Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Obstet Gynecol ; 143(4): 484-490, 2024 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38330405

RESUMO

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a significant cause of infant morbidity and mortality worldwide with peak hospitalization rates for RSV-mediated illnesses between 2 and 3 months of life. Until very recently, prevention strategies for RSV involved primarily passive immunization of neonates at high risk with monoclonal antibodies and promotion of breastfeeding. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices now recommends passive immunization of all neonates with monoclonal antibodies during RSV season, and the American Association of Pediatrics has endorsed this practice. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently approved a vaccination for RSV in pregnancy. The CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices has recently recommended RSV vaccination for all pregnant patients between 32 and 36 weeks of gestation who are anticipated to deliver during RSV season if they are not planning nirsevimab for their infants. This recommendation has been endorsed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. In this clinical perspective, we review the scientific evidence, potential concerns, challenges, and future considerations for RSV vaccination in pregnancy.


Assuntos
Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial , Vírus Sinciciais Respiratórios , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Anticorpos Monoclonais , Imunização , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/tratamento farmacológico , Estados Unidos , Vacinação , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto
2.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 6(3): 101261, 2024 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38280550

RESUMO

In recent years, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association have reduced the thresholds for a hypertension diagnosis among nonpregnant adults. This change has led to more individuals with reproductive potential to be labeled as being chronically hypertensive, and some were started on antihypertensive medications. When these individuals become pregnant, the obstetrical care provider will have to decide whether to manage them as individuals with chronic hypertensive when only a few years ago they would have been managed as normotensive individuals and when the evidence regarding treatment of these patients during pregnancy is limited. If implemented widely, the management of patients with stage 1 hypertension similar to the traditional chronic hypertension will likely lead to additional maternal and fetal testing, to an increase in hospital admissions, and potentially to unnecessary interventions, such as preterm birth. Our goal was to compile the existing evidence regarding the pregnancy outcomes among patients with stage 1 hypertension to assist providers in their diagnosis and management of this patient group.


Assuntos
Hipertensão , Nascimento Prematuro , Gravidez , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Estados Unidos , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Nascimento Prematuro/diagnóstico , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Nascimento Prematuro/prevenção & controle , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Cuidado Pré-Natal
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA