Characteristics of Patients Hospitalized in Rural and Urban ICUs From 2010 to 2019.

OBJECTIVES: Rural hospitals are threatened by workforce shortages and financial strain. To optimize regional critical care delivery, it is essential to understand what types of patients receive intensive care in rural and urban hospitals. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND PATIENTS: All fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in the United States who were 65 years old or older hospitalized in an ICU between 2010 and 2019 were included. Rural and urban hospitals were classified according to the 2013 National Center For Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties. Patient comorbidities, primary diagnoses, organ dysfunction, and procedures were measured using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th revisions diagnosis and procedure codes. Standardized differences were used to compare rural and urban patient admission characteristics. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 12,224,097 ICU admissions between 2010 and 2019, and 1,488,347 admissions (12.2%) were to rural hospitals. The most common diagnoses in rural hospitals were cardiac (30.3%), infectious (24.6%), and respiratory (10.9%). Patients in rural ICUs had similar organ dysfunction compared with urban hospitals (mean organ failures in rural ICUs 0.5, sd 0.8; mean organ failures in urban ICUs 0.6, sd 0.9, absolute standardized mean difference 0.096). Organ dysfunction among rural ICU admissions increased over time (0.4 mean organ failures in 2010 to 0.7 in 2019, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Rural hospitals care for an increasingly complex critically ill patient population with similar organ dysfunction as urban hospitals. There is a pressing need to develop policies at federal and regional healthcare system levels to support the continued provision of high-quality ICU care within rural hospitals.

Inter-hospital Transfer Decision-making During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Inter-hospital patient transfers to hospitals with greater resource availability and expertise may improve clinical outcomes. However, there is little guidance regarding how patient transfer requests should be prioritized when hospital resources become scarce. OBJECTIVE: To understand the experiences of healthcare workers involved in the process of accepting inter-hospital patient transfers during a pandemic surge and determine factors impacting inter-hospital patient transfer decision-making. DESIGN: We conducted a qualitative study consisting of semi-structured interviews between October 2021 and February 2022. PARTICIPANTS: Eligible participants were physicians, nurses, and non-clinician administrators involved in the process of accepting inter-hospital patient transfers. Participants were recruited using maximum variation sampling. APPROACH: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare workers across Michigan. KEY RESULTS: Twenty-one participants from 15 hospitals were interviewed (45.5% of eligible hospitals). About half (52.4%) of participants were physicians, 38.1% were nurses, and 9.5% were non-clinician administrators. Three domains of themes impacting patient transfer decision-making emerged: decision-maker, patient, and environmental factors. Decision-makers described a lack of guidance for transfer decision-making. Patient factors included severity of illness, predicted chance of survival, need for specialized care, and patient preferences for medical care. Decision-making occurred within the context of environmental factors including scarce resources at accepting and requesting hospitals, organizational changes to transfer processes, and alternatives to patient transfer including use of virtual care. Participants described substantial moral distress related to transfer triaging. CONCLUSIONS: A lack of guidance in transfer processes may result in considerable variation in the patients who are accepted for inter-hospital transfer and in substantial moral distress among decision-makers involved in the transfer process. Our findings identify potential organizational changes to improve the inter-hospital transfer process and alleviate the moral distress experienced by decision-makers.

Historic Use of Race-Based Spirometry Values Lowered Transplant Priority for Black Patients.

BACKGROUND: The lung allocation score (LAS) is a tool used to prioritize patients for lung transplantation. For patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), spirometry data are used for the LAS calculation. Spirometry values such as a FVC are subjected to race-specific equations that determine expected values. The effect of race-specific equations in LAS score remains unknown. RESEARCH QUESTION: Did the use of a race-based spirometry equation lead to longer waitlist times for Black patients? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients listed for lung transplantation from 2005 through 2020 using publicly available data from the United Network for Organ Sharing. We recalculated LAS scores for Black patients using White-specific equations with the available variables. The primary objective was to evaluate the effect of race-specific equations on LAS scores and time on the transplant waitlist. RESULTS: A total of 33,845 patients listed for lung transplantation were included in the analysis. White patients were listed at lower LAS scores, a higher proportion of White patients underwent transplantation, and White patients died on the waitlist at lower rates. When recalculating LAS scores using White-specific equations, Black patients with ILD had up to a 1.9-point higher score, which resulted in additional waitlist time. INTERPRETATION: Race-specific equations led to longer wait times in Black patients listed for lung transplantation. The use of race-based equations widened already known disparities in pulmonary transplantation.

Rural-Urban Differences in Mortality among Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Intensive and Intermediate Care.

Rationale: Intermediate care (also termed "step-down" or "moderate care") has been proposed as a lower cost alternative to care for patients who may not clearly benefit from intensive care unit admission. Intermediate care units may be appealing to hospitals in financial crisis, including those in rural areas. Outcomes of patients receiving intermediate care are not widely described. Objectives: To examine relationships among rurality, location of care, and mortality for mechanically ventilated patients. Methods: Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older who received invasive mechanical ventilation between 2010 and 2019 were included. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association between admission to a rural or an urban hospital and 30-day mortality, with separate analyses for patients in general, intermediate, and intensive care. Models were adjusted for age, sex, area deprivation index, primary diagnosis, severity of illness, year, comorbidities, and hospital volume. Results: There were 2,752,492 hospitalizations for patients receiving mechanical ventilation from 2010 to 2019, and 193,745 patients (7.0%) were in rural hospitals. The proportion of patients in rural intermediate care increased from 4.1% in 2010 to 6.3% in 2019. Patient admissions to urban hospitals remained relatively stable. Patients in rural and urban intensive care units had similar adjusted 30-day mortality, at 46.7% (adjusted absolute risk difference -0.1% [95% confidence interval, -0.7% to 0.6%]; P = 0.88). However, adjusted 30-day mortality for patients in rural intermediate care was significantly higher (36.9%) than for patients in urban intermediate care (31.3%) (adjusted absolute risk difference 5.6% [95% confidence interval, 3.7% to 7.6%]; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Hospitalization in rural intermediate care was associated with increased mortality. There is a need to better understand how intermediate care is used across hospitals and to carefully evaluate the types of patients admitted to intermediate care units.

Emotional Experiences and Coping Strategies of Family Members of Critically Ill Patients.

BACKGROUND: Two out of three family members experience symptoms of posttraumatic stress, depression, or anxiety lasting for months after the ICU stay. Interventions aimed at mitigating these symptoms have been unsuccessful. RESEARCH QUESTION: To understand the emotional experiences of family members of critically ill patients and to identify coping strategies used by family members during the ICU stay. STUDY DESIGN: and Methods: As part of a mixed methods study to understand sources of distress among ICU family members, semistructured interviews were conducted with ICU family members. Family members completed surveys at the time of interview and at 90 days to assess for symptoms of depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress. RESULTS: Semistructured interviews and baseline surveys were conducted with 40 ICU family members; 78% of participants (n = 31) completed follow-up surveys at 90 days. At the time of interview, 65% of family members had symptoms of depression, anxiety, or posttraumatic stress. At 90 days, 48% of surveyed family members had symptoms of psychological distress. Three primary emotions were identified among ICU family members: sadness, anger, and fear. A diverse array of coping strategies was used by family members, including problem-solving, information seeking, avoidance/escape, self-reliance, support seeking, and accommodation. INTERPRETATION: This study emphasizes similarities in emotions but diversity in coping strategies used by family members in the ICU. Understanding the relationship between ICU experiences, emotional responses, and long-term psychological outcomes may guide targeted interventions to improve mental health outcomes of ICU family members.