Effectiveness and safety analysis of titanium mesh grafting versus bone grafting in the treatment of spinal Tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To systematically assess the safety and effectiveness of titanium mesh grafting compared with bone grafting in the treatment of spinal tuberculosis. METHODS: Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, were searched from their inception until April 2023. The outcome indicators for patients treated with titanium mesh grafting or bone grafting for spinal tuberculosis include surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, graft fusion time, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Spinal Cord Injury Grade E assessment, VAS score, lumbar pain score, post-graft kyphotic angle, and postoperative complications. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach were used for quality assessment and evidence grading of clinical studies. Funnel plots and Begg's test were employed for bias assessment. RESULTS: A total of 8 studies were finally included, comprising 523 patients, with 267 cases of titanium mesh fixation and 256 cases of bone grafting. The meta-analysis showed no significant statistical differences in surgical duration (Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) = -7.20, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): -28.06 to 13.67, P = 0.499), intraoperative blood loss (WMD = 16.22, 95% CI: -40.62 to 73.06, P = 0.576), graft fusion time (WMD = 0.97, 95% CI: -0.88 to 2.81, P = 0.304), ASIA Spinal Cord Injury Grade E assessment (Relative Risk (RR) = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.09, P = 0.346), and overall complications (RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.49 to 1.55, P = 0.643). Differences in VAS score, ODI lumbar pain score, and post-graft kyphotic angle between the titanium mesh grafting group and the bone grafting group were not significant within the 95% CI range. The rate of postoperative implant subsidence was slightly lower in bone grafting than in titanium mesh grafting (RR = 9.30, 95% CI: 1.05 to 82.22, P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Both bone grafting and titanium mesh grafting are effective and safe for the surgery, with no significant statistical differences in the results. Considering the limitations of the present study, large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to further verify the reliability of this finding.

Risk Prediction Models for Preoperative Deep Vein Thrombosis in Older Patients with Hip Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically assess the risk prediction models for preoperative deep vein thrombosis in older patients with hip fractures. METHOD: We searched four databases for literature through November 17, 2023. We included patients aged ≥60 with hip fractures and considered English-language case-control or cohort studies that focused on developing and/or validating risk prediction models for DVT in this population. Excluded were studies that solely analyzed risk factors without constructing a prediction model, had fewer than 2 predictive variables, or were not available in full-text or were duplicate publications. The Predictive Model Bias Risk Assessment tool was utilized to evaluate risk of bias. The area under the curve (AUC) values were meta-analyzed using R Studio software. The I2 index and Cochrane q test were employed to assess heterogeneity. Additionally, sensitivity analysis was performed by systematically removing individual studies to explore the sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 1880 studies were gathered. Out of these, seven studies were included, encompassing 8 models. The most commonly utilized factors in the models were D-dimer and the time from injury to admission. The pooled AUC value for the validation of 8 models was 0.84 (95% confidence interval: 0.80-0.87), indicating robust model performance. CONCLUSION: Current risk prediction models for preoperative DVT in elderly hip fracture patients are still in the developmental phase. Future research should focus on developing new models with larger sample sizes, robust study designs, and multicenter external validation.

Knockdown of lncRNA NORAD inhibits the proliferation, inflammation and fibrosis of human mesangial cells under high-glucose conditions by regulating the miR-485/NRF1 axis.

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) serve major roles in diabetic nephropathy (DN). The present study investigated the regulatory mechanism of lncRNA non-coding RNA activated by DNA damage (NORAD) on DN in vitro. Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was used to detect the expression of lncRNA NORAD, microRNA-485 (miR-485) and nuclear respiratory factor 1 (NRF1) in the tissues of patients with DN and high-glucose (HG)-induced human mesangial cells (HMCs). The viability of HMCs was determined using an MTT assay. The levels of inflammatory [tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1ß and IL-6] and fibrotic [type IV collagen (Col. IV), fibronectin (FN) and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1)] factors in HMCs were measured by ELISA. The interactions between miR-485 and NORAD/NRF1 were predicted using StarBase and miRDB softwares and confirmed by a dual-luciferase reporter assay. Western blot analysis was utilized to measure NRF1 protein levels. lncRNA NORAD was highly expressed in tissues and HG-induced HMCs. NORAD knockdown suppressed cell viability in HG-induced HMCs. The levels of the inflammatory and fibrotic factors in HG-induced HMCs were inhibited by NORAD knockdown. miR-485 was the direct target of NORAD. NORAD reversed the inhibitory effects of miR-485 on HG-induced HMCs. Furthermore, NRF1 was the target gene of miR-485. Downregulation of miR-485 and upregulation of NRF1 reversed the inhibitory effects of NORAD knockdown on HG-induced HMCs. NORAD knockdown inhibited HG-induced HMC proliferation, inflammation and fibrosis by regulating miR-485/NRF1, providing a possible therapeutic strategy for DN.

RETRACTED: Diagnosis of Early Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction by Layer-Specific Strain Echocardiography in Diabetic Rabbits.

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal). This article has been retracted at the request of the Editor. The authors have copied figures and text verbatim from another manuscript published by the first author and others in Med Ultrason, 18 (2016) 339­344; doi:10.11152/mu.2013.2066.183.qia. We apologize to readers of the journal for this incident.