Adaptation of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index to the Turkish population, its reliability and validity: functional assessment in AS.

The aim of this study was to adapt the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) to the Turkish population and investigate the reliability and the validity of the Turkish version. Seventy-six patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) were included in the study. The functional status of the patients was assessed by using the adapted Turkish version of the BASFI twice, at recruitment and 24 h later. For validity analysis, patients were also assessed by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) evaluating disease activity, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global Score (BAS-G) indicating effect of the disease on patient's well-being, physician's assessment of the disease activity and pain intensity. Spinal mobility was assessed by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels of the patients were also recorded. The lumbar region and the sacroiliac joints were assessed by Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (SASSS) and the hip joints were assessed by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index hip (BASRI-h). The internal consistency was 0.89 (Cronbach's alpha), which showed a high reliability for the Turkish version of the BASFI. Test-retest reliability was good, with a high intraclass correlation coefficient between the two time points (ICC=0.93). Significant correlations were detected between the BASFI and the BASDAI, BAS-G, doctor's global assessment, and general pain intensity (r=0.62, p<0.001; r=0.47, p<0.001; r=0.55, p<0.001; r=0.47, p<0.001, respectively). The adaptation of the BASFI to the Turkish population was successful and it was found to be reliable and valid among Turkish patients. Thus, studies using the Turkish BASFI can be compared with international studies.

Rehabilitation outcome of Turkish stroke patients: in a team approach setting.

The aim of this study was to identify the efficacy of in-patient stroke rehabilitation, to evaluate the relationship between clinical characteristics and functional outcome, and to determine factors predicting functional outcome at discharge in Turkish stroke patients with a team approach. Retrospective data were collected from 102 of 116 patients with first stroke who were admitted to our rehabilitation unit at Ankara University. Demographic data, length of hospital stay (LOHS), onset to admission interval (OAI), type, side and location of stroke lesion, and most common medical complications were recorded. Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and Brunnstrom's motor recovery stages (BMRS) were assessed on admission and at discharge. The mean age was 61.6 +/- 10.9 years and the mean LOHS was 69.7 +/- 28.2 days. The mean FIM total scores were 69.2 +/- 27.4 and 83.2 +/- 25.7 on admission, and at discharge, respectively. The mean FIM total score was significantly correlated to age, LOHS and motor recovery. The FIM total scores of patients with aphasia and depression were found to be lower than those of patients without aphasia and depression. In a stepwise multiple regression analysis, FIM total score on admission, age and OAI were found to be valid predictors of FIM total score at discharge. Functional Independence Measure total score on admission was the strongest variable. Our results suggest that knowledge of the poor prognostic factors effecting functional outcome on admission can provide information to clinicians in identifying severity of stroke. Admission FIM total score, can be used to predict the patients' functional recovery. Advanced age, aphasia and post-stroke depression contribute to lower FIM scores.