Plastic Surgery and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of Clinical Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: A novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) was first reported in December 2019 in China and was soon declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. Many elective and nonessential surgeries were postponed worldwide in an effort to minimize spread of disease, as well as to conserve resources. Our goal with this article is to review current practice guidelines in setting of the COVID-19 pandemic, based on available data and literature. METHODS: Websites pertaining to surgical and medical societies, and government agencies were reviewed, along with recently published literature to identify recommendations related to COVID-19 and plastic surgery procedures. RESULTS: Clinical practice modifications are recommended during the pandemic in outpatient and perioperative settings. Use of personal protective equipment is critical for aerosol-generating procedures, such as surgery in the head and neck area. Care for trauma and malignancy should continue during the pandemic; however, definitive reconstruction could be delayed for select cases. Specific recommendations were made for surgical treatment of cancer, trauma, and semiurgent reconstructive procedures based on available data and literature. CONCLUSIONS: The risk and benefit of each reconstructive procedure should be carefully analyzed in relation to necessary patient care, minimized COVID-19 spread, protection of health care personnel, and utilization of resources. Recommendations in this article should be taken in the context of each institute's resources and prevalance of COVID-19 in the region. It should be emphasized that the guidelines provided are a snapshot of current practices and are subject to change as the pandemic continues to evolve.

Clinical Anatomy of Submental Intubation: A Review of the Indications, Technique, and a Modified Approach.

Since its original description in 1986 by Hernandez, submental intubation has been used in a wide variety of craniomaxillofacial cases as a way to satisfy both surgeon and anesthesiologist to provide access to necessary surgical sites and airway protection. Many modifications to the original technique have been described. There has been a paucity of plastic surgery literature over the last 10 years that have reviewed the anatomy, technique, and complications. In this article, the authors review the pertinent anatomy related to this method of intubation. A cadaver was used to enhance visualization of important structures and to show the modification used by our group. Submental intubation provides a useful alternative to tracheostomy in several craniomaxillofacial procedures. Our approach uses a reinforced endotracheal tube to prevent kinking and provide additional intraoperative protection of the airway. Submental intubation may be indicated in select patients undergoing craniomaxillofacial surgery. Therefore, it is pertinent to be aware of the important anatomy and the complications of this technique to appropriately counsel patients. Our modification provides safe airway control.

Revisiting the "July Effect" in Plastic Surgery: New Data to Support Resident Autonomy.

BACKGROUND: The "July Effect" represents a topic of considerable interest across residency programs. This study investigated the frequency of postoperative complications following procedures with plastic surgery resident participation (all postgraduate year [PGY] levels) during the first (quarter 3, July-September) and last academic quarters. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to calculate complication rates from 2006 to 2010. Resident involvement was analyzed as a categorical variable consisting of "juniors" (PGY1-PGY3), and "seniors" (PGY4-PGY6). Outcomes from procedures during Q3 were compared with all quarters. Propensity score matching and adjustment enabled logistic regression identifying the effect of resident involvement and admission. RESULTS: Among all cosmetic and reconstructive procedures (n = 6625), mean operative time was not significantly greater in Q3 compared with all other quarters (P = 0.069); no significant differences in complication rates were observed between Q3 and all other quarters, though superficial surgical site infection (SSI) approached significance (3.3% of procedures in Q3 vs 2.5% in all other quarters, P = 0.063). Among reconstructive procedures only (n = 5677), mean operative time was not significantly greater in Q3 compared with all other quarters (P = 0.119); the same held true for cosmetic procedures only (P = 0.275). Surgical site infection, however, was significantly more likely to occur with reconstructive procedures only, in Q3 compared with all other quarters (3.5% of cases vs 2.3%, P = 0.024). When adjusting for PGY status and matching populations, superficial SSI and return to the operating room were not significantly more common in Q3. When adjusting for quarter of admission, however, superficial SSI was significantly more common among the overall and noncosmetic cases with participation by junior residents (P = 0.013 and 0.020, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This may represent the first fully reproducible, transparent National Surgical Quality Improvement Program study in plastic surgery that demonstrates the absence of a clinically significant "July Effect," and suggests that an appropriate degree of resident autonomy may pose minimal risk during both cosmetic and reconstructive procedures in residency training. Additionally, the findings encourage the development a plastic surgery-specific database to remedy inherent difficulties with larger, more comprehensive surgical databases.

Microsurgical reconstruction of complex maxillofacial gunshot wounds: Outcomes analysis and algorithm.

BACKGROUND: Satisfaction with appearance, functional outcomes (speech, swallowing), work status after microsurgical reconstruction for maxillofacial gunshot wounds (GSW) remain largely unknown. The purpose of this study is to report these parameters. By investigating these outcomes, we also aimed to provide microsurgical algorithms for complex maxillofacial GSW. METHODS: Forty-two consecutive maxillofacial GSW patients between 2006 and 2014 were analyzed for outcomes. Mean age was 41.3 years ranging 14 to 77 years. There were 33 males and 9 females. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients received 36 free flaps for early reconstruction in 1 to 2 weeks, two patients in a delayed manner. Fifteen fibula flaps for mandible reconstruction, five fibula, there radial forearm (RF), and two scapular osteocutaneous (OC) flaps for maxilla reconstruction, two RF flaps for palate reconstruction, one RF for cheek reconstruction were used. Four patients underwent innervated gracilis flap for total lower lip and one for cheek reconstruction. Rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap was used for mid-face defects in two patients. One anterolateral thigh flap was used for lower lip/chin reconstruction. Nine free flaps were performed to treat a complication and/or to improve function. All flaps survived except for three partial skin paddle loss to fibula flaps. Mean follow-up was 17.2 months. Return to work/school was 70%. Surveys noted 58% "satisfied". All patients but two achieved perceptible speech, the majority had no difficulty with swallowing, all patients had oral competence. CONCLUSIONS: Favorable outcomes were obtained in most maxillofacial GSW. After investigating these outcomes, microsurgical algorithms were developed for clinical practice for reconstruction of composite mandible and total-lower lip defects, and maxilla/mid-face defects.

A literature review and meta-analysis of outcomes in microsurgical reconstruction using vasopressors.

INTRODUCTION: There is a hesitancy to utilize vasopressors in microsurgical reconstruction due to fear of vessel spasm and subsequent flap compromise. Although there are large literature reviews analyzing vasopressor usage in head and neck reconstruction, this has not been extrapolated to all regions of the body. The goal of this study was to perform a meta-analysis examining vasopressor usage and risk of complications in microsurgical reconstruction for all recipient sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted for articles discussing the utilization of vasopressors in microsurgical reconstruction. The primary endpoint was total flap failure. Secondary endpoints were necessity for operative take-back and hematoma requiring intervention. Odds ratios were calculated for each complication and for each study. RESULTS: Four prospective and six retrospective studies were analyzed yielding 6321 patients and 7526 flaps. 67.4% (966/1433) of patients received vasopressors and 80.8% (6080/7526) of flaps received vasopressors. There were 100 failures in the vasopressor group (100/6080 = 15.9%) and 39 failures in the non-vasopressor group (39/1456 = 26.8%) (O.R. 0.73; p = 0.12). There were 177 take-backs in the vasopressor group (177/5916 = 29.9%) and 64 take-backs in the non-vasopressor group (64/1404 = 4.6%) (O.R. 0.65; p < 0.05). There were 73 hematomas in the vasopressor group (73/5099 = 14/3%) and 14 hematomas in the non-vasopressor group (14/979 = 14.3%) (O.R. 1; p = 0.89). The odds ratio for total flaps failures in the breast and head/neck cohorts were 0.788 (p = 0.76) and 1.2761 (p = 0.77), respectively, with neither significantly increased in flaps receiving vasopressors. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that vasopressor utilization does not directly result in increased complications. Flaps that received vasopressors had a statistically lower rate of take-back and failure. Due to the paucity of data available for analysis and limited reporting relating flap characteristics to outcomes, prospective, well-designed studies are necessary to verify the safety of vasopressor use in microsurgical reconstruction.

Single-stage versus two-stage arteriovenous loop microsurgical reconstruction: A meta-analysis of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous (AV) loops can be utilized in a single- or two-stage approach in free flap reconstruction when proper vessels are not available. However, there exists no consensus on which method leads to superior microsurgical and patient outcomes. The purpose of this article was to review single- versus two-stage AV loops utilized in free flap reconstruction with a focus on complications and overall outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review of AV loops for autologous free tissue transfer was conducted. Endpoints investigated included flap characteristics, timing to second stage, complications, and outcomes. A Student's t-test and forest plots were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-five unique papers discussed utilizing AV loops in a single- or two-stage approach, yielding 260 and 98 single- and two-stage AV loops, respectively. There was a statistically significant higher rate of major complications in two-stage as compared to single-stage AV loops. There was a non-statistically significant difference in rate of minor complications in the single-stage as compared to two-stage AV loops. Overall, there was a statistically significant higher success rate in the single-stage as compared to two-stage AV loops CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant higher rate of major complications and failures in two-stage AV loops. As well-conducted randomized controlled studies are nearly impossible to perform in this population, the decision to pursue a single- versus two-stage reconstruction should ultimately be determined based on individual patient co-morbidities, the size and etiology of defect, and the type of free tissue transfer planned.

Treatment of vaginal stenosis with fasciocutaneous Singapore flap.

INTRODUCTION: Vaginal stenosis is an unfortunate complication that can occur after pelvic radiation therapy for gynecologic or colorectal malignancies. Treatment is challenging and can require significant reconstructive surgery. The objective of this video is to present a case of vaginal stenosis after radiation and describe vaginal reconstruction with a fasciocutaneous Singapore flap. METHODS: We describe the case of a 42-year-old woman with a history of stage 3 colorectal cancer who underwent partial colectomy, chemotherapy, and pelvic radiation. She subsequently developed a rectovaginal fistula requiring repair with a right-sided gracilis flap. When her stenosis recurred, she underwent vaginal reconstruction with a medial thigh flap. RESULTS: The Singapore flap is a pudendal thigh flap centered on the labial crural fold with a base at the perineal body. As the cutaneous innervation is spared, this flap is sensate. This technique is one option for patients with complex vaginal stenosis who have failed conservative management. However, it is imperative the patient perform vaginal dilation postoperatively and maintain close follow-up with her surgeon, as vaginal stenosis can recur. CONCLUSIONS: Postradiation vaginal stenosis is a complex condition to treat; however, vaginal reconstruction with a thigh flap can provide excellent cosmetic and functional results.

The Simultaneous Use of Breast Reduction and Internal Mammary Artery Perforator Flap in Sternal Wound Reconstruction.

Internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP)-based fasciocutaneous flaps have recently gained popularity in sternal wound reconstruction due to their decreased donor site morbidity. However, patients with significant macromastia or who are obese present a challenge when using these flaps due to their anatomy and associated comorbid conditions. Despite the prevalence of this population, there is a relative paucity of data on the use of local fasciocutaneous flaps and techniques to close sternotomy wounds in the obese population with hypertrophic or ptotic breasts. The authors describe a novel technique using simultaneous unilateral breast reduction with a fifth intercostal IMAP-based flap for closure of a median sternotomy wound through a case presentation, an anatomical injection study, and review of the literature. Five fresh female cadavers were used to conduct 8 trials of injection of the IMAP arteries, isolation of the fifth IMAP branch, and elevation of a local flap. The literature was comprehensively reviewed with a total of 33 cases of IMAP flaps for sternal reconstruction being described. The most commonly used perforators with the second and sixth IMAPs. Overall complication rate was reported to be 9.1% (3/33), with 2 cases reporting dehiscence and 1 with flap tip necrosis. No cases reported use of the fifth IMAP or formal breast reduction procedures, which was successfully performed in a 40-year-old diabetic female patient history of multiple left-sided thoracic surgeries and radiation with a chronic sternal wound.

The Cardioplastic Approach to the Treatment of Infected Aortic Grafts.

BACKGROUND: Aortic graft infection (AGI) is a rare complication following reconstructive aortic surgery, yet it represents a significant source of morbidity and mortality. There is no consensus regarding the optimal surgical management, due in part to the small cohorts of patient reports. Pedicled muscle or omental flap coverage of AGI has been shown to improve outcomes, making them a valuable consideration in the treatment algorithm. Thus, we aim to compile and evaluate cases of autologous vascularized tissue (AVT) in the treatment of infected aortic grafts, summarizing location specific trends, treatments, and outcomes. METHODS: A comprehensive review of peer-reviewed literature regarding the management of AGI was performed. Data collected included patient characteristics, original procedure, pathogen, infection location, tissue utilized, technique of tissue isolation and delivery, staging, outcome, length of follow-up, and level of evidence. RESULTS: Ninety-four cases of AGI managed with AVT transfer were identified. Infection of ascending aorta grafts accounted for 59% of cases, followed by a combination of ascending aorta and aortic arch (21%), the descending thoracic aorta (18%), and the thoracoabdominal aorta (2%). The infected graft was preserved in 81% of cases, followed by debridement and AVT coverage. The omentum was the most commonly applied flap (69%) for all divisions of the aorta followed by the pectoralis major (19%), the rectus abdominis (5%), and latissimus dorsi (4%). Mortality was limited, and the Powered by Editorial Manager and ProduXion Manager from Aries Systems Corporation overall survival was 93% (7 deaths), with a mean follow-up of 33.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: Autologous vascularized tissue coverage has proven to be a successful approach for treatment of infected aortic grafts. Although the incidence of AGI is rare, it represents an area of scarce evidence-based literature that warrants increased attention and surgical refinement. These results, which show a remarkably low infection-related mortality rate (3%), should encourage interdisciplinary collaboration with the plastic surgeon, cardiothoracic surgeon, and infectious disease specialists with the goal of improving outcomes in the treatment of infected aortic grafts.

Recipient vessels for microsurgical flaps to the abdomen: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Large soft tissue defects of the abdominal wall resulting from various reasons may require free tissue transfer. METHODS: A literature search of PubMed and Cochrane electronic databases was conducted to identify articles involving abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) with microsurgical flap. Number of cases, etiology, and reconstruction site, type of microsurgical flap and recipient vessels were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-eight articles published between 1983 and 2016 reported on 149 patients undergoing free flap AWR. TFL was used in 43 patients (28.8%), LAD in 43 (28.8%), and ALT in 28 (18.7%). Conjoined ALT and TFL flap was reported in 24 patients (16.1%). The inferior epigastric artery/vein were the most commonly utilized recipient vessels (n = 43 patients). Intraperitoneal vessels were used in 18 cases, the gastroepiploic vessels being the most common (n = 9). Femoral vessels were used directly or along with a vein graft in 14 patients. AV loop or vein graft was reported in 46 patients. Great saphenous vein rerouting was used in 8 cases. DLCF vessels were used in 2 patients to support an AV loop or directly the pedicle of a microsurgical flap. The internal thoracic vessels were used in only 3 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The current review analyzed articles on AWR using microsurgical flaps with a special emphasis on the recipient vessels. The literature review demonstrated that there is no standard approach to repair a complex abdominal defect given the diversity of patient population. The choice of microsurgical flap and selection of recipient vessels should be tailored to the individual patient's circumstances.

Analysis of Scalp and Forehead Injuries in a Level I Trauma Center.

Traumatic scalp and forehead injuries are frequently encountered in the acute setting in Level I trauma centers. This is a Level IV Therapeutic/Care Management article describing a retrospective review that analyzed a single Plastic and Reconstructive surgeon's experience treating these injuries in patients, over an 8-year period from 2006 to 2014. Fewer complications were seen in patients treated within 7 days of injury. When treating these patients, a surgeon should possess several key attributes. The ability to perform adequate primary debridement, knowledge, and familiarity with the intricate anatomy in this region, and experience with simple and complex reconstructive algorithms-are all crucial to obtaining optimal functional and aesthetic outcomes in this anatomic region. The authors' results support the idea that a plastic and reconstructive surgery service is an indispensable resource in the high-level acute trauma setting.

The innervated gracilis muscle for microsurgical functional lip reconstruction: review of the literature.

Reconstruction of the lower and upper lip should meet both aesthetic and functional requirements, whenever possible. Achievement of these goals presents a major challenge particularly in extensive lip defects requiring microsurgical reconstruction. Successful reconstructive outcomes have been reported using free fasciocutaneous flaps such as composite radial forearm flap or anterolateral thigh flap in conjunction with static tendon slings. In recent years, neurovascular gracilis muscle transfer has been introduced in hopes to overcome noncontractile properties of these flaps and to restore oral competence by muscle contractility. This article reviews the available data on the innervated gracilis muscle transfer for functional lip reconstruction. Tips and techniques gleaned from all of the current literature are discussed.

Nonpersistence of basal cell carcinoma after diagnostic shave biopsy: reconstruction when specimen is negative during surgery.

BACKGROUND: Initial tissue sampling for diagnosis of suspected basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is typically performed using a shave biopsy technique or punch biopsy. METHODS: Our realization of no residual BCC findings after excision in some patients with biopsy-proven BCC diagnosed through a shave biopsy prompted us to conduct a retrospective study of all consecutive patients with 127 BCCs who were treated in our department between 2006 and 2012. All patients with incompletely excised BCCs after shave biopsy diagnosis were operated on by a single surgeon (R.G.), eliminating variables in preoperative evaluation and surgical technique including margin control and reconstructive approach. Patient demographics, initial BCC site, size, subtype, duration between shave biopsy and surgery, size of excision, findings of intraoperative frozen section analysis, type of closure technique, and final pathology reports were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 108 residual BCCs diagnosed after surgical excision. Most of the108 BCCs were nodular (52) or micronodular (21) subtype. Eighteen BCCs were treated with excision and primary closure. Flap procedure was performed in 64 BCCs after excision. Twenty-six defects after excision were reconstructed using skin grafts. There was no evidence of residual BCC in 15% of BCCs (19 patients) after surgical treatment. In other words, shave biopsy was found to be curative in 15% of BCCs. Seven patients in no residual BCC group received excision and primary closure. Eleven patients underwent flap reconstruction, whereas only 1 patient required skin grafting. Most of the patients in this group had nodular or micronodular type BCC (14/19). CONCLUSIONS: We were not able to identify any clinically significant predictors of residual versus no residual BCC, at least within the context of the current study. Although most patients diagnosed with BCC had residual tumors for which they received surgical treatment, 15% of patients had to undergo primary closure, skin graft, or flap procedure for negative residual BCC. We would like to promote greater awareness on the subject among plastic surgeons treating BCCs. And, it is extremely important that the informed consent should include statements regarding possible reconstructive procedures even in the case of nonpersistent tumor from medicolegal standpoint.

Mandibular osteonecrosis and Ramsay Hunt syndrome following a case of herpes zoster.

Varicella zoster virus (VZV) is the agent that causes chicken pox, a common childhood infection that characteristically presents as vesicular rashes affecting the trunk and head. After the primary infection has resolved, VZV lies dormant in the spinal dorsal root ganglia or extramedullary cranial nerve ganglia until reactivation results in herpes zoster (shingles). The sensory nerves of the trunk, as in classic shingles, and the fifth cranial nerve, as in trigeminal zoster, are the most frequently affected. Shingles is an acute viral infection characterized by the appearance of painful unilateral vesicular rash usually restricted to a dermatomal distribution of a sensory nerve. The rash of shingles is usually preceded by pain and paresthesia. A rare, severe complication of the reactivation of VZV in the geniculate ganglion of the facial nerve is Ramsay Hunt syndrome (RHS). RHS is characterized by otalgia, vesicles in the auditory canal, and ipsilateral facial paralysis. An even rarer complication of VZV infection includes post-zoster osteonecrosis. This report documents a case of severe mandibular osteonecrosis and RHS after an outbreak of herpes zoster and treatment strategies.

Flap survival after previous vascular pedicle division and preexisting scar formation at the pedicle site: an experimental study.

BACKGROUND: We conducted an experimental study to investigate if it would be possible to re-elevate a flap at a standard flap site if its vascular pedicle was mutilated previously and there was a preexisting scar formation at the pedicle site. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 3 groups. In the control group (n = 5), animals received a procedure in which unilateral axial pattern abdominal flap was elevated, and then sutured to its original place. The remaining 2 groups underwent 2-stage procedures. In the first stage, scar tissue was created with either a skin incision (group 2, n = 15) or excision (group 3, n = 15) at the prospective pedicle site of the abdominal flap. In the second stage, abdominal flap was raised in 5 rats as a scar-pedicled flap at day 7, day 21, and day 42. Flaps were sutured in their places. Seven days later, flap survival was evaluated. RESULTS: Control flaps had complete survival (day 7, 95.5%; day 21, 94.8%; and day 42, 94.5%). Group 2 and group 3 flaps raised on day 7 (group 2, 65.4%; group 3, 63.9%) and on day 21 (group 2, 65.7%; group 3, 66.7%) showed decreased survival compared to control group flaps (P < 0.05). On day 42, group 1 flaps had better survival when compared to group 2 flaps (82.6% vs 70.0%, P < 0.05). Group 1 flaps showed progressive vascular network formation as evidenced by contrast medium first in the proximal two thirds of the flaps on day 7, and later via visualization of the axial pattern vascular tree on day 42. In group 3, approximately half of the flap was filled with barium contrast and no single pedicle was identified on day 42. CONCLUSIONS: Preexisting scar tissue and pedicle division in the pedicle site of a standard flap diminished dimensions of surviving flap when compared to control flaps. Incision-scar-pedicled flaps achieved better survival compared to excision-group flaps, particularly in the late postoperative period. The study findings showed that it may be possible to raise a flap from previously mutilated site secondary to scar formation and pedicle injury.

Reconstructive outcomes analysis of lower eyelid and infraorbital skin defects using 2 hatchet flaps: a 6-year experience.

BACKGROUND: For the past 6 years, we have used double hatchet flaps for reconstruction of lower lid and infraorbital skin defects. METHODS: Twenty-five patients who underwent reconstruction of lower eyelid/infraorbital skin defects using double hatchet flaps were retrospectively analyzed. Defect size ranged from 11 × 11 to 15 × 15 mm. In addition, pearls and pitfalls of the technique are discussed along with the presentation of 3 cases. RESULTS: Flaps were highly viable in all patients. There was no eyelid retraction, scleral show, ectropion, or entropion. Mean follow-up period was 13.7 months. Patient satisfaction with respect to scar appearance was assessed by the standard 5-point scale. Overall patient satisfaction score was 4 (satisfied) in 6 patients, and was 5 (very satisfied) in 19 patients. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the critical review of outcomes in 25 patients, use of double hatchet flaps for the repair of lower lid and infraorbital skin defects gives an excellent functional and aesthetic result. Horizontal movement of the hatchet flaps avoids vertical skin tension in the lower eyelid, and hence minimizes potential complications.

Current trends in breast reconstruction: survey of American Society of Plastic Surgeons 2010.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a retrospective survey of American Society of Plastic Surgeons to ascertain the current trends in breast reconstruction (BR). METHODS: Surveys were sent to 2250 active American Society of Plastic Surgeons members by e-mail with a cover letter including the link using Survey Monkey for the year 2010. In all, 489 surveys (a response rate of 21.7%) were returned. Three hundred fifty-eight surveys from respondents performing BR in their practices were included in the study. The survey included questions on surgeon demographics, practice characteristics, BR after mastectomy, number of BR per year, type and timing of BR, use of acellular dermal matrix, reconstructive choices in the setting of previous irradiation and in patients requiring postmastectomy radiation therapy, timing of contralateral breast surgery, fat grafting, techniques used for nipple-areola reconstruction, the complications, and physician satisfaction and physician reported patient satisfaction. Returned responses were tabulated and assessed. RESULTS: After prophylactic mastectomy, 16% of BRs were performed. In all, 81.2% of plastic surgeons predominantly performed immediate BR. In patients requiring postmastectomy radiation therapy, 81% did not perform immediate BR. Regardless of practice setting and laterality of reconstruction, 82.7% of respondents predominantly performed implant-based BR. Half of the plastic surgeons performing prosthetic BR used acellular dermal matrix. Only 14% of plastic surgeons predominantly performed autologous BR. Surgeons in solo, plastic surgery group practices, and multispecialty group practices preferred implant-based BR for both unilateral and bilateral cases more frequently than those in academic practices (P < 0.05). Overall, plastic surgeons in academic settings preferred autologous BR more frequently than those in other practice locations (P < 0.05). Of total respondents, 64.8% did not perform microsurgical BR at all; 28% reported performing deep inferior epigastric perforator flap BR. Pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap was the most often used option for unilateral autologous reconstruction, whereas deep inferior epigastric perforator flap was the most commonly used technique for bilateral BR. The overall complication rate reported by respondents was 11%. CONCLUSION: The survey provides an insight to the current trends in BR practice with respect to surgeon and practice setting characteristics. Although not necessarily the correct best practices, the survey does demonstrate a likely portrayal of what is being practiced in the United States in the area of BR.

Reconstruction of large supra-eyebrow and forehead defects using the hatchet flap principle and sparing sensory nerve branches.

BACKGROUND: To reconstruct a forehead defect, a plastic surgeon must be knowledgeable about the neural, vascular, and muscular anatomy. The position of fixed structures such as eyebrows and hairline should be respected. For the past 5 years, we have used double hatchet flaps for reconstruction of relatively large supra-eyebrow and forehead defects. Because this flap does not appear to be among the techniques used by young plastic surgeons, we thought that it would be valuable to report our experience. METHODS: Supra-eyebrow and forehead defects ranging from 2.5 × 2.5 cm to 3.5 × 3.5 cm were reconstructed using double hatchet flaps in 10 patients. Pearls and pitfalls of the technique are discussed along with the presentation of 3 cases. RESULTS: The reconstructions were uneventful and the flaps were highly viable in all patients. There was no significant distortion in the eyebrow or hairline due to reconstruction in any of the patients. All the flaps were sensate. A mild anesthesia in the distribution of supraorbital/trochlear nerve proximal to the flaps was noted only in 3 patients. This was associated with inevitable nerve damage during excision of malignant skin lesions and/or flap dissection. No recurrence was noted during the follow-up period which ranged from 6 to 36 months (mean, 13.5 months). Overall patient satisfaction score based on scar appearance and perceived degree of forehead anesthesia was 3 (neither satisfied nor dissatisfied) in 1 patient, was 4 (somewhat satisfied) in 4 patients, and was 5 (very satisfied) in 5 patients. CONCLUSION: Hatchet flaps have similar color and texture to that of the adjacent supra-eyebrow and forehead defects. The scarring is acceptable with reliable and reproducible results. Oftentimes, sensory nerve branches can be preserved with careful planning and tedious dissection. This type of reconstruction should be considered in the armamentarium of supra-eyebrow and forehead defects.

Incorporation of a preexisting scar in the star-flap technique for nipple reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: This report describes the authors' currently favored method of nipple reconstruction in cases of a pre-existing scar on the breast mound that passes through the intended site of nipple reconstruction. METHODS: The star flap technique incorporating a previous scar is used at least 3 months after satisfactory implant-based breast reconstruction. If the intended site of nipple reconstruction bisects through a vertical mastectomy scar, the star flap is designed as medially or laterally based with its 2 lateral limbs lying adjacent to the scar and the transverse central component incorporating the vertical scar. On the other hand, if the selected site of nipple reconstruction passes into a horizontal scar, the flap is positioned as inferiorly or superiorly based along the scar with its 2 lateral limbs adjacent to the scar and vertical central limb including the scar. Upon ensuring viability, the limbs are inset for nipple reconstruction. The flap donor wounds of the lateral limbs are closed primarily along the previous scar, and all of the scars including that of the central limb are maintained within the area of the intended areola. RESULTS: The procedure was used 16 times in 24 patients who have undergone bilateral implant-based breast reconstruction. All flaps were viable. One nipple reconstruction had an early complication of partial flap loss in the central flap that subsequently healed with wound care. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to use a mastectomy scar in the star flap design for nipple reconstruction with no significant vascular compromise. This novel design enables positioning of the nipple in an optimal location on the breast mound in relation with the scar, use of existing scar, and inclusion of extra skin and subcutaneous tissue within the central limb. Nipple projection and volume have been satisfactory and consistently maintained.

The ascending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral vessels: review of the anatomy and its utilization as recipient vessel for free-flap reconstruction of the hip region.

The ascending branch of the lateral circumflex artery may be of potential value as an alternative recipient vessel in the free-flap transfer to hip region. The anatomy of the ascending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral vessels has been reviewed with regards to size, location, and length and on the basis of previous anatomical and clinical studies in the literature. Surgical exposure of the ascending branch has been described. The ascending vessels were used suitably in the free-flap reconstruction of the hip wounds in two case examples. The ascending vessels follow an oblique course behind the rectus femoris muscle to reach the hilus of tensor fascia latae muscle, laterally and superiorly. The vessels are located at distance 7-12 cm from the anterior superior iliac spine in the interval between the rectus femoris and tensor fascia latae muscles. External diameter of the artery varies between 2 and 3 mm, which is usually accompanied by two venae comitantes measuring 1.8 to 2.5 mm. The ascending branch has a predictable location, a consistent anatomy, and an adequate caliber. Its surgical exposure is relatively easy. It should be placed in the armamentarium of recipient vessels as an alternative particularly in the free-flap reconstruction of the hip region.