Racial and ethnic differences in self-reported barriers to substance use treatment among emergency department patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: As overdose rates rise among non-White Americans, understanding barriers to substance use disorder (SUD) treatment access by race and ethnicity is important. This study explores self-reported barriers to SUD treatment by race and ethnicity in emergency department (ED) populations. METHODS: We conducted a secondary, exploratory analysis of a randomized trial of patients not seeking SUD treatment who endorsed active drug use at six academic EDs. Responses to the Barriers to Treatment Inventory were compared by race, ethnicity, and drug severity, using χ2 tests (N = 858), followed by adjusted logistic regression models. RESULTS: Absence of a perceived drug problem (39% non-Hispanic Black, 38% Hispanic, 50% non-Hispanic White; p ≤ .001) was the most prevalent barrier to SUD treatment. Non-Hispanic Black participants were less likely to state that they could handle their drug use on their own (OR = 0.69, CI = 0.50-0.95), and were more likely to report disliking personal questions than non-Hispanic White participants (OR = 1.49, CI = 1.07-2.09). Non-Hispanic Black participants were less likely than Hispanic participants to agree that treatment availability (OR = 0.46, CI = 0.28-0.76) and family disapproval (OR = 0.38, CI = 0.16-0.91) were treatment barriers. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Screening and counseling may help address the barrier, common to all groups, that drug use was not seen as problematic. Expanding access to diverse treatment options may also address the range of barriers reported by our study population. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: Our study is one of the first in the U.S. to examine both individual and structural barriers to accessing treatment and to examine the association with drug use severity by race/ethnicity.

Assessment of the Short Grit Scale in patients with substance use disorder: Psychometric properties and patient characteristics.

Background: Recovery from substance use disorder requires sustained effort and perseverance. Hence, the resilience factor of grit may be important for people in recovery. Little research has been conducted on grit in patients with substance use disorder (SUD), especially in a large and varied sample.Objectives: To analyze the psychometric properties of the Short Grit Scale (Grit-S) in patients with SUD and to use demographic and clinical characteristics to predict variance in Grit-S scores.Methods: Participants completed the Grit-S and other self-report measures. Psychometric properties of the Grit-S were assessed in outpatients (N = 94, 77.7% male) and a hierarchical regression predicted Grit-S variance in inpatients (N = 1238, 65.0% male).Results: The Grit-S demonstrated good internal consistency (α=.75) and strong test-retest reliability (adjusted r = .79, p < .001). Mean Grit-S score was 3.15, lower than other clinical samples reported in the literature. Regression modeling indicated a moderate, statistically significant association between demographic and clinical characteristics and Grit-S scores (R2 = 15.5%, p < .001). Of particular interest, the positive factor of recovery protection showed the strongest association with Grit-S of all variables assessed (ß=.185 vs. ß = .052-.175 for the remaining significant independent variables).Conclusion: The psychometric properties of the Grit-S in patients with SUD support its use in this population. Moreover, the particularly low grit scores among inpatients with SUDs and the association of grit scores with substance use risk and recovery factors suggest that grit could be useful as a treatment target in this population.

Correlates of optimism among patients in substance use disorder inpatient treatment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Early recovery from substance use disorder (SUD) is often characterized by hopelessness and despair about the future. Optimism, or the expectation that good things will happen, may provide a buffer against despair, and motivate adaptive goal engagement and coping. Study objectives were to (1) compare levels of optimism among individuals in substance use disorder inpatient treatment to other populations and (2) examine correlates of optimism. METHODS: This exploratory study utilized a cross-sectional survey design. Participants (n = 355) completed self-report measures assessing sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. The main variable of interest, optimism, was assessed by Life Orientation Test-Revised scores. Multivariate regression was used to examine the association among sociodemographic and clinical variables and optimism. RESULTS: Our sample (n = 342) scored lower on optimism (mean = 11.7) than general population and SUD patients reported in the literature (range = 13.0-18.5). Optimism was higher for SUD inpatients who were college-educated and those with higher scores on the recovery protection factor, while greater anxiety severity was associated with lower optimism scores. CONCLUSIONS AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: This study contributes to emerging research on the association between optimism and SUDs. Optimism has not been previously studied among patients in acute, short-term inpatient SUD treatment and doing so may be clinically useful in addressing low optimism as an obstacle to motivation for treatment. Bolstering optimism may be a promising target for intervention and future research.

Associations between Childhood Abuse and Chronic Pain in Adults with Substance Use Disorders.

BACKGROUND: Both childhood abuse and chronic pain are common in people with substance use disorders (SUDs). Studies have found that exposure to childhood abuse is associated with chronic pain in adulthood; however, few studies have examined this association in people with SUDs. Objectives: This study aimed to characterize the association between childhood abuse and chronic pain presence and severity in adults with SUDs. Methods: Data were obtained from 672 treatment-seeking participants with SUDs on an inpatient detoxification unit. Regression models evaluated whether childhood physical or sexual abuse was associated with the likelihood of chronic pain and severity of several pain-related characteristics: pain catastrophizing, pain severity, and pain interference. Results: Childhood physical and sexual abuse were significantly associated with a greater likelihood of chronic pain in adulthood. In the adjusted analyses, childhood physical abuse was associated with worse pain severity, whereas childhood sexual abuse was associated with greater pain catastrophizing and worse pain interference. Conclusions: Childhood physical and sexual abuse were associated with a greater likelihood of chronic pain in adults with SUDs. Among those with chronic pain, exposure to childhood abuse was associated with a more severe symptom profile, characterized by greater pain severity, more catastrophic interpretations of pain, and more pain-related interference with daily life. People with SUDs and a history of childhood abuse may benefit from screening for pain and interventions to reduce pain catastrophizing. These findings highlight the importance of longitudinal research to understand mechanisms linking childhood abuse exposure to later pain and substance misuse.

Pain interference and catastrophizing are not associated with polysubstance use among treatment-seeking patients with substance use disorders and chronic pain.

Background: People with substance use disorders (SUD) and co-occurring chronic pain report the use of myriad substances, which is concerning due to the heightened risk of overdose associated with polysubstance use. Identifying malleable factors associated with polysubstance use in this population can inform interventions. In this study, we examined whether two pain processes - pain interference and pain catastrophizing - were associated with polysubstance use. Objectives: We examined the cross-sectional associations among self-reported pain interference and catastrophizing and polysubstance use. We also determined if sex and primary SUD moderated these associations. Methods: Participants were 236 (36% female) adults receiving inpatient treatment for SUD (58% alcohol use disorder, 42% opioid use disorder) who met criteria for chronic pain. We utilized negative binomial regression to examine associations between pain interference and catastrophizing (focal independent variables) and the number of substances used in the month before treatment (i.e., polysubstance use; outcome). Results: Participants used three substances, on average, in the month prior to treatment. Neither pain interference (IRR = 1.05, p = .06) nor pain catastrophizing (IRR = 1.00, p = .37) were associated with polysubstance use. The association between pain interference and polysubstance use was moderated by sex and primary SUD (ps<0.01), such that these variables were positively related in men and those with alcohol use disorder. Conclusion: Pain interference and catastrophizing were not uniformly associated with polysubstance use, underscoring the need to examine other factors associated with polysubstance use in this population. However, men and those with alcohol use disorder might benefit from interventions targeting pain interference to reduce polysubstance use.

Clinical Correlates of Smoking Status in Men and Women with Opioid Use Disorder.

Background: Smoking is highly prevalent in people with opioid use disorder (OUD) and is a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality in this population. However, little is known about the differences between those with OUD who do and do not smoke cigarettes. Objectives: Our aim was to investigate differences between treatment-seeking adults with OUD who did and did not smoke. Methods: Participants (N = 568; 30% female) completed a battery of self-report questionnaires including measures of current smoking status and number of cigarettes smoked per day as well as measures of clinical characteristics (e.g. craving, anxiety). Results: Of the total sample, 77% were current smokers. Multivariable logistic regression identified heroin use (OR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.38, 3.53) and younger age (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.95, 0.997) as strong correlates of smoking status; other characteristics were not significant. Older age and opioid craving were associated with more cigarettes smoked per day. Notably, these patterns differed for males and females; opioid craving (B = 0.62, SEB = 0.24) was associated with the number of cigarettes smoked among men, and anxiety (B = 0.39, SEB = 0.19) was associated with the number of cigarettes smoked among women. Conclusion: Adults with OUD who used heroin in the past month were more likely to be current smokers. No sex differences were observed in likelihood of smoking; however, the predictors of smoking status and severity differed between men and women.

Associations between pain catastrophizing and clinical characteristics in adults with substance use disorders and co-occurring chronic pain.

Background: Pain catastrophizing refers to the tendency to interpret pain as harmful, intolerable, or uncontrollable. Greater pain catastrophizing is associated with more pain-related negative phenomena, such as pain reactivity, pain disability, and emotional distress related to pain. Several studies of patients seeking chronic pain treatment have identified an association between pain catastrophizing and misuse of opioids and alcohol; however, it is unknown whether this association would be similarly present in patients with chronic pain seeking substance use disorder treatment. Objectives: The current study examined whether pain catastrophizing is associated with worse pain-related outcomes and psychological functioning in individuals receiving inpatient substance use disorder treatment who endorsed current chronic pain. Methods: In a series of regression models, we tested the associations between pain catastrophizing and functioning, specifically pain interference, craving, anxiety, and days of mood difficulties in a cross-sectional sample of patients seeking substance use disorder treatment with co-occurring chronic pain (N = 244, 67.6% female). Results: Greater pain catastrophizing was associated with more pain interference, higher levels of craving, more anxiety symptoms and more days of mood difficulties, adjusted for demographic characteristics and pain severity. Conclusion: In patients with comorbid substance use disorder and chronic pain, pain catastrophizing may offer a potential therapeutic target to improve substance use treatment outcomes.

Nonmedical benzodiazepine use in adults with alcohol use disorder: The role of anxiety sensitivity and polysubstance use.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The nonmedical use of benzodiazepines-defined as use without a prescription or at a dose or frequency higher than prescribed-is increasing among adults in substance use disorder treatment and is associated with risk for overdose. The aim of the current study was to characterize the prevalence of nonmedical benzodiazepine use among adults seeking treatment for alcohol use disorder and to examine whether nonmedical benzodiazepine use was associated with: (1) polysubstance use and (2) greater anxiety sensitivity. METHODS: A sample of 461 treatment-seeking adults with alcohol use disorder who were recruited for a cross-sectional study were included in this analysis. RESULTS: A total of 89 participants (19%) reported nonmedical benzodiazepine use in the previous 30 days. Results of a logistic regression indicated that polysubstance use (number of substances used in the past month) was associated with nonmedical benzodiazepine use. The association between anxiety sensitivity and nonmedical benzodiazepine misuse was moderated by gender; anxiety sensitivity was associated with benzodiazepine use among women, but not men. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: These results replicate findings from research on opioid use disorder suggesting that anxiety sensitivity is associated with nonmedical benzodiazepine use in women and not men. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: Targeted intervention to those with polysubstance use-including education on overdose risk when benzodiazepines are combined with other substances-is indicated in men and women with alcohol use disorder. Anxiety sensitivity may be a potential therapeutic target to reduce nonmedical benzodiazepine use among women with alcohol use disorder. (Am J Addict 2018;27:485-490).

Religious coping in patients with severe substance use disorders receiving acute inpatient detoxification.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Religious coping, one of the most widely studied components of spirituality among psychiatric populations, has rarely been addressed in patients with severe substance use disorders (SUD). The aim of our study was to elucidate whether religious coping is related to symptom expression and mutual-help participation. METHODS: Self-reported religious coping was assessed in individuals sequentially admitted to a private psychiatric hospital for inpatient detoxification. Target symptoms of SUD included severity of substance use prior to admission and craving during detoxification. Three hundred thirty-one patients (68.6% male) participated in the survey; mean age was 38.0 years, and primary presenting diagnosis was most commonly alcohol use disorder (n = 202; 61%), followed by opioid use disorder (n = 119; 36%). RESULTS: Positive religious coping was associated with significantly greater mutual-help participation, fewer days of drug use prior to admission, and was modestly, yet significantly associated with lower drug craving. Negative religious coping was associated with lower confidence in the ability to remain abstinent post-discharge and higher drug craving. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with hypotheses, greater positive religious coping was associated with greater mutual-help participation, lower severity of pre-admission drug use, and lower substance craving during detoxification. Use of positive religious coping may modify the course of SUD recovery by promoting engagement in mutual-help activities. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: The findings of this study suggest that positive and negative religious coping are linked with several key SUD recovery variables. Further research to replicate this finding and to assess mechanisms within this potential association is warranted. (Am J Addict 2017;26:744-750).

Grit in patients with substance use disorders.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Grit is an emerging concept in positive psychology, defined as the ability to be persistent and focused in pursuit of long-term goals. This concept has received a great deal of interest recently because of its robust ability to predict success and well-being across a wide variety of domains. The study aim was to examine the clinical relevance of the construct of grit among patients with substance use disorders. METHODS: Inpatients on a detoxification unit were enrolled from September 2013 to August 2015 (N = 673). Psychometric properties of the Short Grit Scale (Grit-S) were reported. We then examined sociodemographic and clinical variables that might be associated with grit in this population. RESULTS: In this sample of patients with substance use disorders, the total Grit-S demonstrated strong psychometric properties. Grit-S scores were higher among older patients and those who were employed; scores were lower among those never married, diagnosed with a co-occurring psychiatric disorder, or who had used heroin during the past month, according to bivariate analyses. Grit-S scores remained associated with age, employment, and presence of a co-occurring psychiatric disorder in adjusted analysis. CONCLUSIONS AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides initial support for the utility of the Grit-S among those with substance use disorders; this novel measure has not been previously reported in clinical populations. Research examining grit prospectively is needed to determine whether the links between grit and outcomes observed in other populations apply to patients with substance use disorders. (Am J Addict 2016;25:652-658).

Health-related quality of life among prescription opioid-dependent patients: Results from a multi-site study.

BACKGROUND: Although prescription opioid use disorder has recently increased sharply in the United States, relatively little is known about the general well-being of this population. Assessment of quality of life in patients with substance use disorders has been recommended to improve clinical care. OBJECTIVES: Health-related quality of life was examined in prescription opioid-dependent patients at entry to a national multi-site clinical trial, to compare quality of life scores in the study sample to other populations; further, background variables associated with quality of life in the literature were examined. METHODS: Prescription opioid-dependent patients (N = 653) were compared to general populations on the Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) quality of life measure; and the association between patient background variables and quality of life was examined. RESULTS: Compared to a general population, the current sample of prescription opioid-dependent patients had worse physical (-1.7 points, p < .001) and mental quality of life (-12.3 points, p < .001) as measured by the SF-36, similar to other opioid-use disorder populations. Within our sample, women showed more impairment than men in mental quality of life (-4.3 points, p < .001); older patients scored worse on physical (-5.2 points, p < .001), but not mental, quality of life. Chronic pain was associated with poorer physical quality of life (-9.0 points, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: The growing focus on wellness underscores the importance of measuring quality of life in addition to substance use outcomes. Routine assessment of health-related quality of life can add an important dimension to overall evaluation of patients' treatment response.

Concurrent substance abuse is associated with sexual risk behavior among adults seeking treatment for prescription opioid dependence.

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, new HIV infections among people who use drugs are attributed to sexual risk behavior. However, HIV prevention research targeting persons with opioid dependence continues to focus on drug injection practices. Moreover, despite the rising prevalence of prescription opioid dependence in the United States, little is known about HIV risk in this population. METHODS: This study examined the prevalence of sexual risk behavior among patients with opioid dependence who primarily use prescription opioids for non-medical purposes. As part of a multi-site clinical trial, participants (N = 653) completed a baseline assessment that included the Risk Behavior Survey. RESULTS: In the past month, 74% were sexually active. Of these, most had opposite sex partners (97.3%) and vaginal intercourse (97.1%); anal intercourse was uncommon (3.1%). The majority reported unprotected intercourse (76.5%), but few had multiple partners (11.3%). Unprotected intercourse was associated with history of other substance dependence (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.73), and having multiple partners was associated with concurrent cocaine use (AOR = 2.54). Injection drug use in the past month was rare (2.5%). CONCLUSIONS: While the majority of sexually active participants engaged in unprotected intercourse, the proportion with multiple sex partners was low relative to other samples of persons who use illicit drugs. Among persons with non-medical prescription opioid dependence, those who concurrently use other substances may be at elevated risk for HIV infection. Comprehensive assessment of substance abuse history among individuals dependent upon prescription opioids is critical for identifying patients who may require additional clinical interventions to reduce HIV sexual risk behavior.

Baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes in prescription opioid dependent patients with and without co-occurring psychiatric disorder.

BACKGROUND: Given the growing prevalence of prescription opioid dependence and the considerable rates of additional psychopathology in drug dependence, we examined the association between the presence of a co-occurring Axis I psychiatric disorder and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics in this secondary analysis of patients entering a treatment study for dependence on prescription opioids. Treatment outcomes were also compared. METHODS: Patients dependent on prescription opioids participated in a multi-site, two-phase, randomized, controlled trial to assess different lengths of buprenorphine-naloxone pharmacotherapy and different intensities of counseling (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00316277). Among the 653 participants entering the first phase of the trial, 360 entered the second phase, receiving 12 weeks of buprenorphine-naloxone treatment; they are reported here. Half of those participants (180/360) had a current co-occurring psychiatric disorder in addition to substance dependence. RESULTS: Sociodemographic characteristics were similar overall between those with and without a co-occurring psychiatric disorder, but women were 1.6 times more likely than men to have a co-occurring disorder. On several clinical indicators at baseline, participants with a co-occurring disorder had greater impairment. However, they had better opioid use outcomes at the conclusion of 12 weeks of buprenorphine-naloxone stabilization than did participants without a co-occurring disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Prescription opioid-dependent patients with a co-occurring psychiatric disorder had a better response to buprenorphine-naloxone treatment despite demonstrating greater impairment at baseline. Additional research is needed to determine the mechanism of this finding and to adapt treatments to address this population.

Clinician beliefs and attitudes about buprenorphine/naloxone diversion.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Concern about diversion of buprenorphine/naloxone (B/N) in the United States may affect prescribing patterns and policy decisions. This study examines addiction treatment clinician beliefs and attitudes regarding B/N diversion. METHODS: Participants (n = 369) completed a 34-item survey in 2010 during two national symposia on opioid dependence. We conducted multivariable regression, examining the relationship of perceived danger from B/N diversion with clinician characteristics and their beliefs about B/N treatment and diversion. We compared causal beliefs about diversion among clinicians with and without B/N treatment experience. RESULTS: Forty percent of clinicians believed that B/N diversion is a dangerous problem. The belief that B/N diversion increases accidental overdoses in the community was strongly associated with perceived danger from B/N diversion. CONCLUSIONS AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: Attitudes and beliefs, not education level, were associated with clinician's perceived danger from B/N diversion. Clinicians with greater B/N patient experience were more likely to believe treatment access barriers are the major cause of B/N diversion.

Suicidal motivations among opioid overdose survivors: Replication and extension.

BACKGROUND: Several studies suggest suicidal motivation may contribute to opioid overdose fatalities in people with opioid use disorder. In this study, we sought to replicate and extend prior findings suggesting that a desire to die is common prior to nonfatal opioid overdose in people with opioid use disorder. METHODS: Adults receiving inpatient detoxification and stabilization who reported a history of opioid overdose (N = 60) completed questions about suicidal cognition prior to their most recent overdose. RESULTS: Approximately 45% reported some desire to die prior to their most recent overdose, with 20% reporting they had some intention to die. The correlation between these ratings was of a moderate magnitude (ρ = 0.58). Almost 40% of the sample perceived no risk of overdose prior to their most recent overdose event, suggesting a significant underestimation of risk in this population. CONCLUSIONS: Desire to die was common in adults with opioid use disorder prior to nonfatal opioid overdose events, and 1 in 5 people with a history of opioid overdose reported intention to die prior to their most recent opioid overdose. Careful assessment of suicidal cognition in this population may improve prevention of opioid overdose deaths.

Psychometric properties of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 in adults with substance use disorders.

Anxiety sensitivity, or the fear of anxiety-related sensations, has demonstrated relevance to a broad range of psychiatric conditions, including substance use disorders (SUDs). Anxiety sensitivity is typically measured through self-report instruments, most commonly the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3). Despite the widespread use of the ASI-3 in studies of SUDs, little is known about its psychometric properties within this population. Patients on an inpatient detoxification unit seeking treatment for SUDs (N = 1248) completed a battery of self-report measures, including the ASI-3. Psychometric properties of the ASI-3 were examined. An exploratory factor analysis with half of the sample (n = 624) supported a 3-factor structure corresponding to the ASI-3 subscales (Social Concerns, Cognitive Concerns, Physical Concerns). Confirmatory factor analysis was used to validate this 3-dimensional structure in a separate subsample (n = 624), resulting in adequate fit when testing a second-order hierarchical model. Internal consistency and convergent and discriminant validity results also supported the use of the ASI-3 in people with SUDs. Despite its widespread use in SUD research, this is the first psychometric investigation of the ASI-3 among individuals seeking treatment for SUDs.

The relationship of manic episodes and drug abuse to sexual risk behavior in patients with co-occurring bipolar and substance use disorders: a 15-month prospective analysis.

Risky sexual behavior is common among individuals with bipolar and substance use disorders. This 15-month prospective study examined the effects of between-subject differences and within-subject changes in mood symptoms and drug use on sexual risk behavior among 61 patients with both disorders. Participants completed five post-treatment follow-up assessments at 3-month intervals. Using a multivariate mixed-effects model analysis, more average weeks of mania (between-subject difference) was associated with greater sexual risk, but change in weeks of mania (within-subject change) was not; depression was unrelated to sexual risk. In addition, within-subject increases in days of cocaine use predicted increases in sexual risk. Results underscore the importance of substance abuse treatment and suggest that bipolar patients with active and/or recurrent mania are in need of targeted HIV prevention services. Further research is needed to test whether individual differences in impulsivity may explain the association between mania and sexual risk.

The impact of drug use in social networks of patients with substance use and bipolar disorders.

In this exploratory analysis, we assessed the effect of drug use among social-network members on recovery from drug dependence in patients with co-occurring bipolar disorder. Patients (n = 57) enrolled in a group therapy study completed assessments over 15 months. Patients with zero to one drug users in their social networks at intake had few days of drug use during treatment and follow-up, whereas those with ≥ 2 drug users had significantly more days of drug use. Multivariate analysis showed that patients who consistently named multiple drug users in their social networks had a marked increase in drug use over 15 months, while those who never or occasionally named multiple drug users had a small decline in drug use over time. Multiple drug users in social networks of treatment-seeking drug-dependent patients with co-occurring bipolar disorder may indicate poor drug use outcomes; efforts to reduce the association with drug users may be useful. This clinical trial has been registered in a public trials registry at clinicaltrials.gov (identifier is NCT00227838).

Do people with opioid use disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder benefit from dding Individual opioid Drug Counseling to buprenorphine?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Large randomized trials have found that behavioral therapy for opioid use disorder (e.g., Individual Drug Counseling, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Opioid Use Disorder) does not improve buprenorphine maintenance outcomes, on average, for individuals with opioid use disorder. However, recent studies indicate that certain subgroups of patients may benefit from the addition of behavioral therapy to buprenorphine. In particular, people with more complex and severe psychosocial needs may benefit from the addition of behavioral therapy for opioid use disorder. METHODS: In this study, we conducted a secondary analysis of a large, multi-site randomized trial (N = 357) of buprenorphine maintenance with and without individual Opioid Drug Counseling (ODC) for the treatment of opioid use disorder. We hypothesized that participants with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) would benefit from the addition of ODC. RESULTS: Logistic regression models indicated a significant PTSD by treatment condition interaction. Specifically, 67% of those with PTSD had a successful opioid use disorder treatment outcome when they were assigned to receive both ODC and buprenorphine, compared to a 36% response rate among those who received buprenorphine alone. CONCLUSIONS: Although these results require replication, our findings provide initial indication that ODC is an important complement to buprenorphine maintenance treatment for people with co-occurring PTSD and opioid use disorder.

Validation of the craving scale in a large sample of adults with substance use disorders.

Valid and reliable measures of craving are essential for both clinical practice and research. Brief measures are particularly valuable for clinical and research settings in which assessment burden needs to be minimized. The Craving Scale is a 3-item measure of craving that has been previously validated in cocaine-dependent samples. This brief measure has also demonstrated predictive validity in both alcohol and opioid use disorder; however, its psychometric properties in these disorders are not well characterized. The aim of this paper was to extend prior psychometric analyses of the Craving Scale to a large sample of adults seeking treatment for substance use disorders (N = 1,283). Analyses of readability indicated that the Craving Scale was written between a 7-8th grade reading level and had minimal grammatical complexity. The Craving Scale demonstrated strong internal consistency reliability (omega = 0.81), a single-factor latent structure, and adequate concurrent and discriminant validity. Importantly, results were similar when analyses were run separately for alcohol and opioid craving and in men and women, supporting measure invariance across these key groups. Our results provide further support for the reliability and validity of the Craving Scale for use in people with substance use disorders.