Inhibitory effect of topical antibiotics/antiseptics administration on bacterial growth in the open wound of the jawbone surgery: Randomized controlled, preliminary study.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: TThe bone cavities after extirpation of cysts or tumor of the jawbone requires the insertion of gauze containing various antibiotics/antiseptics to minimize the risk of pain, bleeding, and surgical site infection (SSI). However, there have been few reports on the efficacy of topical administration of antibiotics/antiseptics to an open wound of the jawbone. To compare the inhibitory effects of topical povidone-iodine gel and tetracycline ointment on the jawbone wound bacterial growth after extirpation of cyst or tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a preliminary, randomized controlled, open-labeled trial. Eighteen patients were randomly assigned into two groups. In povidone-iodine (PI) group, gauze mixed with povidone-iodine gel was inserted into the bone cavity wound, and in tetracycline (TC) group gauze mixed with tetracycline ointment was inserted after extirpation of cyst or tumor of the jaw bone. In both groups, gauze was removed 48 h after surgery, and examined by bacterial culture and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers detecting total bacteria and MRSA. RESULTS: The topical application of tetracycline ointment was superior to that of povidone-iodine gel concerning inhibitory effects of total bacteria and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). CONCLUSION: This preliminary study suggests that the insertion of gauze mixed with tetracycline ointment is recommended for bone wounds after extirpation of cyst or tumor of the oral cavity.

Semi-fixed versus fixed oral appliance therapy for obstructive sleep apnea: A randomized crossover pilot study.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Although mandibular advancement oral appliances (OAs) are the most widely used and accepted therapeutic modality for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), whether these maxillary and mandibular appliances should be semi-fixed or fixed remains uncertain. This randomized crossover pilot study compared the efficacy, side effects, and patient preference of semi-fixed and fixed OAs for the treatment of OSA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with mild to moderate OSA were recruited and randomly assigned to either the semi-fixed or fixed OA group, whereby they used their assigned OA for the first 4 weeks, followed by assessments for sleep parameters (including the Apnea-Hypopnea Index [AHI]) and temporomandibular joint pain as a side effect. After a two-week washout period, patients were switched to the alternative OA for 4 weeks, followed by repeated assessments. Patient preference was assessed at the end of the completed treatment period. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled and completed the full study protocol. Both types of OAs were efficient in reducing the patient's AHI in comparison to baseline (i.e., without OA). However, there was no significant difference in AHI reduction between the semi-fixed and fixed OA devices. Regarding the side effect of temporomandibular joint pain and patient preference, the semi-fixed OA device was superior to the fixed OA device on both measures. CONCLUSION: While both semi-fixed and fixed OAs are effective in treating patients with OSA, semi-fixed OAs are superior in regards to both patient preference and reduced side effects. Thus, semi-fixed OAs may be the preferred therapeutic modality for OSA.