RESUMO
There are many important unanswered issues regarding the occurrence of cognitive impairment in physicians, such as detection of deficits, remediation efforts, policy implications for safe medical practice, and the need to safeguard quality patient care. The authors review existing literature on these complex issues and derive heuristic formulations regarding how to help manage the professional needs of the aging physician with dementia. To ensure safe standards of medical care while also protecting the needs of physicians and their families, state regulatory or licensing agencies in collaboration with state medical associations and academic medical centers should generate evaluation guidelines to assure continued high levels of functioning. The authors also raise the question of whether age should be considered as a risk factor that merits special screening for adequate functioning. Either age-related screening for cognitive impairment should be initiated or rigorous evaluation after lapses in standard of care should be the norm regardless of age. Ultimately, competence rather than mandatory retirement due to age per se should be the deciding factor regarding whether physicians should be able to continue their practice. Finally, the authors issue a call for an expert consensus panel to convene to make recommendations concerning aging physicians with cognitive impairment who are at risk for medical errors.
Assuntos
Envelhecimento/fisiologia , Transtornos Cognitivos/psicologia , Demência/diagnóstico , Médicos/psicologia , Envelhecimento/psicologia , Competência Clínica/normas , Transtornos Cognitivos/diagnóstico , Demência/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Inabilitação do Médico/psicologiaRESUMO
Preclinical and uncontrolled human studies have suggested the possible efficacy of second-generation antipsychotics, particularly olanzapine, in treating cocaine dependence. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which 48 cocaine-dependent subjects received olanzapine or identical-appearing placebo for 16 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of cocaine-negative weekly urine screens during treatment. Secondary measures included scores on a Craving Questionnaire, Addiction Severity Index subscales, and extrapyramidal symptom scales. Olanzapine and placebo did not differ on any outcome measure. Both olanzapine and placebo subjects frequently reported side effects, but no unexpected ones. We conclude that olanzapine appears ineffective for cocaine dependence.
Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Cocaína/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Benzodiazepinas/efeitos adversos , Cocaína/urina , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Olanzapina , Placebos , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Resultado do Tratamento , VeteranosRESUMO
Under-recognition of somatic symptoms associated with panic in primary care settings results in unnecessary and costly diagnostic procedures and inappropriate referrals to cardiologists, gastroenterologists, and neurologists. In the current study specialists' knowledge regarding the nature and treatment of panic were examined. One-hundred and fourteen specialists completed a questionnaire assessing their knowledge about panic attacks, including their perceptions of psychologists' role in treating panic. Respondents answered 51% of knowledge items correctly. Although most knew the definition of a panic attack, they knew less about clinical features of panic and its treatment. Specifically, whereas 97.4% believed medication effectively relieves panic symptoms, only 32.5% knew that cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is a first-line treatment. Only 6% reported knowing how to implement CBT, and only 56.1% recognized that psychologists could effectively treat panic. These findings demonstrate significant gaps in specialists' knowledge about panic and the need to enhance physician knowledge about panic attacks and their treatment.
Assuntos
Ansiedade/terapia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Somatoformes/terapia , Adulto , Análise de Variância , Ansiedade/psicologia , Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Médicos de Família/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Somatoformes/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , TexasRESUMO
This study compares the effectiveness of panic control treatment (PCT) with that of a psychoeducational supportive treatment (PE-SUP) in treating panic disorder among a veteran sample with a primary diagnosis of chronic posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Thirty-five patients randomized to receive 10 individual sessions of either PCT or PE-SUP underwent assessments at pretreatment, at 1-week posttreatment, and at a 3-month follow-up. Intent-to-treat analyses of covariance showed that PCT participants significantly improved on panic severity at posttreatment and panic fear at the 3-month follow-up. The PCT group also showed significant reductions in anxiety sensitivity at posttreatment and follow-up compared with that of the PE-SUP group. A significantly higher proportion of persons (63%) in the PCT group was panic free by the follow-up period compared with that of the PE-SUP group (19%). Patient self-report and clinician ratings showed no changes in general anxiety, depression, and PTSD symptoms in either group. These findings indicated that PCT was superior to an active control therapy in reducing the frequency, severity, and distress associated with panic disorder and suggested that brief cognitive-behavioral therapy for panic is effective for persons with chronic PTSD.
Assuntos
Agorafobia/terapia , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/métodos , Distúrbios de Guerra/terapia , Transtorno de Pânico/terapia , Veteranos/psicologia , Adulto , Agorafobia/diagnóstico , Agorafobia/psicologia , Doença Crônica , Distúrbios de Guerra/diagnóstico , Distúrbios de Guerra/psicologia , Comorbidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtorno de Pânico/diagnóstico , Transtorno de Pânico/psicologia , Inventário de PersonalidadeRESUMO
The authors randomized 101 male veterans with chronic combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depressive disorder to an evidence-based depression treatment (self-management therapy; n = 51) or active-control therapy (n = 50). Main outcome measures for efficacy, using intention-to-treat analyses, were subjective and objective PTSD and depression scales at pretest, posttest, and 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. Other measures included treatment compliance, satisfaction, treatment-targeted constructs, functioning, service utilization, and costs. Self-management therapy's modestly greater improvement on depression symptoms at treatment completion disappeared on follow-up. No other differences on symptoms or functioning appeared, although psychiatric outpatient utilization and overall outpatient costs were lower with self-management therapy. Despite success in other depressed populations, self-management therapy produced no clinically significant effect in depression with chronic PTSD.
Assuntos
Distúrbios de Guerra/terapia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/terapia , Transtorno Distímico/terapia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Psicoterapia de Grupo , Autocuidado/psicologia , Veteranos/psicologia , Distúrbios de Guerra/diagnóstico , Distúrbios de Guerra/economia , Distúrbios de Guerra/psicologia , Terapia Combinada , Comorbidade , Análise Custo-Benefício , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/economia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/psicologia , Transtorno Distímico/diagnóstico , Transtorno Distímico/economia , Transtorno Distímico/psicologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Serviços de Saúde/economia , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Serviços de Saúde Mental/economia , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/economia , Psicoterapia de Grupo/economia , Psicotrópicos/uso terapêutico , Autocuidado/economia , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Little is known about the frequency of the full-range of personality disorders in outpatients with concurrent posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression, a common and oftentimes treatment-resistant combination in clinical practice. In a group therapy outcome study, Axis I and II diagnoses were assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV and the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale to select 115 male combat veterans with PTSD and depressive disorder. Within this sample, 52 (45.2%) had one or more personality disorders--most commonly paranoid (17.4%), obsessive-compulsive (16.5%), avoidant (12.2%), and borderline (8.7%)--and 19 (16.5%) had two or more. Documenting a substantial frequency of personality disorders is a first step in devising appropriate interventions for this treatment-resistant combination of disorders.