Prediction of Patient Survival with Psoas Muscle Density Following Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND Psoas muscle density (PMD) as a nutritional indicator is a tool to evaluate sarcopenia, which is commonly diagnosed in patients with liver cirrhosis. However, there are limited data on its role in patients who have received a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). We aimed to determine the utility of PMD in predicting mortality of patients with TIPS implantation and to compare the clinical value of PMD, Child-Pugh score, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, and MELD paired with serum sodium measurement (MELD-Na) score in predicting post-TIPS survival in 1 year. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective study included 273 patients who met the criteria for study inclusion. All participants underwent computed tomography (CT) scans, Child-Pugh score evaluation, MELD-Na scoring, and MELD scoring. Post-TIPS survival time was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. The prognostic values of scoring models such as the Child-Pugh score, MELD, MELD-Na, and PMD were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS During the 1-year follow-up period, 31 of 273 (11.36%) post-TIPS patients died. Multivariate analysis identified PMD as an independent protective factor. PMD showed a good ability to predict the occurrence of an endpoint within 1 year after TIPS. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for PMD, Child-Pugh score, MELD score, and MELD-Na for predicting mortality were, respectively, 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.663-0.773), 0.59 (95% CI: 0.531-0.651), 0.60 (95% CI: 0.535-0.655), and 0.58 (95% CI: 0.487-0.608). CONCLUSIONS PMD has appreciable clinical value for predicting the mortality of patients with TIPS implantation. In addition, PMD is superior to established scoring systems for identifying high-risk patients with a poor prognosis.

Association between anesthesia assistance and precancerous lesions and early cancer detection during diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a propensity score-matched retrospective study.

Background: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is a fundamental procedure for early detection of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer. However, limited research has been conducted on the impact of sedation during EGD on the identification of precancerous lesions and early cancer (EC). This retrospective study aims to evaluate whether sedation during EGD can improve the detection rates of precancerous lesions and EC. Methods: In this propensity score-matched retrospective study, we examined medical records from outpatients who underwent diagnostic EGD at a large tertiary center between January 2023 and December 2023. Data on endoscopic findings and histology biopsies were obtained from an endoscopy quality-control system. The primary objective was to compare the rates of detecting precancerous lesions and EC in patients who received sedation during EGD vs. those who did not receive sedation. Additionally, we aimed to identify factors influencing these detection rates using binary logistic regression analysis. Results: Following propensity score matching, a total of 17,862 patients who underwent diagnostic EGD with or without propofol sedation were identified. The group that received sedation exhibited a higher detection rate of precancerous lesions and EC in comparison to the non-sedated group (1.04 vs. 0.75%; p = 0.039). Additionally, within the sedated group, there was an increased likelihood of identifying precancerous lesions and EC specifically at the gastric antrum (0.60 vs. 0.32%, p = 0.006). Binary logistic regression analysis demonstrated that independent risk factors influencing the detection rates included age, gender, observation time, and number of biopsies conducted during the procedure. Conclusion: Anesthesia assistance during EGD screening proved advantageous in detecting EC as well as precancerous lesions. It is crucial for endoscopists to consider these factors when performing EGD screening procedures.

The function of Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 (S1PR2) in maintaining intestinal barrier and inducing ulcerative colitis.

Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 (S1PR2) was highly expressed in intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) and facilitated the proliferation of IECs. However, the specific function of S1PR2 in intestinal diseases, such as ulcerative colitis (UC), remains unclear. Accordingly, the current study set out to investigate the function of S1PR2 in maintaining intestinal barrier and inducing UC. S1PR2-overexpressed and knockdown Caco-2 cells were established to explore the function of S1PR2 on the permeability of IECs barrier. The UC-like mouse model in which UC is induced by dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) was established and utilized to investigate the role for S1PR2. The results showed that S1PR2 functioned as a maintainer of IECs permeability and a pathogenic factor for UC. A series of in vitro and in vivo experiments were conducted, and it was found that S1PR2 played an important role in intestinal epithelial cell proliferation and maintenance of intestinal epithelial cell barrier, possibly by the regulation on the expression level of SphK2, HDAC1, HDAC2, and ERK1/2 signaling pathway. The expression of S1PR2 was upregulated in UC mice and the colonic pathological damage in UC mice could be alleviated by the inhibition of S1PR2. Collectively, these results suggest that S1PR2 functions as a maintainer of IECs permeability and a pathogenic factor for UC. The research suggests S1PR2 may be an effective target for developing therapeutic strategies against UC.Abbreviations: S1PR2, Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2; UC, ulcerative colitis; IECs, intestinal epithelial cells; DSS, dextran sulfate sodium; IBD, inflammation bowel disease; CD, Crohn's disease; S1P, sphingosin-1-phosphate; SphK, sphingosine kinase; HIECs, human IECs; siRNA, small interfering RNA; CCK-8, cell counting kit-8; TEER, transepithelial electrical resistance; TEM, transmission electron microscope; RT-PCR, real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase-chain reaction; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; HE, hematoxylin and eosin.