Limited value for ultrasonography in predicting flare in rheumatoid arthritis patients with low disease activity stopping TNF inhibitors.

Objective: Ultrasonography (US) can be used for treatment decisions in RA patients. This study investigated the added value of US to clinical variables in predicting flare in RA patients with longstanding low disease activity when stopping TNF inhibitors (TNFi). Methods: Cox models with and without using US added to clinical variables were developed in the Potential Optimization of Expediency of TNFi-UltraSonography study. RA patients (n = 259), using >1 year TNFi and csDMARD with DAS28 < 3.2 for 6 months prior to inclusion, were followed for 52 weeks after stopping TNFi. The added value of US was assessed in two ways: first, by the extent to which individual predictions for flare at 52 weeks with and without US differed; and second, by comparing how US information improved the prediction to classify patients at 52 weeks in the low risk (<33% flare), intermediate risk (33-50%) and high risk (50-100%) groups. Results: Although US was predictive of flare at group level (multivariate hazard ratio = 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1, 2.5), individual predictions for flare at 52 weeks with and without US differed little (median difference 3.7%; interquartile range: -7.8 to 6.5%). With US, 15.9% of patients were designated low risk; without US, 14.6%. In fact, 12.0% of patients were US-classified as low risk with/without knowing US. Conclusion: In RA patients with longstanding low disease activity, at time of stopping TNFi, US is a predictor for flare at group level, but at the patient level, US has limited added value when common clinical parameters are used already, though the predictive value of clinical predictors is modest as well.

Development of a web-based patient decision aid for initiating disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs using user-centred design methods.

BACKGROUND: A main element of patient-centred care, Patient Decision Aids (PtDAs) facilitate shared decision-making (SDM). A recent update of the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) emphasised patient involvement during PtDA development, but omitted a methodology for doing so. This article reports on the value of user-centred design (UCD) methods for the development of a PtDA that aims to support inflammatory arthritis patients in their choice between disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). METHODS: The IPDAS development process model in combination with UCD methods were applied. The process was overseen by an eight-member multidisciplinary steering group. Patients and health professionals were iteratively consulted. Qualitative in-depth interviews combined with rapid prototyping were conducted with patients to assess their needs for specific functionality, content and design of the PtDA. Group meetings with health professionals were organized to assess patients' needs and to determine how the PtDA should be integrated into patient pathways. The current literature was reviewed to determine the clinical evidence to include in the PtDA. To evaluate usability among patients, they were observed using the PtDA while thinking aloud and then interviewed. RESULTS: The combination of patient interviews with rapid prototyping revealed that patients wanted to compare multiple DMARDs both for their clinical aspects and implications for daily life. Health professionals mainly wanted to refer patients to a reliable, easily adjustable source of information about DMARDs. A web-based PtDA was constructed consisting of four parts: 1) general information about SDM, inflammatory arthritis and DMARDs; 2) an application to compare particular DMARDs; 3) value clarification exercises; and 4) a printed summary of patients' notes, preferences, worries and questions that they could bring to discuss with their rheumatologist. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that UCD methods can be of great value for the development of PtDAs. The early, iterative involvement of patients and health professionals was helpful in developing a novel user-friendly PtDA that allowed patients to choose between DMARDs. The PtDA fits the values of all stakeholders and easily integrates with the patient pathway and daily workflow of health professionals. This collaborative designed PtDA may improve SDM and patient participation in arthritis care.

A tight control treatment strategy aiming for remission in early rheumatoid arthritis is more effective than usual care treatment in daily clinical practice: a study of two cohorts in the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring registry.

UNLABELLED: There is strong evidence from clinical trials that a 'treat to target' strategy is effective in reaching remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the question is whether these results can be translated into daily clinical practice and clinical remission is a reachable target indeed. OBJECTIVE: The study aims to investigate whether in early RA a treatment strategy aiming at Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 <2.6 is more effective than 'usual care' treatment for reaching clinical remission after 1 year. METHODS: Two early RA inception cohorts from two different regions including patients who fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA were compared. Patients in the tight-control cohort (n=126) were treated according to a DAS28-driven step-up treatment strategy starting with methotrexate, addition of sulphasalazine (SSZ) and exchange of SSZ by anti-tumour necrosis factor in case of failure. Patients in the usual-care cohort (n=126) were treated with methotrexate or SSZ, without DAS28-guided treatment decisions. The primary outcome was the percentage remission (DAS28<2.6) at 1 year. Time to first remission and change in DAS28 were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: After 1 year, 55% of tight-control patients had a DAS28<2.6 versus 30% of usual care patients (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.8 to 5.2). The median time to first remission was 25 weeks for tight control and more than 52 weeks for usual care (p<0.0001). The DAS28 decreased with -2.5 in tight control and -1.5 in usual care (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: In early RA, a tight control treatment strategy aiming for remission leads to more rapid DAS28 remission and higher percentages of remission after 1 year than does a usual care treatment.

Implementation of a treat-to-target strategy in very early rheumatoid arthritis: results of the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring remission induction cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical remission is the ultimate therapeutic goal in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although clinical trials have proven this to be a realistic goal, the concept of targeting at remission has not yet been implemented. The objective of this study was to develop, implement, and evaluate a treat-to-target strategy aimed at achieving remission in very early RA in daily clinical practice. METHODS: Five hundred thirty-four patients with a clinical diagnosis of very early RA were included in the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring remission induction cohort study. Treatment adjustments were based on the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), aiming at a DAS28 of <2.6 (methotrexate, followed by the addition of sulfasalazine, and exchange of sulfasalazine with biologic agents in case of persistent disease activity). The primary outcome was disease activity after 6 months and 12 months of followup, according to the DAS28, the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria, and the modified American College of Rheumatology (ACR) remission criteria. Secondary outcomes were time to first DAS28 remission and outcome of radiography. RESULTS: Six-month and 12-month followup data were available for 491 and 389 patients, respectively. At 6 months, 47.0% of patients achieved DAS28 remission, 57.6% had a good EULAR response, and 32.0% satisfied the ACR remission criteria. At 12 months, 58.1% of patients achieved DAS28 remission, 67.9% had a good EULAR response, and 46.4% achieved ACR remission. The median time to first remission was 25.3 weeks (interquartile range 13.0-52.0). The majority of patients did not have clinically relevant radiographic progression after 1 year. CONCLUSION: The successful implementation of this treat-to-target strategy aiming at remission demonstrated that achieving remission in daily clinical practice is a realistic goal.

Tenosynovitis caused by a pseudallescheria boydii infection and symptoms of reflex sympathetic dystrophy after a dog bite.

Tenosynovitis caused by a Pseudallescheria boydii infection is an extremely rare complication after a dog bite and is easily misdiagnosed, leading to a delay in treatment. Careful history taking and adequate cultures can lead to a timely diagnosis, and longstanding antimycotic treatment can successfully eradicate the fungus.

Evaluation of a patient decision aid for initiating disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.

BACKGROUND: According to international guidelines, treatment of inflammatory arthritis should be based on a shared decision between patient and rheumatologist. Furthermore, patients with inflammatory arthritis have high need of information and want to be more actively involved in medical decision-making. To facilitate shared decision-making and support patients in choosing between disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), a web-based patient decision aid (PtDA) was developed. This study evaluated use, appreciation and effect of this PtDA. METHODS: A post-test only study with a historical comparison group was conducted. In a two-year period, all patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis, who were deciding whether to start a (different) DMARD were invited to participate. In the first year, patients received standard information (comparison group). In the second year, patients were referred to the PtDA (intervention group). In both groups, a questionnaire was sent four weeks after consulting the rheumatologist. Patient characteristics included sociodemographic, health-related and preference-related variables. Process measures were for use and appraisal of the PtDA (intervention group only). The primary outcome measure was patients' perceived role in medical decision-making. Secondary outcome measures comprised satisfaction with the decision-making process and the decision, beliefs about medication, adherence to medication and trust in the physician. RESULTS: We received 158/232 questionnaires (68 %) from the comparison group and 123/200 (61 %) from the intervention group. The PtDA was used by 69/123 patients (57 %) in the intervention group. Patients who used the PtDA highly appreciated it and perceived it as easy to use and helpful. Relative to the comparison group, patients in the intervention group perceived a more active role in medical decision-making and decisions were more in line with patients' personal preferences. Other outcomes showed no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The web-based PtDA was highly appreciated and perceived as helpful for decision-making. Implementation of the PtDA in rheumatology practice was associated with a significantly larger proportion of patients perceiving an active role in medical decision-making and decisions were more in line with patients' personal preferences. The PtDA can be a valuable aid in improving patient participation in decision-making about DMARDs.

Comparison of 2 Dosages of Intraarticular Triamcinolone for the Treatment of Knee Arthritis: Results of a 12-week Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a double dose of intraarticular triamcinolone acetonide is more effective for knee arthritis than a 40-mg dose. METHODS: In this 12-week randomized controlled clinical trial, 40 mg and 80 mg of intraarticular triamcinolone acetonide were compared in patients with knee arthritis. Evaluated variables included a Likert burden scale, visual analog scale pain scale, degree of arthritis activity, presence of swelling, and presence of functional limitation. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients were randomized. No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding any outcomes. CONCLUSION: An 80-mg dose of triamcinolone acetonide had no additional benefit compared with 40 mg as treatment for knee arthritis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Nederlands Trial Register; trial registration number: NTR2298.

Role of ultrasonography in diagnosing early rheumatoid arthritis and remission of rheumatoid arthritis--a systematic review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasonography (US) might have an added value to clinical examination in diagnosing early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and assessing remission of RA. We aimed to clarify the added value of US in RA in these situations performing a systematic review. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed for RA, US, diagnosis and remission. Methodological quality was assessed; the wide variability in the design of studies prohibited pooling of results. RESULTS: Six papers on the added value of US diagnosing early RA were found, in which at least bilateral metacarpophalangeal (MCP), wrists and metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints were scanned. Compared to clinical examination, US was superior with regard to detecting synovitis and predicting progression to persistent arthritis or RA. Eleven papers on assessing remission were identified, in which at least the wrist and the MCP joints of the dominant hand were scanned. Often US detected inflammation in patients clinically in remission, irrespective of the remission criteria used. Power Doppler signs of synovitis predicted X-ray progression and future flare in patients clinically in remission. CONCLUSIONS: US appears to have added value to clinical examination for diagnosing of RA when scanning at least MCP, wrist and MTP joints, and, when evaluating remission of RA, scanning at least wrist and MCP joints of the dominant hand. For both purposes primarily power Doppler US might be used since its results are less equivocal than those of greyscale US.

Splitting high-dose oral methotrexate improves bioavailability: a pharmacokinetic study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To study the bioavailability of a divided higher oral dose of methotrexate (MTX), in comparison to a single dose, in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in 10 patients with RA taking a stable dose (25-35 mg weekly) of MTX. Separated by one week, a pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in each patient after an oral single dose, and after an equal but split dose separated by 8 hours. MTX serum concentrations were measured by a fluorescence polarization immunoassay technique. Analysis was performed by calculation of the area under the curve (AUC) by the trapezoidal rule and by means of an iterative 2-stage Bayesian population procedure, obtaining population and individual pharmacokinetic parameters. For the population analysis, data from 15 patients in our previous study comparing oral and subcutaneous administration of MTX were also used. RESULTS: The median MTX dose was 30 mg weekly (range 25-35 mg). The bioavailability of the split dose was 28% higher compared to the single dose (p = 0.007). In the population pharmacokinetic modeling, a 2-compartment model best described the serum MTX concentration versus time curves. The mean bioavailability after single-dose and split-dose MTX was 0.76 and 0.90, respectively, compared to subcutaneous administration. There was a statistically significant difference in the bioavailability of the 2 oral administration regimens (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: The bioavailability of oral higher dose MTX in adult patients with RA can be improved by splitting the dose.

Bioavailability of higher dose methotrexate comparing oral and subcutaneous administration in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the bioavailability of higher oral doses of methotrexate (MTX) in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in 15 patients with RA taking a stable dose of MTX (> or = 25 mg weekly). Separated by 2 weeks, a pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in each patient after oral and subcutaneous administration of the same dose of MTX. MTX serum concentrations were measured by a fluorescence polarization immunoassay. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed with an iterative 2-stage Bayesian population procedure, obtaining population and individual pharmacokinetic parameters. RESULTS: The median MTX dose was 30 mg weekly (range 25-40 mg). A 2-compartment model best described the serum MTX concentration versus time curves. The mean bioavailability after oral MTX was 0.64 (range 0.21-0.96) compared to subcutaneous administration. There was a statistically significant difference in the bioavailability of the 2 administration regimens. CONCLUSION: Bioavailability of a higher oral dose of MTX in adult patients with RA is highly variable, and on average two-thirds that of the subcutaneous administration. To improve efficacy of MTX at dosages of 25 mg weekly or more, a change to parenteral administration should be considered.

Longterm observational study of methotrexate use in a Dutch cohort of 1022 patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To study which factors are associated with longterm methotrexate (MTX) use in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: All patients with RA who had started MTX after January 1, 1993, were selected from a regional hospital based registration system. Data on demographic and clinical features were retrieved through chart review. By means of life table analysis and Cox regression analysis, MTX survival and the relation between demographic variables, clinical features, and MTX survival were studied. RESULTS: A total of 1072 MTX treatment episodes in 1022 patients were analyzed. The cumulative MTX survival probability after 5 years was 64%, and after 9 years was 50%. Univariate analysis showed a significant relation between MTX survival probability and folic acid supplementation, attending rheumatologist, concurrent prednisolone use, concurrent sulfasalazine use, and the number of previous disease modifying drugs. In the multivariate analysis folic acid supplementation, attending rheumatologist, and concurrent prednisolone use remained significantly related to MTX survival. Age, disease duration, and creatinine clearance were not. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study of 1022 patients with RA the cumulative MTX survival probability was 64% after 5 years and 50% after 9 years. Folic acid supplementation and to a lesser extent prednisolone were associated with a longer MTX survival. In addition, treatment strategies of individual rheumatologists influenced MTX survival.