Surgical occlusion of middle meningeal artery in treatment of chronic subdural haematoma: anatomical and technical considerations.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) treatment is to relieve pressure to improve neurological symptoms. The secondary aim is to avoid recurrence. The blood supply from the middle meningeal artery (MMA) to the haematoma membranes has recently become a research target, to enhance our understanding of the processes leading to growth and re-growth of a CSDH. Several studies indicate that endovascular embolization of the MMA (eMMA) reduces recurrence rates, but this effect must be confirmed in a randomized controlled setting. Endovascular embolization is an advanced and costly procedure carrying a significant risk of embolism in the elderly. The aim of this study was to assess anatomical and technical aspects of surgical occlusion of the MMA (soMMA) via a single same-procedure burr hole, as an alternative to eMMA. METHOD: Technical aspects of soMMA were assessed using cadaver head dissection. MMA anatomy was examined by mapping the branching pattern and distribution of MMA in dry skulls, and CSDH position was investigated by analysis of computed tomography (CT) of CSDHs. Finally, we evaluated the possibility of CT-guided navigation to mark the branching point of the anterior MMA division on the skin. RESULTS: We established anatomical landmarks to locate the MMA and found that particularly the anterior MMA branch can be occluded through a single burr hole at the pterion during the same procedure as haematoma decompression. CT of 1454 CSDHs in 1162 patients showed that the CSDH was anteriorly located in 57.5% compared with posteriorly in only 3%. This correlated with the anterior branch of the MMA being dominant in 58% of dry skull samples examined. We further confirmed that the MMA can be localized by neuronavigation as an alternative to using anatomical landmarks and average measurements. CONCLUSION: A CSDH is mainly anteriorly located and supposedly primarily supplied by the anterior MMA branch. In a simulated setting, soMMA can be performed during the same procedure as haematoma decompression. A few reservations notwithstanding, we find that soMMA may be a viable alternative to eMMA in most CSDH cases and that soMMA should be further evaluated in a clinical setting.

Embolization of the middle meningeal artery in patients with chronic subdural hematoma-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) remains a neurosurgical condition with high recurrence rate after surgical treatment. The primary pathological mechanism is considered to be repeated microbleedings from fragile neo-vessels within the outer hematoma membrane. The neo-vessels are supplied from peripheral branches of the middle meningeal artery, and embolization of MMA (eMMA) has been performed to prevent re-bleeding episodes and thereby CSDH recurrence. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the published evidence for the effect of eMMA in patients with recurrent CSDH. Secondarily, to investigate the effect of eMMA as an alternative to surgery for primary treatment of CSDH. METHOD: A systematic review of the literature on eMMA in patients with recurrent CSDH was conducted. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were reviewed using the search terms: Embolization, Medial Meningeal Artery, Chronic Subdural Haematoma, and Recurrence. Furthermore, the following mesh terms were used: Chronic Subdural Haematoma AND embolization AND medial meningeal artery AND recurrence. Eighteen papers were found and included. No papers were excluded. The number of patients with primary CSDH and the number of patients with recurrent CSDH treated with eMMA were listed. Furthermore, the number of recurrences in both categories was registered. RESULTS: Eighteen papers with a total of 191 included patients diagnosed with CSDH treated with eMMA for primary and recurrent CSDH were identified. Recurrence rate for patients treated with eMMA for recurrent CSDH was found to be 2.4%, 95% CI (0.5%; 11.0%), whereas the recurrence rate for patients treated with eMMA for primary CSDH was 4.1%, 95% CI (1.4%; 11.4%). CONCLUSION: eMMA is a minimally invasive procedure for treatment of CSDH. Although this study is limited by publication bias, it seems that this procedure may reduce recurrence rates compared with burr hole craniostomy for both primary and recurrent hematomas. A controlled study is warranted.

Early decompressive surgery in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury improves neurological outcome.

BACKGROUND: The role and timing of a decompressive surgical intervention in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) remain controversial. Given the impact of SCI on the individual and society, decompressive surgery to reduce the extent of tissue destruction and improving neurological outcome after initial spinal cord trauma are needed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate any possible correlation between the time of a decompressive procedure after traumatic SCI and end-neurologic outcome for traumatic SCI patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study on patients with traumatic SCI in Western Denmark from 2010 to 2017. Data on date and time of injury and time of surgery and data on neurologic status at admission and one-year post-trauma were found in the Electronic Patients Journal (EPJ) and in paper journals. Patients were divided into 4 groups (< 6 h, < 12 h, < 24 h, and > 24 h) based on the time between injury and surgery. Further, patients were separated into two groups depending on whether they did or did not achieve neurological improvement one-year post-trauma. We used Fisher's exact test to compare the abovementioned groups to examine an eventual correlation between time from injury to operation and change in neurological outcome one-year post-trauma. RESULTS: Patients undergoing surgery < 24 h after trauma obtained a significantly better neurological outcome as compared with patients who underwent surgery > 24 h after trauma (p < 0.001). This result did not change for subgroups of incomplete SCI patients (p = 0.002). However, complete SCI patients operated < 24 h as compared with > 24 h did not obtain better outcome (p = 0.14). We did not find a statistically significant correlation when time from trauma to surgery was reduced further to < 6 or < 12 h post-trauma. Furthermore, stratification on patients undergoing surgery before and after 24 h was made regarding gender, completeness, and years of age. The groups did not differ concerning gender and SCI completeness, but significant difference in age was found (44 and 58 years of age, respectively, p < 0.001). The chance of improved outcome was significantly higher for patients < 50 years of age (42% versus 24%, p = 0.05). Patients under the age of 50 seemed to benefit from early intervention (50% improvement versus 23%); however, difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.08). In patients aged above 50, the trend was similar, but significant correlation was found (40% versus 16%, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: The present study reports a beneficial effect of early decompression surgery, especially for incomplete SCI patients; however, surgical decision-making is complex, and all cases of acute spinal cord injury should be cautiously interpreted and handled on an individual basis.

Reliability and performance of the IRRAflow® system for intracranial lavage and evacuation of hematomas-A technical note.

BACKGROUND: Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is a severe condition with poor outcomes and high mortality. IRRAflow® (IRRAS AB) is a new technology introduced to accelerate IVH clearance by minimally invasive wash-out. The IRRAflow® system performs active and controlled intracranial irrigation and aspiration with physiological saline, while simultaneously monitoring and maintaining a stable intracranial pressure (ICP). We addressed important aspects of the device implementation and intracranial lavage. METHOD: To allow versatile investigation of multiple device parameters, we designed an ex vivo lab setup. We evaluated 1) compatibility between the IRRAflow® catheter and the Silverline f10 bolt (Spiegelberg), 2) the physiological and hydrodynamic effects of varying the IRRAflow® settings, 3) the accuracy of the IRRAflow® injection volumes, and 4) the reliability of the internal ICP monitor of the IRRAflow®. RESULTS: The IRRAflow® catheter was not compatible with Silverline bolt fixation, which was associated with leakage and obstruction. Design space exploration of IRRAflow® settings revealed that appropriate settings included irrigation rate 20 ml/h with a drainage bag height at 0 cm, irrigation rate 90 ml/h with a drainage bag height at 19 cm and irrigation rate 180 ml/h with a drainage bag height at 29 cm. We found the injection volume performed by the IRRAflow® to be stable and reliable, while the internal ICP monitor was compromised in several ways. We observed a significant mean drift difference of 3.16 mmHg (variance 0.4, p = 0.05) over a 24-hour test period with a mean 24-hour drift of 3.66 mmHg (variance 0.28) in the pressures measured by the IRRAflow® compared to 0.5 mmHg (variance 1.12) in the Raumedic measured pressures. CONCLUSION: Bolting of the IRRAflow® catheter using the Medtronic Silverline® bolt is not recommendable. Increased irrigation rates are recommendable followed by a decrease in drainage bag level. ICP measurement using the IRRAflow® device was unreliable and should be accompanied by a control ICP monitor device in clinical settings.

Cisternal and intraventricular irrigation in subarachnoid and intraventricular haemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) are associated with poor patient outcomes. Intraventricular fibrinolysis is effective in clearing IVH and improving patient survival and neurological outcome. By similar rationale, cisternal irrigation has been proposed as a potential method to accelerate haematoma clearance in SAH. We aimed to provide a comprehensive review and meta-analysis evaluating the effect of intraventricular and cisternal irrigation on clinical outcomes in patients with SAH and IVH. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed preparing this systematic review and study selection was performed by multiple investigators. We extracted ORs from the individual studies and aggregated these using a random effects model. The quality of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations assessment and ROBINS-I or RoB-2. RESULTS: 24 articles were included. In SAH, we found that cisternal irrigation with fibrinolytic agents was associated with reduced mortality (OR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.00), higher probability of favourable functional outcome (OR: 1.80, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.51), and reduced risks of DCI (OR: 0.28, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.42) and cerebral vasospasm (OR: 0.28, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.42), compared with conventional therapy. Cisternal irrigation with vasodilatory agents was associated with lower mortality (OR: 0.32, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.79) and reduced risk of cerebral vasospasm (OR: 0.37, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.79). The evidence for irrigation therapy of IVH was sparse and insufficient to show any significant effect. CONCLUSION: In this study, we found that cisternal irrigation could improve the prognosis in patients with SAH compared with conventional therapy. There is no evidence to support cisternal irrigation treatment of IVH.

Descriptive registry study on outcome and complications of external ventricular drainage treatment of intraventricular haemorrhage in a Danish cohort: a study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. External ventricular drainage (EVD) has been shown to decrease mortality. Although EVD is widely used, outcome and complication rates in EVD-treated patients with IVH are not fully elucidated. This study aims to describe EVD complication rates and outcomes in patients with primary and secondary IVH at two university hospitals in Denmark. The study will provide a historical reference of relevant endpoints for use in future clinical trials involving patients with IVH. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This descriptive, multicentre registry study included adult patients (age 18+) with primary or secondary IVH and treated with at least one EVD between 2017 and 2021 at Aarhus University Hospital or Odense University Hospital. Patients are identified using the Danish National Patient Register. Data are collected and recorded from patient medical records. Relevant descriptive statistics and correlation analyses will be applied. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval and authorisation to access, store and analyse data have been obtained (Central Denmark Region Committee on Health Research Ethics). The research lead will present the results of the study. Data will be reported according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology and results submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.

Treatment of Intraventricular Hemorrhage with External Ventricular Drainage and Fibrinolysis: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Complications and Outcome.

BACKGROUND: External ventricular drainage (EVD) is a key factor in the treatment of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) but associated with risks and complications. Intraventricular fibrinolysis (IVF) has been proposed to improve clinical outcome and reduce complications of EVD treatment. The following review and metaanalysis provides a comprehensive evaluation of IVH treatment with external ventricular drainage (EVD) and intraventricular fibrinolysis (IVF) with regards to complications and clinical outcomes. METHODS: The PRISMA guidelines were followed preparing this review. Studies included in the meta-analysis were compared using forest plots and the related odds ratios. RESULTS: After a literature search, 980 articles were identified and 65 and underwent full-text review. Forty-two articles were included in the review and meta-analysis. We found that bolted and antibiotic-coated catheters were superior to tunnelled/uncoated catheters (P < 0.001) and antibiotic- vs. silver-impregnated catheters (P < 0.001]) in preventing infection. Shunt dependency was related to the volume of blood in the ventricles but unaffected by IVF (P = 0.98). IVF promoted hematoma clearance, decreased mortality (22.4% vs. 40.9% with IVF vs. no IVF, respectively, P < 0.00001), improved good functional outcomes (47.2% [IVF] vs. 38.3% [no IVF], P = 0.03), and reduced the rate of catheter occlusion from 37.3% without IVF to 10.6% with IVF (P = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: We present evidence and best practice recommendations for the treatment of IVH with EVD and intraventricular fibrinolysis. Our analysis further provides a comprehensive quantitative reference of the most relevant clinical endpoints for future studies on novel IVH technologies and treatments.

Intraventricular Lavage vs External Ventricular Drainage for Intraventricular Hemorrhage: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Intraventricular lavage has been proposed as a minimally invasive method to evacuate intraventricular hemorrhage. There is little evidence to support its use. Objective: To evaluate the safety and potential efficacy of intraventricular lavage treatment of intraventricular hemorrhage. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-blinded, controlled, investigator-initiated 1:1 randomized clinical trial was conducted at Aarhus University Hospital and Odense University Hospital in Denmark from January 13, 2022, to November 24, 2022. Follow-up duration was 90 days. The trial was set to include 58 patients with intraventricular hemorrhage. Prespecified interim analysis was performed for the first 20 participants. Data were analyzed from February to April 2023. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive either intraventricular lavage or standard drainage. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was risk of catheter occlusions. Additional safety outcomes were catheter-related infections and procedure time, length of stay at the intensive care unit, duration of treatment, and 30-day mortality. The main outcome of the prespecified interim analysis was risk of severe adverse events. Efficacy outcomes were hematoma clearance, functional outcome, overall survival, and shunt dependency. Results: A total of 21 participants (median [IQR] age, 67 [59-82] years; 14 [66%] male) were enrolled, with 11 participants randomized to intraventricular lavage and 10 participants randomized to standard drainage; 20 participants (95%) had secondary intraventricular hemorrhage. The median (IQR) Graeb score was 9 (5-11), and the median (IQR) Glasgow Coma Scale score was 6.5 (4-8). The study was terminated early due to a significantly increased risk of severe adverse events associated with intraventricular lavage at interim analysis (risk difference for control vs intervention, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.06-0.81; P = .04; incidence rate ratio for control vs intervention, 6.0; 95% CI, 1.38-26.1; P = .01). The rate of catheter occlusion was higher for intraventricular lavage compared with drainage (6 of 16 patients [38%] vs 2 of 13 patients [7%]; hazard ratio, 4.4 [95% CI, 0.6-31.2]; P = .14), which met the prespecified α = .20 level. Median (IQR) procedure time for catheter placement was 53.5 (33-75) minutes for intraventricular lavage vs 12 (4-20) minutes for control (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial of intraventricular lavage vs standard drainage found that intraventricular lavage was encumbered with a significantly increased number of severe adverse events. Caution is recommended when using the device to ensure patient safety. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05204849.

Study protocol for ACTIVE study: safety and feasibility evaluation of external ventricular drainage with ACTIVE fluid exchange in intraventricular hemorrhage-a phase 2, multi-center, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Primary intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) or IVH secondary to intracerebral (ICH) and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) are known to have a very poor prognosis, with an expected mortality between 50 and 80% (Hinson et al. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 10:73-82, 2010). Clearance of IVH might improve patient outcome. METHODS: The study is designed as an investigator-initiated, comparative, prospective, multi-center, 1:1 randomized phase 2 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of active irrigation in external ventricular drainage (intervention arm-IRRAflow) compared to passive external ventricular drainage (control arm-EVD). The trial will enroll 58 patients with primary or secondary IVH. Major eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years of age, IVH documented on head CT or MRI scan (Graeb score ≥3), need of cerebrospinal fluid drainage, deterioration of consciousness or medical sedation at the time of enrollment, and indication for active treatment evaluated by the treating physicians. Exclusion criteria included patients with fixed and dilated pupils and pregnant or nursing women. The primary endpoint of the study is catheter occlusion evaluated by time to first observed occlusion from VC placement. Secondary endpoints include clearance of ventricular blood as measured by head CT scan, rates of catheter-related infection and shunt dependency, length of intensive care unit stay, functional status-Extended Glascow Outcome Scale (eGOS) and modified Rankin scale (mRS) at discharge to rehabilitation and 90 days-and mortality rates at 30 days and 90 days. DISCUSSION: With no standardized treatment for IVH and a poor prognosis, new treatments are needed. IVH patients often need CSF drainage to treat hydrocephalus and to decrease ICP. Standard treatment with passive external ventricular drainage is related to an increased risk of infections which is found in up to 22% of treated cases. The passive VC is known to have a risk of occlusion and is seen in 19-47% of the cases. We hypothesize that the use of active fluid change using the IRRAflow system will be safe and feasible and will reduce the occlusion and infection rates in patients with IVH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClicalTrials.gov NCT05204849. Registered 15 December 2021. Updated 24 January 2022.

National randomized clinical trial on subdural drainage time after chronic subdural hematoma evacuation.

OBJECTIVE: Placement of a subdural drain reduces recurrence and death after evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH), but little is known about optimal drainage duration. In the present national trial, the authors investigated the effect of drainage duration on recurrence and death. METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial involving all neurosurgical departments in Denmark, patients treated with single burr hole evacuation of CSDH were randomly assigned to 24 hours or 48 hours of postoperative passive subdural drainage. Follow-up duration was 90 days, and the primary study outcome was recurrent hematoma requiring reoperation. Secondary outcome was death. In addition, complications and length of hospital stay were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 420 included patients, 212 were assigned 24-hour drainage and 208 were assigned 48-hour drainage. The recurrence rate was 14% in the 24-hour group and 13% in the 48-hour group. Four patients died in the 24-hour group, and 8 patients died in the 48-hour group; this difference was not statistically significant. The ORs (95% CIs) for recurrence and mortality (48 hours vs 24 hours) were 0.94 (0.53-1.66) and 2.07 (0.64-7.85), respectively, in the intention-to-treat analysis. The ORs (95% CIs) for recurrence and mortality per 1-hour increase in drainage time were 1.0005 (0.9770-1.0244) and 1.0046 (0.9564-1.0554), respectively, in the as-treated sensitivity analysis that used the observed drainage times instead of the preassigned treatment groups. The rates of surgical and drain-related complications, postoperative infections, and thromboembolic events were not different between groups. The mean ± SD postoperative length of hospital stay was 7.4 ± 4.3 days for patients who received 24-hour drainage versus 8.4 ± 4.9 days for those who received 48-hour drainage (p = 0.14). The mean ± SD postoperative length of stay in the neurosurgical department was significantly shorter for the 24-hour group (2 ± 0.9 days vs 2.8 ± 1.6 days, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in the rates of recurrent hematoma or death during 90-day follow-up were identified between the two groups that randomly received either 24- or 48-hour passive subdural drainage after burr hole evacuation of CSDH.

[Anosmia and ageusia as primary symptoms of COVID-19].

This case report describes a physician in the early 30ies with subjective anosmia and ageusia as the major presenting symptoms of COVID-19. Apart from a week of slightly runny nose when coming from cold to warm air, the only symptom was a sudden onset of persistent anosmia and ageusia. Two weeks after normalisation of the mild sino-nasal symptoms, the patient was tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, and anosmia was verified with Sniffin' Sticks tests. Hypogeusia was verified with taste screening and two validated taste tests. Olfactory and gustatory loss may be underestimated symptoms of COVID-19.

Initial blood pressure is important for long-term outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) are at risk of developing neurogenic shock that causes hypotension and thereby secondary injury to the spinal cord due to ischemia. Hemodynamic treatment of patients with acute TSCI remains inadequately elucidated. Guidelines for management are divergent and based on limited evidence. To this end, the authors evaluated whether mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) during the prehospital and initial hospital phases of TSCI treatment is correlated with long-term neurological outcome. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective cohort study based on a chart review of MABP data collected during the prehospital transport, in the operating room (OR), and in the neurointensive care unit (NICU) during the first 7 days after trauma. Data from the NICU were divided into two periods: days 1-2 and days 3-7. Data were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation to evaluate for any correlation between MABP and changes in the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) score 1 year postinjury. In the analysis, the MABP target value was 80 mm Hg. Hypotension was treated with metaoxedrin or norepinephrine. Statistically significant differences were evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The chart review yielded 129 patients treated for TSCI. The inclusion period was 2010-2017. For the prehospital transport measurements of MABP, the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was a rho of 0.5662 (p < 0.001), for OR measurements it was a rho of 0.6818 (p < 0.001), and for the NICU measurements it was a rho of 0.4611 (p < 0.001); for NICU unit days 1-2 and days 3-7, the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was a rho of 0.2209 (p = 0.0681). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous MABP levels exceeding 80 mm Hg have a significant impact on neurological outcome-from earliest possible stabilization in the prehospital care, through hospital admission, the surgical phase, and into the first 2 days in the NICU.

[Sentinel node-positive melanoma].

Two recent randomised studies found no survival difference in patients, who had melanoma with metastasis to the sentinel node (SN) and underwent immediate complete lymph node dissection (CLND), compared with patients, who were followed closely with ultrasound scans and only underwent CLND if metastases developed. From 2018, the Danish guidelines concur: SN-positive patients will no longer undergo routine CLND, which has high morbidity, but will be followed with ultrasound scans of the SN-positive region(s) at their follow-up visits every third month for two years, then every six month for three years, except if PET-CT is performed.