Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Am Surg ; 73(4): 337-43, 2007 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17439024

RESUMO

Little data exists addressing the relationship between initial margin status in a specimen from an excisional biopsy and the presence of residual carcinoma in a subsequent specimen from lumpectomy or mastectomy. We sought to determine the relationship between initial margin status and the presence of residual invasive cancer, and to identify any relationship to other variables. This study was a retrospective review of pathology reports of 582 early-stage invasive duct carcinomas with open excisional biopsies. The initial specimen was classified into one of six margin categories: multiply focally positive (n = 174), focally positive (n = 132), margins < 1 mm (n = 98), margins 1 to 2 mm (n = 20), margins > 2 mm (n = 46), and margins undetermined (n = 90). All patients had a subsequent definitive second procedure. Pathology reports from the second procedure revealed the presence of residual invasive cancer by initial margin status as follows: in 30 per cent of the initial procedures with multiply focally positive margins, in 22 per cent with focally positive margins, in 8 per cent, 15 per cent, and 4 per cent with margins of < 1 mm, 1 to 2 mm, and > 2 mm, respectively, and in 28 per cent with undetermined margins. Women with palpable tumors, larger tumor size, and positive axillary nodes were more likely to have multiply focal and focally positive margins. Multiply focally positive and focally positive margins had similar residual invasive carcinoma rates and should be re-excised. All clear margins were equivalent; thus, re-excision was not necessary.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patologia , Neoplasia Residual/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Mastectomia Segmentar , Neoplasia Residual/patologia , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Am Surg ; 72(8): 739-45, 2006 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16913320

RESUMO

Appendicitis, hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS), and intussusception are common conditions treated in most hospitals. In which hospital settings are children with these conditions treated? Are there differences in outcomes based on hospital characteristics? Our purpose was to use a nationwide database to address these questions. Data were extracted from Kids' Inpatient Database 2000. Data were queried by International Classification of Diseases procedure code for appendectomy and pyloromyotomy and by diagnosis code for intussusception. Length of stay (LOS) and hospital charges were analyzed based on hospital size, location, teaching status, and specialty designation. There were 73,618 appendectomies, with 5,910 (8%) in children's hospitals. Overall LOS was 3.1 days, and was the longest in children's hospitals (3.9). Overall charges were dollar 10,562, with the highest in children's hospitals (dollar 14,124). There were 11,070 pyloromyotomies, with 2,960 (27%) in children's hospitals. Overall LOS was 2.7 days, the shortest being in children's hospitals (2.5). Overall charges were dollar 7,938, with the highest in children's hospitals (dollar 8,676). There were 2,677 intussusceptions, with 921 (34%) in children's hospitals. Overall LOS was 3.0 days, the shortest being in children's hospitals (2.8). Overall charges were dollar 9,558, with the highest in children's hospitals (dollar 10,844). Most children with appendicitis, HPS, and intussusception are treated in nonspecialty hospitals. HPS (27%) and intussusception (34%) are more likely than appendicitis (8%) to be treated in children's hospitals. Children's hospitals have higher charges for all three conditions despite shorter LOS for HPS and intussusception.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Gerais/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Apendicite/cirurgia , Criança , Humanos , Intussuscepção/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estenose Pilórica/cirurgia , População Rural , Estados Unidos , População Urbana
3.
Am Surg ; 71(8): 662-5, 2005 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16217949

RESUMO

Imiquimod is a topical immune response modifier that has proved efficacious in the treatment of the superficial variant of basal cell carcinoma. The nodular variant of basal cell carcinoma has shown moderate response to imiquimod; other variants have not been tested. The mechanism of action is largely unknown; however, studies indicate the mechanism involves alteration of local cytokine production. The objective of this study is to evaluate the cytokine response of imiquimod in all variants of basal cell carcinoma. Ten patients were selected who had clinically and histologically proven basal cell carcinoma. All lesions were treated with imiquimod once a day, 5 days a week, for 3 weeks. After a 3-week rest period, the lesions were rebiopsied. All biopsy specimens were analyzed via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for various cytokines. Nine of 10 lesions resolved clinically, which included nodular, superficial, infiltrative, adenoid, and micronodular variants. The cytokine with the greatest change pre- and post-treatment was IL-8, which decreased an average of 44 per cent (P = 0.06). We concluded that topical 5 per cent imiquimod is an effective treatment of various subtypes of basal cell carcinoma. IL-8, which plays an important role in the development and metastasis of melanoma, may be involved in the mechanism of action of imiquimod on cutaneous malignancies. Larger studies are needed to prove the efficacy of imiquimod on nonsuperficial variants of basal cell carcinoma and cutaneous melanoma metastasis.


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Aminoquinolinas/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Basocelular/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Tópica , Biópsia , Carcinoma Basocelular/diagnóstico , Humanos , Imiquimode , Projetos Piloto , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Pele/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Am J Surg ; 186(6): 723-8; discussion 728-9, 2003 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14672786

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ductal cancer in situ (DCIS) is an increasingly frequent diagnosis in breast cancer, and management continues to challenge surgeons and oncologists. The purpose of our study was to examine local and national rates of breast conservation surgery and breast reconstruction surgery and to explore patient and surgeon factors associated with the procedures. METHODS: Review of the 1,342 patients in our institutional breast cancer database yielded 211 patients with DCIS. The sample of 211 patients was compared with a national (Nationwide Inpatient Sample [NIS]) database. Patient and surgeon factors associated with the use of breast conservative surgery (BCS) and breast reconstruction (BR) postmastectomy were identified. RESULTS: At our institution, the use of BCS steadily increased over ten years. Younger women with nonpalpable tumors, nonprivate insurance, and younger surgeons were more likely to have BCS. In 28 patients, breast reconstruction was performed: younger Caucasian women with private insurance and younger surgeons were more likely to undergo reconstruction. NIS data revealed that BCS was performed in 20% but that BCS did not increase over the 12-year period. CONCLUSIONS: There was a steady increase in the use of BCS for DCIS at our institution, but a consistent, and much lower, use nationally. To increase breast conservation and reconstruction for DCIS, educational efforts should especially be directed toward elderly women and elderly surgeons.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/cirurgia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Mamoplastia/estatística & dados numéricos , Mamoplastia/tendências , Mastectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Mastectomia/tendências , Mastectomia Segmentar/estatística & dados numéricos , Mastectomia Segmentar/tendências , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , North Carolina , Estados Unidos
5.
Am Surg ; 69(8): 663-7; discussion 668, 2003 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12953823

RESUMO

It has been estimated that 180,000 patients in the United States have end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis, and this number is currently increasing at a rate of 10 per cent per year. With the growing number of patients requiring hemodialysis the insertion and maintenance of dialysis access has become a common task for vascular surgeons. In fact dialysis access is now the most common vascular operation and may account for as much as 40 to 50 per cent of the practice of a busy vascular surgeon. The two major techniques for repairing thrombosed dialysis access grafts are open surgical revision and balloon angioplasty. Surgical revisions of access sites include patch angioplasty and interposition jump grafts. Balloon angioplasty involves declotting the graft mechanically or chemically followed by dilation of the stenotic segment by an angioplasty balloon under fluoroscopy. Few studies have compared the two methods of repair, and the studies that have been done reveal conflicting results. A retrospective chart review of patients treated at the New Hanover Regional Medical Center for repair of thrombosed dialysis access grafts was conducted. The final sample available for analysis consisted of 16 patients with balloon angioplasty and 44 patients with surgical revision. These two groups were compared in terms of demographics, past medical history, surgery time, complications, length of stay, length of graft patency, and typical costs. Overall balloon angioplasty as compared with surgical revision was associated with longer patency (5.5 vs 3.2 months), shorter surgical time (43.9 vs 64.5 minutes), shorter length of hospital stay (less than one day vs one day or more), and fewer complications (12% vs 30% of the patients). We concluded from this analysis that endovascular treatment of thrombosed dialysis grafts is an acceptable alternative to surgical revision and should be the first option after primary failure of the grafts caused by stenotic lesions.


Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Trombose/terapia , Angioplastia com Balão/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Diálise Renal , Estudos Retrospectivos , Trombose/etiologia , Trombose/cirurgia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular
6.
J Pediatr Surg ; 43(1): 102-8, 2008 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18206465

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Both pediatric and general surgeons perform pyloromyotomy. Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy (LAP), and changes in referral patterns have affected the training of pediatric surgery fellows and general surgery residents. We surveyed pediatric surgeons regarding these issues. METHODS: We mailed an Institutional Review Board of New Hanover Regional Medical Center-approved survey to 701 members of the American Pediatric Surgical Association within the United States to determine each surgeon's preferred technique for pyloromyotomy (LAP vs Ramstedt or transumbilical procedures [OPEN]), practice setting, involvement with trainees, and opinions regarding pyloromyotomy. Significance was determined using chi(2) analyses. RESULTS: A total of 331 (48%) surgeons responded: 197 (60%) performed most or all OPEN, and 85 (26%), most or all LAP. Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy was more likely in academic practices and children's hospitals (P < .05). Residents under surgeons performing LAP were less likely to participate (58% vs 91%; P < .05) or gain competence (22% vs 42%; P < .5). Only 34% of surgeons performing LAP believed that general surgery residents should learn pyloromyotomy, whereas 67% of surgeons performing OPEN believed that residents should learn the procedure (P < .05). A total of 307 (93%) surgeons believed at least 4 OPEN were necessary to become competent, but 126 (44%) reported that their residents performed fewer than 4. Only 104 (31%) surgeons believed that their residents were competent in pyloromyotomy. There were 303 (92%) surgeons who believed that pyloromyotomy should be performed only by pediatric surgeons when possible. CONCLUSIONS: Most general surgical residents are not learning pyloromyotomy, in part because of the adoption of laparoscopic technique, limited operative experience, and the opinion of most pediatric surgeons that the procedure should be performed only by pediatric surgeons.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Estenose Pilórica/cirurgia , Adulto , Análise de Variância , Estudos Transversais , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Feminino , Seguimentos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Internato e Residência , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparotomia/métodos , Masculino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/educação , Análise Multivariada , Pediatria/educação , Probabilidade , Medição de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA