Improving equity of services for sexually transmitted infections through community pharmacies: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacists have the potential to improve care for marginalized populations. Stigmatized and racialized groups may not find traditional health services accessible in other settings. Research focused on health care access for these populations is fundamental in understanding how to improve health equity. OBJECTIVES: This scoping review aimed to determine how health equity is addressed within services offered through community pharmacies for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). METHODS: This scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist. A comprehensive search strategy was developed with an academic librarian to capture studies containing search terms related to each of the following 3 topics: STIs, pharmacy, and underserved groups. PubMed and Embase were both searched up to July 2023 and search results were uploaded to the screening software Covidence. Two researchers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Articles were included if they reported evaluation of a pharmacy-based sexual health service and addressed health equity in service design or implementation. RESULTS: A total of 8 articles were identified that described services implemented for underserved groups. Four populations were identified: injection drug users, men who have sex with men, racial minorities, and those with low socioeconomic status. Equity was addressed through 2 mechanisms: location-based implementation of services in areas of high target population density or through specific targeting of marginalized populations in recruitment and promotion. All studies involved interventions for the prevention or testing services rather than assessment and treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Equity is not being readily addressed in pharmacy-based services for STIs yet evidence exists that considering equity in the design and implementation of services may improve reach to underserved populations.

Mental effort in the assessment of critical reflection: Implications for assessment quality and scoring.

INTRODUCTION: Critical reflection is a mainstay in the training of health professionals, yet assessment of reflection is commonly described as difficult, taxing, and resulting in inconsistent scoring across assessors. At the same time, there is evidence from experiential and simulation settings that assessors' mental effort may explain assessor variability, which could be a target for simplifications in assessment design. Assessors' mental effort for assessment of reflection is currently unknown. This study aimed to determine reliability of rubric scoring of critical reflection, variation in pass-fail rates, and the relationship between reflection scores and assessors' perceived mental effort. METHODS: Eleven assessors were recruited to assess six reflection assignments using a published rubric. Mental effort was measured using the Paas scale for each assignment assessed and was correlated with rubric scores for each assignment. RESULTS: Findings showed inconsistency in scoring between assessors, resulting in varying pass rates for each assignment (55-100%). All assignments demonstrated negative correlations between rubric scores and perceived mental effort (r = -0.115 to -0.649). CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the notion that more work should be done to optimize assessment of critical reflection. Future studies should focus on disentangling the influence on mental effort of scoring tools, assignment structures, and writing quality.