Perceived Health Status and Capability after Hip Fracture: Secondary Outcomes from an Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures can have a significant impact on the lives of older people and their families. We conducted a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of post-discharge comprehensive geriatric care (CGC) for community-dwelling older adults after a surgically repaired hip fracture. The objective of this study was to conduct a secondary analysis to compare changes in health status and perceived capability from baseline to 12 months after randomization with: the EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D-5L) (1) utility score and (2) visual analog scale (VAS); and (3) well-being as measured by participants' perceptions of their ability (or capability) toward completing life activities using the ICEpop Capability Measure for Older People (ICECAP-O). METHODS: We tested the effect of usual care (control) versus usual care and an outpatient CGC clinic (intervention) on mobility after hip fracture in community-dwelling older adults (65 years+). In this secondary analysis, we report the following outcomes: EQ-5D-5L utility score and VAS collected monthly via telephone and ICECAP-O collected in person three times at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Data were analyzed using area under the curve and regression adjusted for baseline values for utility scores and capability, and constrained longitudinal data analysis for VAS. RESULTS: We enrolled 53 older adults, including 34 women and 19 men, with mean (SD) age of 80 (8) years. There were no statistical or clinically meaningful differences between groups (control group - intervention group values) for all variables: utility score = -0.028 (95% CI: -0.071, 0.014; p = 0.18); VAS: -0.03 (95% CI: -0.39 to 0.33; p = 0.86); and capability = -0.021 (95% CI: -0.090, 0.046; p = 0.54). CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in outcomes between groups over 12 months, but values remained constant, contrary to a potential decline for this age group, especially after a major life event like a hip fracture.

Older adults and social prescribing experience, outcomes, and processes: a meta-aggregation systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Social prescribing is a complex care model, which aims to address unmet non-medical needs and connect people to community resources. The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize available evidence from qualitative methods (e.g. interviews or focus groups) on experience, outcomes, and processes for social prescribing and older adults (from the person or provider level). STUDY DESIGN: This was a systematic review using the Joanna Brigg's meta-aggregative approach. METHODS: We searched multiple online databases for peer-reviewed studies, which included older adults aged ≥60 years (group mean age) and social prescribing experience, outcomes, or processes. We included all qualitative or mixed methods designs from all years and languages. Date of the last primary search was March 24, 2022. Two authors used online software to conduct the screening independently and then decided on the final list of included studies via notes and online discussion. RESULTS: We screened 376 citations (after duplicates) and included eight publications. There were 197 older adult participants (59% women), and many people were living with chronic health conditions. Few details were provided for participants' ethnicity, education, and related factors. We created five synthesized findings related to (1) the approach of social prescribing; implementation factors such as (2) relationships, (3) behavior change strategies, and (4) the environment; and (5) older adults' perceived health and psychosocial outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limited number of available studies, data provide an overview of people and processes involved with social prescribing, identified research and practice gaps, and possible next steps for implementing and evaluating social prescribing for older adults in primary care.

Walking soccer: A systematic review of a modified sport.

BACKGROUND: Walking soccer (football) is an emerging modified sport gaining recognition globally. OBJECTIVES: To synthesize current evidence for walking soccer and provide a summary of global walking soccer organizations. DATA SOURCES: We searched for studies published across all years and all languages within multiple databases for studies focused on walking soccer (football) in adults (18 + years). Two authors independently screened citations at Level 1 and 2. We also conducted a forward citation search and reviewed the reference lists for included studies. We searched the gray literature to identify walking soccer organizations. We conducted the last database search in December 2019. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: We conducted a standard systematic review following established guidelines. We also summarized findings from a limited search for walking soccer organizations. For peer-reviewed literature, we used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) to assess methodological quality and conducted a narrative synthesis of the evidence. RESULTS: We identified nine peer-reviewed studies (with 117 participants). Most studies included small sample sizes and interventions with short duration. Walking soccer is an emerging modified sport that is popular across the United Kingdom (UK), with its reach extending to other countries. CONCLUSIONS: Limited published evidence exists for walking soccer, despite is global popularity. For the studies identified, generalizability was limited to predominately older men from the UK. Based on preliminary findings, walking soccer has the potential to confer health benefits and build social connections.

Type 2 diabetes susceptibility gene GRK5 regulates physiological pancreatic ß-cell proliferation via phosphorylation of HDAC5.

Restoring functional ß cell mass is a potential therapy for those with diabetes. However, the pathways regulating ß cell mass are not fully understood. Previously, we demonstrated that Sox4 is required for ß cell proliferation during prediabetes. Here, we report that Sox4 regulates ß cell mass through modulating expression of the type 2 diabetes (T2D) susceptibility gene GRK5. ß cell-specific Grk5 knockout mice showed impaired glucose tolerance with reduced ß cell mass, which was accompanied by upregulation of cell cycle inhibitor gene Cdkn1a. Furthermore, we found that Grk5 may drive ß cell proliferation through a pathway that includes phosphorylation of HDAC5 and subsequent transcription of immediate-early genes (IEGs) such as Nr4a1, Fosb, Junb, Arc, Egr1, and Srf. Together, these studies suggest GRK5 is linked to T2D through regulation of ß cell growth and that it may be a target to preserve ß cells during the development of T2D.

Social Prescribing Outcomes for Trials (SPOT): Protocol for a modified Delphi study on core outcomes.

PURPOSE: This is a study protocol to co-create with knowledge users a core outcome set focused on middle-aged and older adults (40 years+) for use in social prescribing research. METHODS: We will follow the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) guide and use modified Delphi methods, including collating outcomes reported in social prescribing publications, online surveys, and discussion with our team to finalize the core outcome set. We intentionally center this work on people who deliver and receive social prescribing and include methods to evaluate collaboration. Our three-part process includes: (1) identifying published systematic reviews on social prescribing for adults to extract reported outcomes; and (2) up to three rounds of online surveys to rate the importance of outcomes for social prescribing. For this part, we will invite people (n = 240) who represent the population experienced in social prescribing, including researchers, members of social prescribing organizations, and people who receive social prescribing and their caregivers. Finally, we will (3) convene a virtual team meeting to discuss and rank the findings and finalize the core outcome set and our knowledge mobilization plan. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study designed to use a modified Delphi method to co-create core outcomes for social prescribing. Development of a core outcome set contributes to improved knowledge synthesis via consistency in measures and terminology. We aim to develop guidance for future research, and specifically on the use of core outcomes for social prescribing at the person/patient, provider, program, and societal-level.

Defining and implementing patient-centered care: An umbrella review.

OBJECTIVES: Patient- or person-centered care (PCC) integrates people's preferences, values, and beliefs into health decision-making. Gaps exist for defining and implementing PCC; therefore, we aimed to identify core elements of PCC and synthesize implementation facilitators and barriers. METHODS: We conducted an overview of systematic reviews (umbrella review) and included peer-reviewed literature for adults in community/primary care settings. Two reviewers independently screened at Level 1 and 2, extracted data and appraised the quality of reviews. Three reviewers conducted a thematic analysis, and we present a narrative synthesis of findings. RESULTS: There were 2371 citations screened, and 10 systematic reviews included. We identified 10 PCC definitions with common elements, such as patient empowerment, patient individuality, and a biopsychosocial approach. Implementation factors focused on communication, training healthcare providers, and organizational structure. CONCLUSIONS: We provide a synthesis of key PCC elements to include in a future definition, and an overview of elements to consider for implementing PCC into practice. We extend existing literature by identifying clinician empowerment and culture change at the systems-level as two future areas to prioritize to enable routine integration of PCC into practice. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Findings may be useful for researchers and or health providers delivering and evaluating PCC.

Determinants of implementing reablement into research or practice: A concept mapping study.

PURPOSE: Reablement is a health and social model of care gaining international prominence. It is included in some publicly funded healthcare systems in Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, Norway, Sweden and other European countries. To advance reablement research and practice, we aimed to synthesize expert opinion on opportunities and challenges to delivering care with this model. METHODS: We invited authors of reablement publications and other experts from the field to take part in a three-step online concept mapping exercise: (i) brainstorming statements based on a focus prompt; followed by (ii) sorting and (iii) rating statements. We invited 63 participants, of whom 19 participants generated 114 statements. Two authors reviewed each statement independently then met three times to determine one main idea/statement and removed unrelated or duplicate ideas. The research team used concept mapping software and online and email discussion to generate clusters or groups of determinants. RESULTS: There were 58 statements for sorting and rating; 11 and 12 participants completed the sorting and rating steps, respectively. The five clusters were person and caregiver elements for participation; key reablement components for success; reablement content and delivery; organizational factors; and provider beliefs and training. Statements rated as both highly important and feasible to implement into practice were generally captured under the domains of goal setting and pursuit and person-centred care. CONCLUSION: These results generate hypotheses for future research and practice in reablement for older adults.

Exploring behavior change techniques for reablement: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Reablement is a team-based person-centered health and social care model, most commonly available for community-dwelling older adults. Understanding the components of reablement and how it is delivered, received, and enacted facilitates best evidence and practice. Determining behavior change techniques (BCTs) or strategies is an important step to operationalize implementation of reablement. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature to identify BCTs used within reablement studies. METHODS: We registered our study with the Joanna Briggs Institute and conducted five database searches. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed studies focused on adults and older adults without significant cognitive impairment or dementia receiving reablement, and all study designs, years, and languages. We excluded studies focused on reablement for people with dementia or reablement training programs. The last search was on April 8, 2021. Two authors screened independently at Level 1 (title and abstract) and 2 (full text). Two authors adjudicated BCTs for each study, and a third author confirmed the final list. RESULTS: We identified 567 studies (591 publications) and included 21 studies (44 publications) from six global locations. We identified 27 different BCTs across all studies. The three most common BCTs for reablement were goal setting (behavior), social support (unspecified), and instruction on how to perform a behavior. CONCLUSIONS: We highlight some behavioral components of reablement and encourage detailed reporting to increase transparency and replication of the intervention. Future research should explore effective BCTs (or combinations of) to include within reablement to support health behavior adoption and maintenance.