Implementation of image-guided brachytherapy as part of non-surgical treatment in inoperable endometrial cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed outcomes of inoperable endometrial cancer (IEC) patients treated with definitive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by a 3D image-guided brachytherapy boost. METHODS: All consecutive patients treated with EBRT followed by 3D image-guided brachytherapy for IEC were retrospectively included. EBRT delivered a dose of 45Gy. Then, patients had an uterovaginal brachytherapy guided by 3D imaging. Clinical target volume (CTVBT) included the whole uterus and the initial disease extent. Gross tumour volume (GTVres) included the residual disease at time of brachytherapy. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were identified. Causes of inoperability were comorbidities (37%) or tumour loco regional extent (63%). Including EBRT and brachytherapy, the median D90 (minimal dose delivered to 90% of the volume) was 60.7 GyEQD2 (IQR = 56.4-64.2) for the CTVBT, and was 73.6 GyEQD2 (IQR = 64.1-83.7) for the GTVres. The median overall treatment time was 50 days (IQR = 46-54). The mean follow-up was 36.5 months (SD = 30.2). The cumulative incidence of local, pelvic and distant failures was 19% (n = 5), 7% (n = 2) and 26% (n = 7), respectively. Five-year overall survival was 63% (95% CI = 43-91). Late urinary and gastro intestinal toxicities ≥ grade 2 were reported in four (15%) and two patients (7%) respectively. No vaginal toxicity ≥ grade 2 was reported. CONCLUSIONS: EBRT followed by intracavitary brachytherapy seems to be an effective option for IEC. The implementation of 3D concepts at time of brachytherapy may contribute to high local control probability and low toxicity profile. Large scale retrospective or prospective data are needed to confirm these early data.

Comprehensive analysis of patient outcome after local recurrence of locally advanced cervical cancer treated with concomitant chemoradiation and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Since dose escalation allowed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), local relapses have become a rare event. Only scarce data are available on the outcome of patients experiencing a local relapse after IGABT. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2016, all consecutive patients treated at Gustave Roussy Institute for LACC and receiving concomitant chemoradiation and IGABT were analysed. Clinical and treatment-related prognostic factors for survival after local relapse were searched, in order to potentially identify patients requiring salvage treatment. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-nine patients were treated during this period. With a median follow-up of 4.1 years, 10.8% (n = 28) had a local relapse. Among these patients, 53.6% had synchronous lymph nodes or distant metastatic relapse and only 13 patients (5% of all patients) had isolated local relapse. After local relapse, median survival was 47 months and three patients were alive at last follow-up. Only three patients with local relapse could receive salvage surgery (10.7%). Metastases occurrence and pelvic wall involvement were the main contraindications (67.9%) for salvage surgery. Among the three patients treated with surgery, two are still alive at last follow-up without significant complication. Improved survival was observed among the two patients who could have surgery (p = .02). Local progression led to serious symptoms in 75% of patients. Only the time interval between brachytherapy and relapse (<1 year) was prognostic for 2-year overall survival (p = .005). CONCLUSION: Salvage surgery is feasible in a very low number of highly selected patients with local relapse following IGABT. Local failure is a major cause of severe local symptoms, confirming that every effort should be done to achieve long-term local control through dose escalation.

Clinical and imaging findings in cervical cancer and their impact on FIGO and TNM staging - An analysis from the EMBRACE study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate differences in local tumour staging between clinical examination and MRI and differences between FIGO 2009, FIGO 2018 and TNM in patients with primary cervical cancer undergoing definitive radio-chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients from the prospective observational multi-centre study "EMBRACE" were considered for analysis. All patients had gynaecological examination and pelvic MRI before treatment. Nodal status was assessed by MRI, CT, PET-CT or lymphadenectomy. For this analysis, patients were restaged according to the FIGO 2009, FIGO 2018 and TNM staging system. The local tumour stage was evaluated for MRI and clinical examination separately. Descriptive statistics were used to compare local tumour stages and different staging systems. RESULTS: Data was available from 1338 patients. For local tumour staging, differences between MRI and clinical examination were found in 364 patients (27.2%). Affected lymph nodes were detected in 52%. The two most frequent stages with FIGO 2009 are IIB (54%) and IIIB (16%), with FIGO 2018 IIIC1 (43%) and IIB (27%) and with TNM T2b N0 M0 (27%) and T2b N1 M0 (23%) in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: MRI and clinical examination resulted in a different local tumour staging in approximately one quarter of patients. Comprehensive knowledge of the differential value of clinical examination and MRI is necessary to define one final local stage, especially when a decision about treatment options is to be taken. The use of FIGO 2009, FIGO 2018 and TNM staging system leads to differences in stage distributions complicating comparability of treatment results. TNM provides the most differentiated stage allocation.

Clinical consequences of upfront pathology review in the randomised PORTEC-3 trial for high-risk endometrial cancer.

Background: In the PORTEC-3 trial, women with high-risk endometrial cancer (HR-EC) were randomised to receive pelvic radiotherapy (RT) with or without concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy (two cycles of cisplatin 50 mg/m2 in weeks 1 and 4 of RT, followed by four cycles of carboplatin AUC5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2). Pathology review was required before patient enrolment. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the role of central pathology review before randomisation. Patients and methods: A total of 1295 cases underwent pathology review to confirm HR-EC in the Netherlands (n = 395) and the UK (n = 900), and for 1226/1295 (95%) matching review and original reports were available. In total, 329 of these patients were enrolled in the PORTEC-3 trial: 145 in the Netherlands and 184 in the UK, comprising 48% of the total PORTEC-3 cohort of 686 participants. Areas of discrepancies were evaluated, and inter-observer agreement between original and review opinion was evaluated by calculating the kappa value (κ). Results: In the 1226 pathology reviews, 6356 selected items were evaluable for both original and review pathology. In 43% of cases at least one pathology item changed after review. For 102 patients (8%), this discrepancy led to ineligibility for the PORTEC-3 trial, most frequently due to differences in the assessment of histological type (34%), endocervical stromal involvement (27%) and histological grade (19%). Lowest inter-observer agreement was found for histological type (κ = 0.72), lymph-vascular space invasion (κ = 0.72) and histological grade (κ = 0.70). Conclusion: Central pathology review by expert gynaeco-pathologists changed histological type, grade or other items in 43% of women with HR-EC, leading to ineligibility for the PORTEC-3 trial in 8%. Upfront pathology review is essential to ensure enrolment of the target trial-population, and to avoid over- or undertreatment, especially when treatment modalities with substantial toxicity are involved. This study is registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN14387080, www.controlled-trials.com) and with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00411138).

Volumetric evaluation of an alternative bladder point in brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate an alternative dose point, so-called ALG (for Alain Gerbaulet), for the bladder in comparison to the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) point and D2cm(3) (minimal dose to maximally exposed 2 cm(3)) in a large cohort of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy followed by image-guided pulsed dose rate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: For each patient, the ALG point was constructed 1.5 cm above the ICRU bladder, parallel to the tandem (coronal and sagittal planes). The dosimetric data from 162 patients were reviewed. RESULTS: Average doses to ALG and bladder points were 19.40 Gy ± 7.93 and 17.14 ± 8.70, respectively (p=0.01). The 2 cm(3) bladder dose averaged 24.40 ± 6.77 Gy. Ratios between D2cm(3) and dose points were 1.37 ± 0.46 and 1.68 ± 0.74 (p<0.001) for ALG and ICRU points, respectively. Both dose points appeared correlated with D2cm(3) (p<0.001) with coefficients of determination (R(2)) of 0.331 and 0.399 respectively. The estimated dose to the ICRU point of the rectum was 12.77 ± 4.21 and 15.76 ± 5.94 for D2cm(3) (p<0.0001). Both values were significantly correlated (p<0.0001, R(2) = 0.485). CONCLUSION: The ALG point underestimates the D2cm(3), but its mean on a large cohort is closer to D2cm(3) than the dose to ICRU point. However, it shows great variability between cases and the weak strength of its correlation to D2cm(3) indicates that it is not a good surrogate for individual volumetric evaluation of the dose D2cm(3).

Quality indicators in ovarian cancer surgery: report from the French Society of Gynecologic Oncology (Societe Francaise d'Oncologie Gynecologique, SFOG).

BACKGROUND: Based on registries, the European experience has been that <50% of patients are treated according to protocols and/or benefit from the minimum required surgery for ovarian cancer. The French Cancer Plan 2009-2013 considers the definition of qualitative indicators in ovarian cancer surgery in France. This endeavour was undertaken by the French Society of Gynaecologic Oncology (SFOG) in partnership with the French National College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and all concerned learned societies in a multidisciplinary mindset. METHODS: The quality indicators for the initial management of patients with ovarian cancer were based on the standards of practice determined from scientific evidence or expert consensus. RESULTS: The indicators were divided into structural indicators, including material (equipment), human (number and qualification of staff), and organizational resources, process indicators, and outcome indicators. CONCLUSIONS: The enforcement of a quality assurance programme in any country would undoubtedly promote improvement in the quality of care for ovarian cancer patients and would result in a dramatic positive impact on their survival. Such a policy is not only beneficial to the patient, but is also profitable for the healthcare system.

A randomized clinical trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin followed by radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in patients with localized uterine sarcomas (SARCGYN study). A study of the French Sarcoma Group.

BACKGROUND: There is no proven benefit of adjuvant treatment of uterine sarcoma (US). SARCGYN phase III study compared adjuvant polychemotherapy followed by pelvic radiotherapy (RT) (arm A) versus RT alone (arm B) conducted to detect an increase ≥ 20% of 3-year PFS. METHODS: Patients with FIGO stage ≤ III US, physiological age ≤ 65 years; chemotherapy: four cycles of doxorubicin 50 mg/m² d1, ifosfamide 3 g/m²/day d1-2, cisplatin 75 mg/m² d3, (API) + G-CSF q 3 weeks. Study was stopped because of lack of recruitment. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were included: 39 in arm A and 42 in arm B; 52 stage I, 16 stage II, 13 stage III; 53 leiomyosarcomas, 9 undifferenciated sarcomas, 19 carcinosarcomas. Gr 3-4 toxicity during API (/37 patients): thrombopenia (76%), febrile neutropenia (22%) with two toxic deaths; renal gr 3 (1 patient). After a median follow-up of 4.3 years, 41/81 patients recurred, 15 in arm A, 26 in arm B. The 3 years DFS is 55% in arm A, 41% in arm B (P = 0.048). The 3-year overall survival (OS) is 81% in arm A and 69% in arm B (P = 0.41). CONCLUSION: API adjuvant CT statistically increases the 3 year-DFS of patients with US.

Do clinicians and patients agree regarding symptoms? A comparison after definitive radiochemotherapy in 223 uterine cervical cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: In clinical cancer research of morbidity, low associations between clinician-assessed toxicity/morbidity and patient-reported symptoms are consistently described in the literature. While morbidity grading systems are supposed to follow more or less objective criteria, patient reported symptoms inherently are based on a subjective self-evaluation of the impact on quality of life. The aim of this study was to focus on major discrepancies with high clinical relevance and to evaluate its impact with regard to underreporting of morbidity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Early morbidity assessed by clinicians with CTCAEv.3 and patient reported quality of life (EORTC-QLQ-C30/CX24) were compared regarding 12 overlapping symptoms in 223 patients with uterine cervical cancer 3 months after definitive radio(chemo)therapy in the ongoing EMBRACE study. Mismatches showing discrepancies between both grading systems were classified, if patients reported substantial symptoms (quite a bit/very much) and CTCAE grading was rated G0. RESULTS: In total, 360 substantial symptoms were reported by patients by EORTC-QLQ; 159 (44%) of those were not recognized by CTCAE. Symptoms with the highest occurrence of mismatches overall are urinary frequency, fatigue, and insomnia. Large institutional differences were found, showing two centers with 4 vs. 71% of patients with at least one mismatch. CONCLUSION: Analysis of mismatches indicated a high risk of underestimation of early morbidity. Thus, nearly half of the patient-reported substantial symptoms were not recognized by CTCAE scoring (G0) 3 months after treatment. Prospective assessment of morbidity in clinical studies should, therefore, integrate patient reported symptoms to receive a complete and comprehensive picture.

[Molecular-integrated risk profile: An opportunity for therapeutic de-escalation in intermediate and high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer]. / Cancer de l'endomètre de stade localisé : la perspective d'une désescalade thérapeutique guidée par la classification moléculaire.

In Europe, endometrial cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women. The majority of patients are diagnosed at a localized stage. For these patients, the standard of care is based on an hysterectomy with salpingo oophorectomy±lymph node staging. Through the assessment of histopathologic features, risk groups are determined: low, intermediate, high-intermediate, and high risk. Adjuvant strategies are guided by these risk groups. While the prognosis of low-risk and high-risk is well known, that of intermediate and high-intermediate risk is more heterogeneous, and the therapeutic index of adjuvant treatments is more questionable. Several trials (PORTEC [Post Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma] I, GOG [Gynecologic Oncology Group] 99, ASTEC [A Study in the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer] EN.5, PORTEC II, Sorbe et al trial) have assessed observation, vaginal cuff brachytherapy and/or pelvic external beam radiotherapy in this population. Vaginal cuff brachytherapy reduces the local recurrence rate, and pelvic external beam radiotherapy the pelvic recurrence rate. However, no benefit in terms of overall survival or occurrence of distant metastases is highlighted. Compared to observation, brachytherapy and above all external beam radiotherapy are associated with an increased morbidity, and with a decreased quality of life. In order to improve the therapeutic ratio and to optimize medico-economic decisions, therapeutic de-escalation strategies, based on the molecular profiles, are emerging in clinical trials, and in the recommendations for the management of intermediate and high-intermediate risk endometrial cancers. The four main molecular profiles highlighted by the genomic analyzes of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) - POLE (polymerase epsilon) mutation, non-specific molecular profile, MMR (MisMatch repair) deficiency, and p53 mutation - but also the quantification of lymphovascular space invasion (absent, focal or substantial), and the assessment of L1CAM (L1 cell adhesion molecule) overexpression represent growing concerns. Thus, the use of molecular-integrated risk profile to determine the best adjuvant treatment represent a major way to personalize adjuvant treatment of endometrial cancers, with therapeutic de-escalation opportunity for around half of the high-intermediate risks. However, in the absence of prospective data, inclusion in clinical trials assessing molecular profile-based treatment remains the best therapeutic opportunity.

Role of radiotherapy in the treatment of primary vaginal cancer: Recommendations of the French society for radiation oncology.

Primary vaginal cancers are rare tumours, for which external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy are major treatment tools. Given the complexity of brachytherapy techniques, the treatment should be performed in specialised centres. We present the recommendations of the French society for radiation oncology on the indications and techniques for external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for primary vaginal cancer.

Radiotherapy of cervical cancer.

External beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy are major treatments in the management of cervical cancer. For early-stage tumours with local risk factors, brachytherapy is a preoperative option. Postoperative radiotherapy is indicated according to histopathological criteria. For advanced local tumours, chemoradiation is the standard treatment, followed by brachytherapy boost, which is not optional. We present the update of the recommendations of the French Society of Oncological Radiotherapy on the indications and techniques for external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Radiotherapy for endometrial cancer.

The first intent upfront treatment of endometrial cancer is surgery. External radiotherapy and brachytherapy; however, are important tools in adjuvant setting, according to histopathological risk factors for locoregional recurrence or in the event of an inoperable tumor. We present the update of the recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy on the indications and technical methods of performing radiotherapy and brachytherapy for endometrial cancer.

Role of radiotherapy in the management of vulvar cancer: Recommendations of the French society for radiation oncology.

Primary vulvar carcinomas are rare gynaecological cancers, for which surgery is the mainstay of treatment. There is however a major place for external beam radiotherapy in the situation of inoperable locally advanced tumours and/or as adjuvant therapy, when there are risk factors for locoregional relapse. We present the recommendations of the French society for radiation oncology on the indications and techniques for radiotherapy in the treatment of primary vulvar cancer.

Radiotherapy for penile cancers.

Penile cancers are uncommon and should be treated in expert center. Radiotherapy indications are mainly limited to exclusive brachytherapy for early stage penile glans cancer. Brachytherapy yields to excellent outcome for disease control and organ and function preservation. Only scarce data are available for external beam radiation therapy. It could be considered as palliative setting for irradiation of the primary tumor. For lymph node irradiation, external beam radiation therapy (with or without chemotherapy) could be discussed either as neoadjuvant approach prior to surgery for massive inguinal lymph node invasion or as adjuvant approach in case of high-risk of relapse. However, these cases should be discussed on an individual basis, as the level of evidence is poor. We present the recommendations of the French Society of Oncological Radiotherapy on the indications and techniques for external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for penile glans cancer.

Use of an intravaginal spacer in young girls treated with brachytherapy for bladder neck rhabdomyosarcoma: Dosimetric impact for organs at risk sparing and acute tolerance.

PURPOSE: Interstitial brachytherapy is indicated as part of a conservative strategy for children with bladder and/or prostate rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), providing high local control probability with acceptable functional results. Vaginal and/or rectal complications were however reported, due to the close proximity to the implanted volume. We investigated the dosimetric impact of a vaginal spacer in terms of rectal and vaginal doses. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Medical records of 12 consecutive female patients with bladder neck RMS, median age 32 months (range: 1.3-6 years), were reviewed. Five patients were treated prior to 2017 without a vaginal spacer and seven patients treated after 2017 had their brachytherapy delivered with a vaginal spacer placed at time of implant. RESULTS: Minimal doses delivered to the most exposed 2cm3, 1cm3, and 0.5cm3 of the rectum were all statistically significantly lower among patients treated with a vaginal spacer, as compared to those treated without a spacer. Median rectal D2cm3 was 22GyEQD2 versus 38GyEQD2 (P=0.02), D1cm3 was 29GyEQD2 versus 51GyEQD2 (P=0.013), and D0.5cm3 was 32GyEQD2 versus 61GyEQD2 (P=0.017), with and without the vaginal spacer, respectively. The posterior vaginal wall D0.5cm3 dose was also significantly decreased, with median D0.5cm3 of 92GyEQD2 versus 54GyEQD2 (P<0.0001), with and without the spacer, respectively. Acute tolerance was excellent in all patients, with no need for replanning and no acute complication. CONCLUSIONS: The use of vaginal spacers in brachytherapy of female pediatric patients with bladder neck RMS resulted in significantly decreased doses to the rectum and the posterior vaginal wall. Though the clinical impact of such dose reduction remains undemonstrated, routine utilization of a vaginal spacer could be a method to decrease long-term morbidity in these patients.

Radiotherapy Quality Assurance in the PORTEC-3 (TROG 08.04) Trial.

AIMS: Quality assurance in radiotherapy (QART) is essential to ensure the scientific integrity of a clinical trial. This paper reports the findings of the retrospective QART assessment for all centres that participated in PORTEC-3; a randomised controlled trial that compared pelvic radiotherapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy to the pelvis followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The trial showed an overall survival benefit for the addition of the chemotherapy in the management of women with high-risk endometrial cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinicians were invited to upload a randomly selected case/s treated at each of the participating sites. Panel reviewers analysed the contours to certify that the target volumes and organ at risk structures were contoured according to guidelines. The results were categorised into acceptable, minor variation, major variation or unevaluable. The radiotherapy plans were dosimetrically evaluated using the well-established Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) protocol. RESULTS: Between August 2010 and January 2018, data from 146 patients of 686 consecutively treated patients were retrospectively reviewed. All 16 Australia and New Zealand and 71 of 77 international centres uploaded data for evaluation. In total, 3514 dosimetric and contour variables were reviewed. Of these, 3136 variables were deemed acceptable (89.2%), with 335 minor (9.6%) and 43 major variations (1.2%). Major contour variations included the clinical target volume vaginal vault, clinical target volume parametria and differential planning target volume vault expansion. CONCLUSION: The results of the QART assessment confirmed high uniformity and low rates of both minor and major deviations in contouring and dosimetry in all sites. This supports the safe introduction of the PORTEC-3 treatment protocol into routine clinical practice.

[Penile cancer in 2010: update from the Oncology Committee of the French Association of Urology: external genital organs group (CCAFU-OGE)]. / Prise en charge du cancer du pénis en 2010 : rapport du forum du Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie - organes génitaux externes (CCAFU-OGE).

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of penile carcinoma, even if it is well codified, is not well known because of its rarity. The aim of this article is to report the management of penile carcinoma in 2010. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This article is a summary of the forum of the Committee of Oncology of the French Association of Urology (AFU-CC), held at the Congress of the AFU. RESULTS: The role of the urologist is to diagnose precancerous lesions and penile carcinomas beginners to limit the risk of mutilating treatments. In case of doubt, a biopsy with orientation must be performed. The extension of the tumor is mainly based on clinical examination. Penile MRI can help to assess the depth extension. The treatment of penile tumor must be the most conservative either with surgery or brachytherapy. The risk of local recurrence, after conservative treatment, is 20 % but does not influence survival. The management of lymph nodes should be systematic, bilateral and performed at diagnosis. Tumors greater or equal to pT1b and/or grade greater or equal to 2 are at risk of lymph node extension. The staging of lymph node and distance metastase is clinical and radiological (CT and/or PET-CT 18F-FDG). The inguinal lymphadenectomy have a curative role. The type of inguinal lymphadenectomy (modified and/or total) is based on clinical examination, para-clinical and fine needle aspiration of lymph nodes. In some cases, associated pelvic lymph node dissection is recommended. The place and the type of chemotherapy remain to be defined. This treatment is based at least on the administration of cisplatin. CONCLUSION: The treatment of penile carcinoma requires a local treatment of the tumor as conservative as possible. The management of inguinal lymph nodes is important because of its prognostic value. It must be made at initial diagnosis and is based on clinical and para-clinical examinations.

Glassy cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: 20-year experience from a comprehensive cancer center.

PURPOSE: Glassy cell carcinoma (GCC) of the uterine cervix is a rare entity. This study aims at describing the clinical characteristics and outcomes of cervical GCC patients treated in a comprehensive cancer center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reported patients and tumors characteristics, therapeutic management, overall survival (OS), progression-free progression (PFS), relapse rates, and toxicities. RESULTS: Between 1994 and 2014, 55 patients were treated with curative intent. The median age at diagnosis was 41 years (range, 20-68). Among 22 patients with early stage tumors (IA2-IB1-IIA1), 17 had preoperative brachytherapy, followed by radical hysterectomy. Among 33 patients with locally advanced disease (≥IB2), 32 underwent chemoradiation±brachytherapy boost. After a median follow-up of 5.4 years (range, 0.15-21.7 years), 18/55 (33%) patients experienced tumor relapse. Local recurrence occurred in 2/22 (9%) patients with early disease (treated with upfront surgery) and in 3/32 (9%) patients with locally advanced disease. Most frequent relapses were distant, occurring in a total of 11/55 patients (20%). PFS rates at 5-year were 86.4% (95% CI: 63.4-95.4) for early stage versus 75.9% (95% CI: 55.2-89.2) for locally advanced stages, respectively (P=0.18). CONCLUSION: Large cohort data are warranted to guide the optimal management of GCC. From this retrospective analysis, a multimodal approach yielded to good disease control in early stages tumors. Given the high-risk of distant failure, consideration should be given to adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced disease.

Impact of adjuvant treatment modalities on the management of patients with stages I-II endometrial stromal sarcoma.

PURPOSE: To explore whether adjuvant treatment options may impact on the prognosis in localized endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESSs; stages I and II). The historical options usually discussed in addition to hysterectomy and bilateral salpingoophorectomy (BSO) are active surveillance, pelvic radiotherapy, chemotherapy and hormonal therapy, alone or in combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 84 consecutive patients treated for ESS at a single referral center, 54 with localized stage disease were identified. Recurrence-free survival and overall survival were estimated and patterns of recurrences described. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 58 months, only one patient had died. None of the 23 patients who had received adjuvant therapy relapsed compared with 13 of 31 patients who had not received any adjuvant therapy. Adjuvant treatments were hormonal therapy (n = 10) and brachytherapy with/without pelvic radiotherapy (n = 13). Almost the majority of relapses were local (92%) and extra-pelvic metastasis was observed in nearly half of the patients (46%). In the multivariate analysis, the major determinants of relapse-free survival were adjuvant treatment, myometrial invasion (P = 0.005) and no BSO (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In this series, adjuvant treatment of localized ESSs was associated with the absence of recurrence.

Evaluation of adjuvant vaginal vault brachytherapy in early stage cervical cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) was shown to decrease pelvic relapses in patients with an early stage cervical cancer and intermediate-risk histopathological prognostic factors, at the cost of increased bowel morbidity. We examined the feasibility and results of adjuvant brachytherapy alone as an alternative to EBRT in this situation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical records of consecutive patients receiving adjuvant brachytherapy between 1991 and 2018 for an early stage cervical cancer were examined. Patients were included if they presented a pT1a2N0 or pT1b1N0 disease following radical colpohysterectomy. Adjuvant vaginal wall brachytherapy (without EBRT) was indicated because of a tumor size≥2cm and/or presence of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). Patients received 60Gy to 5mm of the vaginal wall, through low-dose or pulse-dose rate technique. Patients' outcome was examined for disease control, toxicities and prognostic factors. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were included. Eight patients (20%) had LVSI, 26 patients (65%) had a tumor size≥2cm. With median follow-up time of 42.0 months, 90% of patients were in complete remission and four patients (10%) experienced tumor relapse, all in the peritoneal cavity, and associated with synchronous pelvic lymph node failure in 2/4 patients. No vaginal or isolated pelvic nodal failure was reported. At 5 year, overall survival was 83.6% (CI95%: 67.8-100%) and disease-free survival was 85.1% (CI95%: 72.6-99.9%). In univariate analysis, probability of relapse correlated with tumor size≥3cm (P=0.004). No acute or late toxicity grade more than 2 was reported. CONCLUSION: Brachytherapy alone was a well-tolerated adjuvant treatment for selected patients with intermediate risk factors. The risk of relapse in patients with tumor size≥3cm was however high, suggesting that EBRT is more appropriate in this situation.