Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 101(10): 716-721, 2021 Mar 16.
Artigo em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33721950

RESUMO

Pancreatic cancer has a high degree of malignancy, with a poor prognosis. Although surgical resection remains the only way to cure pancreatic cancer at present, the treatment mode has changed from "surgery priority" to "multidisciplinary cooperation" with the development of adjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy has been documented to increase the R0 resection rate of borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer and improve the prognosis of the patients, and there has been a consensus on neoadjuvant therapy for these patients. However, there is still much controversy in the choice of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the status of radiotherapy, imaging and pathological evaluation after neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer.


Assuntos
Terapia Neoadjuvante , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Prognóstico
2.
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi ; 58(5): 326-330, 2020 May 01.
Artigo em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32107909

RESUMO

Objective: To explore the proper protective measures for pancreatic diseases treatment during the outbreak of 2019 coronavirus disease(COVID-19). Methods: Clinical data of four cases of patients that suffered COVID-19 from February 2(nd) to February 9(th), 2020 at Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology were reviewed induding 4 males and 1 female, aging of 50, 51, 46, 87 years old, respectively. After the first patients cuffed nosocomial infection of COVID-19, the general protective measures were updated.Only one patient was admitted to each room alone, with no more than one caregiver. The body temperature of care givers was measured twice a day.Primary protections were applied to all staff.The floor was sterilized using disinfectant with an effective chlorine concentration of 1 000 mg/L. The protective measures for interventional procedures were as follow. Primary protection was applied to the operators of central venipuncture catheter, percutaneous abdominal/pleural drainage, percutaneous retroperitoneal drainage, percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage and other surgical procedures with local anesthesia and epidural anesthesia. Secondary protection was applied to the operators of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and surgical procedures with general anesthesia. Results: There were four patients who were diagnosed as COVID-19, of which one died of COVID-19, two were cured, and one was still in hospital for COVID-19. After the update of protective measures, no more nosocomial infection of COVID-19 occurred. Two central venipuncture catheter, three percutaneous abdominal or pleural drainage, one percutaneous retroperitoneal drainage, one percuteneous transhepatic cholecyst drainage and one open surgery with general anesthesia were performed with no infection of operators. Conclusions: The caregivers of patients are potential infection source of COVID-19. Enhanced protective measures including the management measures of caregivers can decrease the risk of nosocomial infection of COVID-19.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/prevenção & controle , Pancreatopatias , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Cateterismo , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Coronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Surtos de Doenças , Drenagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pancreatopatias/complicações , Pancreatopatias/terapia , Flebotomia , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi ; 57(10): 14-18, 2019 Oct 01.
Artigo em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31510727

RESUMO

Objective: To investigate the changes of surgical invitations on necrotizing pancreatitis in recent 14 years by reviewing single center data. Methods: One thousand and eighty patients with necrotizing pancreatitis who received surgical invitation were involved in the study.All the patients were treated at Department of Pancreatic Surgery,Union Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology from January 2005 to December 2018. Six hundred and seventy-eight were males and 402 were females. The median (range) age of the study patients was 45 (20-76) years.The etiology of the disease was related to cholelithiasis in 335 cases(31.02%), hyperlipemia in 302 cases(27.96%), alcohol in 226 cases(20.93%), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in 28 cases(2.59%), pregnancy in 50 cases(4.63%), idiopathic factors in 72 cases(6.67%) and other causes in 67 cases(6.20%). The patients were divided into two groups according to the time of admission. Group 1 included 1 475 patients that admitted from January 2005 to December 2010, and group 2 included 1 539 patients that admitted from January 2011 to December 2018. The surgical interventions, morbidity and mortality of the two group were compared, and χ(2) test was used for the statistical test. Results: Two hundred and sixty-six among the 1 080 cases were treated with drainage procedures because of the pseudocyst.One hundred and seventy-five drainage procedures were performed between January 2005 and December 2018, which account for 11.87%(175 /1 475) of all patients of necrotizing pancreatitis; 91 drainage procedures were performed between January 2011 and December 2018,which account for 5.91%(91/1 539) of all patients of necrotizing pancreatitis. Eight hundred and fourteen cases received surgical intervention for infection of necrotizing tissues. Of these cases, 410 cases received percutaneous catheter drainage(PCD) of retroperitoneal fluid or residual infection. Debridement of necrotic tissues was performed on 756 cases. Of these cases, 32 cases received minimal invasive retroperitoneal debridement with/without denotes video assistant,4 cases received transluminal endoscopic debridement, 21 cases received laparoscopic debridement, and 709 cases received open laparotic debridement.Three hundred and sixty-five cases were admitted to our institute during January 2005 to December 2010, and the other 391 cases were admitted to our institute from January 2011 to December 2018. Of the first period, all debridement were performed with open laparotic procedures. Of the second period,debridement were performed with open laparotic procedures and minimal invasive procedures. The average times of surgical invasion, morbidity of principal local complications and mortality of the two periods were 1.27 and 1.34,28.22%(103/365) and 29.92%(117/346),and 6.03%(23/365) and 6.91%(27/346), respectively. Conclusions: Minimal invasive procedures can be considered for debridement in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis in some selected conditions.The involvements of minimal invasive procedures in treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis don't decrease the morbidity of principal local complications and mortality in recent years. Rational surgical procedures and appropriate surgical timing are the keys to improve the efficacy of necrotizing pancreatitis.


Assuntos
Pancreatite Necrosante Aguda/cirurgia , Espaço Retroperitoneal/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Desbridamento/métodos , Drenagem/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pseudocisto Pancreático/etiologia , Pseudocisto Pancreático/cirurgia , Pancreatite Necrosante Aguda/complicações , Pancreatite Necrosante Aguda/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA