Clinical evaluation of a dose management system-integrated 3D skin dose map by comparison with radiochromic films.

OBJECTIVES: To validate the performance of an automatic tool to estimate a patient's peak skin dose (PSD) and a skin dose map from data collected by a radiation dose management system (RDMS) during interventional procedures. METHODS: In total, 288 eligible consecutive patients undergoing abdominopelvic embolisation or planned coronary angioplasty using radiochromic films were screened between June 2018 and March 2019. For 98 included patients, PSD was measured using radiochromic films (PSDFilm) and computed by RDMS (PSDRDMS) using one flat and two anthropomorphic phantoms. Statistical concordance between PSDFilm and PSDRDMS was computed with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient and clinical concordance with the Bland and Altman graphic; values were compared using the paired Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: In total, 190/288 patients were excluded and 98 patients were analysed (69 men, mean age 66 ± 14 years). The PSDFilm median (1st; 3rd quartile) was 0.59 Gy (0.40; 1.08). PSDRDMS was 0.62 Gy (0.43; 1.22) for the flat phantom and 0.62 Gy (0.42; 1.19) for anthropomorphic phantoms. The concordance between PSDFilm and PSDRDMS was good for both phantoms (flat: 0.94 [0.91; 0.95]; anthropomorphic 0.94 [0.91; 0.96]). Compared with the values of PSDFilm, the values of PSDRDMS were significantly increased by 5% (- 4%; 16%) for flat phantom (p = 0.001) and 7% (- 6%; 22%) for anthropomorphic phantoms (p = 0.002) for vascular procedures and 9% (- 4%; 26%, p = 0.01) and 6% (- 4%; 23%, p = 0.02) for cardiac procedures, respectively. Dose map representations matched for most patients. The gaps identified were due to table displacement during fluoroscopy events and the use of a wedge filter. CONCLUSIONS: The RDMS skin dose map tool allowed the computation of the PSD and skin dose distribution for all patients with fewer constraints than radiochromic films. However, the computed PSD was overestimated, increasing the number of patients requiring follow-up. KEY POINTS: • A good concordance correlation was identified between the peak skin dose (PSD) values measured with radiochromic films and estimated with the radiation dose management system (RDMS) skin dose map tool. • Differences were related to table displacement during fluoroscopy events and the use of a wedge filter, which are not accounted in the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine Radiation Dose Structured Reports. • For all procedures, the estimated PSDs were significantly higher than the measured PSDs by 5% (- 4%; 18%) for flat phantom (p < 0.001) and 6% (- 5%; 22%) for anthropomorphic phantoms (p < 0.001).

Experimental evaluation of a radiation dose management system-integrated 3D skin dose map by comparison with XR-RV3 Gafchromic® films.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the interactive Skin Dose Map® tool (SDMTool) integrated to the radiation dose management system (RDMS) DoseWatch® with Gafchromic® films for implementation in routine practice. METHODS: A retrospective dose estimation software SDMTool was used to calculate Peak Skin Dose (PSD) and display the patient skin dose distribution. PSD was calculated with a triangle mesh of 0.055 cm2 resolution on ICRP 110 male anthropomorphic phantom and with a square ROI of 1 cm2 on flat phantom. The tool uses Radiation Dose Structured Reports (RDSR) data to model exposure events and calculate the PSD per event. The PSD and the skin dose distribution estimated with SDMTool were evaluated in comparison with Gafchromic® films positioned under the PMMA phantom (20 cm) for 13 configurations. Measurements were performed on a Philips system. Statistical analysis were carried out to compare PSDFilm and PSDSDM. RESULTS: Average differences between PSDFilm and PSDSDM were 6% ±â€¯6% (range from -3% to 22%) for flat phantom and 5% ±â€¯7% (range from -3% to 25%) for ICRP phantom. Concordance was good between the measured PSDFilm and the estimated PSDSDM with Lin's coefficient estimation and 95% Confidence Interval of 0.979 [0.875; 0.984] for flat phantom and 0.977 [0.877; 0.985] for ICRP phantom. Dose map representations are concordant for 11 of the 13 tests on PMMA phantom. Disparities arose from the limitations of the RSDR format: table displacement during fluoroscopy events and the use of wedge filter. CONCLUSION: The results found in this experimental evaluation show that the SDMTool is a suitable alternative to Gafchromic® film to calculate PSD.