Reporting involvement activities with children and young people in paediatric research: a framework analysis.

BACKGROUND: The active involvement of patients and the public in the design and delivery of health research has been increasingly encouraged, if not enforced. Knowledge of how this is realised in practice, especially where children and young people (CYP) are concerned, is limited, partly due to the low level of reporting of patient and public involvement (PPI) in general. The aim of this work was to assess how researchers funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) report the involvement of CYP in the design and conduct of child health research to better understand the opportunities offered to CYP, and the realities of involvement in practice. METHODS: A participation matrix, analysis framework and accompanying tools were adapted from existing frameworks, including a child-rights informed framework, the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public Checklist Short Form (GRIPP2SF), and NIHR reporting expectations. Child-focused research reports were identified from the NIHR Journals Library, including any interventional or observational study involving CYP aged 0-< 24 years. In two co-design workshops with healthcare professionals and CYP, we tested and refined the participation matrix, analysis framework and accompanying tools. RESULTS: Only thirty-two NIHR reports out of 169 (19%) were identified as relevant and included reporting of PPI with CYP. We identified significant variability in the way PPI with CYP was reported. Only 4/32 (12%) reports fully met NIHR (and GRIPP2SF) reporting criteria. Only 3/32 (9%) reports formally evaluated or self-reflected on PPI activities with CYP, whilst 15/32 (47%) provided minimal information about CYP involvement. The most common approach to involving CYP (23/32, 72%) was through the medium of existing groups or networks. CONCLUSION: Despite the NIHR's commitment to increase the quality, transparency, and consistency of reporting PPI, the reporting of involvement with CYP remains sub-optimal. Neglecting to report key details of involvement methods and impacts deprives the research community of knowledge to advance the field of delivering 'meaningful' PPI with CYP. Practical guidance on how researchers can report the processes and outputs of CYP involvement more rigorously may help child health researchers to involve them more meaningfully. This research offers practical tools informed by CYP to aid the reporting process.

BACKGROUND: Children and young people can (and should) be involved in the design of child-health research. How this works in practice is limited due to the low-level reporting of involvement activities. AIM: We wanted to understand how researchers funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) are reporting involvement activities with children and young people in child-health research. WHAT WE DID AND HOW WE DID IT: A team of healthcare researchers (working in child-health research), a parent, and children and young people adapted existing tools to assess how the involvement of children and young people is reported in child-health research. We looked at reports in an online library to see how researchers are meeting the reporting guidelines set by the NIHR. FINDINGS: Despite the reporting guidelines provided by the NIHR, only four out of thirty-two reports followed this. It is still unclear who is involved, why, and what outcomes and impact involvement has on the research process, on children and young people and/or on researchers. This is a missed opportunity to learn from previous experiences and to build on good practice. Further work is needed to understand why and how the NIHR, and other funders of health research collect such information, and what their plans are for sharing the findings with the wider research community.

Identifying common health indicators from paediatric core outcome sets: a systematic review with narrative synthesis using the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Health and Disability.

BACKGROUND: Indicators of child health have the potential to inform societal conversations, decision-making and prioritisation. Paediatric core outcome sets are an increasingly common way of identifying a minimum set of outcomes for trials within clinical groups. Exploring commonality across existing sets may give insight into universally important and inclusive child health indicators. METHODS: A search of the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trial register from 2008 to 2022 was carried out. Eligible articles were those reporting on core outcome sets focused on children and young people aged 0-18 years old. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) was used as a framework to categorise extracted outcomes. Information about the involvement of children, young people and their families in the development of sets was also extracted. RESULTS: 206 articles were identified, of which 36 were included. 441 unique outcomes were extracted, mapping to 22 outcome clusters present across multiple sets. Medical diagnostic outcomes were the biggest cluster, followed by pain, communication and social interaction, mobility, self-care and school. Children and young people's views were under-represented across core outcome sets, with only 36% of reviewed studies including them at any stage of development. CONCLUSIONS: Existing paediatric core outcome sets show overlap in key outcomes, suggesting the potential for generic child health measurement frameworks. It is unclear whether existing sets best reflect health dimensions important to children and young people, and there is a need for better child and young person involvement in health indicator development to address this.

Wearable Technologies for Children with Chronic Illnesses: An Exploratory Approach.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of wearable technologies in physical activity assessment in three paediatric diseases, namely, Niemann-Pick C (NP-C), Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) and Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD). DESIGN: Exploratory study SETTING AND PATIENTS: Thirty children were recruited across three UK hospitals (Royal Manchester's Children Hospital, Great Ormond Street Children's Hospital, and the Great North Children's Hospital). Ten were diagnosed with NP-C, eight with DMD and twelve with JIA. INTERVENTION: All participants completed the 6-min walk test (6MWT) at enrolment. Patients were provided with disease-specific smartphone apps paired with a wearable device via Bluetooth. Ambulation was recorded in 30-min epochs measuring average daily maximum (ADM), average daily steps (ADS) and average daily steps per 30-min epoch (ASE). RESULTS: Median 6MWT results were 450 m, 325 m and 434.5 m for the NP-C, DMD and JIA cohorts, respectively. Wearable data capture was feasible in all three disease cohorts, although complete data capture was not sustained. A statistically significant between-cohort difference was identified for ADM, ADS and ASE. Statistically significant differences were found between DMD/JIA for ADM; NP-C/DMD for ADS and DMD/JIA for ASE. DISCUSSION: Wearable sensor technologies have the potential to provide additional information for our understanding of ambulation in chronic paediatric disease. The wearable devices were easy to use and popular with patients although key features need to be addressed to appropriately meet study objectives. As the technology continues to evolve at a rapid pace, opportunities to implement child friendly solutions are already available.