An Educational Module to Teach Interprofessional Learner Feedback Skills for Trauma Simulation Events.

BACKGROUND: Peer feedback, or feedback given by a learner to another learner, is an important active learning strategy. Hierarchy and stereotypes may affect interprofessional (IP) learner-to-learner feedback. The aim was to assess the efficacy of an educational module for IP learners in delivering effective feedback during trauma simulations. METHODS: Multiple simulation events designed to improve teamwork and leadership skills during trauma simulations included IP learners (residents and nurses). Participants completed a pre-course educational module on IP peer feedback. The Trauma Team Competence Assessment-24 tool structured feedback. Learners completed pre/post-assessments utilizing IP Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey (ICCAS). RESULTS: Twenty-five learners participated in the trauma simulations (13 general surgery and 5 emergency residents, 3 medical students, 4 nurses). The majority of learners had either not received any previous training in how to effectively deliver peer feedback (40%) or had engaged in self-directed learning only (24%). Most learners (64%) had delivered peer feedback less than ten times. Learner knowledge and confidence in delivering feedback to fellow IP learners improved after simulations. All learners felt the feedback received was useful to their daily practice (68% agree, 32% strongly agree). All participants agreed that the simulation achieved each of the ICCAS competencies. CONCLUSIONS: Formal education on IP peer feedback is rare. This pilot work demonstrates educational modules with a foundation in validated tools can be effective in improving learner knowledge and confidence in the process. Engaging in IP peer feedback may also serve to flatten hierarchies that can challenge effective interprofessional teamwork.

Perceptions of the Moral Obligations of Pediatric Nurses During an Active Shooter Event in a Children's Hospital.

PURPOSE: To explore and compare the perceptions of nurses and parent/family advisors regarding pediatric nurses' moral obligations to children and families during an active shooter event in a children's hospital. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a descriptive, exploratory study using survey methodology. A convenience sample of all licensed nurses and parent/family advisors from four children's hospitals across the United States were recruited. Surveys consisted of five primary domains including Appropriateness of National Guidelines, Personal Preparedness, Moral Accountability, Professional/Legal Concerns, and Personal Risk Expectations. Frequency counts and percentages were calculated for each survey item. RESULTS: Data from 874 pediatric nurses and 81 parent/family advisors were analyzed. Most respondents believed the Run-Hide-Fight campaign should be changed to Secure-Preserve-Fight. Only 30% of nurses felt mentally prepared to respond to an active shooter event. Most respondents agreed that nurses have a professional duty to protect their patients, but agreed that it was a personal choice, not a moral obligation, to accept potentially fatal risks. Hospital setting and patient vulnerability often influenced nurses' perceived obligations to patients. Most respondents reported they would not leave their patient/child during an active shooter event. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses feel morally obligated to patients, but must balance their own personal risk tolerance level against the need to protect patients and families. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Hospitals need in-depth active shooter training for both nurses and parents as well as safety plans that address both evacuation protocols and measures to secure in place to protect the lives of patients, families, and staff.

The community of inquiry framework for virtual team-to-team debriefings during interprofessional trauma simulations.

Purpose: Psychological safety is key to effective debriefing and learning. The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated rapid adaption of simulation events to virtual/hybrid platforms. We sought to determine the effect of utilizing the Community of Inquiry framework (CoI) for debriefing virtually connecting interprofessional learner teams on the psychological safety experienced during trauma simulations. Methods: General surgery (GSR), emergency medicine (EMR) residents, trauma nurses/nurse practitioners and medical students participated in multiple simulation events designed to improve teamwork and leadership skills. Pre-course materials were provided before the event for learners to prepare. Briefings delineating expectations emphasized importance of and strategies employed to achieve psychological safety. Four unique clinical scenarios were run for each simulation event, with a debrief after each scenario. Virtual team-to-team debriefings were structured using the Community of Inquiry (CoI) conceptual framework. All learners completed pre-/post-assessments utilizing Inter-professional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey (ICCAS). Results: Twenty-five learners participated (13 GSR, 5 EMR, 3 medical students, 2 trauma APRNs and 2 trauma RNs). Learner assessment found 88% (22) "agreed"/"strongly agreed" that virtual team-to-team debriefing had social, cognitive and educator presence per the CoI domains. However, one GSR and two nurse learners "strongly disagreed" with these statements. Most learners felt the debriefing was effective and safe. All participants "strongly agreed"/"agreed" the simulation achieved ICCAS competencies. Conclusions: Debriefings utilizing a virtual platform are challenging with multiple barriers to ensuring psychological safety and efficacy. By structuring debriefings using the CoI framework we demonstrate they can be effective for most learners. However, educators should recognize the implications of social identity theory, particularly the effects of hierarchy, on comfort level of learners. Developing strategies to optimize virtual simulation learning environments is essential as this valuable pedagogy persists during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.