Antithrombin Levels and Heparin Responsiveness during Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Prospective Single-center Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Unfractionated heparin, administered during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to prevent thromboembolic events, largely depends on plasma antithrombin for its antithrombotic effects. Decreased heparin responsiveness seems frequent on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; however, its association with acquired antithrombin deficiency is poorly understood. The objective of this study was to describe longitudinal changes in plasma antithrombin levels during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support and evaluate the association between antithrombin levels and heparin responsiveness. The hypothesis was that extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support would be associated with acquired antithrombin deficiency and related decreased heparin responsiveness. METHODS: Adults receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were prospectively included. All patients received continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin using a standardized protocol (target anti-Xa 0.3 to 0.5 IU/ml). For each patient, arterial blood was withdrawn into citrate-containing tubes at 11 time points (from hour 0 up to day 7). Anti-Xa (without dextran or antithrombin added) and antithrombin levels were measured. The primary outcome was the antithrombin plasma level. In the absence of consensus, antithrombin deficiency was defined as a time-weighted average of antithrombin less than or equal to 70%. Data regarding clinical management and heparin dosage were collected. RESULTS: Fifty patients, including 42% postcardiotomy, were included between April 2020 and May 2021, with a total of 447 samples. Median extracorporeal membrane oxygenation duration was 7 (interquartile range, 4 to 12) days. Median antithrombin level was 48% (37 to 60%) at baseline. Antithrombin levels significantly increased throughout the follow-up. Time-weighted average of antithrombin levels was 63% (57 to 73%) and was less than or equal to 70% in 32 (64%) of patients. Overall, 45 (90%) patients had at least one antithrombin value less than 70%, and 35 (70%) had at least one antithrombin value less than 50%. Antithrombin levels were not significantly associated with heparin responsiveness evaluated by anti-Xa assay or heparin dosage. CONCLUSIONS: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support was associated with a moderate acquired antithrombin deficiency, mainly during the first 72 h, that did not correlate with heparin responsiveness.

Impact of Intraoperative Allogeneic Platelet Transfusion on Healthcare-Associated Infections in Cardiac Surgery: Insights From a Large Single-Center Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: Despite significant improvement in patient blood management, cardiac surgery remains a high hemorrhagic risk procedure. Platelet transfusion is used commonly to treat thrombocytopenia-associated perioperative bleeding. Allogeneic platelet transfusion may induce transfusion-related immunomodulation. However, its association with postoperative healthcare-associated infections is still a matter of debate. The objective was to evaluate the impact of allogeneic platelet transfusion during cardiac surgery on postoperative healthcare-associated infection incidence. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral academic center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery from 2012 to 2018. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intraoperative platelet transfusion was defined as exposure in a causal model. The primary outcome was the incidence of healthcare-associated infections comprised of bloodstream infection, hospital-acquired pneumonia, and surgical-site infection. Among 7,662 included patients, 528 patients (6.8%) were exposed to intraoperative platelet transfusion, and 329 patients (4.3%) developed 454 postoperative infections. Bloodstream infection affected 106 patients (1.4%), hospital-acquired pneumonia affected 174 patients (2.3%), and surgical-site infection affected 148 patients (1.9%). Intraoperative platelet transfusion was associated with an increased risk of bloodstream infection after adjustment by multivariable logistic regression (odds ratio [OR] 2.85; 95% CI 1.40-5.8; p = 0.004; n = 7,662), propensity score matching (OR 3.95; 95% CI 1.57-12.0), p = 0.007; n = 766), and propensity score overlap weighting (OR 3.04; 95% CI 1.51-6.1, p = 0.002; n = 7,762). Surgical-site infection and hospital-acquired pneumonia were not significantly associated with platelet transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that intraoperative allogeneic platelet transfusion is a risk factor for bloodstream infection after cardiac surgery. These results supported the development of patient blood management strategies aimed at minimizing perioperative platelet transfusion in cardiac surgery.

A performance evaluation of sthemO 301 coagulation analyzer and associated reagents.

AIM: The study objective was to evaluate the performance of sthemO 301 system and to compare it with the analyzer used in our university hospital laboratory (STA R Max® 2), for a selection of hemostasis parameters. METHODS: Method comparison (according to CLSI EP09-A3), carryover (according to CLSI H57-A), APTT sensitivity to heparin (according to CLSI H47-A2), HIL level assessment, and productivity were performed using leftover samples from our laboratory (n > 1000). Commercial quality control materials were used to evaluate precision (according to CLSI EP15-A3) and accuracy. The assays tested on sthemO 301 were: PT, APTT (silica and kaolin activators), fibrinogen (Fib), thrombin time (TT), chromogenic and clotting protein C (PC) activity, and von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF:Ag) levels. RESULTS: All intra-assay and inter-assay precision CVs were below the maximal precision limit proposed by the French Group for Hemostasis and Thrombosis (GFHT). Accuracy was verified with bias below GFHT criteria and most Z-scores were between -2 and +2. No clinically relevant carryover was detected. Silica APTT reagent sensitivity to unfractionated heparin was moderate, as expected. Productivity results were consistent over the 10 repeats performed. The overall agreement between the two systems was excellent for all assays, with Spearman rank correlation coefficient all above 0.9 and slopes of Passing-Bablok correlation near 1 and intercepts close to 0. CONCLUSION: For the methods tested, sthemO 301 system met all the criteria to implement a novel coagulation analyzer in the laboratory and result comparability with STA R Max® 2 was good.

Platelet-derived sCD40L: specific inflammatory marker for early-stage severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection.

BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 virus is the causing agent of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) characterized by a huge pro-inflammatory response and coagulation disorders that may lead to for its severe forms, in organ failure or even death. As major players of thrombo-inflammation, platelets release large amounts of immunomodulatory molecules and regulate leukocyte and endothelial activity, which are both altered in COVID-19. Altogether, this makes platelets a very likely actor of the thrombo-inflammatory complications of COVID-19. Thus, we propose to identify a platelet inflammatory signature of severe COVID-19 specifically modulated throughout the course of the disease. METHODS: Luminex technology and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were used to assess plasma levels of platelet inflammatory markers in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection on admission and for 14 days afterwards. RESULTS: In accordance with the observations of other teams, we evidence that the plasma levels of the platelet soluble (s)CD40L is significantly elevated in the early stages of the disease. Interestingly we observe that the plasma level of sCD40L decreases overtime while that of sCD62P increases significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that there is a platelet signature of inflammatory response to SARS-COv-2 infection which varies overtime and could serve as monitoring biomarkers of patient inflammatory state. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 2020-A01100-39; title: Human Ab Response & immunoMONItoring of COVID-19 Patients, registration date: 05/25/2020; URL of the registry: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/history/NCT04373200?V_5=View .

Combined Platelet and Erythrocyte Salvage: Evaluation of a New Filtration-based Autotransfusion Device.

BACKGROUND: The SAME device (i-SEP, France) is an innovative filtration-based autotransfusion device able to salvage and wash both red blood cells and platelets. This study evaluated the device performances using human whole blood with the hypothesis that the device will be able to salvage platelets while achieving a erythrocyte yield of 80% and removal ratios of 90% for heparin and 80% for major plasma proteins without inducing signification activation of salvaged cells. METHODS: Thirty healthy human whole blood units (median volume, 478 ml) were diluted, heparinized, and processed by the device in two consecutive treatment cycles. Samples from the collection reservoir and the concentrated blood were analyzed. Complete blood count was performed to measure blood cell recovery rates. Flow cytometry evaluated the activation state and function of platelets and leukocytes. Heparin and plasma proteins were measured to assess washing performance. RESULTS: The global erythrocyte yield was 88.1% (84.1 to 91.1%; median [25th to 75th]) with posttreatment hematocrits of 48.9% (44.8 to 51.4%) and 51.4% (48.4 to 53.2%) for the first and second cycles, respectively. Ektacytometry did not show evidence of erythrocyte alteration. Platelet recovery was 36.8% (26.3 to 43.4%), with posttreatment counts of 88 × 109/l (73 to 101 × 109/l) and 115 × 109/l (95 to 135 × 109/l) for the first and second cycles, respectively. Recovered platelets showed a low basal P-selectin expression at 10.8% (8.1 to 15.2%) and a strong response to thrombin-activating peptide. Leukocyte yield was 93.0% (90.1 to 95.7%) with no activation or cell death. Global removal ratios were 98.3% (97.8 to 98.9%), 98.2% (96.9 to 98.8%), and 88.3% (86.6 to 90.7%) for heparin, albumin, and fibrinogen, respectively. The processing times were 4.4 min (4.2 to 4.6 min) and 4.4 min (4.2 to 4.7 min) for the first and second cycles, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the performance of the SAME device. Platelets and red blood cells were salvaged without significant impact on cell integrity and function. In the meantime, leukocytes were not activated, and the washing quality of the device prevented reinfusion of high concentrations of heparin and plasma proteins.

Heparin Anti-Xa Activity, a Readily Available Unique Test to Quantify Apixaban, Rivaroxaban, Fondaparinux, and Danaparoid Levels.

BACKGROUND: Despite their usefulness in perioperative and acute care settings, factor-Xa inhibitor-specific assays are scarcely available, contrary to heparin anti-Xa assay. We assessed whether the heparin anti-Xa assay can (1) be used as a screening test to rule out apixaban, rivaroxaban, fondaparinux, and danaparoid levels that contraindicate invasive procedures according to current guidelines (>30 ng·mL-1, >30 ng·mL-1, >0.1 µg·mL-1, and >0.1 IU·mL-1, respectively), (2) quantify the anticoagulant level if found significant, that is, if it exceeded the abovementioned threshold. METHODS: In the derivation cohort then in the validation cohort, via receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis, we evaluated the ability of heparin anti-Xa assay to detect levels of factor-Xa inhibitors above or below the abovementioned safety thresholds recommended for an invasive procedure (screening test). Among samples with relevant levels of factor-Xa inhibitor, we determined the conversion factor linking the measured level and heparin anti-Xa activity in a derivation cohort. In a validation cohort, the estimated level of each factor-Xa inhibitor was thus inferred from heparin anti-Xa activity. The agreement between measured and estimated levels of factor-Xa inhibitors was assessed. RESULTS: Among 989 (355 patients) and 756 blood samples (420 patients) in the derivation and validation cohort, there was a strong linear relationship between heparin anti-Xa activities and factor-Xa inhibitors measured level (r = 0.99 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.99-0.99]). In the derivation cohort, heparin anti-Xa activity ≤0.2, ≤0.3, <0.1, <0.1 IU·mL-1 reliably ruled out a relevant level of apixaban, rivaroxaban, fondaparinux, and danaparoid, respectively (area under the ROC curve ≥0.99). In the validation cohort, these cutoffs yielded excellent classification accuracy (≥96%). If this screening test indicated relevant level of factor-Xa inhibitor, estimated and measured levels closely agreed (Lin's correlation coefficient close to its maximal value: 95% CI, 0.99-0.99). More than 96% of the estimated levels fell into the predefined range of acceptability (ie, 80%-120% of the measured level). CONCLUSIONS: A unique simple test already widely used to assay heparin was also useful for quantifying these 4 other anticoagulants. Both clinical and economic impacts of these findings should be assessed in a specific study.

P2Y12 Inhibition beyond Thrombosis: Effects on Inflammation.

The P2Y12 receptor is a key player in platelet activation and a major target for antithrombotic drugs. The beneficial effects of P2Y12 receptor antagonists might, however, not be restricted to the primary and secondary prevention of arterial thrombosis. Indeed, it has been established that platelet activation also has an essential role in inflammation. Additionally, nonplatelet P2Y12 receptors present in immune cells and vascular smooth muscle cells might be effective players in the inflammatory response. This review will investigate the biological and clinical impact of P2Y12 receptor inhibition beyond its platelet-driven antithrombotic effects, focusing on its anti-inflammatory role. We will discuss the potential molecular and cellular mechanisms of P2Y12-mediated inflammation, including cytokine release, platelet-leukocyte interactions and neutrophil extracellular trap formation. Then we will summarize the current evidence on the beneficial effects of P2Y12 antagonists during various clinical inflammatory diseases, especially during sepsis, acute lung injury, asthma, atherosclerosis, and cancer.

Modified ROTEM for the detection of rivaroxaban and apixaban anticoagulant activity in whole blood: A diagnostic test study.

BACKGROUND: Rapid detection of the anticoagulant effect of oral factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors may be essential in several emergency clinical situations. Specific assays quantifying the drugs are performed in plasma and require a turnaround time that is too long to be useful in emergency situations. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is a whole blood coagulation assay of blood viscoelasticity and could be of interest for FXa inhibitor detection in emergency. However, conventional ROTEM reagents only detect high amounts of inhibitors. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was first to assess the effect of whole blood components on the viscoelastic measurement of the effects of FXa inhibitors, and second to evaluate whether a modified ROTEM, triggered with a low amount of tissue factor and a saturating amount of phospholipid vesicles, can reliably detect low levels of FXa inhibitor activity in whole blood. DESIGN: Diagnostic test study. SETTINGS: A university research laboratory. From November 2014 to April 2016. PATIENTS: Sixty-six patients: 30 treated with rivaroxaban, 17 with apixaban and 19 without treatment. INTERVENTION: ROTEM was triggered with 2.5 pmol l of tissue factor and 10 µmol l of phospholipid vesicles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Modified ROTEM parameters were measured in different experimental conditions: platelet-poor plasma (PPP), platelet-rich plasma, PPP supplemented with fibrinogen and reconstituted whole blood with various haematocrit levels adjusted between 30 and 60%. Modified ROTEM was further validated using whole blood from patients who were either treated or not treated with FXa inhibitors. RESULTS: Modified ROTEM allowed detection of as little as 25 ng ml FXa inhibitors in PPP, with at least a 1.4-fold increase of the clotting time (P ≤ 0.02). Neither changes of fibrinogen concentration nor variations of platelet count or haematocrit precluded FXa inhibitor detection. A lengthened modified ROTEM clotting time of more than 197 s allowed detection of FXa inhibitor concentrations above 30 ng ml in whole blood with 90% sensitivity and 85% specificity. CONCLUSION: Modified ROTEM may be applicable in emergency situations for the detection of FXa inhibitors in whole blood.

Predictors of pre-procedural concentrations of direct oral anticoagulants: a prospective multicentre study.

AIMS: Patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) frequently undergo elective invasive procedures. Their management is challenging. We aimed to determine the optimal duration of DOAC discontinuation that ensures a minimal anticoagulant effect during the procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: This prospective multicentre study included 422 DOAC-treated patients requiring an invasive procedure. Pre-procedural DOAC concentration ([DOAC]) and routine haemostasis assays were performed to determine i/the proportion of patients who achieved a minimal pre-procedural [DOAC] (≤30 ng/mL) according to the duration of DOAC discontinuation, ii/the predictors of minimal [DOAC] and, iii/the ability of routine assays to predict minimal [DOAC]. Lastly, we assessed the predictors of peri-procedural bleeding events. The duration of DOAC discontinuation ranged from 1 to 218 h and pre-procedural [DOAC] from ≤30 to 527 ng/mL. After a 49-72-h discontinuation, 95% of the [DOAC] were ≤30 ng/mL. A 72-h discontinuation predicted concentrations ≤30 ng/mL with 91% specificity. In multivariable analysis, duration of DOAC discontinuation, creatinine clearance <50 mL/min and antiarrhythmics were independent predictors of minimal pre-procedural [DOAC] (concordance statistic 0.869; 95% confidence interval: 0.829-0.912). Conversely, routine haemostasis assays were poor predictors. Last, creatinine clearance <50 mL/min, antiplatelets and high-bleeding risk procedures were predictors of bleeding events. CONCLUSION: A last DOAC intake 3 days before a procedure resulted in minimal pre-procedural anticoagulant effect for almost all patients. Moderate renal impairment, especially in dabigatran-treated patients, and antiarrhythmics in anti-Xa-treated patients should result in a longer DOAC interruption. In situations requiring testing, routine assays should not replace DOAC concentration measurement.

Assessment of haemostasis in patients with cirrhosis: Relevance of the ROTEM tests?: A prospective, cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: In patients with cirrhosis, decreased rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) parameters suggest hypocoagulability secondary to liver dysfunction. However, observed normal or increased thrombin generation suggests preserved haemostasis and/or a procoagulant state. The correlated levels of both coagulation factors and inhibitors also support preserved haemostasis. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to investigate the correlation between three specific approaches of haemostasis (ROTEM, thrombin generation and coagulation factors/inhibitors) on the same plasma sample from patients with cirrhosis. DESIGN: A prospective, observational study. SETTING: Single university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Forty patients with cirrhosis. INTERVENTION: Measurement of the following factors: model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores; ROTEM maximum clot firmness (ROTEM-MCF) in EXTEM, INTEM, FIBTEM assays; fibrinogen; factors V and VIII; von Willebrand factor; protein C; protein S; antithrombin; and the thrombin generation test (TGT) enabling the calculation of endogenous thrombin potential without and with thrombomodulin, and the ratio of endogenous thrombin potential with-to-without thrombomodulin (regarded as an index of hypercoagulability). RESULTS: ROTEM-MCF values were distributed within the normal and hypocoagulation ranges; were correlated to variations in factor V, fibrinogen, protein C and S and antithrombin; and were inversely correlated to MELD scores (ρ > 0.5; P < 0.05). Levels of von Willebrand factor were above normal and were not correlated with any other factor levels. After addition of thrombomodulin, endogenous thrombin potential values were distributed within or above normal values. Factor V variation was correlated to the ratio of endogenous thrombin potential with-to-without thrombomodulin. CONCLUSION: ROTEM indicated hypocoagulability correlated to liver dysfunction. In contrast, the TGT indicated a preserved or even increased coagulation profile (which was supported by the correlation between coagulant factors and inhibitors) and a potential for hypercoagulability inversely correlated to the degree of liver dysfunction. ROTEM may not be appropriate for haemostasis assessment in patients with liver cirrhosis and could lead to the unnecessary transfusion of fresh frozen plasma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: S.C. 3024 - ID RCB: 2012-A01728-35.

The effectiveness of platelet supplementation for the reversal of ticagrelor-induced inhibition of platelet aggregation: An in-vitro study.

BACKGROUND: Management of ticagrelor-induced bleeding is challenging, as no antidote is currently available. Platelet transfusion, usually proposed to reverse antiplatelet drugs, has been suggested to be ineffective but few data are available. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of platelet supplementation to restore platelet aggregation inhibited by ticagrelor. DESIGN: In vitro study. SETTING: Blood samples were obtained from the French Blood Bank Institute. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy blood donors. INTERVENTIONS: Whole blood from healthy donors was spiked with ticagrelor or aspirin (used as a positive control). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Platelet aggregation was investigated with impedance aggregometry on whole blood [expressed in ohms (V)] and light transmission aggregometry (expressed in %) on platelet-rich plasma using ADP or arachidonic acid as agonists for ticagrelor or aspirin, respectively. Platelet supplementation was defined as the addition of washed platelet suspension increasing at least 60% of whole blood platelet count. RESULTS: Ticagrelor (3.25 mM) inhibited ADP-induced platelet aggregation compared with control either in whole blood (2 vs. 13 V, P < 0.05) or in platelet-rich plasma (15 vs. 75% P < 0.05). Aspirin (25 mM) inhibited arachidonic acid-induced aggregation (1 vs. 7.5 V, P < 0.05 in whole blood and 5 vs. 77.5%, P = 0.01 in platelet-rich plasma). Platelet supplementation completely restored arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation in whole blood (10 vs. 1 V, P = 0.008) and platelet-rich plasma (73 vs. 5%, P < 0.01) in aspirin-treated samples, whereas it failed to correct ADP-induced aggregation (2 vs. 2 V in whole blood and 13.5 vs. 15% in platelet-rich plasma, P > 0.05) in ticagrelor-treated samples. We also report a case of a ticagrelor-treated patient in whom platelet transfusion failed to restore ADP-induced platelet aggregation. CONCLUSION: Platelet supplementation restored platelet aggregation in aspirin-spiked but not in ticagrelor-spiked samples. These results do not support the use of platelet transfusion to reverse the effects of ticagrelor.

Comparisons between diluted thrombin time, ecarin chromogenic assays, and UPLC-MS for plasma level dabigatran quantification: Results from DRIVING study.

INTRODUCTION: The knowledge of dabigatran levels is helpful for decision-making in specific situations such as urgent surgery or when the question of reversal arises (uncontrolled bleeding, eligibility for thrombolysis). However, a limited number of observational studies are available regarding comparisons between quantification methods. The objective of the study was to compare dabigatran plasma levels using three assays including the reference method (high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry), focusing on the agreement around the 30-50 ng/mL clinically relevant thresholds. METHODS: Sixty healthy volunteers from DRIVING trial (NCT01627665) were given a single 300-mg dabigatran etexilate dose. Serial blood samplings were performed at pre-defined time points (0 to 24 h). We analyzed plasma samples using ultra-performance-liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS) (dabigatran reference method); ii/diluted thrombin time (dTT) (Hemoclot-DTI-Hyphen-Biomed); iii/ecarin-based chromogenic assay (ECA-II-Stago). RESULTS: Nine hundred sixty samples were analyzed using the three assays (2759 values). dTT and ECA-II values were highly correlated with those of UPLC-MS (Deming regression). Most values >50 ng/mL were higher using dTT and ECA-II compared to UPLC-MS: biases were constant, +14% and +16% with dTT and ECA-II, respectively (Bland-Altman plots), suggesting that active metabolites accounted for ~15% of thrombin inhibition. Regarding values <30 ng/mL, 30-50 ng/mL, or ≥50 ng/mL, the agreement probability between dTT and ECA-II was of 90.6% [88.4-92.5] (Cohen's kappa coefficient 0.84). CONCLUSION: dTT and ECA-II assays rapidly provide accurate dabigatran-level results for clinical practice, both assays being suitable in emergency, taking into account the thrombin inhibitory effect of dabigatran metabolites.

[Interference of oral anti-Xa anticoagulants during monitoring of unfractionated heparin treatments: practical and future attitudes]. / Interférence des anticoagulants oraux directs anti-Xa lors de la surveillance des traitements par héparine non-fractionnée : attitudes pratiques et à venir.

Contrary to direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), unfractionated heparin (UFH) requires daily monitoring when administered at therapeutic dose. At present, UFH monitoring is preferably carried out by measuring plasma anti-Xa activity, however, in patients previously treated with an anti-Xa DOAC and switched to UFH, there is a high risk of DOAC interfering with the measurement of UFH anti-Xa activity. Residual anti-Xa DOAC in the sample can lead to an overestimation of the anticoagulant activity attributed to heparin and thus to incorrect anticoagulation. This risk of interference should not be overlooked because interference may occur even at concentration of DOAC below the hemostatic safety threshold and can last several days. To overcome this issue, several alternatives are being studied. This note provides an update on anti-Xa DOAC interference and different strategies available in current practice. It also underlines the importance of communication between biologists and clinicians on anticoagulant treatments received by patients.

Factors Influencing Unfractionated Heparin Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics During a Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

BACKGROUND: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is commonly used during cardiac surgery with a cardiopulmonary bypass to prevent blood clotting. However, empirical administration of UFH leads to variable responses. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling can be used to optimize UFH dosing and perform real-time individualization. In previous studies, many factors that could influence UFH pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics had not been taken into account such as hemodilution or the type of UFH. Few covariates were identified probably owing to a lack of statistical power. This study aims to address these limitations through a meta-analysis of individual data from two studies. METHODS: An individual patient data meta-analysis was conducted using data from two single-center prospective observational studies, where different UFH types were used for anticoagulation. A pharmacodynamic/pharmacodynamic model of UFH was developed using a non-linear mixed-effects approach. Time-varying covariates such as hemodilution and fluid infusions during a cardiopulmonary bypass were considered. RESULTS: Activities of UFH's anti-activated factor/anti-thrombin were best described by a two-compartment model. Unfractionated heparin clearance was influenced by body weight and the specific UFH type. Volume of distribution was influenced by body weight and pre-operative fibrinogen levels. Pharmacodynamic data followed a log-linear model, accounting for the effect of hemodilution and the pre-operative fibrinogen level. Equations were derived from the model to personalize UFH dosing based on the targeted activated clotting time level and patient covariates. CONCLUSIONS: The population model effectively characterized UFH's pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in cardiopulmonary bypass patients. This meta-analysis incorporated new covariates related to UFH's pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, enabling personalized dosing regimens. The proposed model holds potential for individualization using a Bayesian estimation.

Tinzaparin, an alternative to subcutaneous unfractionated heparin, in patients with severe and end-stage renal impairment: a retrospective observational single-center study.

BACKGROUND: Tinzaparin could be easier to manage than unfractionated heparin in patients with severe renal impairment. However, clinical and pharmacologic data regarding its use in such patients are lacking. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to determine, in patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <30 mL.min⁻1, tinzaparin pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters using a population PK approach and bleeding and thrombotic complications. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational single-center study, including in-patients with eGFR of <30 mL.min⁻1 receiving prophylactic (4500 IU.d⁻1) or therapeutic (175 IU.kg⁻1.d⁻1) tinzaparin. Measured anti-Xa levels were analyzed using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach. Individual predicted tinzaparin exposure markers at steady state were calculated for each patient and dosing regimen. The PK was also evaluated through Monte Carlo simulations based on the final covariate model parameter estimates. RESULTS: Over a 22-month period, 802 tinzaparin treatment periods in 623 patients were analyzed: two-thirds received a prophylactic dose, 66% had an eGFR of <20 mL.min⁻1, and 25% were on renal replacement therapy. In patients for whom anti-Xa measurements were performed (n = 199; 746 values), PK parameters, profiles, and maximum plasma concentrations were comparable with those in patients without renal impairment or in healthy volunteers. In the whole population, major bleeding occurred in 2.4% and 3.5% of patients receiving prophylactic and therapeutic doses over a median 9- and 7-day treatment period, respectively. No patients had thrombotic complications. CONCLUSION: Tinzaparin PK parameters and profiles were not affected by renal impairment. This suggests that tinzaparin, at therapeutic or prophylactic dose, could be an alternative to unfractionated heparin in hospitalized patients with severe renal impairment.

Is there a role for the laboratory monitoring in the management of specific antidotes of direct oral anticoagulants?

Given the growing number of patients receiving direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), patients requiring rapid neutralization is also increasing in case of major bleedings or urgent surgery/procedures. Idarucizumab is commercialized as a specific antidote to dabigatran while andexanet alfa has gained the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency approval as an oral anti-factor Xa inhibitors antidote. Other antidotes or hemostatic agents are still under preclinical or clinical development, the most advanced being ciraparantag. DOAC plasma levels measurement allows to appropriately select patient for antidote administration and may prevent unnecessary prescription of expensive molecules in some acute clinical settings. However, these tests might be inconclusive after some antidote administration, namely andexanet alfa and ciraparantag. The benefit of laboratory monitoring following DOAC reversal remains unclear. Here, we sought to provide an overview of the key studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of DOAC reversal using the most developed/commercialized specific antidotes, to discuss the potential role of the laboratory monitoring in the management of patients receiving DOAC specific antidotes and to highlight the areas that deserve further investigations in order to establish the exact role of laboratory monitoring in the appropriate management of DOAC specific antidotes.

The use of 1E12, a monoclonal anti-platelet factor 4 antibody, to improve the diagnosis of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a complication of adenoviral-based vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 due to prothrombotic immunoglobulin (Ig) G antibodies to platelet factor 4 (PF4) and may be difficult to distinguish from heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in patients treated with heparin. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the usefulness of competitive anti-PF4 enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) in this context. METHODS: The ability of F(ab')2 fragments of 1E12, 1C12, and 2E1, 3 monoclonal anti-PF4 antibodies, to inhibit the binding of human VITT or HIT antibodies to PF4 was evaluated using EIAs. Alanine-scanning mutagenesis was performed to define the amino acids involved in the interactions between the monoclonal antibodies and PF4. RESULTS: A strong inhibition of VITT IgG binding to PF4 was measured with 1E12 (median inhibition, 93%; n = 8), whereas it had no effect on the binding of HIT antibodies (median, 6%; n = 8). In contrast, 1C12 and 2E1 inhibited VITT (median, 74% and 76%, respectively) and HIT antibodies (median, 68% and 53%, respectively) binding to PF4. When a competitive anti-PF4 EIA was performed with 1E12 for 19 additional VITT samples, it strongly inhibited IgG binding to PF4, except for 1 patient, who had actually developed HIT according to the clinical history. Epitope mapping showed that 1E12 interacts with 5 key amino acids on PF4, of which 4 are also required for the binding of human VITT antibodies, thus explaining the competitive inhibition. CONCLUSION: A simple competitive anti-PF4 EIA with 1E12 could help confirm VITT diagnosis and distinguish it from HIT in patients when both diagnoses are possible.

Sensitivity and Specificity of Strategies to Identify Patients with Haemostasis Abnormalities Leading to an Increased Risk of Bleeding Before Scheduled Intervention: the Hemorisk Study.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative identification of patients with haemostasis abnormalities leading to an increased bleeding risk was based on routine haemostasis tests: prothrombin time (PT), activated prothrombin time (aPTT), and platelet count. Because of their low predictive performance, guidelines recommend replacing them with structured bleeding risk questionnaires, but none is validated in this population. OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of 3 strategies, performed at the pre-anaesthesia visit before scheduled interventions, to identify patients with haemostasis abnormalities leading to an increased bleeding risk PATIENTS AND METHODS: Multicenter study in 7 French academic hospitals, involving patients scheduled for surgical intervention, without antiplatelet/anticoagulant treatment. The 3 strategies consisted of 1-a structured screening questionnaire; 2-PT, aPTT, and platelet count ordered in selected patients; 3-systematic PT, aPTT, and platelet count. The reference standard comprised von Willebrand factor activity/antigen, factors VIII, IX, and XI, platelet-function analyser, and, when required, FII, FV, FX, and FVII and haemostasis consultation. RESULTS: Eighteen (1.2%) of 1484 patients had a haemostasis abnormality leading to an increased bleeding risk according to reference standard. In the overall cohort, sensitivity of the questionnaire-based strategy was 50% (95%CI, 26-74; specificity 87% (95%CI, 85-88); sensitivity was 0 (95%CI, 0-41) in men vs 82% (95%CI, 48- 98) in women. For selective routine tests, sensitivity was 33% (95%CI, 13-59) and specificity 97% (95% CI, 96-98). Corresponding values for systematic routine tests were 44% (95%CI, 22-69) and 93% (95%CI, 91-94). CONCLUSIONS: Sensitivity was low for all 3 strategies investigated. The structured screening questionnaire had clinically acceptable diagnostic accuracy only in women.

Management of Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Resumption of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Multidisciplinary Discussion.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended for the prevention of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and are now preferred over vitamin K antagonists due to their beneficial efficacy and safety profile. However, all oral anticoagulants carry a risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Although the risk is well documented and acute bleeding well codified, there is limited high-quality evidence and no guidelines to guide physicians on the optimal management of anticoagulation after a GI bleeding event. The aim of this review is to provide a multidisciplinary critical discussion of the optimal management of GI bleeding in patients with AF receiving oral anticoagulants to help physicians provide individualized treatment for each patient and optimize outcomes. It is important to perform endoscopy when a patient presents with bleeding manifestations or hemodynamic instability to determine the bleed location and severity of bleeding and then perform initial resuscitation. Administration of all anticoagulants and antiplatelets should be stopped and bleeding allowed to resolve with time; however, anticoagulant reversal should be considered for patients who have life-threatening bleeding or when the bleeding is not controlled by the initial resuscitation. Anticoagulation needs to be timely resumed considering that bleeding risk outweighs thrombotic risk when anticoagulation is resumed early after the bleeding event. To prevent further bleeding, physicians should prescribe anticoagulant therapy with the lowest risk of GI bleeding, avoid medications with GI toxicity, and consider the effect of concomitant medications on potentiating the bleeding risk.