Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Am Fam Physician ; 102(11): 679-691, 2020 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33252908

RESUMO

Parkinson disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder with significant morbidity and mortality. Most patients consult with their primary care physician about Parkinson disease symptoms before seeking care from a specialist. The diagnosis of Parkinson disease is clinical, and key disease features are bradykinesia, rigidity, and tremor. The main diagnostic signs of Parkinson disease are motor symptoms; however, Parkinson disease is also associated with nonmotor symptoms, including autonomic dysfunction, depression, and hallucinations, which can make the initial diagnosis of Parkinson disease difficult. Disease progression is variable and clinical signs cannot be used to predict progression accurately. Therapies, including levodopa, have not demonstrated the ability to slow disease progression. Motor symptoms are managed with carbidopa/levodopa, monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors, and nonergot dopamine agonists. Prolonged use and higher doses of levodopa result in dyskinesias and motor symptom fluctuations over time. Deep brain stimulation surgery is performed for patients who do not achieve adequate control with levodopa therapy. Deep brain stimulation is most effective for significant motor fluctuations, dyskinesias, and tremors. Nonmotor symptom therapies target patient-specific conditions during the disease course. Interdisciplinary team care can alleviate multiple symptoms of Parkinson disease.


Assuntos
Medicina de Família e Comunidade/métodos , Doença de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Doença de Parkinson/terapia , Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapêutico , Carbidopa/uso terapêutico , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Estimulação Encefálica Profunda , Progressão da Doença , Combinação de Medicamentos , Humanos , Levodopa/uso terapêutico , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Modalidades de Fisioterapia
2.
Am Fam Physician ; 100(1): 32-38, 2019 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31259501

RESUMO

Polypharmacy, defined as regular use of at least five medications, is common in older adults and younger at-risk populations and increases the risk of adverse medical outcomes. There are several risk factors that can lead to polypharmacy. Patient-related factors include having multiple medical conditions managed by multiple subspecialist physicians, having chronic mental health conditions, and residing in a long-term care facility. Systems-level factors include poorly updated medical records, automated refill services, and prescribing to meet disease-specific quality metrics. Tools that help identify potentially inappropriate medication use include the Beers, STOPP (screening tool of older people's prescriptions), and START (screening tool to alert to right treatment) criteria, and the Medication Appropriateness Index. No one tool or strategy has been shown to be superior in improving patient-related outcomes and decreasing polypharmacy risks. Monitoring patients' active medication lists and deprescribing any unnecessary medications are recommended to reduce pill burden, the risks of adverse drug events, and financial hardship. Physicians should view deprescribing as a therapeutic intervention similar to initiating clinically appropriate therapy. When deprescribing, physicians should consider patient/ caregiver perspectives on goals of therapy, including views on medications and chronic conditions and preferences and priorities regarding prescribing to slow disease progression, prevent health decline, and address symptoms. Point-of-care tools can aid physicians in deprescribing and help patients understand the need to decrease medication burden to reduce the risks of polypharmacy.


Assuntos
Desprescrições , Polimedicação , Idoso , Humanos , Múltiplas Afecções Crônicas/tratamento farmacológico , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropriados , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco
3.
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care ; 11(3-4): 346-66, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26654065

RESUMO

Informal caregivers for older adults often act as medical 'proxies' based on their assumed knowledge of the care recipient's illness-related symptoms. Differences between symptom descriptions given by care recipients and caregivers, however, raise questions about the validity of proxy reports. Community-dwelling caregivers and their care recipients with chronic, multi-morbid conditions revealed similar numbers of symptoms reported as well as average symptom distress. Dyads with care recipients who scored higher on negative affect were more likely to have significantly lower. Results suggested the possibility of identifying and intervening with dyads who may be 'at-risk' for divergent symptom reporting. This awareness may increase the ability to engage in informed and shared medical decision making throughout the illness trajectory.


Assuntos
Cuidadores/psicologia , Doença Crônica/psicologia , Tomada de Decisões , Nível de Saúde , Autorrelato/normas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cognição , Comunicação , Comorbidade , Depressão/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Serviço Social/métodos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estresse Psicológico/psicologia
4.
Gerontologist ; 58(2): e15-e24, 2018 03 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28499032

RESUMO

Purpose of Study: To develop a structured observational tool, the Resident-centered Assessment of Interactions with Staff and Engagement tool (RAISE), to measure 2 critical, multi-faceted, organizational-level aspects of person-centered care (PCC) in nursing homes: (a) resident engagement and (b) the quality and frequency of staff-resident interactions. Design and Methods: In this multi-method psychometric development study, we conducted (a) 120 hr of ethnographic observations in one nursing home and (b) a targeted literature review to enable construct development. Two constructs for which no current structured observation measures existed emerged from this phase: nursing home resident-staff engagement and interaction. We developed the preliminary RAISE to measure these constructs and used the tool in 8 nursing homes at an average of 16 times. We conducted 8 iterative psychometric testing and refinement cycles with multi-disciplinary research team members. Each cycle consisted of observations using the draft tool, results review, and tool modification. Results: The final RAISE included a set of coding rules and procedures enabling simultaneously efficient, non-reactive, and representative quantitative measurement of the interaction and engagement components of nursing home life for staff and residents. It comprised 8 observational variables, each represented by extensive numeric codes. Raters achieved adequate to high reliability with all variables. There is preliminary evidence of face and construct validity via expert panel review. Implications: The RAISE represents a valuable step forward in the measurement of PCC, providing objective, reliable data based on systematic observation.


Assuntos
Envelhecimento/psicologia , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Técnicas de Observação do Comportamento/métodos , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos , Casas de Saúde , Participação do Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Participação do Paciente/métodos , Participação do Paciente/psicologia , Relações Profissional-Paciente , Psicometria/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA