Early steps of cryopreservation of day one honeybee (Apis mellifera) embryos treated with low-frequency sonophoresis.

Honeybees, major providers of pollination, are endangered in many areas. Embryo cryopreservation may be a very useful tool to maintain their genetic diversity. However, it is complex in insects, because embryos are chill sensitive and are surrounded by two protectant membranes, the chorion and vitelline. These membranes prevent penetration of cryoprotectant in the embryos. This study aimed to test different conditions of embryo preparation before cryopreservation, including low-frequency sonophoresis, a physical method of permeabilization, and passages through cryoprotectant solutions. Apis mellifera ligustica embryos were collected in artificial cell plugs 7.5 h after queens had been caged, in two different seasons (winter, spring) and were then incubated in vitro overnight (16.5 h). Embryos were individually sonicated and then incubated in three cryoprotectant baths (B1 = 10%, B2 = 20% and B3 = 40% of cryoprotectant) and quenched in liquid nitrogen. Artificial cell plugs and in vitro incubation device were efficient in producing future embryos hatching. Embryos stained ruby red with rhodamine B after sonophoresis treatment indicated that low-frequency ultrasound had permeabilized embryos. According to the treatment, different significant hatching rates were obtained after sonophoresis (up to 25%). After three cryoprotectant incubations, best hatching rates were obtained after 10 min in B1 and B2, and 40 s in B3. These results show that sonophoresis is an efficient tool to permeabilize the chorion and vitelline membrane of the day one honeybee embryo allowing a hatching rate of more than 20%. They also show that the season is an important variability factor.

Experimental Ecotoxicology Procedures Interfere with Honey Bee Life History.

Apis mellifera was used as a model species for ecotoxicological testing. In the present study, we tested the effects of acetone (0.1% in feed), a solvent commonly used to dissolve pesticides, on bees exposed at different developmental stages (larval and/or adult). Moreover, we explored the potential effect of in vitro larval rearing, a commonly used technique for accurately monitoring worker exposure at the larval stage, by combining acetone exposure and treatment conditions (in vitro larval rearing vs. in vivo larval rearing). We then analyzed the life-history traits of the experimental bees using radio frequency identification technology over three sessions (May, June, and August) to assess the potential seasonal dependence of the solvent effects. Our results highlight the substantial influence of in vitro larval rearing on the life cycle of bees, with a 47.7% decrease in life span, a decrease of 0.9 days in the age at first exit, an increase of 57.3% in the loss rate at first exit, and a decrease of 40.6% in foraging tenure. We did not observe any effect of exposure to acetone at the larval stage on the capacities of bees reared in vitro. Conversely, acetone exposure at the adult stage reduced the bee life span by 21.8% to 60%, decreased the age at first exit by 1.12 to 4.34 days, and reduced the foraging tenure by 30% to 37.7%. Interestingly, we found a significant effect of season on acetone exposure, suggesting that interference with the life-history traits of honey bees is dependent on season. These findings suggest improved integration of long-term monitoring for assessing sublethal responses in bees following exposure to chemicals during both the larval and adult stages. Environ Toxicol Chem 2024;43:1320-1331. © 2024 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.

Honeybee queen exposure to a widely used fungicide disrupts reproduction and colony dynamic.

Pollinators have to cope with a wide range of stressful, not necessarily lethal factors limiting their performance and the ecological services they provide. Among these stressors are pesticides, chemicals that are originally designed to target crop-harming organisms but that also disrupt various functions in pollinators, including flight, communication, orientation and memory. Although all these functions are crucial for reproductive individuals when searching for mates or nesting places, it remains poorly understood how pesticides affect reproduction in pollinators. In this study, we investigated how a widely used fungicide, boscalid, affects reproduction in honey bees (Apis mellifera), an eusocial insect in which a single individual, the queen, fulfills the reproductive functions of the whole colony. Boscalid is a succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor (SDHI) fungicide mainly used on rapeseed flowers to target mitochondrial respiration in fungi but it is also suspected to disrupt foraging-linked functions in bees. We found that immature queen exposure to sublethal, field relevant doses of boscalid disrupted reproduction, as indicated by a dramatic increase in queen mortality during and shortly after the nuptial flights period and a decreased number of spermatozoa stored in the spermatheca of surviving queens. However, we did not observe a decreased paternity frequency in exposed queens that successfully established a colony. Queen exposure to boscalid had detrimental consequences on the colonies they later established regarding brood production, Varroa destructor infection and pollen storage but not nectar storage and population size. These perturbations at the colony-level correspond to nutritional stress conditions, and may have resulted from queen reduced energy provisioning to the eggs. Accordingly, we found that exposed queens had decreased gene expression levels of vitellogenin, a protein involved in egg-yolk formation. Overall, our results indicate that boscalid decreases honey bee queen reproductive quality, thus supporting the need to include reproduction in the traits measured during pesticide risk assessment procedures.