Development and validation of the sitting balance assessment for spinal cord injury (SitBASCI).

STUDY DESIGN: Multicentric psychometric study. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to introduce the development of the Sitting Balance Assessment for Spinal Cord Injury (SitBASCI) and assess its inter-rater reliability and internal consistency. SETTING: The study was developed among the three Spinal Units of San Bortolo Hospital in Vicenza, Niguarda Hospital in Milan and AOU Careggi in Florence. METHODS: SitBASCI is a 13-item scale developed to evaluate trunk control in individuals with SCI. Subjects were filmed while performing the 13 items of the scale. The videotapes were submitted to 25 examiners who evaluated patients' performances with the scale. The power of the study was estimated. The interclass correlational coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the inter-rater reliability of the examiner's evaluations regarding each item and the total. Cronbach's alpha was used to assess internal consistency of the scale and internal consistency of the scale on the eliminated item. RESULTS: The study showed to have a significant power. The inter-rater reliability for the total score was ptot = 0.997 (item's values were p = 0.876-0.998). The internal consistency of the scale was alpha = 0.925, while the internal consistency of the scale on the eliminated item was alpha = 0.912-0.930. CONCLUSION: SitBASCI had a high inter-rater reliability and internal consistency. Items had also good inter-rater reliability and item-total correlation. Therefore, SitBASCI could be proposed as a good and reliable instrument for Italian clinicians to evaluate sitting balance and trunk control in patient with SCI despite of aetiology and level of injury.

A protocol for Italian validation of DEMQoL-Proxy Scale: assessing the Quality of Life of people with moderate or mild dementia.

In this paper, we propose an adaptation of a protocol for a tool's validation. We have utilized this phases-theory to validate in Italian language an instrument to assess Quality of Life for people with moderate or mild dementia. We will explain the example of our Italian validation of DEMQoL-Proxy considering each De Vellis's phase. We will explain our application of De Vellis's model to Italian example described. For the first three phases, we reproduced the original validating study in which authors (Smith et al., 2005) defined what to measure, how generate a set of items and the structure of the scale. Indeed, for the last five phases we explained the adaptation of De Vellis's model to Italian validation. We hope that this model could be effective to validating goals, for researchers and in particular for all professionals who deal with caregivers and patients with moderate and mild dementia. Furthermore, the measurement of the Quality of Life makes the scale widely useful within the various professional specialties and setting. Finally, thanks to the methodological assumptions adopted following the De Vellis's eight-phase model, we can affirm that this first Italian pre-validation of the DEMQoL-Proxy seems to be an excellent forerunner for its effective validation in the Italian context.