Twelve years of assessing the quality of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders.

OBJECTIVE: Genomics Quality Assessment has provided external quality assessments (EQAs) for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for 12 years for eight monogenic diseases to identify sub-optimal PGT strategies, testing and reporting of results, which can be shared with the genomics community to aid optimised standards of PGT services for couples. METHOD: The EQAs were provided in two stages to mimic end-to-end protocols. Stage 1 involved DNA feasibility testing of a couple undergoing PGT and affected proband. Participants were required to report genotyping results and outline their embryo testing strategy. Lymphoblasts were distributed for mock embryo testing for stage 2. Submitted clinical reports and haplotyping results were assessed against peer-ratified criteria. Performance was monitored to identify poor performance. RESULTS: The most common testing methodology was short tandem repeat linkage analysis (59%); however, the adoption of single nucleotide polymorphism-based platforms was observed and a move from blastomere to trophectoderm testing. There was a variation in testing strategies, assigning marker informativity and understanding test limitations, some clinically unsafe. Critical errors were reported for genotyping and interpretation. CONCLUSION: EQA provides an overview of the standard of preimplantation genetic testing-M clinical testing and identifies areas of improvement for accurate detection of high-risk embryos.

Development and clinical application of a preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease (PGT-M) for beta thalassemia in Vietnam.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this research is to study the clinical outcomes using a next-generation sequencing-based protocol allowing for simultaneous testing of mutations in the beta thalassemia (HBB) gene, including single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers for PGT-M along with low-pass whole genome analysis of chromosome aneuploidies for PGT-A. METHODS: A combined PGT-M (thalassemia) plus PGT-A system was developed for patients undergoing IVF in Vietnam. Here we developed a system for testing numerous thalassemia mutations plus SNP-based testing for backup mutation analysis and contamination control using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Low -pass next-generation sequencing was used to assess aneuploidy in some of the clinical PGT cases. Patients underwent IVF followed by embryo biopsy at the blastocyst stage for combined PGT-A/M. RESULTS: Two cases have completed the entire process including transfer of embryos, while a further nine cases have completed the IVF and PGT-M/A analysis but have not completed embryo transfer. In the two cases with embryo transfer, both patients achieved pregnancy with an unaffected, euploid embryo confirmed through prenatal diagnosis. In the further nine cases, 39 embryos were biopsied and all passed QC for amplification. There were 8 unaffected embryos, 31 carrier embryos, and 11 affected embryos. A subset of 24 embryos also had PGT-A analysis with 22 euploid embryos and 2 aneuploid embryos. CONCLUSIONS: Here we report the development and clinical application of a combined PGT-M for HBB and PGT-A for gross chromosome aneuploidies from 11 patients with detailed laboratory findings along with 2 cases that have completed embryo transfer.

Current issues in medically assisted reproduction and genetics in Europe: research, clinical practice, ethics, legal issues and policy.

STUDY QUESTION: How has the interface between genetics and assisted reproduction technology (ART) evolved since 2005? SUMMARY ANSWER: The interface between ART and genetics has become more entwined as we increase our understanding about the genetics of infertility and we are able to perform more comprehensive genetic testing. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In March 2005, a group of experts from the European Society of Human Genetics and European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology met to discuss the interface between genetics and ART and published an extended background paper, recommendations and two Editorials. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: An interdisciplinary workshop was held, involving representatives of both professional societies and experts from the European Union Eurogentest2 Coordination Action Project. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: In March 2012, a group of experts from the European Society of Human Genetics, the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology and the EuroGentest2 Coordination Action Project met to discuss developments at the interface between clinical genetics and ART. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: As more genetic causes of reproductive failure are now recognized and an increasing number of patients undergo testing of their genome prior to conception, either in regular health care or in the context of direct-to-consumer testing, the need for genetic counselling and PGD may increase. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) thus far does not have evidence from RCTs to substantiate that the technique is both effective and efficient. Whole genome sequencing may create greater challenges both in the technological and interpretational domains, and requires further reflection about the ethics of genetic testing in ART and PGD/PGS. Diagnostic laboratories should be reporting their results according to internationally accepted accreditation standards (ISO 15189). Further studies are needed in order to address issues related to the impact of ART on epigenetic reprogramming of the early embryo. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The legal landscape regarding assisted reproduction is evolving, but still remains very heterogeneous and often contradictory. The lack of legal harmonization and uneven access to infertility treatment and PGD/PGS fosters considerable cross-border reproductive care in Europe, and beyond. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This continually evolving field requires communication between the clinical genetics and IVF teams and patients to ensure that they are fully informed and can make well-considered choices. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: Funding was received from ESHRE, ESHG and EuroGentest2 European Union Coordination Action project (FP7 - HEALTH-F4-2010-26146) to support attendance at this meeting.

Karyomapping: a universal method for genome wide analysis of genetic disease based on mapping crossovers between parental haplotypes.

The use of genome wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays for high resolution molecular cytogenetic analysis using a combination of quantitative and genotype analysis is well established. This study demonstrates that by Mendelian analysis of the SNP genotypes of the parents and a sibling or other appropriate family member to establish phase, it is possible to identify informative loci for each of the four parental haplotypes across each chromosome and map the inheritance of these haplotypes and the position of any crossovers in the proband. The resulting 'karyomap', unlike a karyotype, identifies the parental and grandparental origin of each chromosome and chromosome segment and is unique for every individual being defined by the independent segregation of parental chromosomes and the pattern of non-recombinant and recombinant chromosomes. Karyomapping, therefore, enables both genome wide linkage based analysis of inheritance and detection of chromosome imbalance where either both haplotypes from one parent are present (trisomy) or neither are present (monosomy/deletion). The study also demonstrates that karyomapping is possible at the single cell level following whole genome amplification and, without any prior patient or disease specific test development, provides a universal linkage based methodology for preimplantation genetic diagnosis readily available worldwide.

What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? A position statement from the ESHRE PGD Consortium Steering Committee.

Since 2004, there have been 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) mainly for advanced maternal age (AMA), which have shown no benefit of performing preimplantation genetic screening (PGS). Ten of the RCTs have been performed at the cleavage stage and one at the blastocyst stage. It is probable that the high levels of chromosomal mosaicism at cleavage stages, which may result in the tested cell not being representative of the embryo, and the inability to examine all of the chromosomes using fluorescence in situ hybridization, have contributed to the lack of positive outcome from the RCTs. We suggest that future RCTs should examine alternative biopsy timing (polar body and/or trophectoderm biopsy), and should apply technologies that allow more comprehensive testing to include all chromosomes (microarray-based testing) to determine if PGS shows an improvement in delivery rate. Currently there is no evidence that routine PGS is beneficial for patients with AMA and conclusive data (RCTs) on repeated miscarriage, implantation failure and severe male factor are missing. To evaluate benefits of PGS, an ESHRE trial has recently been started on patients with AMA using polar body biopsy and array-comparative genomic hybridization, which should bring more information on this patient group in the near future.

Aneuploidy Screening using Next Generation Sequencing.

Chromosomal aneuploidy is recognized to be a significant contributing factor in implantation failure and spontaneous miscarriage Hellani et al. (Reprod Biomed Online 17:841-847, 2008), Vanneste et al. (Nat Med 15:577-583, 2009) and is likely to be responsible for the majority of IVF failure [Baltaci et al. (Reprod Biomed Online 12:77-82, 2006), Munne (Placenta 24:S70-76, 2003)]. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) screening, formerly termed preimplantation genetic screening (PGS), enables the assessment of the numeric chromosomal constitution in blastomere and/or trophectoderm biopsy before embryo transfer.Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) has been proven to improve the selection of embryos for transfer and therefore also assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles. In this chapter we describe the current gold standard platform for PGT-A, next generation sequencing (NGS) protocol used in our laboratory.

What next for preimplantation genetic screening?

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening (preimplantation genetic screening-PGS) has been used to detect chromosomally normal embryos from subfertile patients. The main indications are advanced maternal age (AMA), repeated implantation failure, repeated miscarriages and severe male factor infertility. Many non-randomized PGS studies have been published and report an increase in implantation rate, and/or a decrease in miscarriage rate. Recently, two randomized controlled trials have been conducted on patients with AMA as the only indication. Neither study showed a benefit in performing PGS using live birth rate as the measure of success. The debate on the usefulness of PGS is ongoing; the only effective way to resolve the debate is to perform more well-designed and well-executed randomized clinical trials.

Current experience concerning mosaic embryos diagnosed during preimplantation genetic screening.

The concept of embryos containing multiple cell lines (mosaicism) is not new, but much attention has been paid to this concept recently owing to recent advances in molecular techniques to analyze human embryos. Mosaicism in embryos has been known and reported for some time, originally in early cleavage-stage embryos diagnosed with the use of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). However, the early data have come under attack owing to the limited ability of FISH to reliably detect the actual copy number count of chromosomes as well as potential ascertainment bias of those early studies, which were all performed on already analyzed embryos found to be aneuploid. More recent molecular techniques for analyzing embryos have allowed scientists to really begin to understand mosaic embryos, and to now transfer and follow this class of embryo. Indeed, it could be said that three classes of embryos now exist after preimplantation genetic screening: euploid, aneuploid, and mosaic aneuploid. This paper attempts to bring to light the latest data on mosaic embryos and to understand how clinicians and others will deal with this issue today and in the future. Finally, an attempt is made to look to other fields of genetics to understand how this important issue can be dealt with as a group much better than any one individual group may be able to.

The improvement of the best practice guidelines for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: toward an international consensus.

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is one of the most common indications for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for single gene disorders, giving couples the opportunity to conceive unaffected children without having to consider termination of pregnancy. However, there are no available standardized protocols, so that each center has to develop its own diagnostic strategies and procedures. Furthermore, reproductive decisions are complicated by the diversity of disease-causing variants in the CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) gene and the complexity of correlations between genotypes and associated phenotypes, so that attitudes and practices toward the risks for future offspring can vary greatly between countries. On behalf of the EuroGentest Network, eighteen experts in PGD and/or molecular diagnosis of CF from seven countries attended a workshop held in Montpellier, France, on 14 December 2011. Building on the best practice guidelines for amplification-based PGD established by ESHRE (European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology), the goal of this meeting was to formulate specific guidelines for CF-PGD in order to contribute to a better harmonization of practices across Europe. Different topics were covered including variant nomenclature, inclusion criteria, genetic counseling, PGD strategy and reporting of results. The recommendations are summarized here, and updated information on the clinical significance of CFTR variants and associated phenotypes is presented.

Evaluation of PCR-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis applied to monogenic diseases: a collaborative ESHRE PGD consortium study.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for monogenic disorders currently involves polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods, which must be robust, sensitive and highly accurate, precluding misdiagnosis. Twelve adverse misdiagnoses reported to the ESHRE PGD-Consortium are likely an underestimate. This retrospective study, involving six PGD centres, assessed the validity of PCR-based PGD through reanalysis of untransferred embryos from monogenic-PGD cycles. Data were collected on the genotype concordance at PGD and follow-up from 940 untransferred embryos, including details on the parameters of PGD cycles: category of monogenic disease, embryo morphology, embryo biopsy and genotype assay strategy. To determine the validity of PCR-based PGD, the sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp) and diagnostic accuracy were calculated. Stratified analyses were also conducted to assess the influence of the parameters above on the validity of PCR-based PGD. The analysis of overall data showed that 93.7% of embryos had been correctly classified at the time of PGD, with Se of 99.2% and Sp of 80.9%. The stratified analyses found that diagnostic accuracy is statistically significantly higher when PGD is performed on two cells versus one cell (P=0.001). Se was significantly higher when multiplex protocols versus singleplex protocols were applied (P=0.005), as well as for PGD applied on cells from good compared with poor morphology embryos (P=0.032). Morphology, however, did not affect diagnostic accuracy. Multiplex PCR-based methods on one cell, are as robust as those on two cells regarding false negative rate, which is the most important criteria for clinical PGD applications. Overall, this study demonstrates the validity, robustness and high diagnostic value of PCR-based PGD.

The experience of 3 years of external quality assessment of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for cystic fibrosis.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was first performed over 20 years ago and has become an accepted part of genetic testing and assisted reproduction worldwide. The techniques and protocols necessary to carry out genetic testing at the single-cell level can be difficult to master and have been developed independently by the laboratories worldwide offering preimplantation testing. These factors indicated the need for an external quality assessment (EQA) scheme for monogenic disease PGD. Toward this end, the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology came together with United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Services for Molecular Genetics, to create a pilot EQA scheme followed by practical EQA schemes for all interested parties. Here, we detail the development of the pilot scheme as well as development and findings from the practical (clinical) schemes that have followed. Results were generally acceptable and there was marked improvement in results and laboratory scores for those labs that participated in multiple schemes. Data from the first three schemes indicate that the EQA scheme is working as planned and has helped laboratories improve their techniques and result reporting. The EQA scheme for monogenic PGD will continue to be developed to offer assessment for other monogenic disorders.

Diminished effect of maternal age on implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis with array comparative genomic hybridization.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between maternal age, chromosome abnormality, implantation, and pregnancy loss. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective study. SETTING: IVF centers in the United States. PATIENT(S): IVF patients undergoing chromosome screening. INTERVENTION(S): Embryo biopsy on day 3 or day 5/6 with preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) by array comparative genomic hybridization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Aneuploidy, implantation, pregnancy, and loss rates. RESULT(S): Aneuploidy rates increased with maternal age from 53% to 93% for day 3 biopsies and from 32% to 85% for blastocyst biopsies. Implantation rates for euploid embryos for ages <35-42 years did not decrease after PGD: ranges 44%-32% for day 3 and 51%-40% for blastocyst. Ongoing pregnancy rates per transfer did not decrease for maternal ages <42 years after PGD with day 3 biopsy (48.5%-38.1%) or blastocyst biopsy (64.4%-54.5%). Patients >42 years old had implantation rates of 23.3% (day 3), 27.7% (day 5/6), and the pregnancy rate with day 3 biopsy was 9.3% and with day 5 biopsy 10.3%. CONCLUSION(S): Selective transfer of euploid embryos showed that implantation and pregnancy rates were not significantly different between reproductively younger and older patients up to age 42 years. Some patients who start an IVF cycle planning to have chromosome screening do not have euploid embryos available for transfer, a situation that increases with advancing maternal age. Mounting data suggests that the dramatic decline in IVF treatment success rates with female age is primarily caused by aneuploidy.

Current issues in medically assisted reproduction and genetics in Europe: research, clinical practice, ethics, legal issues and policy. European Society of Human Genetics and European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.

In March 2005, a group of experts from the European Society of Human Genetics and European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology met to discuss the interface between genetics and assisted reproductive technology (ART), and published an extended background paper, recommendations and two Editorials. Seven years later, in March 2012, a follow-up interdisciplinary workshop was held, involving representatives of both professional societies, including experts from the European Union Eurogentest2 Coordination Action Project. The main goal of this meeting was to discuss developments at the interface between clinical genetics and ARTs. As more genetic causes of reproductive failure are now recognised and an increasing number of patients undergo testing of their genome before conception, either in regular health care or in the context of direct-to-consumer testing, the need for genetic counselling and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) may increase. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) thus far does not have evidence from randomised clinical trials to substantiate that the technique is both effective and efficient. Whole-genome sequencing may create greater challenges both in the technological and interpretational domains, and requires further reflection about the ethics of genetic testing in ART and PGD/PGS. Diagnostic laboratories should be reporting their results according to internationally accepted accreditation standards (International Standards Organisation - ISO 15189). Further studies are needed in order to address issues related to the impact of ART on epigenetic reprogramming of the early embryo. The legal landscape regarding assisted reproduction is evolving but still remains very heterogeneous and often contradictory. The lack of legal harmonisation and uneven access to infertility treatment and PGD/PGS fosters considerable cross-border reproductive care in Europe and beyond. The aim of this paper is to complement previous publications and provide an update of selected topics that have evolved since 2005.

Chromosomal disorders and male infertility.

Infertility in humans is surprisingly common occurring in approximately 15% of the population wishing to start a family. Despite this, the molecular and genetic factors underlying the cause of infertility remain largely undiscovered. Nevertheless, more and more genetic factors associated with infertility are being identified. This review will focus on our current understanding of the chromosomal basis of male infertility specifically: chromosomal aneuploidy, structural and numerical karyotype abnormalities and Y chromosomal microdeletions. Chromosomal aneuploidy is the leading cause of pregnancy loss and developmental disabilities in humans. Aneuploidy is predominantly maternal in origin, but concerns have been raised regarding the safety of intracytoplasmic sperm injection as infertile men have significantly higher levels of sperm aneuploidy compared to their fertile counterparts. Males with numerical or structural karyotype abnormalities are also at an increased risk of producing aneuploid sperm. Our current understanding of how sperm aneuploidy translates to embryo aneuploidy will be reviewed, as well as the application of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) in such cases. Clinical recommendations where possible will be made, as well as discussion of the use of emerging array technology in PGD and its potential applications in male infertility.

The use of arrays in preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening.

BACKGROUND: In preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), polymerase chain reaction has been used to detect monogenic disorders, and in PGD/preimplantation genetic screening (PGS), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been used to analyze chromosomes. Ten randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using FISH-based PGS on cleavage-stage embryos and one on blastocyst-stage embryos have shown that PGS does not increase delivery rates. Is the failure of PGS due to a fundamental flaw in the idea, or are the techniques that are being used unable to overcome their own, inherent flaws? Array-based technology allows for analysis of all of the chromosomes. Two types of arrays are being developed for use in PGD; array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and single nucleotide polymorphism-based (SNP) arrays. Each array can determine the number of chromosomes, however, SNP-based arrays can also be used to haplotype the sample. OBJECTIVE(S): To describe aCGH and SNP array technology and make suggestions for the future use of arrays in PGD and PGS. CONCLUSION(S): If array-based testing is going to prove useful, three steps need to be taken: [1] Validation of the array platform on appropriate cell and tissue samples to allow for reliable testing, even at the single-cell level; [2] deciding which embryo stage is the best for biopsy: polar body, cleavage, or blastocyst stage; [3] performing RCTs to show improvement in delivery rates. If RCTs are able to show that array-based testing at the optimal stage for embryo biopsy increases delivery rates, this will be a major step forward for assisted reproductive technology patients around the world.

Polymerase chain reaction-based detection of chromosomal imbalances on embryos: the evolution of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for chromosomal translocations.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and assess a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) approach for detection of chromosomal imbalances in embryos. DESIGN: A prospective study of embryos derived from chromosome translocation carriers that have undergone PGD using a novel molecular-based approach. SETTING: A reference molecular genetics laboratory specialized in the provision of transport PGD services and a private IVF clinic. PATIENT(S): Twenty-seven couples carrying 12 different reciprocal translocations and 2 Robertsonian translocations. INTERVENTION(S): Preimplantation genetic diagnosis from chromosome translocation carriers on blastomeres biopsied from cleavage stage embryos. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Embryo diagnosis rate, pregnancy rate (PR), implantation rate, take-home-baby rate. RESULT(S): Overall, 241/251 (96.0%) embryos were successfully diagnosed for chromosome rearrangements. Preimplantation genetic screening was included in the protocol of 12 couples, involving analysis of 90 embryos, 84 (93.3%) of which were successfully diagnosed and 53 (63.1%) showed aneuploidies. Embryos suitable for transfer were identified in 24 cycles. Eighteen couples achieved a clinical pregnancy (75.0% PR/embryo transfer), with a total of 31 embryos implanted (59.6% implantation rate). Ten patients (1 triplet, 1 twin, and 8 singleton pregnancies) have delivered 13 healthy babies, and the other patients (3 twins and 5 singletons) have currently ongoing pregnancies. CONCLUSION(S): The PCR-based PGD protocol for translocations has the potential to overcome several inherent limitations of fluorescence in situ hybridization-based tests, providing potential improvements in terms of test performance, automation, turnaround time, sensitivity, and reliability.

Non-disclosing preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Huntington disease.

OBJECTIVES: Individuals at risk for Huntington disease face difficult decisions regarding their reproductive options. Most do not wish to pass on the gene for Huntington disease to their children, but may not be prepared themselves to undergo presymptomatic testing and learn their genetic status. For these reasons, many at-risk individuals with a family history of HD would choose a method of genetic diagnosis that would assure them that they can have children unaffected with HD without revealing their own genetic status (non-disclosing). We have shown that, with a carefully designed and executed programme of non-disclosing preimplantation genetic testing, one can successfully assist at-risk couples to have their own biological children who are free from Huntington disease, without forcing parents to confront knowledge of their own genetic status. METHODS: Couples where one partner was at 50% risk for Huntington disease underwent in vitro fertilization with preimplantation embryo biopsy and molecular analysis for Huntington disease where appropriate. RESULTS: After extensive counselling and informed consent, 10 couples underwent 13 in vitro fertilization and two frozen embryo transfer cycles in a programme for non-disclosing preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Huntington disease. In 11 cycles, embryos determined to be free of Huntington disease were transferred, resulting in five clinical pregnancies. One set of twins and three singleton pregnancies have delivered. One pregnancy resulted in a first-trimester loss. CONCLUSIONS: The option of non-disclosing preimplantation genetic diagnosis should be reviewed, along with other relevant medical options, when counselling at-risk Huntington disease families.