Ideal Outcome After Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Transatlantic Evaluation of a Harmonized Composite Outcome Measure.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to define and assess Ideal Outcome in the national or multicenter registries of North America, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden. BACKGROUND: Assessing outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy among centers and countries requires a broad evaluation that cannot be captured by a single parameter. Previously, 2 composite outcome measures (textbook outcome and optimal pancreatic surgery) for pancreatoduodenectomy have been described from Europe and the United States. These composites were harmonized into ideal outcome (IO). METHODS: This analysis is a transatlantic retrospective study (2018-2020) of patients after pancreatoduodenectomy within the registries from North America, Germany, The Netherlands, and Sweden. After 3 consensus meetings, IO for pancreatoduodenectomy was defined as the absence of all 6 parameters: (1) in-hospital mortality, (2) severe complications-Clavien-Dindo ≥3, (3) postoperative pancreatic fistula-International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) grade B/C, (4) reoperation, (5) hospital stay >75th percentile, and (6) readmission. Outcomes were evaluated using relative largest difference (RLD) and absolute largest difference (ALD), and multivariate regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 21,036 patients after pancreatoduodenectomy were included, of whom 11,194 (54%) reached IO. The rate of IO varied between 55% in North America, 53% in Germany, 52% in The Netherlands, and 54% in Sweden (RLD: 1.1, ALD: 3%, P <0.001). Individual components varied with an ALD of 2% length of stay, 4% for in-hospital mortality, 12% severe complications, 10% postoperative pancreatic fistula, 11% reoperation, and 9% readmission. Age, sex, absence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, body mass index, performance status, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, biliary drainage, absence of vascular resection, and histologic diagnosis were associated with IO. In the subgroup of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, country, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy also was associated with improved IO. CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed composite outcome measure "Ideal Outcome" can be used for auditing and comparing outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy. The observed differences can be used to guide collaborative initiatives to further improve the outcomes of pancreatic surgery.

Transatlantic registries for minimally invasive liver surgery: towards harmonization.

BACKGROUND: Several registries focus on patients undergoing minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS). This study compared transatlantic registries focusing on the variables collected and differences in baseline characteristics, indications, and treatment in patients undergoing MILS. Furthermore, key variables were identified. METHODS: The five registries for liver surgery from North America (ACS-NSQIP), Italy, Norway, the Netherlands, and Europe were compared. A set of key variables were established by consensus expert opinion and compared between the registries. Anonymized data of all MILS procedures were collected (January 2014-December 2019). To summarize differences for all patient characteristics, treatment, and outcome, the relative and absolute largest differences (RLD, ALD) between the smallest and largest outcome per variable among the registries are presented. RESULTS: In total, 13,571 patients after MILS were included. Both 30- and 90-day mortality after MILS were below 1.1% in all registries. The largest differences in baseline characteristics were seen in ASA grade 3-4 (RLD 3.0, ALD 46.1%) and the presence of liver cirrhosis (RLD 6.4, ALD 21.2%). The largest difference in treatment was the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (RLD 4.3, ALD 20.6%). The number of variables collected per registry varied from 28 to 303. From the 46 key variables, 34 were missing in at least one of the registries. CONCLUSION: Despite considerable variation in baseline characteristics, indications, and treatment of patients undergoing MILS in the five transatlantic registries, overall mortality after MILS was consistently below 1.1%. The registries should be harmonized to facilitate future collaborative research on MILS for which the identified 46 key variables will be instrumental.

Hypophosphatemia Is Associated With Postoperative Morbidity After Cytoreductive Surgery and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Hypophosphatemia following surgery is associated with a higher rate of postoperative complications; however, the significance of postoperative hypophosphatemia after cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is unknown. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was queried for all patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC for any histology at the Mount Sinai Health System. The perioperative serum phosphate levels, postoperative complications, and comorbidities were compared between patients with or without major complications. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2018, 327 patients underwent CRS/HIPEC. Most of the patients had low phosphate levels on postoperative day (POD) 2, reaching a median nadir of 2.3 mg/dL on POD 3. Patients with major complications had significantly lower levels of serum phosphate on POD 5-7 compared with patients without complications, with median serum phosphate 2.2 mg/dL (IQR 1.9-2.4) versus 2.7 mg/dL, (IQR 2.3-3), P < 0.01. Hypophosphatemia on POD 5-7 was also more frequent in patients who developed an anastomotic leak, with median serum phosphate 2.2 mg/dL (IQR 1.9-2.6) versus 2.8 mg/dL (IQR 2.2-3.2), P = 0.001. On multivariate analysis, the number of organs resected at surgery, diaphragm resection, postoperative intensive care unit stay, and serum phosphate level <2.4 mg/dL on POD 5-7 were independently associated with a major complication after CRS/HIPEC. CONCLUSIONS: Following CRS/HIPEC, POD 5-7 hypophosphatemia is associated with severe postoperative complications and anastomotic leak.

Hepatitis C-positive Black patients develop hepatocellular carcinoma at earlier stages of liver disease and present with a more aggressive phenotype.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, mortality after a diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is higher in patients who are Black than in patients of other racial groups. The objective of this study was to clarify factors contributing to this disparity by analyzing liver and tumor characteristics in patients with HCC who have a history of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. METHODS: Records of patients with HCV and HCC at the authors' institution from 2003 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Race and ethnicity were self-identified. Imaging, laboratory, and pathologic features were compared between Black and non-Black cohorts. RESULTS: Among 1195 individuals with HCC, 390 identified as Black. At the time of HCC diagnosis, Black patients had better liver function, as measured by Child-Pugh score, Model of End-Stage Liver Disease score, histology of nontumor tissue, and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score (all P < .05). FIB-4 scores were <3.25 in 31% of Black patients. In addition, Black patients had less early stage HCC (20.2% vs 32.3%; P < .05), larger tumors (median [interquartile range]: 3.5 cm [2.2-6.2 cm] vs 3.1 cm [2.1-5.1 cm]; P < .01), more multiple tumors (median, [interquartile range]: 1 tumor [1-3 tumors] vs 1 tumor [1-2 tumors]; P = .03), more poorly differentiated tumors (30.3% vs 20.5%; P < .05), and more microvascular invasion (67.2% vs 56.5%; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Black patients with HCV exposure develop HCC at earlier stages of liver disease than members of other racial groups. Nearly one-third would not qualify for HCC screening using the common FIB-4 cirrhosis threshold. Practice guidelines that stress HCC surveillance for cirrhotic patients with HCV may need to be revised to be more inclusive for Black patients. In addition, tumors in Black patients carry worse prognostic features, and molecular studies are needed to characterize their biologic properties.

Failure to Rescue After Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Transatlantic Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This analysis aimed to compare failure to rescue (FTR) after pancreatoduodenectomy across the Atlantic. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: FTR, or mortality after development of a major complication, is a quality metric originally created to compare hospital results. FTR has been studied in North American and Northern European patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). However, a direct comparison of FTR after PD between North America and Northern Europe has not been performed. METHODS: Patients who underwent PD in North America, the Netherlands, Sweden and Germany (GAPASURG dataset) were identified from their respective registries (2014-17). Patients who developed a major complication defined as Clavien-Dindo ≥3 or developed a grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) were included. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were compared between patients with and without FTR. Variables significant on univariable analysis were entered into a logistic regression for FTR. RESULTS: Major complications occurred in 6188 of 22,983 patients (26.9%) after PD, and 504 (8.1%) patients had FTR. North American and Northern European patients with complications differed, and rates of FTR were lower in North America (5.4% vs 12%, P < 0.001). Fourteen factors from univariable analysis contributing to differences in patients who developed FTR were included in a logistic regression. On multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with FTR were age, American Society of Anesthesiology ≥3, Northern Europe, POPF, organ failure, life-threatening complication, nonradiologic intervention, and reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with severe systemic diseases are more difficult to rescue. Failure to rescue is more common in Northern Europe than North America. In stable patients, management of complications by interventional radiology is preferred over reoperation.

When does a Pringle Maneuver cause harm?

BACKGROUND: The Pringle Maneuver (PM) is considered to be safe and effective. However, data regarding perioperative outcomes after a PM are conflicting. Therefore, the aim of this analysis is to compare the outcomes of patients who have and have not undergone a PM in North America. METHODS: Patients undergoing major (≥3 segments) or partial hepatectomy (≤2 segments) were identified in the 2014-17 ACS-NSQIP hepatectomy database. Patients with and without a PM were compared. Propensity matching was utilized, and subgroup analyses by liver texture, hepatectomy extent and pathology were performed. RESULTS: Prior to matching, 3706 (24%) of 15,748 hepatectomy patients underwent a PM. The PM was utilized in 1445 (27%) of major and 2261 (22%) of partial hepatectomies. After matching, 3295 patients with and 3295 without a PM were compared. Operative time was significantly increased for patients undergoing a PM (246 vs. 225 min, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed post-hepatectomy liver failure and septic shock to be significantly increased (both p < 0.05) for patients undergoing a PM during a partial hepatectomy or in patients with metastatic disease. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing a partial hepatectomy and those with metastatic disease have worse outcomes when a Pringle Maneuver is performed.

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy in North America: are the outcomes acceptable?

BACKGROUND: Hepatopancreatoduodenectomies (HPD) are historically associated with high morbidity and mortality. Currently, no data with hepatopancreatobiliary-specific complications have been available for HPD in North America. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to compare the outcomes of HPD to those of major hepatectomy (MH) and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) in North America. METHODS: The 2014-16 American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for MH, PD, and HPD. Partial hepatectomies, wedge liver biopsies, distal pancreatectomies, pancreatic enucleations and total pancreatectomies were excluded. Propensity score matching was utilized to match 23 HPDs to 92 MHs and 138 PDs by 28 demographic, comorbidity, laboratory, operative and pathologic variables. Outcomes were compared among these three groups. RESULTS: The overall morbidity and mortality for HPD were 87% and 26%, respectively, and were significantly higher (p < 0.01) compared to both MH (51%, 7.6%) and PD (52%, 1.4%). Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) was more common (p < 0.01) in HPD patients, but pancreatic fistula rates were similar. CONCLUSION: The morbidity and mortality after HPD are significantly higher than after MH or PD alone and may explain why HPD is performed so infrequently in North America. Centralization of HPD to a very few centers may be a strategy to improve outcomes.

Early drain removal after hepatectomy: an underutilized management strategy.

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggest that routine drainage is unnecessary in patients undergoing hepatectomy, but many surgeons continue to utilize drains. We compared the outcomes of patients undergoing early versus routine drain removal after hepatectomy. METHODS: Patients having drains placed during major (≥3 segments) or partial hepatectomy (≤2 segments) were identified in the 2014-16 ACS-NSQIP database. Propensity matching between early (POD 0-3) and routine (POD 4-7) drain removal and multivariable regressions were performed. RESULTS: Early drain removal was performed in 661 (40%) of patients undergoing a partial hepatectomy and 211 (22%) of major hepatectomy patients. After matching, 719 early and 719 routine drain removal patients were compared. Early drain removal patients had lower overall (12 vs 19%, p < 0.001) and serious (9 vs 13%, p < 0.03) morbidity as well as fewer bile leaks (2.1% vs 5.0%, p < 0.003). Length of stay was two days shorter (4 vs 6 days, p < 0.01) and readmissions were less frequent (5.4 vs 8.1%, p = 0.02) for patients undergoing early drain removal. CONCLUSION: Early drain removal is associated with fewer overall and serious complications, shorter length of stay and fewer readmissions. Early drain removal after hepatectomy is an underutilized management strategy.

Patient-specific predictors of failure to rescue after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Failure to rescue (FTR) is a recently described outcome metric for quality of care. However, predictors of FTR have not been adequately investigated, particularly after pancreaticoduodenectomy. We aim to identify predictors of FTR after pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: We reviewed all patients who developed serious morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy from 2005 to 2012 in the ACS-NSQIP database. Logistic regression was used to identify preoperative and postoperative risks for 30-day mortality within a development cohort (randomly selected 80%). A score was created using weighted beta coefficients. Predictive accuracy was assessed on the validation cohort (remaining 20%) using a receiver operator characteristic curve and calculating the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: The FTR rate was 7.2% after pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 5,027). We identified 5 independent risk factors: age ≥65 and albumin ≤3.5 g/dL, preoperatively; and development of shock, renal failure, and reintubation, postoperatively. The generated score had an AUC = 0.83 (95% CI, 0.77-0.89) in the validation cohort. Using the score: 1*Albumin ≤3.5 g/dL + 2*Age ≥ 65 + 2*Shock + 5*Renal failure + 5*Reintubation, FTR rates increased with increasing score (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: FTR rates have previously been shown to be associated with hospital factors. We show that FTR is also associated with preoperative and postoperative patient-specific factors.

Multidisciplinary strategies in bloodless medicine and surgery for patients undergoing pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Bloodless pancreatic surgery (BPS) is rarely performed and/or reported. We aim to characterize perioperative and anesthetic strategies in BPS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed on MEDLINE looking for case reports/case series using search terms ("Jehovah's Witness" [All Fields]) AND ("Pancreatic Surgery" [All Fields] OR "Pancreaticoduodenectomy" [All Fields] OR "Distal Pancreatectomy" [All Fields]). Data regarding categorical variables are reported as proportions and quantitative continuous variables as medians with ranges or means with standard deviation. Forty-one patients requiring BPS are reported in the literature with three additional cases from our institution (n = 44). The data analyzed included clinicopathologic factors, BPS strategies, patient complications, and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The most common procedure and diagnosis were pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 34, 77.3%) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (n = 12, 27.3%), respectively. Transfusion reduction strategies in BPS fell into three categories: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative. Preoperative strategies included iron supplementation (n = 24, 54.5%) and erythropoietin administration (n = 14, 41.2%). Intraoperative strategies included acute normovolemic hemodilution (n = 30, 68%) and cell saver (n = 4, 9.1%). Postoperative strategies included erythropoietin (n = 16, 48.5%) and iron supplementation (n = 16, 48.5%). Complications occurred in 21 (60%) patients. There was no in-hospital mortality among the 44 patients in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: A broad spectrum of bloodless medicine and surgery practices were used based on patient selection, multidisciplinary practice, and preference. With careful perioperative and anesthetic management, BPS can be performed with good outcomes.

Reconstruction options following pancreaticoduodenectomy after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a risk factor for pancreatic cancer which may be treated with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and represents an increasing morbidity. Post-RYGB anatomy poses considerable challenges for reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), a growing problem encountered by surgeons. We characterize specific strategies used for post-PD reconstruction in the RYGB patient. METHODS: PubMed search was performed using MeSH terms "Gastric Bypass" and "Pancreaticoduodenectomy" between 2000 and 2018. Articles reporting cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy in post-RYGB patients were included and systematically reviewed for this study. RESULTS: Three case reports and five case series (25 patients) addressed PD after RYGB; we report one additional case. The typical post-gastric bypass PD patient is a woman in the sixth decade of life, presenting most commonly with pain (69.2%) and/or jaundice (53.8%), median 5 years after RYGB. Five post-PD reconstructive options are reported. Among these, the gastric remnant was resected in 18 cases (69.2%), with reconstruction of biliopancreatic drainage most commonly achieved using the distal jejunal segment of the pre-existing biliopancreatic limb (73.1%). Similarly, in the eight cases where the gastric remnant was spared (30.8%), drainage was most commonly performed using the distal jejunal segment of the biliopancreatic limb (50%). Among the 17 cases reporting follow-up data, median was 27 months. CONCLUSION: Reconstruction options after PD in the post-RYGB patient focus on resection or preservation gastric remnant, as well as creation of new biliopancreatic limb. Insufficient data exists to make recommendations regarding the optimal reconstruction option, yet surgeons must prepare for the possible clinical challenge. PD reconstruction post-RYGB requires evaluation through prospective studies.

The prognostic role of aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index on outcomes after nonemergent major hepatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Noninvasive screening methods to identify patients preoperatively with abnormal liver texture remain limited. Aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index has been validated to predict fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C; however, its use as a predictor of postoperative outcomes in patients without viral hepatitis remains unknown. METHODS: We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset to identify patients who underwent a major hepatectomy between 2014 and 2021. We excluded patients who underwent emergent operations, patients with viral hepatitis, and patients with ascites. Aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index was calculated using the following equation: (aspartate transaminase/40)/(platelet count) × 100. An aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index ≥0.7 was used to identify patients with significant fibrosis. Univariable analysis was performed to identify factors associated with aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index ≥0.7, perioperative transfusion, serious morbidity, overall morbidity, and 30-day mortality. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify adjusted predictors of these outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 8,933 patients who met inclusion criteria, 1,170 (13.1%) patients had an aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index ≥0.7. A perioperative blood transfusion was administered to 2,497 (28.0%). The number of patients who experienced overall morbidity, serious morbidity, and mortality were 3,195 (35.8%), 2,665 (29.8%), and 238 (2.7%), respectively. Aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index ≥0.7 was an independent predictor of transfusion (odds ratio: 1.51 [1.32-1.72], P < .001), overall morbidity (1.16 [1.01-1.33], P = .032), and mortality (1.56 [1.12-2.13], P = .006). Transfusion was an independent predictor of overall morbidity (2.50 [2.26-2.76], P < .001), serious morbidity (2.51 [2.26-2.79], P < .001), and mortality (3.28 [2.49-4.33], P < .001). CONCLUSION: An aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index ≥0.7 is associated with perioperative transfusion, overall morbidity, and 30-day mortality. The aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index may serve as a noninvasive tool to risk stratify patients before elective major hepatectomy.

"The Prognostic Role of Aspartate Transaminase to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) on Outcomes Following Non-emergent Minor Hepatectomy".

INTRODUCTION: Fibrosis and cirrhosis are associated with worse outcomes after hepatectomy. Aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI) is associated with fibrosis and cirrhosis in hepatitis C patients. However, APRI has not been studied to predict outcomes after hepatectomy in patients without viral hepatitis. METHODS: We reviewed the ACS-NSQIP dataset to identify patients who underwent a minor hepatectomy between 2014 and 2021. We excluded patients with viral hepatitis or ascites as well as patients who underwent emergent operations or biliary reconstruction. APRI was calculated using the following equation: (AST/40)/(platelet count) × 100. APRI ≥0.7 was used to identify significant fibrosis. Univariable analysis was performed to identify factors associated with APRI ≥0.7, transfusion, serious morbidity, overall morbidity, and 30-day mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify adjusted predictors of these outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 18,069 patients who met inclusion criteria, 1630 (9.0%) patients had an APRI ≥0.7. A perioperative blood transfusion was administered to 2139 (11.8%). Overall morbidity, serious morbidity, and mortality were experienced by 3162 (17.5%), 2475 (13.7%), and 131 (.7%) patients, respectively. APRI ≥0.7 was an independent predictor of transfusion (adjusted OR: 1.48 [1.26-1.74], P < .001), overall morbidity (1.17 [1.02-1.33], P = .022), and mortality (1.97 [1.22-3.06], P = .004). Transfusion was an independent predictor of overall morbidity (3.31 [2.99-3.65], P < .001), serious morbidity (3.70 [3.33-4.11], P < .001), and mortality (5.73 [4.01-8.14], P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: APRI ≥0.7 is associated with perioperative transfusion, overall morbidity, and 30-day mortality. APRI may serve as a noninvasive tool to risk stratify patients prior to elective minor hepatectomy.

Impact of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer: Transatlantic Trend and Postoperative Outcomes Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of modern chemotherapy a decade ago has led to increased use of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). A recent North American study demonstrated increased use of NAT and improved operative outcomes in patients with PDAC. The aims of this study were to compare the use of NAT and short-term outcomes in patients with PDAC undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) among registries from the US and Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden. STUDY DESIGN: Databases from 2 multicenter (voluntary) and 2 nationwide (mandatory) registries were queried from 2018 to 2020. Patients undergoing PD for PDAC were compared based on the use of upfront surgery vs NAT. Adoption of NAT was measured in each country over time. Thirty-day outcomes, including the composite measure (ideal outcomes), were compared by multivariable analyses. Sensitivity analyses of patients undergoing vascular resection were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 11,402 patients underwent PD for PDAC with 33.7% of patients receiving NAT. The use of NAT increased steadily from 28.3% in 2018 to 38.5% in 2020 (p < 0.0001). However, use of NAT varied widely by country: the US (46.8%), the Netherlands (44.9%), Sweden (11.0%), and Germany (7.8%). On multivariable analysis, NAT was significantly (p < 0.01) associated with reduced rates of serious morbidity, clinically relevant pancreatic fistulae, reoperations, and increased ideal outcomes. These associations remained on sensitivity analysis of patients undergoing vascular resection. CONCLUSIONS: NAT before PD for pancreatic cancer varied widely among 4 Western audits yet increased by 26% during 3 years. NAT was associated with improved short-term outcomes.

International differences in the selection and outcome of minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy: A transatlantic analysis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy have been confirmed by randomized trials, but current patient selection and outcome of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy in large international cohorts is unknown. This study aimed to compare the use and outcome of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy in North America, the Netherlands, Germany, and Sweden. METHODS: All patients in the 4 Global Audits on Pancreatic Surgery Group (GAPASURG) registries who underwent minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy or open distal pancreatectomy during 2014-2020 were included. RESULTS: Overall, 20,158 distal pancreatectomies were included, of which 7,316 (36%) were minimally invasive distal pancreatectomies. Use of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy varied from 29% to 54% among registries, of which 13% to 35% were performed robotically. Both the use of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy and robotic surgery were the highest in the Netherlands. Patients undergoing minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy tended to have a younger age (Germany and Sweden), female sex (North America, Germany), higher body mass index (North America, the Netherlands, Germany), lower comorbidity classification (North America, Germany, Sweden), lower performance status (Germany), and lower rate of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (all). The minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy group had fewer vascular resections (all) and lower rates of severe complications and mortality (North America, Germany). In the multivariable regression analysis, country was associated with severe complications but not with 30-day mortality. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy was associated with a lower risk of 30-day mortality compared with open distal pancreatectomy (odds ratio 1.633, 95% CI 1.159-2.300, P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Considerable disparities were seen in the use of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy among 4 transatlantic registries of pancreatic surgery. Overall, minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy was associated with decreased mortality as compared with open distal pancreatectomy. Differences in patient selection among countries could imply that countries are in different stages of the learning curve.

What is the best definitive treatment for Graves' disease? A systematic review of the existing literature.

BACKGROUND: The management guidelines of the American Thyroid Association and American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists for Graves' disease (GD) include any of the following modalities: (131)I therapy, antithyroid medication, or thyroidectomy. No in-depth analysis has been performed comparing the treatment options, even though a single treatment option seems to be universally accepted. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed to examine contemporary literature between 2001 and 2011 evaluating the management options of GD. We compiled retrospective and prospective studies analyzing surgery and radioactive iodine. Outcomes of interest included postoperative hypothyroidism, euthyroidism, and persistent or recurrent hyperthyroidism without supplementation. Success was defined as postoperative euthyroidism or hypothyroidism. Failure was defined as persistent or recurrent hyperthyroidism. RESULTS: Of the 14,245 patients, 4,546 underwent surgery [3,158 patients had subtotal thyroidectomy (STT) and 1,388 had total thyroidectomy (TT)] and 9,699 had radioactive iodine. The radioactive iodine group consisted of 2,383 patients receiving 1-10 mCi, 1,558 patients receiving 11-15 mCi, 516 patients receiving >15 mCi, and 5,242 patients receiving an unspecified amount. Surgery was found to be 3.44 times more likely to be successful than radioactive iodine (p < 0.001). STT and TT were found to be 2.33 and 94.45 times more likely to be successful than radioactive iodine (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the outcomes analyzed, surgery appears to be the most successful in the management of GD, with TT being the preferred surgical option.

Failure to Rescue After the Whipple: What Do We Know?

Mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy has improved over time. This progress is likely related to advancements in failure to rescue (FTR-the percentage of patients who die after developing a major complication). Several factors associated with FTR include patient-specific risks, development of certain postoperative complications, surgeon-specific factors, hospital-specific factors, rescue techniques, and regional differences. Efforts should be made to explore additional factors such as the influence of safety culture in the postoperative setting. Improvement in FTR may be better explored through randomized controlled postoperative management trials. In stable patients, management of complications by interventional radiology is preferred over reoperation.

Minimally Invasive Hepatectomy in North America: Laparoscopic Versus Robotic.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive hepatectomy has been shown to be associated with improved outcomes when compared with open surgery. However, data comparing laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy is lacking and limited to single-center studies. METHODS: Patients undergoing major (≥ 3 segments) or partial (≤ 2 segments) hepatectomy were identified in the 2014-2017 ACS-NSQIP hepatectomy targeted database. Patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic approaches were compared, and propensity score matching was utilized to adjust for bias. RESULTS: Of 3152 minimally invasive hepatectomies (MIHs), 86% (N = 2706) were partial and 14% (N = 446) were major. The laparoscopic approach was utilized in 92% of patients (N = 2905) and 8% were performed robotically (N = 247). The percentage of MIHs increased over time (p < 0.01). After matching, 240 were identified in each cohort. Compared with the robotic approach, patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy had a significantly higher conversion rate (23% vs. 7.4%) but had shorter operative time (159 vs. 204 min) (p < 0.001). Laparoscopic cases undergoing an unplanned conversion to open were associated with increased morbidity (p < 0.001), but this difference was not observed in robotic cases. Both MIH approaches had low mortality (1.0%, p = 1.00), overall morbidity (17%, p = 0.47), and very short length of stay (3 days, p = 0.80). CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive hepatectomy is performed primarily for partial hepatectomies. Laparoscopic hepatectomy is associated with a significantly higher conversion rate, and converted cases have worse outcomes. Both minimally invasive approaches are safe with similar mortality, morbidity, and a very short length of stay. Graphical Abstract.

Optimal hepatic surgery: Are we making progress in North America?

BACKGROUND: The aim of this analysis was to determine whether optimal outcomes have increased in recent years. Hepatic surgery is high risk, but regionalization and minimally invasive approaches have evolved. Best practices also have been defined with the goal of improving outcomes. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried. Analyses were performed separately for partial (≤2 segments), major (≥3 segments), and all hepatectomies. Optimal hepatic surgery was defined as the absence of mortality, serious morbidity, need for a postoperative invasive procedure or reoperation, prolonged length of stay (<75th percentile) or readmission. Tests of trend, χ2, and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: From 2014 to 2018, 17,082 hepatectomies, including 11,862 partial hepatectomies and 5,220 major hepatectomies, were analyzed. Minimally invasive approaches increased from 25.6% in 2014 to 29.6% in 2018 (P < .01) and were performed more frequently for partial hepatectomies (34.2%) than major hepatectomies (14.4%) (P < .01). Operative time decreased from 220 minutes in 2014 to 208 minutes in 2018 (P < .05) and was lower in partial hepatectomies (189 vs 258 minutes for major hepatectomies) (P < .01). Mortality (0.7%) and length of stay (4 days) were lower for partial hepatectomies compared with major hepatectomies (1.9%; 6 days), and length of stay decreased for both partial hepatectomies (5 days in 2014 to 4 days in 2018) and major hepatectomies (6 days in 2014 to 6 days in 2018) (all P < .01). Postoperative sepsis (2.9% in 2014 and 2.4% in 2018), bile leaks (6% in 2014 and 4.8% in 2018), and liver failure (3.7% in 2014 and 3.3% in 2018) decreased for all patients (<.05). On multivariable analyses, overall morbidity decreased for major hepatectomies (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99) and all hepatectomies (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.99, both P < .01), and optimal hepatic surgery increased over time for partial hepatectomies (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.09) and all hepatectomies (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.07, both P < .01). CONCLUSION: Over a 5-year period in North America, minimally invasive hepatectomies have increased, while operative time, postoperative sepsis, bile leaks, liver failure, and prolonged length of stay have decreased. Optimal hepatic surgery has increased for partial and all hepatectomies and is achieved more often in partial than in major resections.