Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 37(1): 11-16, 2021 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32195977

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This study describes the experience at a level 1 pediatric trauma center before and after the centralization of prehospital trauma triage, focusing on the rate of undertriage of trauma patients. Before centralization, emergency physicians were responsible for triaging these patients with mainly physiology-based criteria; after centralization, paramedics in a communication center performed this function using the same criteria. METHODS: This retrospective study includes 10 years of pediatric trauma registry patients at our institution, 5 years before and after centralization of prehospital triage. Rates of undertriage were calculated by both the Cribari Method and by disposition from the emergency department. Logistic regression was used to assess the effect of centralization on the incidence of undertriage while adjusting for differences in case-mix. RESULTS: Over the 10-year study period, 1862 trauma activations meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria were recorded in the trauma registry: 893 patients in the precentralization and 969 in the postcentralization groups. After centralization of the triage process, there were statistically significant decreases in the rates of undertriage from 8.7% to 4.2% (adjusted odds ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.73) when analyzed by the Cribari Method and from 37.7% to 27.7% when analyzed by disposition from the emergency department (adjusted odds ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.81). This represents a reduction in undertriage by 51.7% and 26.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Centralization of prehospital trauma triage at a level 1 pediatric trauma facility significantly reduced undertriage rates. Trauma centers should consider similar processes to improve prehospital triage.


Assuntos
Centros de Traumatologia/organização & administração , Triagem , Ferimentos e Lesões , Criança , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Modelos Logísticos , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Triagem/organização & administração , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnóstico
3.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 73(2): 371-6; discussion 376, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22846942

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Blunt trauma is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children. Despite the potential for malignancy, increased cost, limited small bowel injury detection sensitivity, and the low incidence of injury requiring operative intervention, the use of computed tomographic (CT) scan in pediatric blunt trauma evaluation remains common. Previous studies suggest that a clinical model using examination and laboratory data may help predict intra-abdominal injuries (IAIs) and potentially limit unnecessary CT scans in children. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all blunt "trauma alerts" for patients younger than 16 years during an 18-month period was performed at a Level I trauma center. Clinical factors, which might predict blunt IAI (hemodynamics, abdominal examination, serology, and plain radiographs), and potential limitations to performing a reliable abdominal examination (altered mental status, young age) were reviewed. A previously defined clinical prediction model based on six high-risk clinical variables for blunt IAI (hypotension, abnormal abdominal examination, elevated aspartate aminotransferase, elevated amylase, low hematocrit, and heme-positive urinalysis) was applied to each patient. RESULTS: Of the 125 "trauma alert" patients who sustained blunt trauma during the study period, 97 underwent abdominal CT scan, with only 15 identified as IAI. Our prediction rule would have identified 16 of 17 patients with IAI (SE, 94%) as high-risk and missed only 1 patient (grade I spleen laceration, which did not require operation) (negative predictive value, 99%). Of the 83 patients with no risk factors for IAI based on the prediction rule, 54 underwent a negative abdominal CT scan. Of these 54 patients, only 22 had a potential limitation to a reliable abdominal examination. Application of our prediction rule could have prevented unnecessary CT scan in at least 32 patients (33%) during an 18-month period. CONCLUSION: Use of a prediction model based on high-risk variables for IAI may decrease cost and radiation exposure by reducing the number of abdominal CT scans in children being evaluated for blunt abdominal trauma.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Desnecessários , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Intervalos de Confiança , Redução de Custos , Feminino , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Traumatismo Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Traumatismo Múltiplo/diagnóstico por imagem , Razão de Chances , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Lesões por Radiação/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Centros de Traumatologia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA