Increased N-terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide during Extracorporeal Life Support Is Associated with Poor Outcome in Neonates with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prognostic information derived from the daily measurements of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (proBNP) in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia undergoing extracorporeal life support (ECLS). STUDY DESIGN: Plasma proBNP was prospectively measured daily during the first week of ECLS using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Patients (n = 63) were allocated according to outcome: survivors (group 1, n = 35); nonsurvivors with successful weaning (defined as survival for >12 hours after ECLS discontinuation) (group 2, n = 16); nonsurvivors with unsuccessful weaning (group 3, n = 12). ProBNP kinetics were compared using Kruskal-Wallis testing and correlated with pulmonary hypertension and cardiac dysfunction on echocardiography using the Spearman correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Infants in group 3 presented significantly higher proBNP values from day 3 to day 6 compared with group 1 and 2. Overall mortality among patients with the highest proBNP values on day 1 was 30.6% compared with 63% in those patients with at least 1 higher value on day 2 to day 7. In patients with a late increase (day 4 to day 7) in proBNP the mortality was 70%, compared with 32.6% in those with proBNP below the value on day 1. Weaning failure was 35% in patients with a late increase and 11.6% in those without a late increase. ProBNP correlated significantly with pulmonary hypertension and cardiac dysfunction before and during ECLS. CONCLUSIONS: Absolute proBNP values are associated with weaning failure but not overall mortality in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia undergoing ECLS. Echocardiographic findings correlate well with proBNP values.

Exploratory Assessment of Levosimendan in Infants With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.

OBJECTIVES: Infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia frequently suffer from cardiac dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension during the postnatal course. With the use of the inodilator levosimendan, a therapeutic approach is available in situations with catecholamine-refractory low-cardiac-output failure and severe pulmonary hypertension. DESIGN: Retrospective single-center cohort study. SETTING: University-based, tertiary-care children's hospital neonatal ICU. PATIENTS: Cohort of 24 infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia and levosimendan therapy, without underlying major cardiac defect, treated at the University Children´s Hospital Bonn, Germany, between January 2017 and December 2018. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-four infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia were treated with levosimendan (41% of hospitalized congenital diaphragmatic hernia infants in the study period). In 88%, the congenital diaphragmatic hernia was left-sided. The median observed-to-expected lung-to-head ratio was 36%. About 60% of the infants were supported with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and the mortality was 38% (9/24 infants). Levosimendan administration was associated with improvement of pulmonary hypertension severity (p = 0.013 and p = 0.000) and right ventricular dysfunction (p = 0.011 and p = 0.000) at 24 hours and 7 days after treatment. Similarly, the prevalence of left ventricular dysfunction decreased from 50% at baseline to 10% after 7 days (p = 0.026). A significant reduction in the peak inspiratory pressure was observed after drug application (p = 0.038) and a significant decrease of the Vasoactive-Inotropic Score was apparent (p = 0.022). A relevant arterial hypotension as a drug-related adverse event occurred in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study exploring clinical and hemodynamic changes after levosimendan treatment in a cohort of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. An association of levosimendan application and an improvement in pulmonary hypertension, right ventricular, and left ventricular dysfunction were observed within 7 days after drug infusion. However, due to the retrospective design of this study, the results should be interpreted carefully.