Minimized weight gain between hemodialysis contributes to a reduced risk of death.

UNLABELLED: The risk of death is higher in dialysis patients compared to age matched healthy subjects, the main reason being cardiovascular. This prospective study investigated if the extent of ultrafiltration was of importance for the outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 88 hemodialysis patients were included and followed prospectively. The outcome was registered in regard to death, acute myocardial infarction or coronary vascular intervention. The extent of ultrafiltration needed at dialysis was calculated as a mean during the observation period as were other variables. The mean extent of ultrafiltration was compared for patients who had survived without end-points (group 1, n=53) versus those who reached any end-point during the period (group 2, n=35). RESULTS: In total, 40% of the patients reached end-point during the observation period. There was no difference at baseline between the groups in regard to age, prevalence of diabetes mellitus or history of previous cardiovascular disease, KT/V, residual renal function ultrafiltration need, C-reactive protein, s-albumin, cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, appetite or wellbeing, while triglyceride was lower in group 2 (p=0.035). The observation period for group 1 was at a mean 24.7 months (SD13.1) and for those in group 2 at a mean 13.8 (+/-11.7 months, p<0.001). Patients representing group 1 at 24 and 30 months had less need of ultrafiltration than those in group 2. Thus, the need of ultrafiltration was about 27% lower at 24 months (for 29 persons in group 1: 3.63+/-1.93 weight% versus 4.97+/-1.70 weight% for 9 patients from group 2, p=0.046) and 46% at 30 months (for 18 from group 1: 3.48+/-1.95 versus 6.45+/-1.55 for 3 from group 2, p=0.030). C-reactive protein did not differ significantly between the groups during the period. CONCLUSION: After a prolonged period of 24 months the extent of ultrafiltration need seems to be important for the outcome of the patients. Thereby those with higher need of ultrafiltration had worse prognosis. It seems important to motivate patients to reduce the extent of fluid intake between dialysis to prolong survival.

Low-dose atorvastatin in severe chronic kidney disease patients: a randomized, controlled endpoint study.

OBJECTIVE: There have been no endpoint studies with statins for patients with severe renal failure. The purpose of this prospective, open, randomized, controlled study was to investigate whether atorvastatin (10 mg/day) would alter cardiovascular endpoints and the overall mortality rate of patients with chronic kidney disease stage 4 or 5 (creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study subjects comprised 143 patients who were randomized either to placebo (controls; n=73; mean age 69.5 years) or to treatment with atorvastatin (n=70; mean age 67.9 years). The patients included were either non-dialysis (n=33), haemodialysis (n=97) or peritoneal dialysis (n=13) patients. Analysis focused on the primary endpoints of all-cause mortality, non-lethal acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Statistical analysis for endpoint data was mainly by intention-to-treat. RESULTS: Primary endpoints occurred in 74% of the subjects. There was no difference in outcome between the control and atorvastatin groups. The 5-year endpoint-free survival rate from study entry was 20%. Atorvastatin was withdrawn in 20% of patients due to unacceptable side-effects. In the atorvastatin group, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was reduced by 35% at 1 month and then sustained. The controls showed a progressive reduction in LDL cholesterol until 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: Although atorvastatin reduced total and LDL cholesterol effectively it was not beneficial regarding the long-term outcomes of cardiovascular endpoints or survival. In contrast to other patient groups, patients with severe chronic kidney disease, especially those on dialysis, seem to derive limited benefit from this lower dose of atorvastatin.

Safety and efficacy of atorvastatin in patients with severe renal dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of a daily dose of 10 mg of atorvastatin in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 4 and 5 and a glomerular filtration rate of <30 ml/min. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was an open, prospective, randomized study. A total of 143 patients were included: 73 were controls and 70 were prescribed 10 mg/day of atorvastatin. As efficacy variables, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and triglyceride levels were determined at the start of the study and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months. RESULTS: The follow-up period was a mean of 20+/-14.4 months (range 1-36 months) for those on atorvastatin versus 22+/-12.7 months (range 0.5-36 months) for the controls. Compared with baseline values, patients treated with atorvastatin had significantly lower concentrations of total cholesterol at Month 36 (5.8 vs 4.4 mmol/l; -23%; p<0.001), of LDL cholesterol at Month 36 (3.6 vs 2.2 mmol/l; -35%; p<0.001) and of triglycerides at Months 24 (2.5 vs 1.9 mmol/l) and 36 (2.5 vs 1.8 mmol/l). The controls had significantly reduced levels of total cholesterol at Month 36 (p<0.21) and of LDL cholesterol at Months 30 and 36. Compared with the controls, the atorvastatin group had lower levels of total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol at Months 1-30. Fifteen patients (21%) stopped taking their medication as they could not tolerate the side-effects, the most frequent complaints being gastrointestinal discomfort and headache. CONCLUSION: Although the medication caused no severe adverse events, we recommend caution when using atorvastatin for severe CKD patients until further evidence of its safety and efficacy is verified.

Thromboprophylactic effect of ticlopidine in arteriovenous fistulas for haemodialysis.

When constructing arteriovenous fistulas for haemodialysis in chronic renal failure patients, one of the main problems is still their clotting tendency. Ticlopidine is an effective inhibitor of platelet aggregation. In this randomized double-blind study placebo or ticlopidine 250 mg twice daily was given to chronic uremic patients up to 4 weeks after construction of an arteriovenous fistula. 42 patients were recruited and 36 completed the trial. The fistula clotted in 8 patients on placebo and in 2 patients on ticlopidine. The difference is significant. This effect was achieved without an increased frequency of side effects compared with placebo. It is concluded that ticlopidine has a function as a thromboprophylactic drug in chronic uremic patients.

Effects of ticlopidine in AV-fistula surgery in uremia. Fistula Study Group.

Two hundred and fifty-eight patients with uremia who were offered surgery for placement of an arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis were recruited in nine regional dialysis centers. The patients were randomized to receive the platelet aggregation inhibitory compound ticlopidine, 250 mg b.d., or matching placebo. Study medication was targeted at 7, minimum 3, days before scheduled surgery and continued for 28 days after surgery. The overall rate of occlusion was 41/260 evaluable operations (16%), 25/131 (19%) in the placebo group and 16/129 (12%) in the ticlopidine group. The risk of early occlusion was a non-significant 35% lower in the ticlopidine group. Limited risk factor analysis did not clearly identify any subgroup other than females at greater risk of early thrombosis nor any subgroup deriving particular benefit from ticlopidine treatment.

Bicarbonate and bicarbonate/lactate peritoneal dialysis solutions for the treatment of infusion pain.

A randomized, double-blind, cross-over study was undertaken to determine the effects of novel bicarbonate (38 mM) and bicarbonate (25 mM)/lactate (15 mM) containing peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions on infusion pain in patients who experienced inflow pain with conventional lactate (40 mM) solution. Pain was assessed using a verbal rating scale and the validated McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). Eighteen patients were recruited to the study. Both novel solutions resulted in highly statistically significant reductions in inflow pain compared to the control lactate solution, as assessed with both the verbal rating scale and the MPQ. For all pain variables assessed, the bicarbonate/lactate solution was more effective than the bicarbonate solution in alleviating pain. In conclusion, both solutions reduced the infusion pain experienced with control solution, but the bicarbonate/lactate solution appears to be the most effective. In contrast to the most widespread current treatment, which is the manual injection of sodium bicarbonate, the bicarbonate/lactate solution does not have the associated increased risk of peritonitis.