 21 (5.8%) died from prostate cancer or treatment, as compared with 31 men (8.4%) assigned to observation (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.09; P=0.09; absolute risk reduction, 2.6 percentage points). The effect of treatment on all-cause and prostate-cancer mortality did not differ according to age, race, coexisting conditions, self-reported performance status, or histologic features of the tumor. Radical prostatectomy was associated with reduced all-cause mortality among men with a PSA value greater than 10 ng per milliliter (P=0.04 for interaction) and possibly among those with intermediate-risk or high-risk tumors (P=0.07 for interaction). Adverse events within 30 days after surgery occurred in 21.4% of men, including one death. CONCLUSIONS: Among men with localized prostate cancer detected during the early era of PSA testing, radical prostatectomy did not significantly reduce all-cause or prostate-cancer mortality, as compared with observation, through at least 12 years of follow-up. Absolute differences were less than 3 percentage points. (Funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program and others; PIVOT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00007644.).

The use of botulinum neurotoxin type a in a patient with refractory urge incontinence to facilitate the intravesical treatment of bladder carcinoma.

Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) has become the preferred initial treatment after resection of high-grade T1 urothelial carcinoma and carcinoma in situ (CIS). We report the case of a patient with high-grade T1 urothelial carcinoma and CIS who was treated with intravesical BCG. Due to the patient's severe urge incontinence, however, the BCG solution leaked from the bladder immediately upon instillation. We describe our experience of using botulinum neurotoxin A intradetrusor injections to facilitate successful intravesical therapy by increasing bladder capacity to enable the BCG to remain in the patient's bladder for the appropriate treatment duration.

Sebaceous hyperplasia of the vulva: case report and review of the literature.

Sebaceous hyperplasia is a cutaneous lesion consisting of soft, yellow, papular lesions usually occurring on the face in elderly patients. The occurrence of the lesion on the vulva is exceptionally rare. We were able to identify only three cases reported in the literature. We report a case of sebaceous hyperplasia of the vulva with an unusual presentation.

Assessment of the efficacy of Viagra (sildenafil citrate) using the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS).

Treatment satisfaction is a predictor of long-term compliance in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). We assessed patient satisfaction with and efficacy of Viagra (sildenafil citrate) using the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) and 3 global efficacy questions. Twenty-nine men with ED who had completed a prior study of MUSE (alprostadil) versus Caverject (alprostadil) took a 50-mg dose of Viagra 1 h preceding intercourse. Efficacy and patient satisfaction with Viagra were high. Satisfaction as measured by EDITS was highly correlated to patients' final ED treatment choice. This correlation could make EDITS useful in identifying long-term patient satisfaction, and thus of considerable clinical benefit.

Efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) in black and Hispanic American men.

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) in black American and Hispanic American men with erectile dysfunction (ED) of broad-spectrum etiology. A total of 246 black American and 197 Hispanic American men were randomized to sildenafil (50 mg, adjustable to 25 mg or 100 mg, depending on efficacy and tolerability; n = 124 and n = 99, respectively) or matching placebo (n = 122 and n = 98, respectively). After 6 weeks, patients were given the option of switching to the other blinded treatment for the following 6 weeks. The 12 weeks of double-blind treatment were followed by 12 weeks of open-label extension. Despite differences in prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and use of concomitant antihypertensive agents between the 2 study groups, sildenafil was efficacious and well tolerated. After 6 weeks, scores for questions 3 and 4 from the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) were significantly higher among sildenafil-treated black and Hispanic patients than in placebo-treated patients. In addition, compared with placebo, a significantly larger proportion of sildenafil patients reported improved erections and improved ability to have sexual intercourse. When efficacy results were stratified by ED severity or number of risk factors, scores for IIEF questions 3 and 4 were lower in men with severe ED versus mild-to-moderate ED. Similarly, the percentage of patients reporting improved erections decreased with ED severity and number of risk factors. The proportion of patients switching to the other treatment after 6 weeks was significantly higher in the placebo group (71% to 85%) than in the sildenafil group (27% to 28%). The most common adverse events included headache and vasodilation, which were mild to moderate in nature and were comparable between groups. These data demonstrate that despite differences in prevalence rates of comorbidities, efficacy and safety of sildenafil is maintained across different ethnic groups.