Bridge plating is an effective adjunct treatment for complex elbow instability.

BACKGROUND: Managing persistent elbow instability and chronic dislocations presents challenges despite traditional treatments. Supplementary methods like immobilization and various fixations, though common, can carry high complication rates. This study assesses the efficacy of bridge plating in treating complex elbow instability through a retrospective review of patients. Data on characteristics, treatment duration, range of motion, complications, and evaluation scores were analyzed, providing insights into outcomes complications associated with bridge plating. RESULTS: Eleven patients were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 80 ± 68 weeks postoperatively. The mean age was 53 ± 14 years and there were 5 females and 6 males. The mean body mass index was 38. Bridge plating was used for a spectrum of complex elbow injuries. The mean time from injury to bridge plating in acute cases was 29 ± 19 days and 344 ± 381 days in chronic cases. The mean duration of bridge plating was 121 ± 72 days. At the time of plate removal, mean intraoperative elbow motion was extension 58° ± 12°, flexion 107° ± 14°, supination 66° ± 23° and pronation 60° ± 26°. At the latest follow-up visit, mean elbow motion was extension 37° ± 22°, flexion 127° ± 17°, supination 72° ± 15°, and pronation 63° ± 18°. There were 6 complications (55%): heterotopic ossification, ulnar neuropathy, wound failure over the plate in a thin patient, an ulnar shaft periprosthetic fracture due to a seizure-induced fall, and persistent elbow subluxation despite bridge plate fixation. Finally, 1 patient sustained a fracture of a 3.5-mm locking bridge plate. One patient required a contracture release for persistent stiffness. Four of these complications can be directly attributed to the use of the bridge plate (36%). At final follow-up, the mean patient-rated elbow evaluation score was 34, with 0 indicating no pain and disability. The mean Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score was 66% for the 8 patients who had this available, with 100% being the best possible attainable score. CONCLUSION: Bridge plating effectively maintains joint reduction in selected complex elbow instability cases. However, patients with bridge plates often require a second surgery for removal and experience high rates of general complications because of the complexity of their condition.

The effectiveness of biophysical agents in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome- an umbrella review.

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to summarize, synthesize, and integrate the evidence evaluating the effectiveness of biophysical agents compared to other conservative treatments, for the management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). METHODS: This was an overview of systematic reviews (SRs). We searched several online databases and obtained SRs relating to managing CTS using biophysical agents. Two independent researchers screened and appraised the quality of the SRs using the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews-2 appraisal tool. We extracted information related to study characteristics as well as the effectiveness of biophysical agents for CTS, the effect sizes, and between-group significances. We categorized the information based on the type of biophysical agent. We also performed a citation mapping and calculated the corrected covered area index. RESULTS: We found 17 SRs addressing 12 different biophysical agents. The quality of the SRs was mainly critically low (n = 16) or low (n = 1). The evidence was inconclusive for the effectiveness of Low-level Laser therapy and favorable for the short-term efficacy of non-thermal ultrasound in improving symptom severity, function, pain, global rating of improvement, satisfaction with treatment, and other electrophysiological measures compared to manual therapy or placebo. Evidence was inconclusive for Extracorporeal Shockwave therapy, and favorable for the short-term effectiveness of Shortwave and Microwave Diathermy on pain and hand function. The corrected covered area index was lower than 35% indicating a low overlap of the SRs. CONCLUSIONS: The findings were based on low-quality primary studies, with an unclear or high risk of bias, small sample sizes, and short follow-ups. Therefore, no recommendations can be made for the long-term effectiveness of any biophysical agents. High-quality evidence is needed to support evidence-based recommendations on the use of biophysical agents in the management of CTS. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022319002, registered on 17/04/2022.

Risk Factors for Complications in Ulnar Shortening Osteotomies: A Multicenter Retrospective Review.

PURPOSE: Ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) is commonly performed to alleviate pathologies causing ulnar-sided wrist pain. Surgical complications include nonunion and hardware removal, with rates up to 18% and 45%, respectively. The primary objective of the study was to report the overall complication rate of USO. The secondary objective was to identify risk factors for complications. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter cohort review was undertaken, including six Canadian cities over a 6-year period (January 2013-December 2018). Chart review was used to collect demographic data, surgical technique, implant used, and postoperative complications. Descriptive statistics of demographics and operative characteristics, including plate positioning, type of osteotomy, plate type, and ulnar variance (mm), were analyzed. Univariate analyses were used to select predictor variables for nonunion and hardware removal. These predictor variables were then entered into an adjusted multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 361 USOs were performed. Mean age was 46 ± 16 years (60.7% men). The overall complication rate was 37.1%, hardware removal rate was 29.6%, and nonunion rate was 9.4%. There was a workers' compensation claim associated with 21.6% of all complications, and it was a risk factor for both hardware removal (odds ratio [OR] = 3.81) and nonunion (OR = 2.88). Neither smoking nor diabetes was associated with complication rates. Seventy percent of plates were placed volarly, 25.5% dorsally, and 3.9% directly ulnar. Osteotomies were oblique in 83.7% of cases and transverse in 15.5%. Adjusted multivariate regression analysis revealed that younger age (OR = 0.98) was a risk factor for hardware removal and male sex (OR = 2.49) was a risk factor for nonunion. A surgical factor associated with hardware removal was direct ulnar plate placement (OR = 9.93). No surgical factors were associated with nonunions. CONCLUSIONS: There are substantial rates of complications with USOs. Direct ulnar plate placement should be avoided. Patients should be thoroughly counseled on the risks of complications prior to proceeding with USO. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Indomethacin for heterotopic ossification prophylaxis following surgical treatment of elbow trauma: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification is a frequent complication following surgical treatment of elbow trauma. The use of indomethacin to prevent heterotopic ossification is reported in the literature; however, its effectiveness is controversial. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to determine whether indomethacin is effective in reducing the incidence and severity of heterotopic ossification after surgical management of elbow trauma. METHODS: Between February 2013 and April 2018, 164 eligible patients were randomized to receive postoperative indomethacin or placebo medication. The primary outcome was the incidence of heterotopic ossification on elbow radiographs at 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation score, Mayo Elbow Performance Index score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score. Range of motion, complications, and nonunion rates were also obtained. RESULTS: At 1-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in the incidence of heterotopic ossification between the indomethacin group (49%) and the control group (55%) (relative risk, 0.89; P = .52). There were no significant differences in postoperative Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation, Mayo Elbow Performance Index, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores or range of motion (P = .16). The complication rate was 17% in both the treatment and control groups (P > .99). There were no nonunions in either group. CONCLUSION: This Level I study demonstrated that indomethacin prophylaxis against heterotopic ossification in the setting of surgically treated elbow trauma was not significantly different from placebo.

A systematic review of the psychometric properties of pressure pain detection threshold in evaluating mechanical pain threshold in people with hand or wrist injuries.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the psychometric properties of Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPDT) measures in people with hand or wrist injuries. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched to identify eligible studies evaluating psychometric properties of PPDT in samples composed of at least 50% of people with hand or wrist injury. The Consensus-based Standards for the Measurement of Health Instruments' risk of bias checklist was used to critically appraise the included studies, and qualitative synthesis was performed by pooling the results of all studies that presented the same measurement property using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. RESULTS: From 415 studies, 11 relevant studies were identified. Of the 11 studies, four hand or wrist injuries were represented; carpal tunnel syndrome, distal radius fractures, osteoarthritis, and complex regional pain syndrome. Intra-rater reliability was considered sufficient (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.64-0.94), with small reported standard error of the mean values (5.3-39.2 kPa). Results of validity and responsiveness could not be synthesized due to heterogeneity. Risk of bias for reliability and measurement error was assessed as very good or adequate, whereas validity and responsiveness were doubtful or inadequate. Overall quality of evidence was low or very low for all measurement properties. CONCLUSIONS: Inconsistent results and low quality evidence provide little confidence in the overall measurement properties of PPDT in a hand or wrist injury population. No criterion standard for pain further highlights complexities around pain measurement such that the results obtained from PPDT measures in clinical practice cannot be compared to a gold standard measure.

The Role of Perceived Job Exertion and Age as Moderators of the Relationship Between Gender and Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disability and Pain in Injured Workers.

Purpose This cross-sectional study aimed to determine if age and perceived job exertion (PJE) moderate the effect of gender on upper extremity (UE) disorders in injured workers. Methods We sampled a consecutive cohort of patients attending a specialty clinic for injured workers with UE musculoskeletal problems. We measured UE disability and pain using the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QDASH). Participants reported their PJE on a Global Rating of Change scale ranging from 1 (minimal perceived exertion) to 15 (maximal perceived exertion). Linear regression was used to explore the effect of gender on QDASH. We probed the moderating role of age and PJE using floodlight regression and identified the Johnson-Neyman (JN) region of age and PJE, where the effect of gender on QDASH becomes significant at the 95% level. Results We analyzed 418 participants, of whom 44% were women. The effect of gender on QDASH was significant for women aged 49 or younger (JN-region border: Age = 48.5, effect = 4.4, SE = 2.2, p = 0.05). Women workers with UE disorders younger than 49 years old report higher levels of pain and disability than do men. After the age of 49 years, both men and women workers experience a similar worsening of UE pain and disability with increasing age. Pain and disability increase with increased perceived job demands similarly for both men and women workers. Conclusions Women younger than 49 years had higher levels of UE pain and disorders than men. Both men and women workers reported higher UE disability with an increase in their PJE.

Gender disparity in academic orthopedic programs in Canada: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The majority of the literature on gender disparity in orthopedic surgery is from the United States; the Canadian perspective is lacking. The objective of this study was to determine the representation of women faculty members and the proportion of women faculty in published leadership positions in academic orthopedic divisions and departments across Canada. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we used a Web-based search strategy to identify faculty listings for all 17 academic orthopedic programs affiliated with the Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada for the 2018/19 academic year. For each faculty member identified, we determined gender (man or woman), professorial rank and leadership positions. We compared regional gender differences among 3 groups: schools in eastern Canada and Quebec (6), Ontario (6) and western Canada (5). Gender comparisons were made for all variables of interest. RESULTS: We identified 809 orthopedic surgeons at the 17 Canadian academic institutions, of whom 96 (11.9%) were women. In eastern Canada and Quebec, 16.2% of the faculty were women, significantly above the national average (p = 0.03). The corresponding values for Ontario and western Canada were 8.9% (p = 0.1) and 11.4% (p = 0.7). There were no significant differences in the proportions of women and men at lower levels of promotion, but significantly more men than women had attained full professorship (65 [9%] v. 1 [1%], p = 0.002). Women surgeons were not represented in leadership roles or within faculty roles of distinction. CONCLUSION: In 2018/19, women orthopedic surgeons were underrepresented in faculty positions across academic orthopedic training programs in Canada, and were disproportionately underrepresented in promoted academic faculty roles and leadership positions. These data can be used to review and educate on equity in hiring and promotion, as well as to foster mentorship and transition planning.

Cannabis use patterns among patients with upper extremity conditions at the time of legalization in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Recreational cannabis use was legalized in Canada in 2018. Cannabis use patterns and patient attitudes toward cannabis use, particularly in the context of these legal changes, are not well understood. Our aim was to evaluate baseline cannabis use patterns and attitudes at the time of legalization among patients with upper extremity conditions in Canada. METHODS: In 2018, we conducted a multicentre cross-sectional survey study of 1561 patients with upper extremity conditions at 7 surgical centres. Participants were asked whether they currently use cannabis. If yes, they were asked questions regarding usage patterns and perceptions of cannabis use, including likelihood of use, safety and comfort discussing it with their physician. RESULTS: In the 6 months after legalization, 790 (51%) participants felt that cannabis was safer than prescription narcotics, with 450 (29%) currently using cannabis. Reasons for cannabis use included pain (56%), stress (51%) and recreation (42%). Of the 1105 patients not using cannabis, 267 (24%) were more likely to consider it after legalization. Of the 450 cannabis users, 73 (16%) had been using it for less than 6 months, 206 (46%) stated they were more comfortable discussing cannabis with their physician after legalization and 195 (43%) were using cannabis more than 4 times per week. CONCLUSION: Many patients with upper extremity conditions were regularly using cannabis. Patients were more comfortable discussing cannabis with their physician than before legalization. Treating surgeons should be aware of these trends and expect to receive questions regarding cannabis use.

Prevalence of bone fractures among children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a significant neurodevelopment disorder among children and adolescents, with 5 % prevalence. Bone fractures account for 25 % of accidents and injuries among all children and adolescents. Considering the characteristics of inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity in children with ADHD, it is critical to examine bone fractures among these children. The objective of our meta-analysis was to determine the prevalence of bone fractures among children and adolescents with ADHD. METHODS: We completed a systematic review and meta-analysis using an electronic search of the following databases: CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Scopus. The search terms used were: "attention deficit hyperactivity disorder OR attention deficit disorder" and "bone fracture*." We included studies examining patients 18 years or younger who were diagnosed with ADHD and tracked (prospectively or retrospectively) for five or more years. Effect size (es), using a random effects model, was calculated. We registered the review protocol with PROSPERO (CRD42019119527). RESULTS: From 445 records retrieved, 31 full text articles were reviewed and 5 articles met inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. The summary es revealed the prevalence of bone fractures among children and adolescents with ADHD to be 4.83 % (95 % CI: 3.07-6.58 %). The location of bone fractures, using a subset of data, showed a distribution of 69.62 %, 22.85 %, and 7.53 % in the upper limbs, lower limbs, and other anatomical regions, respectively. Another subset of studies revealed a 2.55-fold increase in the prevalence of fractures among the children with ADHD compared to their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of these findings is critical to physicians, parents, and policy makers to create safe environments and provide supports in order to optimize the health and safety of children and adolescents with ADHD.

The Effect of Distal Radius Fractures on 3-Dimensional Joint Congruency.

PURPOSE: Whereas the goal of distal radius fracture treatment is anatomical restoration, controversy exists as to whether it is the severity of the disruption of joint alignment at the time of fracture or residual malalignment after healing that determines outcome. The objective of this study was to compare joint contact mechanics bilaterally a minimum of 3 years following a distal radius fracture. Our hypothesis was that 3-dimensional joint space would be reduced in individuals following wrist fracture and that these changes in joint load lead to the development of degenerative arthritis. To test the hypothesis, an interbone spacing algorithm was used to determine whether 3-dimensional joint space and contact mechanics were altered in the distal radioulnar (DRUJ) and radiocarpal joints following a wrist fracture. METHODS: In 16 subjects with previous unilateral wrist fractures, 3-dimensional interbone distance (joint space), a measure of joint congruency and 3-dimensional alignment, was quantified from reconstructed computed tomography bone models of the distal radius, ulna, scaphoid, and lunate. RESULTS: At an average of 8 years following fracture, joint interbone spacing area was reduced in the radiolunate joint of the injured wrist in comparison with the uninjured wrist. The joint interbone spacing area was decreased in the DRUJ and radioscaphoid joint of the injured wrist compared with the uninjured wrist but this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the use of a noninvasive tool that can be used to examine joint loading and suggests that further investigation into the association between altered joint loading and the development of posttraumatic arthritis is needed, especially in the radiocarpal joints. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This paper provides a noninvasive image-based framework that can be used to examine joint contact area over time and provides preliminary data examining the effect of a distal radius fracture on the joint congruency of the DRUJ and radiocarpal joints.

The Effect of Malunited Scaphoid Fractures on Joint Congruency.

PURPOSE: Although the consequences of scaphoid nonunion have been well-established, the implications of malunions are not well-known. To date, malunions have mainly been studied with 2-dimensional imaging. The objective of this study was to employ 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) imaging and inter-bone distance mapping to determine the implications of a scaphoid malunion on 3-dimensional joint surface area (JSA) (a measure of joint contact area) at an average of 7 ± 2 years (range, 4-12 years) after fracture. METHODS: In 14 subjects with previous unilateral, malunited scaphoid fractures, we measured the 3-dimensional JSA using reconstructed CT bone models of the carpus. The JSA was compared within each individual, comparing images of the wrist collected at the time of fracture (baseline) and 7 years later (follow-up CT scans). RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the measured JSA (reduced joint space) at the scaphotrapezial (23% increase) and scaphocapitate (13% increase) joints when the baseline and follow-up scans of the wrist were compared. An increased JSA indicates that the 2 opposing surfaces are closer in contact and have a reduced joint spacing reflective of degenerative changes. However, participants in this study showed no radiographic signs of degenerative changes in the wrists at midterm follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in JSA was found in patients with a malunited scaphoid in the scaphotrapezial and scaphocapitate joints of the wrist an average of 7 years after injury, but these joint changes were not evident in measured radiographic signs of arthritis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As early as 4 years after injury, the 3-dimensional JSA is significantly increased at the scaphocapitate and scaphotrapezial joints. Future work is needed to determine the implication of this increased in 3-dimensional JSA on the underlying subchondral bone, and to observe these patients for longer to determine whether degenerative changes develop.

A Biomechanical Evaluation of the ECRL Tenodesis for Reconstruction of the Scapholunate Ligament.

PURPOSE: Reconstruction of the scapholunate ligament (SLL) in the setting of dynamic instability remains a surgical challenge, with lack of consensus on the best reconstructive procedure. Reconstruction of only the dorsal component may lead to volar gapping and abnormal wrist kinematics. This cadaveric active motion simulation study determined whether scapholunate (SL) motion, angulation, and contact are restored following open reconstruction using the extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL) tenodesis, which reconstructs both the volar and the dorsal SLL components. METHODS: Seven fresh-frozen cadaveric upper limbs (mean age, 68 ± 10.1 years) underwent a 4-stage protocol of cyclic dart-throw motion and flexion-extension motion (utilizing an active wrist motion simulator that used tendon load/motion-controlled actuation. Scaphoid and lunate motion, relative scaphoid translation, SL angle, and dorsal-volar SL diastasis were measured with (1) wrist ligaments intact, (2) following complete sectioning of the SLL, and (3) following SL reconstruction using the ECRL tenodesis technique. RESULTS: Complete SLL sectioning resulted in a typical pattern of SL instability. Following the ECRL tenodesis, lunate extension was not corrected. Scaphoid flexion, however, was not significantly different from the native state in FEM but remained significantly flexed during dart-throw motion. Differential dorsal and volar gapping did not significantly improve following ECRL tenodesis (dorsal, 1.2-2.3 mm; volar, 1.1-1.7 mm). CONCLUSIONS: This biomechanical study demonstrates that the ECRL tenodesis did not fully restore native carpal kinematics, despite dorsal and volar SLL, and scaphotrapeziotrapezoid reconstruction. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

The Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons-Elbow form capture aspects of functioning that are important to patients with elbow injuries.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study. INTRODUCTION: The Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) and the self-report section of the American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons-elbow form (pASES-e) are two important elbow-specific self-report measures used in routine clinical practice. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To use the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) to link aspects of functioning that are reported using the Patient-Specific Functional Scale by a cohort of patients with elbow disorders and compare it to the content of the PREE and the pASES-e. METHODS: One hundred patients with a variety of elbow disorders (mean age and SD 53.88 (14.51); M: F 48: 52) were recruited from the Roth-McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre. They self-reported important aspects of functioning using the Patient-Specific Functional Scale. These concerns were linked to the ICF using formal linking procedures. These ICF categories were compared to the categories related to the PREE and the pASES-e. Linking was carried out by two independent raters, and agreement was calculated using percentage agreement. RESULTS: A total of 423 self-reported functional activities were linked to 25 second-level ICF categories from the activity and participation domain. Commonly reported activities were D640 doing housework (52%); D540 dressing (47%); and D475 driving (35%). PREE had better coverage of the patient concerns (71%) than pASES-e (50%). D475-driving (35%) and D440-fine hand use (24%) were the 2 major categories that were not captured by the questionnaires. Agreement between the raters was 90.5%. DISCUSSION: This study established that the PREE and the pASES-e were able to capture aspects of functioning important to patients and that align with the ICF, with this happening to a greater extent on the PREE than the pASES-e. Because all patients reported concerns from the activity and participation section ('d' categories) of the ICF, this validated that these PROMs measure this conceptual domain. CONCLUSION: The PREE provided more comprehensive coverage of patients' functional concerns than the pASES-e.

Does Time Spent on Active Surveillance Adversely Affect the Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Delayed Radical Prostatectomy?

PURPOSE: Pathological and oncologic outcomes of delayed radical prostatectomy following prostate cancer active surveillance are not well established. We determined the pathological and oncologic outcomes of favorable risk, Grade Group 1, prostate cancer managed with active surveillance and progressing to radical prostatectomy for clinically significant prostate cancer (Grade Group 2 or greater). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1992 and 2015, 170 men with favorable risk prostate cancer underwent delayed radical prostatectomy for clinically significant prostate cancer (ASRP) at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Pathological and oncologic outcomes of the ASRP cohort were compared with a matched cohort treated with up-front radical prostatectomy (405) immediately before surgery. Biochemical recurrence-free survival, overall survival and cancer specific survival were compared. We examined the association between delayed radical prostatectomy and adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy and biochemical recurrence using logistic and Cox regression analyses, respectively. RESULTS: Median time spent on active surveillance before radical prostatectomy was 31.0 months. At radical prostatectomy pT3 (extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion), positive surgical margin and pN1 rates were comparable between the 2 cohorts. Median followup after radical prostatectomy was 5.6 years. The 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rate in the ASRP cohort and up-front radical prostatectomy cohort were 85.8% and 82.4%, respectively (p=0.38). Overall survival and cancer specific survival were comparable between the 2 groups. Delayed radical prostatectomy was not associated with adverse pathological outcomes and biochemical recurrence on regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Curative intent radical prostatectomy after a period of active surveillance results in excellent pathological and oncologic outcomes at 5 years. A period of active surveillance does not result in inferior outcomes compared to patients with similar risk characteristics undergoing up-front radical prostatectomy.

Evaluation of the content validity index of the Australian/Canadian osteoarthritis hand index, the patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation and the thumb disability exam in people with hand arthritis.

BACKGROUND: The Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN), the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) and the Thumb Disability Exam (TDX) are patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) designed to assess pain and hand function in patients with hand arthritis, hand pain and disability, or thumb pathology respectively. This study evaluated the content validity of AUSCAN, PRWHE and TDX in people with hand arthritis. METHODS: This study enrolled participants with hand arthritis to rate the items of all 3 PROM in terms of relevance and clarity. The Content Validity Index (CVI) was computed for each item in each scale (I-CVI) as well as for the overall scale (S-CVI). Kappa was used to determine the inter-rater agreement among the raters. RESULTS: Overall, 64 individuals with hand arthritis (27% with OA, 67% with rheumatoid arthritis and 6% with psoriatic arthritis) participated in the study. The I-CVI for all items and all scales were very high (I-CVI > 0.76) and the modified Kappa agreement among the raters demonstrated excellent agreement (k > 0.76). The S-CVI for all PROMs was very high for relevance (AUSCAN = 0.92, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.94; PRWHE = 0.85, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.88 and TDX = 0.87, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.89) and for clarity (AUSCAN = 0.99, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.00; PRWHE = 0.95, 95% CI 0.93 to 0.97 and TDX = 0.91, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.94), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated very high content validity indices for the AUSCAN, PRWHE and TDX; with strong consensus across raters. This augments prior studies demonstrating appropriate statistical measurement properties, to provide confidence that all three measures assess important patient concepts of pain and disability.

The Impact of Scaphoid Malunion on Radioscaphoid Joint Contact: A Computational Analysis.

PURPOSE: The clinical relevance of scaphoid malunion is controversial because the biomechanical sequelae remain poorly understood. In this computational study, the effect of increasing scaphoid malunion on radioscaphoid joint contact was assessed. METHODS: Six computational wrist models of active wrist flexion-extension were used to examine 6 scaphoid malunions of varying severities. The malunions were computationally created using 3-dimensional imaging software. Each scaphoid was shortened at the waist by 2 mm to simulate fracture comminution and the distal pole was angulated volarly from 15° to 55° in 10° intervals to create a total of 6 scaphoid malunion models per specimen. Each malunion model was then assessed at 3 wrist positions: neutral, 40° flexion, and 40° extension. The radioscaphoid contact area, as well as the contact centroid, was calculated. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant association between malunion severity and a wider area of contact at the radiocar: pal joint. The centroid of this radioscaphoid contact area also moved in an ulnar direction for all tested wrist positions. In the extended wrist position, the centroid also moved volarly. CONCLUSIONS: In this computational model, the amount of radioscaphoid joint contact was significantly increased with progressive scaphoid malunion severity. Furthermore, the position of the contact centroid had a significant change in position in the ulnar direction in all wrist positions with increasing scaphoid malunion. The clinical importance of this contact is yet to be elucidated, but this computational model serves as a basis for understanding the biomechanical consequences of scaphoid humpback deformities. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides a computational analysis examining changes at the radioscaphoid joint that may occur within the wrist with the scaphoid malunited.

Scaphoid Malunion Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes at a Minimum of 4 Years Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of patients with scaphoid malunion after acute fracture at a mean of 7 years after injury. METHODS: Patients with scaphoid malunion were identified from a departmental database of acute scaphoid fractures. Patients with a scaphoid height-to-length ratio greater than 0.6 on final follow-up computed tomography (CT) scan were considered malunited. These patients were contacted to return for CT imaging and clinical assessment. A total of 22 patients were included (4 females and 18 males). Average age of the group was 41 years (range, 16-64 years) and average length of follow-up was 7.4 years (range, 4.4-11.8 years) after injury. RESULTS: Ten patients who underwent CT imaging demonstrated arthritic changes at the radial styloid, scaphoid fossa, or scaphotrapeziotrapezoid joint(s). Despite this, patients had good clinical function that was not significantly different compared with the uninjured side. Patients reported minimal pain and disability based on patient-reported outcome measures, and there was a moderate correlation between passive range of motion and height-to-length ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of all patients with malunited acute scaphoid fractures demonstrated radiographic findings of early arthritis on CT imaging but overall good clinical results on midterm follow-up. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

The Capitate-to-Axis-of-Radius Distance (CARD): A New Radiographic Measurement for Wrist and Carpal Alignment in the Sagittal Plane.

PURPOSE: To determine the reliability of a new radiographic index evaluating sagittal radiocarpal alignment, the capitate-to-axis-of-radius distance (CARD). A secondary purpose was to validate this index by comparing values between normal wrists and those with distal radial fractures (DRFs) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The CARD is defined as the perpendicular distance from the center of the capitate head to the axis of the radius. Inter- and intraobserver reliability was tested. Cronbach alpha was calculated, and 2 methods of measurement were compared. The superior one (volar border of radial shaft) was used in the second part of the study. The normal CARD was then compared with unilateral DRFs with dorsal displacement DRF (n = 25) and RA (n = 25). Correlations between the CARD and other radiographic parameters (dorsal angulation, radial inclination, and ulnar variance) were calculated as well as between the CARD and the severity of disease or fracture displacement (mild/moderate/severe). RESULTS: The CARD showed excellent intra- and interobserver reliability. The volar radius measurement method was superior to the midaxis method and was, therefore, used for the second portion of the study. The mean CARD for normal, fractured, and RA wrists was significantly different (2.2 ± 2.5 mm, 15.7 ± 6.5 mm and 0.2 ± 4.4 mm, respectively). There was a strong side-to-side correlation in normal wrists (r = 0.77) and a significant correlation between the CARD (mm) and the severity of deformity (RA, r = -0.7; DRF, r = 0.8). CONCLUSION: The CARD is a reproducible, easy-to-use measurement of sagittal carpal alignment with a strong side-to-side correlation. The CARD increases with dorsal angulation of the distal radius and decreases as severity of deformity with RA increases. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The correlation of the CARD with severity of deformity in DRFs and RA makes it a useful method of assessing deformities in the sagittal plane. The normal wrist can be used as a comparison when evaluating the CARD in the setting of unilateral wrist disease.

Management of chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures: primary repair vs. semitendinosus autograft reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Delayed presentation of distal biceps tendon ruptures can make primary repair difficult, in which case reconstruction using a tendon graft is an option. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes and complications between delayed distal biceps tendon ruptures managed with repair vs. semitendinosus autograft reconstruction. METHODS: Nineteen delayed distal biceps tendon rupture cases treated with a tendon reconstruction were compared with 16 delayed primary repair cases (>21 days). The reconstructions were performed using a semitendinosus autograft looped through a transosseous tunnel in the bicipital tuberosity and secured with a Pulvertaft weave to the remnant distal biceps tendon. The patient groups were reviewed and completed functional outcomes testing including range of motion, isometric elbow flexion and supination strength, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and Mayo Elbow Performance Index. RESULTS: Mean patient age (49 ± 9 vs. 46 ± 8 years, P = .65) and follow-up (47 ± 25 vs. 45 ± 27 months, P = .45) were similar between delayed primary repair and reconstruction groups. Range of motion (P = .62), supination strength (P = .26), elbow flexion strength (P = .93), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (P = .08), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (P = .22) were not significantly different between groups. The Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation (P = .02) and Mayo Elbow Performance Index (P = .04), however, were better in the delayed repair group compared with the reconstruction group. Complications were similar between groups (P = .87). CONCLUSION: Delayed reconstruction of irreparable distal biceps tendon ruptures with semitendinosus autograft produces similar strength, range of motion, and complication rates but slightly worse functional outcome scores compared with delayed primary repair. This suggests that when possible direct repair is preferred, however, if not possible, reconstruction with an autologous tendon graft results in predictably good outcomes.

What Factors Contribute to Falls-Related Distal Radius Fracture?

Objective: This mixed methods study analyzed the factors that led to a fall in a cohort of patients with distal radius fracture (DRF). Methods: A sample of 1,453 patients (430 men; 1,023 women; age range: 18-89 years) supplemented by new interview data from 29 patients (19 women) were examined. Chi-square and descriptive analysis of quantitative data and descriptive thematic analysis of qualitative data were compared to determine data convergence and divergence. Results: A higher number of DRF were observed in the 45- to 64-year-old group (44%), employed people (48%), in winter months (41%), and in low-energy fractures (75%). Themes emerged from qualitative data on the cause of the fracture, including environmental factors, behavioral factors, physical factors, and sports activities. Conclusion: Reasons for DRF are multifactorial. Preventive strategies with an emphasis on environmental and behavioral factor modifications are likely to decrease the number of DRF.