Thoracic staging with 18F-FDG PET/MR in non-small cell lung cancer - does it change therapeutic decisions in comparison to 18F-FDG PET/CT?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether differences in thoracic tumour staging between 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MR imaging lead to different therapeutic decisions in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-seven NSCLC patients that underwent whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT from the base of skull to the upper thighs and thoracic PET/MR were enrolled in this retrospective study. Thoracic PET/CT and PET/MR images were staged according to the 7th edition of the AJCC staging manual. Staging results of both modalities were discussed separately in a simulated interdisciplinary tumour board and therapeutic decisions based on both imaging modalities were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to compare the results and reasons for changes in the therapeutic decision were investigated. RESULTS: Staging results differed in 35 % of patients (27 patients) between thoracic PET/CT and PET/MR. Differences were detected when assessing the T-stage in 18 % (n = 14), the N-stage in 23 % (n = 18), and the M-stage in 1 % (n = 1). However, patient therapy management was changed in only six patients (8 %). CONCLUSION: Despite the variability of thoracic 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MR in TNM-staging, both modalities lead to comparable therapeutic decisions in patients suffering from NSCLC. Hence, 18F-FDG PET/MR can be considered an possible alternative to 18F-FDG PET/CT for clinical NSCLC staging. KEY POINTS: • PET/CT and PET/MR provide comparable results in early stages in NSCLC • Clinical impact of different staging results has not been investigated • PET/CT and PET/MR lead to comparable therapeutic decisions • PET/MR can be considered an alternative to PET/CT for NSCLC staging.

Diagnostic accuracy of whole-body PET/MRI and whole-body PET/CT for TNM staging in oncology.

PURPOSE: In various tumours PET/CT with [(18)F]FDG is widely accepted as the diagnostic standard of care. The purpose of this study was to compare a dedicated [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI protocol with [(18)F]FDG PET/CT for TNM staging in a cohort of oncological patients. METHODS: A dedicated [(18)F]FDG PET/MRI protocol was performed in 73 consecutive patients (mean age of 59 years, range 21 - 85 years) with different histologically confirmed solid primary malignant tumours after a routine clinical FDG PET/CT scan (60 min after injection of 295 ± 45 MBq [(18)F]FDG). TNM staging according to the 7th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual was performed by two readers in separate sessions for PET/CT and PET/MRI images. Assessment of the primary tumour and nodal and distant metastases with FDG PET/CT and FDG PET/MRI was based on qualitative and quantitative analyses. Histopathology, and radiological and clinical follow-up served as the standards of reference. A McNemar test was performed to evaluate the differences in diagnostic performance between the imaging procedures. RESULTS: From FDG PET/CT and FDG PET/MRI T stage was correctly determined in 22 (82 %) and 20 (74 %) of 27 patients, N stage in 55 (82 %) and 56 (84 %) of 67 patients, and M stage in 32 (76 %) and 35 (83 %) of 42 patients, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy for lymph node metastases were 65 %, 94 %, 79 %, 89 % and 87 % for PET/CT, and 63 %, 94 %, 80 %, 87 % and 85 % for PET/MRI. The respective values for the detection of distant metastases were 50 %, 82 %, 40 %, 88 % and 76 % for PET/CT, and 50 %, 91 %, 57 %, 89 % and 83 % for PET/MRI. Differences between the two imaging modalities were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: According to our results, FDG PET/CT and FDG PET/MRI are of equal diagnostic accuracy for TNM staging in patients with solid tumours.

Thoracic staging of non-small-cell lung cancer using integrated (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging: diagnostic value of different MR sequences.

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of different MR sequences in simultaneous PET/MR imaging for T staging in non-small-cell lung cancer in relation to histopathology. METHODS: The study included 28 patients who underwent dedicated thoracic PET/MR imaging before tumour resection. Local tumour staging was performed separately by three readers with each of the following MR sequences together with PET: transverse T2 BLADE, transverse non-enhanced and contrast-enhanced T1 FLASH, T1 3D Dixon VIBE in transverse and coronal orientation, coronal T2 HASTE, and coronal TrueFISP. The staging results were compared with histopathology after resection as the reference standard. Differences in the accuracy of T staging among the MR sequences were evaluated using McNemar's test. Due to multiple testing, Bonferroni correction was applied to prevent accumulation of α errors; p < 0.0024 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Compared with histopathology, T-staging accuracy was 69% with T2 BLADE, 68% with T2 HASTE, 59% with contrast-enhanced T1 FLASH, 57% with TrueFISP, 50 % with non-enhanced T1 FLASH, and 45% and 48% with T1 3D Dixon VIBE in transverse and coronal orientation, respectively. Staging accuracy with T2 BLADE was significantly higher than with non-enhanced T1 FLASH and with T1 3D Dixon VIBE in transverse and coronal orientations (p < 0.0024). T2 HASTE had a significantly higher T-staging accuracy than transverse T1 3D-Dixon-VIBE (p < 0.0024). CONCLUSION: Transverse T2 BLADE images provide the highest accuracy for local tumour staging and should therefore be included in dedicated thoracic PET/MR protocols. As T1 3D Dixon VIBE images acquired for attenuation correction performed significantly worse, this sequence cannot be considered sufficiently accurate for local tumour staging in the thorax.

Salvage lymph node dissection in hormone-naïve men: How effective is surgery?

OBJECTIVE: Salvage lymph node dissection (SLND) is still a questionable treatment approach for patients with nodal recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. We assessed the oncological benefit after SLND in hormone-naïve patients as well as the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) scanning. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study relied on retrospective collected data of 43 hormone-naïve men who received transperitoneal SLND between February 2011 and March 2017 at our institution. The oncological outcome for each patient was observed by serum prostate-specific antigen testing. Postoperative complications within 30 and 90 days were assessed according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. The accuracy of PSMA PET/CT was characterized by calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values. RESULTS: Overall 8 patients (18.6%) had a complete biochemical response 40 days after SLND. The median time from SLND to biochemical recurrence was 2 months. Adjuvant treatment encompassing radiotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy, or a combination of both, was administrated in 62.8%. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, no high-grade complications were observed. Sensitivity and specificity for PSMA PET/CT were respectively 32% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.21-51.59) and 91.74% (95% CI: 85.45-95.45). Calculated positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of PSMA PET/CT were 44.44% (95% CI: 25.98-64.58) and 86.72% (95% CI: 83.23-89.57). CONCLUSIONS: For most hormone-naïve men with a nodal recurrence of prostate cancer transperitoneal SLND is neither an appropriate treatment to cure nor an option to delay the need for salvage hormone manipulation. PSMA PET/CT scans in hormone-naïve patients are currently too imprecise to diagnose metastatic sites.

Quantitative performance of 124I PET/MR of neck lesions in thyroid cancer patients using 124I PET/CT as reference.

BACKGROUND: In patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), serial 124I PET/CT imaging is, for instance, used to assess the absorbed (radiation) dose to lesions. Frequently, the lesions are located in the neck and they are close to or surrounded by different tissue types. In contrast to PET/CT, MR-based attenuation correction in PET/MR may be therefore challenging in the neck region. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the quantitative performance of 124I PET/MRI of neck lesions by comparing the MR-based and CT-based 124I activity concentrations (ACs). Sixteen DTC patients underwent PET/CT scans at 24 and 120 h after administration of about 25 MBq 124I. Approximately 1 h before or after PET/CT examination, each patient additionally received a 24-h PET/MR scan and sometimes a 120-h PET/MR scan. PET images were reconstructed using the respective attenuation correction approach. Appropriate reconstruction parameters and corrections were used to harmonize the reconstructed PET images to provide, for instance, similar spatial resolution. For each lesion, two types of ACs were ascertained: the maximum AC (max-AC) and an average AC (avg-AC). The avg-AC is the average activity concentration obtained within a spherical volume of interest with a diameter of 7 mm, equaling the PET scanner resolution. For each type of AC, the percentage AC difference between MR-based and CT-based ACs was determined and Lin's concordance correlation analysis was applied. Quantitative performance was considered acceptable if the standard deviation was ± 25% (precision), and the mean value was within ± 10% (accuracy). RESULTS: The avg-ACs (max-ACs within parentheses) of 74 lesions ranged from 0.20 (0.33) to 657 (733) kBq/mL. Excluding two lesions with ACs of approximately 1 kBq/mL, the mean (median) ± standard deviation (range) was - 4% (- 5%) ± 14% (- 28 to 29%) for the avg-AC and - 9% (- 11%) ± 14% (- 33 to 33%) for the max-AC. Lin's concordance correlation coefficients were ≥ 0.97, indicating substantial AC agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of lesions in the neck region using 124I PET/MR showed acceptable quantitation performance to 124I PET/CT for AC above 1 kBq/mL. The PET/MRI-based 124I ACs in the neck region can be therefore reliably used in pre-therapy dosimetry planning.

Imaging of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Expression in Metastatic Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Using 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA PET/CT.

PURPOSE: The prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) was shown to be overexpressed on the neovasculature of several malignancies. Here, the role of Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA PET/CT for the detection of PSMA expression in patients with metastasized differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) was evaluated. METHODS: Six patients with iodine-negative and F-FDG-positive metastasized DTC (mean TG, 1616 ng/mL) received 71-93 MBq of the Ga-labeled PSMA ligand and underwent PET/CT at 62 ± 7 minutes p.i.. Tumor accumulation capacity of the tracer and the detection rate of local recurrences and metastases were compared with F-FDG. Tracer uptake was quantified in terms of the SUVmax. RESULTS: In 5 of 6 patients, sites of putative metastatic disease could be identified using Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA PET/CT. All lesions detected with Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA PET/CT (n = 42) were confirmed by F-FDG PET/CT or conventional CT imaging. Using Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA PET/CT, all tumor lesions identified with F-FDG PET/CT imaging could be visualized in 3 of 5 patients. In 2 patients, only the most prominent lesions detected with F-FDG PET/CT imaging were visualized by Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA PET/CT. Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA uptake ranged from low in 1 patient (mean SUVmax 3.3) to intermediate (1 patient; mean SUVmax, 6.1) to intense (3 patients; mean SUVmax, 12.8, 16.2, and 18.3). The highest SUVmax values were observed for a bone lesion, reaching 39.7. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results indicate that Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA PET/CT might be suitable for staging of patients with metastasized DTC. Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA PET/CT could be useful for the identification of patients who might qualify for PSMA-targeted radionuclide therapy because of high PSMA uptake.

Is integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI superior to 18F-FDG PET/CT in the differentiation of incidental tracer uptake in the head and neck area?

PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate the accuracy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (18F-FDG PET/MRI) compared with contrast-enhanced 18F-FDG PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the characterization of incidental tracer uptake in examinations of the head and neck. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 81 oncologic patients who underwent contrast-enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT and subsequent PET/MRI was performed by two readers for incidental tracer uptake. In a consensus reading, discrepancies were resolved. Each finding was either characterized as most likely benign, most likely malignant, or indeterminate. Using all available clinical information including results from histopathologic sampling and follow-up examinations, an expert reader classified each finding as benign or malignant. McNemar's test was used to compare the performance of both imaging modalities in characterizing incidental tracer uptake. RESULTS: Forty-six lesions were detected by both modalities. On PET/CT, 27 lesions were classified as most likely benign, one as most likely malignant, and 18 as indeterminate; on PET/MRI, 31 lesions were classified as most likely benign, one lesion as most likely malignant, and 14 as indeterminate. Forty-three lesions were benign and one lesion was malignant according to the reference standard. In two lesions, a definite diagnosis was not possible. McNemar's test detected no differences concerning the correct classification of incidental tracer uptake between PET/CT and PET/MRI (P = 0.125). CONCLUSION: In examinations of the head and neck area, incidental tracer uptake cannot be classified more accurately by PET/MRI than by PET/CT.

Integrated 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA-PET/MRI in patients with suspected recurrent prostate cancer.

AIM: Evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-labeled HBED-CC-PSMA-PET/MRI for detection of recurrent PCa in comparison to PET/CT. METHODS: 48 patients with suspected recurrent PCa underwent PET/CT after injection of the 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA ligand followed by integrated PET/MRI. Image analysis was performed by nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists with respect to the detection of lymph node metastases, bone metastases and local recurrence of the tumour. Image quality was evaluated visually based on a three-point ordinal scale. RESULTS: From 48 patients initially examined, 25 were finally eligible for qualitative and quantitative image evaluation. In 14 patients, neither PET/CT nor PET/MRI found tumour lesions, and 9 patients were excluded from image analysis due to a pronounced extinction artifact around the urinary bladder (halo). In comparison to 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA-PET/CT, 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA-PET/MRI identified 14 vs. 9 local recurrences in the prostate bed and 23 vs. 20 PET-positive lymph nodes, and 4 vs. 4 PET-positive bone lesions, respectively. While the improved detection of suspicious lymph nodes was primarily attributable to the PET component, the advantageous detection of tumour recurrences in the prostate bed was chiefly referable to the superior soft-tissue contrast of the MR component of integrated PET/MRI. Analysis of SUVmax revealed that 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA-PET/MRI provided significantly higher SUVmax compared to 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA-PET/CT (17.6, range 2.0-49.6, and 15.1, range 3.5-36.8, respectively, p = 0.0019). CONCLUSION: 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA-PET/MRI was found to be superior as compared to 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA-PET/CT in the detection of PSMA-expressing prostate bed recurrences.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma: initial experience in integrated (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging.

PURPOSE: This study aims to compare staging results of (18)F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) and integrated PET/magnetic resonance (MR) in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients and to investigate a potential apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)/SUV correlation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six patients with MPM underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MR including diffusion-weighted imaging. Thoracic TNM staging was performed for both modalities. SUV and ADC were assessed in therapy-naive pleural lesions. RESULTS: In thoracic TNM staging, no differences were found between PET/CT and PET/MR. An inverse correlation was observed between SUVmean and ADCmin (r=-0.63, P=.002). CONCLUSION: MPM can be staged using PET/MR. The inverse correlation ADC/SUV indicates that future research on multiparametric therapy response evaluation may be warranted.

Evaluation of the Outcome of Lung Nodules Missed on 18F-FDG PET/MRI Compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Known Malignancies.

UNLABELLED: The lower detection rate of (18)F-FDG PET/MRI than (18)F-FDG PET/CT regarding small lung nodules should be considered in the staging of malignant tumors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of these small lung nodules missed by (18)F-FDG PET/MRI. METHODS: Fifty-one oncologic patients (mean age ± SD, 56.6 ± 14.0 y; 29 women, 22 men; tumor stages, I [n = 7], II [n = 7], III [n = 9], IV [n = 28]) who underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT and subsequent (18)F-FDG PET/MRI on the same day were retrospectively enrolled. Images were analyzed by 2 interpreters in random order and separate sessions with a minimum of 4 wk apart. A maximum of 10 lung nodules was identified for each patient on baseline imaging. The presence, size, and presence of focal tracer uptake was noted for each lung nodule detected on (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/MRI using a postcontrast T1-weighted 3-dimensional gradient echo volume-interpolated breath-hold examination sequence with fat suppression as morphologic dataset. Follow-up CT or (18)F-FDG PET/CT (mean time to follow-up, 11 mo; range, 3-35 mo) was used as a reference standard to define each missed nodule as benign or malignant based on changes in size and potential new tracer uptake. Nodule-to-nodule comparison between baseline and follow-up was performed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Out of 134 lung nodules found on (18)F-FDG PET/CT, (18)F-FDG PET/MRI detected 92 nodules. Accordingly, 42 lung nodules (average size ± SD, 3.9 ± 1.3 mm; range, 2-7 mm) were missed by (18)F-FDG PET/MRI. None of the missed lung nodules presented with focal tracer uptake on baseline imaging or follow-up (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Thirty-three out of 42 missed lung nodules (78.6%) in 26 patients were rated benign, whereas 9 nodules (21.4%) in 4 patients were rated malignant. As a result, 1 patient required upstaging from tumor stage I to IV. CONCLUSION: Although most small lung nodules missed on (18)F-FDG PET/MRI were found to be benign, there was a relevant number of undetected metastases. However, in patients with advanced tumor stages the clinical impact remains controversial as upstaging is usually more relevant in lower stages.

Hybrid imaging of the bowel using PET/MR enterography: Feasibility and first results.

PURPOSE: To implement a protocol for PET/MR enterography for a multimodal assessment of intestinal pathologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 19 patients with bowel malignancies, Crohn's disease or fever of unknown origin (male: n=14, female: n=5, age: 57±13years) underwent PET/MR enterography with either [(18)F]FDG (n=10) or [(68)Ga]-DOTATOC (n=9) using an integrated scanner. For small bowel distension a contrast solution (1500 cm(3) of mannitol and locust bean gum) was ingested. The following sequences were acquired: (a) coronal TrueFISP; (b) coronal T2w HASTE; (c) coronal dynamic T1w VIBE; (d) axial and coronal T1w FLASH post gadolinium. All datasets were reviewed by two readers with regard to co-registration of anatomical structures based on a 3-point ordinal scale as well as overall image quality using a 4-point ordinal scale. Furthermore, visualization of intestinal and extra-intestinal pathologies was assessed. RESULTS: PET/MR enterography was well tolerated by all patients. High overall MR image quality was achieved (mean score: 3.2±0.6) with good co-registration of PET and MRI (mean scores: 2.6 to 3.0). PET/MR enterography allowed for an excellent visualization of both intestinal as well as extra-intestinal pathologies. CONCLUSION: PET/MR enterography is technically feasible and offers good co-registration of bowel structures. This novel method enables a multimodal assessment of bowel lesions in malignant and inflammatory disease.

Comparative Performance of ¹8F-FDG PET/MRI and ¹8F-FDG PET/CT in Detection and Characterization of Pulmonary Lesions in 121 Oncologic Patients.

UNLABELLED: Our objective was to compare (18)F-FDG PET/MRI (performed using a contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-suppressed volume-interpolated breath-hold examination [VIBE]) with (18)F-FDG PET/CT for detecting and characterizing lung lesions in oncologic patients. METHODS: In 121 oncologic patients with 241 lung lesions, PET/MRI was performed after PET/CT in a single-injection protocol (260 ± 58 MBq of (18)F-FDG). The detection rates were computed for MRI, the PET component of PET/CT, and the PET component of PET/MRI in relation to the CT component of PET/CT. Wilcoxon testing was used to assess differences in lesion contrast (4-point scale) and size between morphologic datasets and differences in image quality (4-point scale), SUVmean, SUVmax, and characterization (benign/malignant) between PET/MRI and PET/CT. Correlation was determined using the Pearson coefficient (r) for SUV and size and the Spearman rank coefficient (ρ) for contrast. RESULTS: The detection rates for MRI, the PET component of PET/CT, and the PET component of PET/MRI were 66.8%, 42.7%, and 42.3%, respectively. There was a strong correlation in size (r= 0.98) and SUV (r= 0.91) and a moderate correlation in contrast (ρ = 0.48). Image quality was better for PET/CT than for PET/MRI (P< 0.001). Lesion measurements were smaller for MRI than for CT (P< 0.001). SUVmax and SUVmean were significantly higher for PET/MRI than for PET/CT (P< 0.001 each). There was no significant difference in lesion contrast (P= 0.11) or characterization (P= 0.076). CONCLUSION: In the detection and characterization of lung lesions 10 mm or larger, (18)F-FDG PET/MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT perform comparably. Lesion size, SUV and characterization correlate strongly between the two modalities. However, the overall detection rate of PET/MRI remains inferior to that of PET/CT because of the limited ability of MRI to detect lesions smaller than 10 mm. Thus, thoracic staging with PET/MRI bears a risk of missing small lung metastases.

Optimization of Acquisition time of 68Ga-PSMA-Ligand PET/MRI in Patients with Local and Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this optimization study was to minimize the acquisition time of 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) in patients with local and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) to obtain a sufficient image quality and quantification accuracy without any appreciable loss. METHODS: Twenty patients with PCa were administered intravenously with the 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA ligand (mean activity 99 MBq/patient, range 76-148 MBq) and subsequently underwent PET/MRI at, on average, 168 min (range 77-320 min) after injection. PET and MR imaging data were acquired simultaneously. PET acquisition was performed in list mode and PET images were reconstructed at different time intervals (1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 min). Data were analyzed regarding radiotracer uptake in tumors and muscle tissue and PET image quality. Tumor uptake was quantified in terms of the maximum and mean standardized uptake value (SUVmax, SUVmean) within a spherical volume of interest (VOI). Reference VOIs were drawn in the gluteus maximus muscle on the right side. PET image quality was evaluated by experienced nuclear physicians/radiologists using a five-point ordinal scale from 5-1 (excellent-insufficient). RESULTS: Lesion detectability linearly increased with increasing acquisition times, reaching its maximum at PET acquisition times of 4 min. At this image acquisition time, tumor lesions in 19/20 (95%) patients were detected. PET image quality showed a positive correlation with increasing acquisition time, reaching a plateau at 4-6 min image acquisition. Both SUVmax and SUVmean correlated inversely with acquisition time and reached a plateau at acquisition times after 4 min. CONCLUSION: In the applied image acquisition settings, the optimal acquisition time of 68Ga-PSMA-ligand PET/MRI in patients with local and metastatic PCa was identified to be 4 min per bed position. At this acquisition time, PET image quality and lesion detectability reach a maximum while SUVmax and SUVmean do not change significantly beyond this time point.

Circulating U2 small nuclear RNA fragments as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in lung cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Lung cancer accounts for one in five cancer deaths. Broad screening strategies for high-risk populations are unavailable, and the validation of biomarkers for early cancer detection remains a prime interest. Therefore, we investigated the value of circulating U2 small nuclear RNA fragments (RNU2-1f) as a biomarker for diagnosis, prognosis estimation and treatment monitoring in a large lung cancer cohort. METHODS: We determined RNU2-1f abundance in sera of patients with treatment-naive lung cancer (n = 211, 25.6 % early stage), chronic lung disease (n = 56) and healthy controls (n = 58) by reverse transcription quantitative PCR. Initial levels and changes after one chemotherapy cycle were correlated with treatment outcomes in patient subsets. RESULTS: Relative serum RNU2-1f expression levels (REL) were elevated in lung cancer patients compared with patients with chronic lung disease and healthy controls (p < 0.0001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the complete data set (lung cancer vs. healthy) was 0.91 (95 % CI 0.87-0.95). By applying a REL of -4.505 as diagnostic cutoff (Youden's criterion), sensitivity and specificity reached 0.86 and 0.81, respectively. To determine the generalization error, in a subsampling study, sensitivity and specificity were estimated as 0.82 and 0.77 for the application to future, independent samples. High initial RNU2-1f REL were associated with shorter median survival in stage IIIB/IV disease (RNU2-1fhigh = 228 days/RNU2-1flow = 484 days; p = 0.009, log-rank test, HR1.43 95 % CI 1.23-1.66). Multivariate analysis confirmed RNU2-1f as an independent prognostic factor. Patients with subsequent RNU2-1f reduction had a trend toward better treatment outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Serum RNU2-1f may serve as a biomarker for lung cancer detection, prognosis prediction and treatment monitoring.

Accuracy of [18F]FDG PET/MRI for the Detection of Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG-PET/MRI with PET/CT for the detection of liver metastases. METHODS: 32 patients with solid malignancies underwent [18F]FDG-PET/CT and subsequent PET/MRI of the liver. Two readers assessed both datasets regarding lesion characterization (benign, indeterminate, malignant), conspicuity and diagnostic confidence. An imaging follow-up (mean interval: 185±92 days) and/-or histopathological specimen served as standards of reference. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for both modalities. Accuracy was determined by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Values of conspicuity and diagnostic confidence were compared using Wilcoxon-signed-rank test. RESULTS: The standard of reference revealed 113 liver lesions in 26 patients (malignant: n = 45; benign: n = 68). For PET/MRI a higher accuracy (PET/CT: 82.4%; PET/MRI: 96.1%; p<0.001) as well as sensitivity (67.8% vs. 92.2%, p<0.01) and NPV (82.0% vs. 95.1%, p<0.05) were observed. PET/MRI offered higher lesion conspicuity (PET/CT: 2.0±1.1 [median: 2; range 0-3]; PET/MRI: 2.8±0.5 [median: 3; range 0-3]; p<0.001) and diagnostic confidence (PET/CT: 2.0±0.8 [median: 2; range: 1-3]; PET/MRI 2.6±0.6 [median: 3; range: 1-3]; p<0.001). Furthermore, PET/MRI enabled the detection of additional PET-negative metastases (reader 1: 10; reader 2: 12). CONCLUSIONS: PET/MRI offers higher diagnostic accuracy compared to PET/CT for the detection of liver metastases.

Oncological whole-body staging in integrated (18)F-FDG PET/MR: Value of different MR sequences for simultaneous PET and MR reading.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate different magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequences in integrated positron emission tomography (PET)/MR concerning their ability to detect tumors and allocate increased radionuclide uptake on (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) PET in intraindividual comparison with computed tomography (CT) from PET/CT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients (34 female, 27 male, mean age 57.6 y) who were examined with contrast-enhanced PET/CT and subsequent PET/MR (mean delay for PET/MR after injection: 147 ± 43 min) were included. A maximum of ten (18)F-FDG-avid lesions per patient were analyzed on CT from PET/CT and with the following MR sequences from PET/MR: T2, turbo inversion recovery magnitude (TIRM), non-enhanced T1, contrast-enhanced T1, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). All lesions were rated using a four-point ordinal scale (scored from 0 to 3) concerning visual detectability of the lesion against the surrounding background and anatomical allocation of the PET finding. In each category (detectability and allocation), Wilcoxon rank sum tests were performed. Bonferroni-Holm correction was performed to prevent α-error accumulation. RESULTS: In 225 (18)F-FDG-avid lesions (156 confirmed as malignant by radiological follow up, 69 by histopathology), visual detectability was comparably high on CT (mean: 2.5 ± 0.9), TIRM (mean: 2.5 ± 0.9), T2 (mean: 2.4 ± 0.9), and DWI (mean: 2.5 ± 1.0) and was significantly higher than on non-enhanced T1 (mean: 2.2 ± 1.0). While anatomic allocation of the PET finding was comparable with CT (mean: 2.6 ± 0.7), T2 (mean: 2.6 ± 0.7), and TIRM (mean: 2.8 ± 0.7), it was significantly higher compared to DWI (mean: 2.1 ± 1.0) and non-enhanced T1 (mean: 2.4 ± 0.8). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, T2, TIRM, and contrast-enhanced T1 provide a high quality of lesion detectability and anatomical allocation of FDG-avid foci. Their performance is at least comparable to contrast-enhanced PET/CT. Non-enhanced T1 may be omitted and the necessity of DWI should be further investigated for specific questions, such as assessment of the liver.

Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with the standardized uptake value (SUV) in lymph node metastases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients using hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in lymph node metastases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with standardized uptake values (SUV) derived from combined 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (18F-FDG PET/MRI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: 38 patients with histopathologically proven NSCLC (mean age 60.1 ± 9.5 y) received whole-body PET/CT (Siemens mCT™) 60 min after injection of a mean dose of 280 ± 50 MBq 18F-FDG and subsequent PET/MRI (mean time after tracer injection: 139 ± 26 min, Siemens Biograph mMR). During PET acquisition, simultaneous diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI, b values: 0, 500, 1000 s/mm²) was performed. A maximum of 10 lymph nodes per patient suspicious for malignancy were analyzed. Regions of interest (ROI) were drawn covering the entire lymph node on the attenuation-corrected PET-image and the monoexponential ADC-map. According to histopathology or radiological follow-up, lymph nodes were classified as benign or malignant. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated for all lymph node metastases correlating SUVmax and SUVmean with ADCmean. RESULTS: A total of 146 suspicious lymph nodes were found in 25 patients. One hundred lymph nodes were eligible for final analysis. Ninety-one lymph nodes were classified as malignant and 9 as benign according to the reference standard. In malignant lesions, mean SUVmax was 9.1 ± 3.8 and mean SUVmean was 6.0 ± 2.5 while mean ADCmean was 877.0 ± 128.6 x10(-5) mm²/s in PET/MRI. For all malignant lymph nodes, a weak, inverse correlation between SUVmax and ADCmean as well as SUVmean and ADCmean (r = -0.30, p<0.05 and r = -0.36, p<0.05) existed. CONCLUSION: The present data show a weak inverse correlation between increased glucose-metabolism and cellularity in lymph node metastases of NSCLC patients. 18F-FDG-PET and DWI thus may offer complementary information for the evaluation of treatment response in lymph node metastases of NSCLC.

Does 18F-FDG PET/MRI reduce the number of indeterminate abdominal incidentalomas compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT?

OBJECTIVE: Incidental masses of abdominal organs are a relevant problem in radiological examinations. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether simultaneous (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) PET/MRI, because of its higher soft-tissue contrast and the diversity of available pulse sequences, can reduce the number of indeterminate abdominal incidentalomas compared with (18)F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we enrolled 173 patients (91 women and 82 men, mean age 55.8±14.6 years) who underwent contrast-enhanced (18)F-FDG PET/CT on the same day for oncological indications. Data sets were examined in a random order by two readers noting incidentalomas and incidental tracer uptake of the liver, kidneys, spleen, pancreas, adrenal glands, and gallbladder. Findings were categorized into three categories: most likely malignant, indeterminate, and most likely benign. In addition, the most relevant MR sequence for the final decision was recorded for each incidentaloma. The numbers of benign, indeterminate, and malignant findings on (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/MRI were compared. A subgroup analysis was carried out to detect potential differences with respect to lesion location (organwise) and lesion consistency (solid vs. cystic). RESULTS: A total of 649 upper abdominal incidentalomas were found. (18)F-FDG PET/MRI detected more incidentalomas (n=635) than contrast-enhanced (18)F-FDG PET/CT (n=407, P<0.001). Using (18)F-FDG PET/MRI, significantly fewer incidentalomas were categorized as indeterminate compared with (18)F-FDG PET/CT (n=27 vs. 91, P<0.001). This was true for cystic (P<0.001) as well as solid masses (P<0.001). Seventy incidentalomas categorized as indeterminate on contrast-enhanced (18)F-FDG PET/CT could be clarified as most likely benign by (18)F-FDG PET/MRI, whereas only six lesions rated as benign by (18)F-FDG PET/CT were classified as indeterminate in (18)F-FDG PET/MRI. (18)F-FDG PET/MRI compared with contrast-enhanced (18)F-FDG PET/CT had significantly fewer indeterminate findings in the liver (P<0.001), kidneys (P=0.012), and adrenal glands (P=0.002); differences for the spleen (P=0.5) were not significant. CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET/MRI identifies more incidentalomas than (18)F-FDG PET/CT, but significantly reduces the number of indeterminate incidental findings of abdominal organs.

Thoracic staging in lung cancer: prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET/MR imaging and 18F-FDG PET/CT.

UNLABELLED: Therapeutic decisions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients depend on the tumor stage. PET/CT with (18)F-FDG is widely accepted as the diagnostic standard of care. The purpose of this study was to compare a dedicated pulmonary (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging protocol with (18)F-FDG PET/CT for primary and locoregional lymph node staging in NSCLC patients using histopathology as the reference. METHODS: Twenty-two patients (12 men, 10 women; mean age ± SD, 65.1 ± 9.1 y) with histopathologically confirmed NSCLC underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT, followed by (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging, including a dedicated pulmonary MR imaging protocol. T and N staging according to the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual was performed by 2 readers in separate sessions for (18)F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MR imaging, respectively. Results from histopathology were used as the standard of reference. The mean and maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(mean) and SUV(max), respectively) and maximum diameter of the primary tumor was measured and compared in (18)F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MR imaging. RESULTS: PET/MR imaging and (18)F-FDG PET/CT agreed on T stages in 16 of 16 of patients (100%). All patients were correctly staged by (18)F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MR (100%), compared with histopathology. There was no statistically significant difference between (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging for lymph node metastases detection (P = 0.48). For definition of thoracic N stages, PET/MR imaging and (18)F-FDG PET/CT were concordant in 20 of 22 patients (91%). PET/MR imaging determined the N stage correctly in 20 of 22 patients (91%). (18)F-FDG PET/CT determined the N stage correctly in 18 of 22 patients (82%). The mean differences for SUV(mean) and SUV(max) of NSCLC in (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging and (18)F-FDG PET/CT were 0.21 and -5.06. These differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The SUV(mean) and SUV(max) measurements derived from (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging exhibited a high correlation (R = 0.74 and 0.86, respectively; P < 0.0001). Size measurements showed an excellent correlation between (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging and (18)F-FDG PET/CT (R = 0.99; P < 0.0001). The lower and upper limits of agreement between (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging using Bland-Altman analysis were -2.34 to 3.89 for SUV(mean), -7.42 to 4.40 for SUV(max), and -0.59 to 0.83 for the tumor size, respectively. CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging using a dedicated pulmonary MR imaging protocol, compared with (18)F-FDG PET/CT, does not provide advantages in thoracic staging in NSCLC patients.

Depiction and characterization of liver lesions in whole body [¹8F]-FDG PET/MRI.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the value of PET/MRI with [(18)F]-FDG using a whole body protocol for the depiction and characterization of liver lesions in comparison to PET/CT. METHODS: 70 patients (31 women, 39 men) with solid tumors underwent [(18)F]-FDG PET/CT and followed by an additional PET/MRI using an integrated scanner. Two readers rated the datasets (PET/CT; PET/MRI) regarding conspicuity of hepatic lesions (4-point ordinal scale) and diagnostic confidence (5-point ordinal scale). Median scores for lesion conspicuity and diagnostic confidence were compared using Wilcoxon's rank sum test. Prior examinations, histopathology and clinical follow-up (116 ± 54 days) served as standard of reference. RESULTS: 36 of 70 (51%) patients showed liver lesions. Using PET/CT and PET/MRI all patients with liver metastases could correctly be identified. A total of 97 lesions were found (malignant n=26; benign n=71). For lesion conspicuity significantly higher scores were obtained for PET/MRI in comparison to PET/CT (p<0.001). Significantly better performance for diagnostic confidence was observed in PET/MRI, both for malignant as for benign lesions (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PET/MRI, even in the setting of a whole body approach, provides higher lesion conspicuity and diagnostic confidence compared to PET/CT and may therefore evolve as an attractive alternative in oncologic imaging.