Sudden death in patients with myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, or both.

BACKGROUND: The risk of sudden death from cardiac causes is increased among survivors of acute myocardial infarction with reduced left ventricular systolic function. We assessed the risk and time course of sudden death in high-risk patients after myocardial infarction. METHODS: We studied 14,609 patients with left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, or both after myocardial infarction to assess the incidence and timing of sudden unexpected death or cardiac arrest with resuscitation in relation to the left ventricular ejection fraction. RESULTS: Of 14,609 patients, 1067 (7 percent) had an event a median of 180 days after myocardial infarction: 903 died suddenly, and 164 were resuscitated after cardiac arrest. The risk was highest in the first 30 days after myocardial infarction--1.4 percent per month (95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 1.6 percent)--and decreased to 0.14 percent per month (95 percent confidence interval, 0.11 to 0.18 percent) after 2 years. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 30 percent or less were at highest risk in this early period (rate, 2.3 percent per month; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.8 to 2.8 percent). Nineteen percent of all sudden deaths or episodes of cardiac arrest with resuscitation occurred within the first 30 days after myocardial infarction, and 83 percent of all patients who died suddenly did so in the first 30 days after hospital discharge. Each decrease of 5 percentage points in the left ventricular ejection fraction was associated with a 21 percent adjusted increase in the risk of sudden death or cardiac arrest with resuscitation in the first 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of sudden death is highest in the first 30 days after myocardial infarction among patients with left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, or both. Thus, earlier implementation of strategies for preventing sudden death may be warranted in selected patients.

[Thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke with streptokinase]. / Akut ischaemiás stroke thrombolyticus kezelése sztreptokinázzal.

AIM AND METHODS: In an open, observational study, 40 consecutive ischemic stroke patients eligible for thrombolytic therapy using the combined ECASS/NINDS inclusion criteria have been treated intravenously with 1.5 M units of streptokinase. The therapeutic window was 3 hours or shorter. RESULTS: The safety analysis documented a low rate (5%) of intracerebral hemorrhages, and an additional 13% rate of hemorrhagic transformation of the initial infarction. Two patients died due to intracerebral bleeding. The efficacy of the SK thrombolysis was significant in 53% of the patients (the mean of the improvement on the NIH stroke scale was 15 points), while an other 42% of the patients achieved only the mean of 4 points improvement on their NIHSS score. DISCUSSION: These results are of the same magnitude, as those documented in the NINDS trial with rt-PA. Time window rather than the thrombolytic agent itself seems to be the decisive factor for successful thrombolysis. CONCLUSION: The good safety profile of SK in acute stroke using the ECASS/NINDS criteria, and the cost-effectiveness of the drug underline the necessity of a new SK trial with the recently accepted inclusion and exclusion criteria.