Relationship between erectile dysfunction and silent myocardial ischemia in apparently uncomplicated type 2 diabetic patients.

BACKGROUND: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is associated with coronary artery disease (CAD). In diabetic patients, CAD is often silent. Among diabetic patients with silent CAD, the prevalence of ED has never been evaluated. We investigated whether ED is associated with asymptomatic CAD in type 2 diabetic patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated the prevalence of ED in 133 uncomplicated diabetic men with angiographically verified silent CAD and in 127 diabetic men without myocardial ischemia at exercise ECG, 48-hour ambulatory ECG, and stress echocardiography. The groups were comparable for age and diabetes duration. Patients were screened for ED using the validated International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire. The prevalence of ED was significantly higher in patients with than in those without silent CAD (33.8% versus 4.7%; P=0.000). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that ED, apolipoprotein(a) polymorphism, smoking, microalbuminuria, HDL, and LDL were significantly associated with silent CAD; among these risk factors, ED appeared to be the most efficient predictor of silent CAD (OR, 14.8; 95% CI, 3.8 to 56.9). CONCLUSIONS: Our study first shows a strong and independent association between ED and silent CAD in apparently uncomplicated type 2 diabetic patients. If our findings are confirmed, ED may become a potential marker to identify diabetic patients to screen for silent CAD. Moreover, the high prevalence of ED among diabetics with silent CAD suggests the need to perform an exercise ECG before starting a treatment for ED, especially in patients with additional cardiovascular risk factors.

Assessment of asymptomatic coronary artery disease in apparently uncomplicated type 2 diabetic patients: a role for lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a) polymorphism.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with uncomplicated diabetes, there is low probability of finding significant coronary artery disease (CAD) by noninvasive tests. Therefore, screening for its presence is not justified, and it is important to find reliable predictors of silent CAD to identify patients with uncomplicated diabetes for further screening. The relationship between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] polymorphism, and silent CAD has never been studied. We investigated the association of Lp(a) and apo(a) polymorphism with angiographically documented asymptomatic CAD in type 2 diabetic patients without evident complications. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 1,323 diabetic patients without any clinical and electrocardiographic evidence of CAD were evaluated. Of 121 patients with highly positive results of exercise electrocardiography (ECG) (n = 30) or positive results on exercise thallium scintigraphy (n = 91), 103 subjects showed angiographically documented CAD (CAD group). Of 1,106 patients with negative results on exercise ECG, 103 subjects without CAD (NO CAD group) were selected and matched by age, gender, and duration of diabetes to patients in the CAD group. In patients in the NO CAD group, results of exercise ECG, 48-h ambulatory ECG, and stress echocardiography were negative for CAD. RESULTS: The CAD group had higher Lp(a) levels (21.7 +/- 17.7 vs. 15.2 +/- 19.0 mg/dl; P = 0.0093) than the NO CAD group, and a percentage of subjects had at least one small apo(a) isoform (68.9 vs. 29.1%; P = 0.0000) higher than the NO CAD group. Logistic regression analysis showed that apo(a) phenotypes (odds ratio [OR] 8.13, 95% CI 3.65-21.23), microalbuminuria (5.38, 2.44-11.88), smoking (2.72, 1.31-5.64), and Lp(a) levels (2.41, 1.15-5.03) were predictors of asymptomatic CAD. CONCLUSIONS: Our investigation reports the first evidence of an independent association of Lp(a) and apo(a) polymorphism with asymptomatic CAD. This suggests that Lp(a) levels and apo(a) phenotypes could be used together with other risk factors as markers of asymptomatic CAD in patients with diabetes.

Hypertension among HIV patients: prevalence and relationships to insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of risk factors, such as central obesity, dyslipidemia, glucose intolerance, hypertension, related to insulin resistance. In HIV patients insulin resistance and several metabolic abnormalities of the metabolic syndrome have been described, but few and conflicting studies have investigated the behaviour of blood pressure. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the prevalence of hypertension in a large group of HIV-patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and to investigate the relationship between hypertension, metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance. DESIGN: Case control study. METHODS: We enrolled 287 HIV-positive patients on HAART (mean age 41.1 +/- 7.5 years) and 287 age- and sex-matched controls. Insulin resistance was estimated by the homeostasis model insulin resistance assessment (HOMA) index. Metabolic syndrome was defined according to the European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance. RESULTS: HIV patients showed a prevalence of subjects with hypertension (34.2 versus 11.9%; P < 0.0001) and metabolic syndrome (33.1 versus 2.4%; P < 0.0001) higher than controls. HOMA was higher in HIV-patients than controls (3.3 +/- 1.2 versus 2.0 +/- 0.9; P < 0.0001). HOMA (3.7 +/- 1.0 versus 3.1 +/- 1.2; P < 0.001) and the prevalence of subjects with the metabolic syndrome (64.3 versus 16.9%; P < 0.0001) were greater in HIV-patients with than in those without hypertension. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that family history of hypertension (odds ratio [(OR): 8.73; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.31-17.70; P < 0.0001], metabolic syndrome (OR: 6.79; 95% CI: 3.27-14.10; P < 0.0001), lipodystrophy (OR: 4.80; 95% CI: 2.43-9.85; P < 0.0001) and HOMA (OR: 4.13; 95% CI: 1.14-14.91; P < 0.05) were predictors of hypertension in HIV-patients. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that hypertension is frequent in HIV patients on HAART and that hypertension appears to be linked to insulin resistance; in particular, hypertension seems to be a part of the metabolic syndrome.

Silent coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus: the role of Lipoprotein(a), homocysteine and apo(a) polymorphism.

BACKGROUND: There is little data on the relationship between novel cardiovascular risk factors and silent coronary artery disease (CAD) in diabetic patients. We investigated whether Lipoprotein(a), homocysteine and apolipoprotein(a) polymorphism are associated with angiographically assessed asymptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) in diabetic patients. METHODS: 1,971 type 2 diabetic patients without clinical signs of cardiovascular diseases and with a negative history of CAD were consecutively evaluated. Among them, 179 patients showed electrocardiographic abnormalities suggestive of ischemia or previous asymptomatic myocardial infarction. These 179 patients were subjected to a non-invasive test for CAD (ECG stress testing and/or scintigraphy). Among patients with a highly positive stress testing (n = 19) or a positive scintigraphy (n = 74), 75 showed an angiographically documented CAD (CAD group). Seventy-five patients without CAD (NO CAD group) were matched by age, sex and duration of diabetes to CAD patients. In NO CAD patients an exercise ECG test, a 48-hour ambulatory ECG and a stress echocardiogram were negative for CAD. RESULTS: Lipoprotein(a) levels (22.0 +/- 18.9 versus 16.0 +/- 19.4 mg/dl; p < 0.05), homocysteine levels (13.6 +/- 6.6 versus 11.4 +/- 4.9 mmol/l; p < 0.05) and the percentage of subjects with at least one small apolipoprotein(a) isoform (70.7% versus 29.3%; p < 0.0001) were higher in CAD than NO CAD group. Logistic regression analysis showed that apolipoprotein(a) polymorphism (OR:8.65; 95%CI:3.05-24.55), microalbuminuria (OR:6.16; 95%CI:2.21-17.18), smoking (OR:2.53; 95%CI:1.05-6.08), HDL (OR:3.16; 95%CI:1.28-7.81), homocysteine (OR:2.25; 95%CI:1.14-4.43) and Lipoprotein(a) (OR:2.62; 95%CI:1.01-6.79) were independent predictors of asymptomatic CAD. CONCLUSIONS: The present investigation shows an independent association of Lipoprotein(a), homocysteine and apo(a) polymorphism with silent CAD. Other studies are needed to establish whether these parameters are suitable for CAD screening in diabetic patients.

Weight loss after Swedish Adjustable Gastric Banding: relationships to insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The metabolic syndrome is a cluster of cardiovascular risk factors (central obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, disturbance in glucose metabolism) associated with insulin-resistance. The cluster of risk factors defining the metabolic syndrome increases cardiovascular risk more than each single component. The aim of the present longitudinal study was to evaluate the relationship between weight loss and changes in insulin-resistance and in the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome 1-year after SAGB implantation. METHODS: 51 premenopausal severely obese women (mean age 35.2 +/- 8.8 years, BMI 43.3 +/- 6.9) were enrolled. As a control group, 51 premenopausal non-obese women (BMI < 30) were enrolled. All obese subjects underwent successful implantation of the SAGB via videolaparoscopy. In all subjects insulin-resistance was estimated by HOMA index and metabolic syndrome was defined according to the criteria of the European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance. RESULTS: HOMA (4.2 +/- 2.0 vs 1.9 +/- 0.8, P < 0.001) and the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome (58.8% vs 7.8%, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in obese than non-obese women. 1 year after SAGB, BMI significantly decreased from 43.3 +/- 6.9 to 34.5 +/- 7.4 (P < 0.001). HOMA index showed a significant dramatic breakdown (4.2 +/- 2.0 vs 2.4 +/- 1.0, P < 0.001). The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome declined significantly (58.8% vs 21.6%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that in severely obese women, insulin-resistance and the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome significantly decrease 1 year after SAGB. Our findings indicate that SAGB could be a useful tool to reduce the global cardiovascular risk in severely obese people and to improve their long-term prognosis.

Lipoprotein(a), apolipoprotein(a) polymorphism and restenosis after intracoronary stent placement in Type 2 diabetic patients.

The relationship between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and restenosis after intracoronary stent implantation has never been analysed in diabetic patients. The aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate whether Lp(a) levels and apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotypes are predictors of restenosis after elective stent implantation in Type 2 diabetic patients with de novo lesions of coronary arteries. We recruited 102 Type 2 diabetic patients with a new lesion successfully treated with elective placement of one or two Palmaz-Schatz stents. Follow-up angiography was scheduled at 6 months or earlier if clinically indicated. Seven patients were lost to the follow up. Among 95 patients enrolled, restenosis was present in 37 (38.9%) and absent in 58 (61.1%). The restenosis group showed Lp(a) levels higher than the nonrestenosis group (25.1+/-14.4 vs. 21.3+/-14.6 mg/dl), but the difference was not significant. The restenosis group had a percentage of subjects with at least one apo(a) isoform of low molecular weight (MW) significantly greater than the nonrestenosis group (75.7% vs. 55.1%; P<.05). A multiple logistic regression analysis showed that presence of multivessel disease (risk relative [RR]: 5.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21-28.15; P<.05) was the only predictor of restenosis after stent placement in diabetic patients. Lp(a) and apo(a) polymorphisms did not enter the model as predictive variables. Our study shows that the presence of multivessel disease is a predictor of restenosis after intracoronary stent implantation in diabetic patients. On the contrary, Lp(a) and apo(a) polymorphisms do not appear to be reliable markers of restenosis in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.