Symptom burden guiding invasive electrophysiological study in paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia: The believe SVT registry.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients with palpitations clinically suggestive of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) are often managed conservatively until ECG-documentation of the tachycardia, leading to high impact on life quality and healthcare resource utilization. We evaluated results of electrophysiological study (EPS), and ablation when appropriate, among these patients, with special focus on gender differences in management. METHODS: BELIEVE SVT is a European multicenter, retrospective registry in tertiary hospitals performing EPS in patients with palpitations, without ECG-documentation of tachycardia or preexcitation, and considered highly suggestive of PSVT by a cardiologist or cardiac electrophysiologist. We analyzed clinical characteristics, results of EPS and ablation, complications, and clinical outcomes during follow-up. RESULTS: Six-hundred eighty patients from 20 centers were included. EPS showed sustained tachycardia in 60.9% of patients, and substrate potentially enabling AVNRT in 14.7%. No major/permanent complications occurred. Minor/transient complications were reported in 0.84% of patients undergoing diagnostic-only EPS and 1.8% when followed by ablation. During a 3.4-year follow-up, 76.2% of patients remained free of palpitations recurrence. Ablation (OR: 0.34, P < .01) and male gender (OR: 0.58, P = .01) predicted no recurrence. Despite a higher female proportion among patients with recurrence, (77.2% vs 63.5% among those asymptomatic during follow-up, P < .01), 73% of women in this study reported no recurrence of palpitations after EPS. CONCLUSIONS: EPS and ablation are safe and effective in preventing recurrence of nondocumented palpitations clinically suggestive of PSVT. Despite a lower efficacy, this strategy is also highly effective among women and warrants no gender differences in management.

Cannon A wave validation as a diagnostic tool in paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias.

OBJECTIVE: The presence of cannon A waves, the so called "frog sign", has traditionally been considered diagnostic of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Nevertheless, it has never been systematically evaluated. The aim of this study is to assess the independent diagnostic utility of cannon A waves in the differential diagnosis of supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs). METHODS: We prospectively included 100 patients who underwent an electrophysiology (EP) study for SVT. The right jugular venous pulse was recorded during the study. In 61 patients, invasive central venous pressure (CVP) was registered as well. CVP increase is thought to be related with the timing between atria and ventricle depolarization; two groups were prespecified, the short VA interval tachycardias (including typical AVNRT and atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) mediated by a septal accessory pathway) and the long VA interval tachycardias (including atypical AVNRT and AVRT mediated by a left free wall accessory pathway). RESULTS: The relationship between cannon A waves and AVNRT did not reach the statistical significance (OR: 3.01; p = .058); On the other hand, it was clearly associated with the final diagnosis of a short VA interval tachycardia (OR: 10.21; p < .001). CVP increase showed an inversely proportional relationship with the VA interval during tachycardia (b = -.020; p < .001). CVP increase was larger in cases of AVNRT (4.0 mmHg vs. 1.2 mmHg; p < .001) and short VA interval tachycardias (3.9 mmHg vs. 1.2 mmHg; p < .001). CONCLUSION: The presence of cannon A waves is associated with the final diagnosis of short VA interval tachycardias.

Combined atrial fibrillation ablation and balloon mitral commissurotomy in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis.

INTRODUCTION: Ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is usually not considered in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis (RMS). We analyzed the results of a combined procedure of AF ablation and percutaneous balloon mitral commissurotomy (PBMC). METHODS: We prospectively included 22 patients with severe RMS to undergo a combined PBMC + AF ablation procedure. Noninvasive mapping of the atria was also performed. A historical sample of propensity-scored matched patients who underwent PBMC alone was used as controls. The primary endpoint was freedom from AF/AT at 1-year. Multivariate analysis evaluated sinus rhythm (SR) predictors. RESULTS: Successful pulmonary vein isolation and electrocardiographic imaging-based drivers ablation was performed in 20 patients following PBMC. At 1-year, 75% of the patients in the combined group were in SR compared to 40% in the propensity-score matched group (p = 0.004). The composite of AF recurrence, need for mitral surgery and all-cause mortality was also more frequent in the control group (65% vs. 30%; p = 0.005). Catheter ablation (odds ratio [OR] 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.17-17.37]; p = 0.04) and AF type (OR 1.46; 95% CI [1.05-82.64]; p < 0.001) were the only independent predictors of SR at 1-year. Noninvasive mapping in the combined group showed that the number of simultaneous rotors (OR 2.10; 95% CI [1.41-10.2]; p = 0.04) was the only independent predictor of AF. CONCLUSION: A combined procedure of AF ablation and PBMC significantly increased the proportion of patients in sinus rhythm at 1-year. Noninvasive mapping may help to improve AF characterization and guide personalized AF treatment.

Successful cryoablation of dual atrioventricular nodal nonreentrant tachycardia: First reported cases.

We describe two consecutive adult males with incessant dual atrioventricular nodal nonreentrant tachycardia and associated severe cardiomyopathy. After invasive diagnosis, this is the first published report showing the successful outcome of this rare tachycardia with effective cryoablation. Cryothermal lesions in the roof of the proximal coronary sinus and right midseptal area lead to complete resolution of the tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy in the mid-term follow-up of our patients.

Wide QRS Complex Arrhythmia with Alternating QRS Morphology: What Is the Mechanism?

A 75-year-old man was admitted due to an electrical storm with appropriate recurrent implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) discharges. The patient had had an extensive anterolateral myocardial infarction with associated severe left ventricular dysfunction 10 years earlier (left ventricular ejection fraction, 25%), and an ICD was placed 9 years before admission for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. A first invasive study induced up to five ventricular tachycardias and an extensive endocardial substrate ablation was performed. Despite intravenous ß-blockers, general anesthesia and procainamide infusion, the patient continued to have recurrent episodes of very slow sustained ventricular tachycardia with a right bundle branch block pattern. In a subsequent invasive study, no mid-diastolic activity was found despite careful mapping during the induced clinical ventricular tachycardia and ablation attempts inside the apical endocardial scar were unsuccessful. A percutaneous epicardial approach with navigation system support (EnSite PrecisionTM Cardiac Mapping System v. 2.0, St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) without antiarrhythmic infusion was planned. A wide QRS complex rhythm with alternating QRS morphology was readily induced by epicardial ventricular pacing trains (Fig. 1, top) that elicited both arrhythmia QRS patterns with very long stimulus QRS intervals (Fig. 1, bottom). What is the possible mechanism of this arrhythmia? Do we need further pacing maneuvers during the arrhythmia to localize critical sites at which ablation pulses can predictably be successful?

Differentiation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia from orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia by the resetting response to ventricular extrastimuli: comparison to response to continuous ventricular pacing.

BACKGROUND: The usefulness of ventricular entrainment to differentiate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) from orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT) by substracting the corrected postpacing interval (cPPI) from the tachycardia cycle length (TCL) or the ventriculoatrial interval during stimulation (SA) from that during tachycardia (VA) have been widely validated. However, some tachycardias are interrupted by pacing trains but may not be so by ventricular extrastimuli resulting in resetting. OBJECTIVES: To validate prospectively the diagnostic yield of cPPI-TCL and SA-VA measurements after resetting and to determine the proportion of AVNRT and ORT that can be entrained and/or reset from the right ventricular apex (RVA). METHODS: 223 consecutive patients with inducible AVNRT or ORT underwent pacing trains and single extrastimulus (also double extrastimuli if singles did not reset tachycardia) at the RVA. We calculated cPPI-TCL and SA-VA during entrainment and resetting. RESULTS: Entrainment could not be achieved in 15.2% of tachycardias because of consistent tachycardia interruption by pacing; resetting was observed in 99.5%. Values of cPPI-TCL and SA-VA > 110 milliseconds after resetting identified AVNRT as accurately as after entrainment. Values for cPPI-TCL/ SA-VA were: sensitivity: 98/100%; specificity: 96/98%; positive predictive value: 98/99%; negative predictive value: 98/100%. CONCLUSIONS: Determinations of cPPI-TCL and SA-VA after resetting with single or double RVA extrastimuli are useful maneuvers to differentiate AVNRT from ORT and can be used for nearly every inducible AVNRT or ORT, even if they are interrupted by ventricular trains.

Complications and inappropriate shocks in pediatric patients receiving a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrilator.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: There is limited evidence regarding the use of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) in pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of complications in these patients at our center, according to the type of ICD and patient size. METHODS: We included all patients aged<18 years who received an S-ICD since 2016 at our center. As a control group, we also included contemporary patients (since 2014) who received a transvenous ICD (TV-ICD). The primary endpoint was a composite of complications and inappropriate shocks. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients received an S-ICD (median age, 14 [5-17] years; body mass index [BMI], 20.2 kg/m2). Implantation was intermuscular in 23 patients (88%) and subserratus in the remainder. Two incisions were used in 24 patients (92%). In all patients, 2 zones were programmed: a conditional zone set at 230 (220-230) bpm, and a shock zone set at 250 bpm. Nineteen patients received a TV-ICD (median age, 11 [range, 5-16] years; BMI, 19.2 kg/m2, 79% single-chamber). Survival free from the primary endpoint at 5 years was 80% in the S-ICD group and 63% in the TV-ICD group (P=.54). Survival free from inappropriate shocks was similar (85% vs 89%, P=.86), while survival free from complications was higher in the S-ICD group (96% vs 57%, cloglog P=.016). There were no therapy failures in the S-ICD group, and no increased complication rates were observed in patients with BMI ≤20 kg/m2. CONCLUSIONS: With contemporary implantation techniques and programming, S-ICD is a safe and effective therapy in pediatric patients. The number of inappropriate shocks is similar to TV-ICD, with fewer short- and mid-term complications.

Long-term prognosis and emergency management for patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: the EMERGE-ICD study. / Estudio EMERG-ICD: manejo y pronóstico a largo plazo de las urgencias en los pacientes portadores de un desfibrilador automático implantable.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are at risk of serious complications that are often treated in hospital emergency departments (EDs). The EMERG-ICD study (Emergency Department Management and Long-term Prognosis for Patients with ICDs) analysed management and long-term prognosis of ED patients with an ICD after an acute clinical event. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational multicenter cohort study including consecutive adult patients with ICDs who came to 27 hospital EDs in Spain for treatment and were followed for 10 years. We collected clinical variables on presentation, ED case management variables, and the date and cause of death in each case. The primary outcome variable was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Five-hundred three patients were studied; 471 had structural heart disease (SHD) and 32 had primary electrical heart disease (PEHD). Beta-blockers were prescribed in the ED for 55% of the patients for whom they were indicated. Twenty-four (4.8%), 75 (15.7%), and 368 (73.2%) patients died during follow-up at 1 month, 1 year, and 10 years, respectively. Of these, 363 (77.1%) had SHD and 5 (15.6%) had PEHD (hazard ratio, 8.05 (95% CI, 3.33- 19.46). Among patients with SHD, the cause of death was cardiovascular in 66%. Mortality correlated significantly with seeking care for cardiovascular symptoms, advanced age, male sex, diabetes, a New York Heart Association score of 2 or more, severe ventricular dysfunction, and long-term amiodarone therapy. CONCLUSION: Prognosis after an acute clinical event is poor in patients with SHD and ICDs, mainly due to cardiovascular causes, especially among patients with associated comorbidities and cardiovascular complaints. Mortality is lower in patients with PEHD.

OBJETIVO: Los pacientes portadores de desfibriladores automáticos implantables (DAI) tienen riesgo de complicaciones graves que son atendidas con frecuencia en los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios (SUH). Este estudio analiza el manejo y el pronóstico de las urgencias en portadores de un DAI. METODO: Estudio de cohorte observacional y multicéntrico que incluyó de manera consecutiva pacientes adultos portadores de DAI que consultaron en 27 SUH en España, con seguimiento posterior a 10 años. Se recogieron las variables clínicas, manejo en el SUH, fecha y causa del fallecimiento. La variable de resultado primaria fue la mortalidad por cualquier causa. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 503 pacientes, 471 con cardiopatía estructural (CE) y 32 con enfermedad eléctrica primaria cardiaca (EEPC). Se prescribió betabloqueantes en el SUH al 55% de los pacientes con indicación. Durante el seguimiento fallecieron 24 (4,8%), 75 (15,7%) y 368 pacientes (73,2%) a 1 mes, 1 año y 10 años, respectivamente. De estos, 363 tenían CE y 5 EEPC (77,1% vs 15,6%, HR 8,05 IC 95% 3,33-19,46). Entre los pacientes con CE, la mortalidad global fue de causa cardiovascular en el 66% de los casos. La mortalidad se asoció significativamente con la consulta por una causa cardiovascular, edad avanzada, sexo masculino, diabetes, NHYA 2, disfunción ventricular grave y tratamiento crónico con amiodarona. CONCLUSIONES: El pronóstico de los portadores de DAI con CE es muy adverso, fundamentalmente debido a complicaciones cardiovasculares en pacientes con comorbilidades que consultan por sintomatología cardiovascular. La mortalidad es menor en los pacientes con EEPC.